Remaster Previews: Dragons Most Diabolical

Wednesday, May 03, 2023

Hey, everybody! Luis Loza here with the first in a series of previews of the upcoming Pathfinder Second Edition Remaster. If you aren’t fully up to date on what the Remaster is, make sure to check out our recent blog post announcing the project along with our video where Jason Bulmahn (Director of Game Design) and Logan Bonner (Pathfinder Lead Designer) discuss a few of the things to expect.

Among the most exciting new additions to Pathfinder are the new dragons that will appear in Pathfinder Monster Core. We’re updating the draconic connection to spellcasting traditions to give dragons a better fit within the Lost Omens setting. Every dragon will be arcane, divine, occult, or primal in nature and have their stories and abilities connected to their respective tradition. Creating this new dynamic—and the new dragons that come with it—has been incredibly fun. Not only do we get to imagine awesome and fearsome new dragons, thanks to the incredible talent of art director Kent Hamilton, we get to see them come to life.


 Concept art for the diabolical dragon. This dragon has massive, diabolical horns and a terrifying appearance. Its wings are tattered, suggesting a long life or a dragon that’s endured many battles.

Diabolical Dragon Concept Art by Kent Hamilton (Not final concept)


The first of the dragons we want to preview is the diabolic dragon, a divine dragon with ties to Hell. Divine dragons draw their power from various planes and sometimes even directly from a deity. Diabolic dragons are bound to the will of Hell, serving as guardians and leaders of Hell’s armies, with some even directly reporting to the archdevils. A diabolic dragon can unleash the fires of Hell itself, and no one is safe from their hellfire. This infernal and unholy fire is even capable of burning creatures made of flame, such as fire elementals. Should you somehow get lucky enough to triumph over a diabolic dragon, you may find their lair to be covered in piles of gems filled with trapped souls as well as countless contracts damning unfortunate mortals to an afterlife in Hell.

If you want another look at a diabolic dragon, take a peek at our preview for the cover of Pathfinder Player Core. While you’re there, you can also check out the mirage dragon on the cover of Pathfinder GM Core. Stay tuned for a future preview where we’ll give you a look at that new arcane dragon!

Luis Loza
Creative Director—Rules & Lore

More Paizo Blog.
Tags: Pathfinder Pathfinder Remaster Pathfinder Roleplaying Game
1 to 50 of 129 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Loving this so far! I am really looking forward to seeing what the occult dragons look like.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Pathfinder Accessories, Rulebook Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber

Mini Render up next please?

Nice!


9 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Funny that the tag in the center of the image says "Arcane Dragon" when it is a Divine one, but seems like a copy paste error from a previous design doc?

Either way, looks great. Is there a higher res version of the concept art? Would love to be able to zoom in and get the details clearly.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

Is this the same as the Infernal Dragon from 1e's Bestiary 6? If so, is there a possibility that the rest of the planar dragons might make an appearance eventually? I'd be over the moon for an Edict dragon. If not, is the Infernal still canon, or has it been written out to make room for this new one?

I still wonder whether the Chromatics and Metallics will simply be renamed or removed entirely (hoping for the former as I quite like them), but I suppose it's wait and see.


Looks like a pleasant fellow :D


1 person marked this as a favorite.

That detail is really neat. I'm looking forward to more previews

Dark Archive

5 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

...Wait so what about infernal dragons?

Is this literally just planar dragon infernal dragon renamed for some reason or did paizo accidentally come up with same dragon twice?


I love this

Radiant Oath

8 dragons in Monster Core divided by four traditions of magic = 1 good and 1 evil dragon per tradition, I would think?


I'm all for new dragons, especially if they can be melded into the setting in a more integral way that the current chromatics/metallics


It looks cool, I'm excited to see what the art looks like once color is added


This is looking awesome! I hope we can get some nice, high resolution versions for the desktop and such :)


2 people marked this as a favorite.

I know that Summoner isn't in the reworked books, but I'm curious if dragon eidolons will become available to every magical tradition at some point as a result of this.

In any case, looking very cool!

Wayfinders Contributor

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I loved seeing the full anatomical sketch. Very nice indeed.

Paizo Employee Rule and Lore Creative Director

25 people marked this as a favorite.
BookBird wrote:
Is this the same as the Infernal Dragon from 1e's Bestiary 6? If so, is there a possibility that the rest of the planar dragons might make an appearance eventually? I'd be over the moon for an Edict dragon. If not, is the Infernal still canon, or has it been written out to make room for this new one?
CorvusMask wrote:

...Wait so what about infernal dragons?

