brvheart |
So make a fort save Natalie, don't count the third attack as you were down in 2 and there was no crit.
brvheart |
What hardness? There is a really nice looking greatsword lying on the floor!
Silas Frey |
ok checked and i was out by 4000 :) So 32092 - so 3000 short of 7th for Beth and me.
Did we get experience for Shakes and the fire as I couldn't see any?
Did anyone take the Amulet of Mighty Fists +2?
Natalie Desmee |
Can a makeshift sheath be made? And can you tell me the magical enhancement so I don't have to keep asking every strike? To keep things moving along smoothly. Can the cutlass be repaired? I know broken items can, but can ruined items be repaired?
brvheart |
If it is below 0 hp it cannot be repaired. No CR was listed for that encounter, while you put out the fire Shakes is far from being redeemed. At best 200 each.
Beth Macara |
I've got a general rule question that's more or less related to the fight we are in.
Normaly Zombies have a special ability that says staggered or something like that which mean they can only move or perform a standard action. Does that mean they can't full attack?
I also knows some zombies are fast zombies and are not staggered. If my interpretation is correct, these ones should be able to full attack.
Leialoha |
Heads up that I may not be able to post again until Monday or Tuesday so please GMPC or PCPC if needed to keep the action flowing. I have a very full day of business travel tomorrow followed by a Con where I have heavy GM duties on Fri-Sat-Sun. Monday will be catching up on work and hopefully most PbPs, but I should be fully caught up by Tuesday.
Wexley |
Although fast zombies also lose their DR, if I recall correctly. Since these apparently have DR, I would suppose they are not fast zombies.
brvheart |
I've got a general rule question that's more or less related to the fight we are in.
Normaly Zombies have a special ability that says staggered or something like that which mean they can only move or perform a standard action. Does that mean they can't full attack?
I also knows some zombies are fast zombies and are not staggered. If my interpretation is correct, these ones should be able to full attack.
I kind of had that question too when I read the stat block and yes they are staggered. Yet it listed the second attack. My after action is to say ignore the damage from the second attack on Natalie. Here is the stat block
MINOTAUR ZOMBIES (2) CR 4
XP 1,200 each
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Bestiary “Minotaur,” “Zombie”
NE Large undead
Init –1; Senses darkvision 60 ft.; Perception +0
DEFENSE
AC 11, touch 8, flat-footed 11 (–1 Dex, +3 natural, –1 size)
hp 49 (9d8+9)
Fort +2, Ref +1, Will +6
DR 5/slashing; Immune undead traits
OFFENSE
Speed 30 ft.
Melee greataxe +10/+5 (3d6+7/x3), gore +10 (1d6+7), slam
+10 (1d8+5)
Space 10 ft.; Reach 10 ft.
STATISTICS
Str 21, Dex 8, Con —, Int —, Wis 10, Cha 10
Base Atk +6; CMB +12; CMD 21
Feats ToughnessB
SQ staggered
SPECIAL ABILITIESStaggered (Ex): Zombies have poor reflexes and can only
perform a single move action or standard action each
round. A zombie can move up to its speed and attack in
the same round as a charge action.
OK, that's weird I made one in Hero Lab and it got the second attack??? So, good question for which I am not sure I have an answer. I will keep with the one attack from doing some rule research.
brvheart |
Although fast zombies also lose their DR, if I recall correctly. Since these apparently have DR, I would suppose they are not fast zombies.
Depends on the zombie, juju zombies have DR and are fast!
Wexley |
Wexley wrote:Although fast zombies also lose their DR, if I recall correctly. Since these apparently have DR, I would suppose they are not fast zombies.Depends on the zombie, juju zombies have DR and are fast!
It seems you are correct. How interesting. Juju zombies are quite sinister indeed!
brvheart |
After doing some rule searches they all say no to full attack so I will go with that.
Natalie Desmee |
Great I still would've been up and kicking...
I don't trust Hero Lab I've seen Hero Lab PF characters with abilities not in the books. I use the books and the forums to get advise. That way I'm not faced with asking what a feat or ability does that I can't look up myself.
brvheart |
They are all in a book somewhere, just maybe not sources you are using! I find it mostly accurate, but always do RW testing to be sure. Also FGG admit that they don't always follow rules so I usually just go with it.
brvheart |
Ok, I want an accounting on everyone where they stand vs WBL. Suggested at this level is 16,000 and only Natalie exceeds that and that is only due to the new sword. I think I need make some treasure adjustments here.
Beth Macara |
Since she started, Beth has improved two of her items: she's got a ring of improved swimming and a +2 mithral chain shirt instead of her +1.
That makes her at 10500 for the level 5 then 10000 for the ring and +3000 for the armor. Total is 23500.
brvheart |
Ok, I will make an adjustment. Beth, that ring doesn't help much at present.
Beth Macara |
Ok, I will make an adjustment. Beth, that ring doesn't help much at present.
That's clear but for RP reason, Beth will not sell it. And it may help at some point.
brvheart |
That isn't my point, my point is I am not counting it in your WBL level for this. Besides, I will probably give you something that will help the party.
Natalie Desmee |
If noone has a problem with it may I get one of the nat armor amulets? I know the greatsword was a substantial wealth add, but her cutlass got reduced to slivers and it seems fair to at least claim the sword that broke it till we get out. Also we're not too far from 7th lvl as it is. This game is moving quickly xp wise. One of two PbP's I've levelled in and in less than a year too.
brvheart |
The idea was for the people who fight to get the armor adds and the casters get the wands, but it is up to you all.
brvheart |
There is more treasure ahead although you might have to do some fighting to get all of it. I will add to it if I feel it is not adequate.
Beth Macara |
If noone has a problem with it may I get one of the nat armor amulets? I know the greatsword was a substantial wealth add, but her cutlass got reduced to slivers and it seems fair to at least claim the sword that broke it till we get out. Also we're not too far from 7th lvl as it is. This game is moving quickly xp wise. One of two PbP's I've levelled in and in less than a year too.
I've got nothing against having different wealth level for the party as long as those who can make the best of the items have it. so I'm happy with Wexley, Silas, Oro-Tu and Nathalie sharing the rings and amulets. Beth will take the curing wand.
One question though. What is the CL for the wand?
brvheart |
Natalie is correct on the caster levels. Higher levels are very expensive. So which wizard is taking the fireball wand?
Wexley |
I could probably put it to better use (since I don't do much evoking of my own), but I'll defer to Leialoha's judgement.
brvheart |
Personally, I prefer my wizards to be evokers but to each his own I guess. That is what scrolls and wands are for!
Oro-Tu |
I am at my starting gold minus one or two consumption items I think. I don't mind Natalie taking the big sword or whatever is decided. My activity a bit spotty till Tuesday BTW.
brvheart |
This should not be that hard guys. Suggested-
Natalie - Amulet of Nat Armor +1
Beth - Wand of Cure Moderate Wounds
Silas - Ring of Protection +1
Oro-Tu - Ring of Protection +1
Wexley - Wand of Fireball
Leialoha - Amulet of Nat Armor +1
Swap as you want. I will try and get everyone averaging WBL by level 7.