Is this literally just planar dragon infernal dragon renamed for some reason or did paizo accidentally come up with same dragon twice?

While the two are similar, they are meant to exist as separate entities. Hell is a place all about hierarchy and order, so look forward to see where diabolical and infernal dragons fall within that structure.

Due to very limited space with 1E's Bestiary 6, there wasn't really a good chance to explore the stories of infernal dragons, which might be contributing to why they feel so similar at the moment. (Mind, there are a lot of similarities, since both dragons are derived from Hell!) If and when we get a chance to bring infernal dragons over to 2E, we'll be making sure that both dragons have their roles obviously carved out.

Paizo Employee Director of Game Design

20 people marked this as a favorite.

As a note, the arcane tag on this piece is in error. This is from an early draft and we corrected that later on.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Luis Loza wrote:
BookBird wrote:
Is this the same as the Infernal Dragon from 1e's Bestiary 6? If so, is there a possibility that the rest of the planar dragons might make an appearance eventually? I'd be over the moon for an Edict dragon. If not, is the Infernal still canon, or has it been written out to make room for this new one?
CorvusMask wrote:

...Wait so what about infernal dragons?

Is this literally just planar dragon infernal dragon renamed for some reason or did paizo accidentally come up with same dragon twice?

While the two are similar, they are meant to exist as separate entities. Hell is a place all about hierarchy and order, so look forward to see where diabolical and infernal dragons fall within that structure.

Due to very limited space with 1E's Bestiary 6, there wasn't really a good chance to explore the stories of infernal dragons, which might be contributing to why they feel so similar at the moment. (Mind, there are a lot of similarities, since both dragons are derived from Hell!) If and when we get a chance to bring infernal dragons over to 2E, we'll be making sure that both dragons have their roles obviously carved out.

Are some of the "weird" Dragons from 1e past (Bliss, Dream, Vortex etc) still in consideration for future additions or other lore stuff, or have they been mostly disregarded given their very limited presence in their prior release? I remember being glad to see Cloud Dragons in the Mwangi Expanse, but the revamp of 2e and the introduction of new dragon types dims the hope for some of those more "out there" options.


5 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
AceofMoxen wrote:
8 dragons in Monster Core divided by four traditions of magic = 1 good and 1 evil dragon per tradition, I would think?

While I would expect one unambiguously good dragon in this upcoming batch, I think the rest will either be various forms of what we now call neutral, or else they won't be tied to current ideas of alignment. That would allow them to show up and have their character revealed by their actions. We can still do this with current Chromatics and Metallics, but player expectations can be a problem.

Paizo Employee Rule and Lore Creative Director

24 people marked this as a favorite.
BookBird wrote:
Are some of the "weird" Dragons from 1e past (Bliss, Dream, Vortex etc) still in consideration for future additions or other lore stuff, or have they been mostly disregarded given their very limited presence in their prior release? I remember being glad to see Cloud Dragons in the Mwangi Expanse, but the revamp of 2e and the introduction of new dragon types dims the hope for some of those more "out there" options.

All of the dragons from Pathfinder's past are definitely in consideration for updates. Some of them, like the chromatic and metallic dragons, will require additional considerations to "remaster" them and make them a good fit for the game going forward. We're also excited to create new "weird" dragons, too. There's one I can think of that we're adding to Monster Core that feels very weird and creepy, at least to me, so hopefully it scratches that itch a bit!


Beautiful artwork, kudos to Kent Hamilton.

With such awesomeness and power, I find myself a bit disappointed that the description says they serve the archdevils of Hell...instead of the archdevils serving them. Or maybe they serve the archdevils in the "To Serve Man" sense. Sounds like a good high-level AP plot to me...I can dream, I can dream... :)


11 people marked this as a favorite.

With the remaster, I feel like the Pathfinder butterfly is breaking out of its chrysalis.


4 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Luis Loza wrote:
BookBird wrote:
Are some of the "weird" Dragons from 1e past (Bliss, Dream, Vortex etc) still in consideration for future additions or other lore stuff, or have they been mostly disregarded given their very limited presence in their prior release? I remember being glad to see Cloud Dragons in the Mwangi Expanse, but the revamp of 2e and the introduction of new dragon types dims the hope for some of those more "out there" options.
All of the dragons from Pathfinder's past are definitely in consideration for updates. Some of them, like the chromatic and metallic dragons, will require additional considerations to "remaster" them and make them a good fit for the game going forward. We're also excited to create new "weird" dragons, too. There's one I can think of that we're adding to Monster Core that feels very weird and creepy, at least to me, so hopefully it scratches that itch a bit!

As a dragon lover of old (*mumblemumble* years, if you must know), everything about this makes me a very happy boy.


17 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
Gisher wrote:
With the remaster, I feel like the Pathfinder butterfly is breaking out of its chrysalis.

Praise be to Desna

Scarab Sages

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Hell yeah!

Director of Marketing

14 people marked this as a favorite.
WatersLethe wrote:
Gisher wrote:
With the remaster, I feel like the Pathfinder butterfly is breaking out of its chrysalis.
Praise be to Desna

That is the vibe I feel from the Editorial team. They are excited and making Pathfinder more Pathfinder than ever. Not my best slogan though. ;)

Grand Archive

Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber
BookBird wrote:
...is there a possibility that the rest of the planar dragons might make an appearance eventually? I'd be over the moon for an Edict dragon.

Here here


4 people marked this as a favorite.

As a big fan of void and vortex dragons, I can’t wait to see our Occult pair soon!


I can't deny that I do like this but at the same time I can't help but feel sad that the classic chromatics are, at least seemingly, forced to be retconned away. I liked greens and blacks.

I'm very curious to see how the dragon changes are going to impact Apsu and Dahak lore though.

Horizon Hunters

Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Rulebook Subscriber

Will the existing primal dragons be reclassed as something else or will they remain as what they currently are?

Verdant Wheel

Traditions has been one of my favorite innovations to 2E.

Adding dragons just adds so much sexy cool.

Paizo Employee Creative Director

15 people marked this as a favorite.
Desril wrote:

I can't deny that I do like this but at the same time I can't help but feel sad that the classic chromatics are, at least seemingly, forced to be retconned away. I liked greens and blacks.

I'm very curious to see how the dragon changes are going to impact Apsu and Dahak lore though.

These new dragons are additions to our dragon portfolio, not retcons meant to replace current dragons.

Silver Crusade

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Pathfinder Accessories, Rulebook, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Desril wrote:

I can't deny that I do like this but at the same time I can't help but feel sad that the classic chromatics are, at least seemingly, forced to be retconned away. I liked greens and blacks.

I'm very curious to see how the dragon changes are going to impact Apsu and Dahak lore though.

Luis Loza wrote:
Some of them, like the chromatic and metallic dragons, will require additional considerations to "remaster" them and make them a good fit for the game going forward.

They aren't getting retconned away.


Sooo...is this gonna be a complete retcon of all the True Dragons from 1st Edition Pathfinder? I ask as I'm not sure how I feel about this. I'm already unsure about Pathfinder Second Edition Remaster as it is.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Berselius wrote:
Sooo...is this gonna be a complete retcon of all the True Dragons from 1st Edition Pathfinder?

Nope

James Jacobs wrote:
These new dragons are additions to our dragon portfolio, not retcons meant to replace current dragons.


9 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber

I am looking forward to playing the Pathfinderiest Pathfinder that has ever Pathfindered.

Silver Crusade

5 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Pathfinder Accessories, Rulebook, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Berselius wrote:
Sooo...is this gonna be a complete retcon of all the True Dragons from 1st Edition Pathfinder? I ask as I'm not sure how I feel about this. I'm already unsure about Pathfinder Second Edition Remaster as it is.

Literally the two posts above yours tell you the answer to that.

The Exchange

Pathfinder Maps Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber

This looks amazing now, and the potential to mix and match for some truly bonkers dragons is tantalizing.


keftiu wrote:
As a big fan of void and vortex dragons, I can’t wait to see our Occult pair soon!

I suppose you meant outer dragons, if you're talking about the alien ones.


Pathfinder Adventure, Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Amazing! Really looking forward to this Remaster.


5 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber

Looks like something I'd fight in DOOM, by which I mean it looks metal as heck.


Squeakmaan wrote:
Looks like something I'd fight in DOOM, by which I mean it looks metal as heck.

I was looking for a good word to describe them, and there it is: they indeed do look so METAL.

I'm curious to see the other ones. The one in the cover of GM Core seems to be so alien that I really thought it was an outer dragon, a time dragon to be more specific.

Dark Archive

Diabolic dragons that can unleash the fires of Hell.
That is a big step up from its red so it breathes fire.
New dragons are looking great!


The Gold Sovereign wrote:
Squeakmaan wrote:
Looks like something I'd fight in DOOM, by which I mean it looks metal as heck.

I was looking for a good word to describe them, and there it is: they indeed do look so METAL.

I'm curious to see the other ones. The one in the cover of GM Core seems to be so alien that I really thought it was an outer dragon, a time dragon to be more specific.

Nah, by the description they're explicitly supposed to be scaley and maybe a bit fleshy, not metal.

They do look really cool though. A part of me feels like they feel more abyssal than infernal, but that may just be me.

Super looking forward to the Occult and Primal Dragons though, though a part of me wonders if one of the Primal families could just straight up have the elemental dragons. For Occult I'm really hoping for something Tulpa-esque though, a living story given draconic form, since Bards are our iconic Occult casters after all.

Luis Loza wrote:
There's one I can think of that we're adding to Monster Core that feels very weird and creepy, at least to me, so hopefully it scratches that itch a bit!

That said, a part of me is expecting this to also be an Occult dragon so we'll just have to wait and see.

Paizo Employee Community and Social Media Specialist

3 people marked this as a favorite.

Removed a post for language.


4 people marked this as a favorite.

Very cool! The mention of a dragon who is pretty weird and creepy has my friend thinking of Vaal Hazak from Monster Hunter World.


Luis Loza wrote:
BookBird wrote:
Is this the same as the Infernal Dragon from 1e's Bestiary 6? If so, is there a possibility that the rest of the planar dragons might make an appearance eventually? I'd be over the moon for an Edict dragon. If not, is the Infernal still canon, or has it been written out to make room for this new one?
CorvusMask wrote:

...Wait so what about infernal dragons?

Is this literally just planar dragon infernal dragon renamed for some reason or did paizo accidentally come up with same dragon twice?

While the two are similar, they are meant to exist as separate entities. Hell is a place all about hierarchy and order, so look forward to see where diabolical and infernal dragons fall within that structure.

Due to very limited space with 1E's Bestiary 6, there wasn't really a good chance to explore the stories of infernal dragons, which might be contributing to why they feel so similar at the moment. (Mind, there are a lot of similarities, since both dragons are derived from Hell!) If and when we get a chance to bring infernal dragons over to 2E, we'll be making sure that both dragons have their roles obviously carved out.

Are any dragons being cut from this content/not making a first pass through of the dragons already released to 2e? And are there going to be relevant sorcerous origins - i.e if I want to emulate a primal dragon, say a Cloud Dragon, am I going to have abilities appropriate to that?


3 people marked this as a favorite.
HeshKadesh wrote:
Luis Loza wrote:
BookBird wrote:
Is this the same as the Infernal Dragon from 1e's Bestiary 6? If so, is there a possibility that the rest of the planar dragons might make an appearance eventually? I'd be over the moon for an Edict dragon. If not, is the Infernal still canon, or has it been written out to make room for this new one?
CorvusMask wrote:

...Wait so what about infernal dragons?

Is this literally just planar dragon infernal dragon renamed for some reason or did paizo accidentally come up with same dragon twice?

While the two are similar, they are meant to exist as separate entities. Hell is a place all about hierarchy and order, so look forward to see where diabolical and infernal dragons fall within that structure.

Due to very limited space with 1E's Bestiary 6, there wasn't really a good chance to explore the stories of infernal dragons, which might be contributing to why they feel so similar at the moment. (Mind, there are a lot of similarities, since both dragons are derived from Hell!) If and when we get a chance to bring infernal dragons over to 2E, we'll be making sure that both dragons have their roles obviously carved out.

Are any dragons being cut from this content/not making a first pass through of the dragons already released to 2e? And are there going to be relevant sorcerous origins - i.e if I want to emulate a primal dragon, say a Cloud Dragon, am I going to have abilities appropriate to that?

That sounds more like a question you should ask during PaizoCon. Good news, though: They're doing a Q&A on 2 of the 3 days this year, so if you can't make one of the days (or if your question isn't picked during the first one), you can try for the other one!

There's also the Discord channels where you can ask questions as well. I usually do a Google document copy-pasting all the questions and answers there. And I'm planning on covering it again this year.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
The Gold Sovereign wrote:
keftiu wrote:
As a big fan of void and vortex dragons, I can’t wait to see our Occult pair soon!
I suppose you meant outer dragons, if you're talking about the alien ones.

I’m a fan of the Outer Dragons, which makes me excited for the two Occult Dragons (whose vibes I hope will be similar) coming soon.

I try to say what I mean!


5 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber

Diabolic Dragons sound like they would make incredible Villains, and I could imagine their place in the world. Like I can imagine Thrune having some on the pay roll hoarding/protecting very important documents. Perhaps a large bulk of recently made contracts..

1 to 50 of 129 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder Second Edition / General Discussion / Paizo Blog: Remaster Previews: Dragons Most Diabolical All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.