jedi8187 |
Oh I'm on board for the shifter. If it has some spell casting that's cool, but I assume it won't which is fine cause shape sifting is awesome.
The list of classes getting Archetypes looks good, a nice mix.
I love fey so I'm happy to see them around, but agree that some elemental stuff (especially that might tie into some under developed Kineticist elements, hint) is present.
Will we finally get Basic Phytokinesis?
Rysky |
Glad to see you guys are excited!
To expand very vaguely on this bit from the product description: "New archetypes for alchemists, bards, druids, hunters, inquisitors, investigators, kineticists, mesmerists, paladins, rangers, rogues, slayers, and more!" I'll mention that brawlers (who haven't had an archetype in quite a while) are one of the other classes among the "and more".
Although excited I am slightly saddened that Barbarian has been relegated to the "and more" part :3
Dean HS Jones |
3 people marked this as a favorite. |
Please
Please
PLEASE
tell me that she can't change into animals only!
Tell me that she will be as versatile as hell!
Pleaseeeeeeee
That's right, because we have the right to Bear Arms!
Seriously though, any chance that we can get a Vigilante style play test for the Shifter, maybe with a PFS play test chronicle?
Mark Seifter Designer |
4 people marked this as a favorite. |
Mark Seifter wrote:Although excited I am slightly saddened that Barbarian has been relegated to the "and more" part :3Glad to see you guys are excited!
To expand very vaguely on this bit from the product description: "New archetypes for alchemists, bards, druids, hunters, inquisitors, investigators, kineticists, mesmerists, paladins, rangers, rogues, slayers, and more!" I'll mention that brawlers (who haven't had an archetype in quite a while) are one of the other classes among the "and more".
Just going to say: the "and more" part of the announcement doesn't mean that the class is just in the "other class archetypes and class features" section of the book. For example, brawlers have their own section, and other classes do too (will barbarian be one of them? you'll have to find out!)
Rysky |
Rysky wrote:Just going to say: the "and more" part of the announcement doesn't mean that the class is just in the "other class archetypes and class features" section of the book. For example, brawlers have their own section, and other classes do too (will barbarian be one of them? you'll have to find out!)Mark Seifter wrote:Although excited I am slightly saddened that Barbarian has been relegated to the "and more" part :3Glad to see you guys are excited!
To expand very vaguely on this bit from the product description: "New archetypes for alchemists, bards, druids, hunters, inquisitors, investigators, kineticists, mesmerists, paladins, rangers, rogues, slayers, and more!" I'll mention that brawlers (who haven't had an archetype in quite a while) are one of the other classes among the "and more".
Yay! Okies!
Thankies Mark ^w^
Erik Mona Publisher, Chief Creative Officer |
Erik Mona Publisher, Chief Creative Officer |
22 people marked this as a favorite. |
I hope its a martial class and not a caster.
Related, holy crap, there are a lot of hardcovers coming out this calendar year. #walletiscrying
Well, people were worried that Starfinder was going to mean less Pathfinder, and we can't be leaving folks with a faulty impression like that! :)
kevin_video |
A martial shapeshifting class. I'm soooo ready for this. Will the Shifter have a play test?
I would really love that. I really enjoyed testing the kineticist and vigilante when they were first released.
All I'm hoping is that they're more than just an animorph or feral hunter archetype (hunter).
The Gold Sovereign |
5 people marked this as a favorite. |
Although it's too early to predict what it can and can't do, If the shifter can only shift into animals, vermins and plants (wilderness related creature types), I'm sure there are going to be archetypes for changing into celestials, fiends, dragons and elemental in no time. ;)
I'm also really happy to see a new system for weather hazards. It's going to be really useful in my homebrew draconic realm.
Chemlak |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I am excited for this book...maybe we will see Ultimate City book?
I'm trying hard not to get my hopes up about future broad environment Ultimate series books, but this would be soooo awesome.
JoelF847 RPG Superstar 2008 Top 32, 2011 Top 16 |
Brew Bird |
Davic The Grey wrote:Yeah I don't see where it is a martial either. I mean it may be but it might not be.Brew Bird wrote:A martial shapeshifting class. I'm soooo ready for this. Will the Shifter have a play test?Are you assuming Shifter will be martial focused based on something? I don't see anything to suggest they will be other than the overlap with druids and hunters. I'm hoping for a 1/1 BAB martial class but...
True, nothing says it's going to be martial, but spell-based shapeshifting is already so well supported, I thought it would be unlikely a whole new class would retread that same territory.
I love characters that have a humanoid "social" form and a monstrous "combat" form. (The Hulk, The Abomination from Darkest Dungeon, Lycanthropes in Skyrim, Krieg from Borderlands 2, The Gangrel from VTMB, The Shadow Walk power as well as The Crown Killer from Dishonored 2, etc.) Bonus points if the monstrous form has a mind of its own and is at odds with the humanoid form.
So far, the Master Chymist is the closest I've been able to get to that, but you can't do that until 8th level. The Brute Vigilante almost hit the mark... but was pretty lackluster combat wise.
The Lycanthrope template works, but there's no alignment change, and I'm not a big fan of the animal shapeshifting angle.
I guess what I really want is something that has the Master Chymist's mutate from level 1.
I'm really hoping something in this book can scratch that itch.
Jonas Seaborn |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Oh I'm on board for the shifter. If it has some spell casting that's cool, but I assume it won't which is fine cause shape sifting is awesome.
The list of classes getting Archetypes looks good, a nice mix.
I love fey so I'm happy to see them around, but agree that some elemental stuff (especially that might tie into some under developed Kineticist elements, hint) is present.
Will we finally get Basic Phytokinesis?
Really excited for the Shifter Class! can't wait to see the playtest!
Also quick question for Mark, Since the Wood kineticist is still missing it's Basic Phytokinesis talent, will we be seeing that element released properly in this book?
Was going to ask this myself.
Mark Seifter Designer |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
jedi8187 wrote:Oh I'm on board for the shifter. If it has some spell casting that's cool, but I assume it won't which is fine cause shape sifting is awesome.
The list of classes getting Archetypes looks good, a nice mix.
I love fey so I'm happy to see them around, but agree that some elemental stuff (especially that might tie into some under developed Kineticist elements, hint) is present.
Will we finally get Basic Phytokinesis?
zergtitan wrote:Was going to ask this myself.Really excited for the Shifter Class! can't wait to see the playtest!
Also quick question for Mark, Since the Wood kineticist is still missing it's Basic Phytokinesis talent, will we be seeing that element released properly in this book?
If we include the wood element in any new book, it will be certain to have basic phytokinesis, as well as positive blast, verdant blast, etc. However, I'm not confirming wood as being in this book (though kineticist content is confirmed in the product description). You'll have to find out in November! (or sooner with blog previews)
Brinebeast |
Just thought I would mention that several years ago Kobold Quarterly did a spelless shfter druid class for PRPG rules and I am very excited to see how this Shifter class is both similar and different and how they compliment each other!
kevin_video |
Just thought I would mention that several years ago Kobold Quarterly did a spelless shfter druid class for PRPG rules and I am very excited to see how this Shifter class is both similar and different and how they compliment each other!
Did they? I completely bypassed that. I only remember the spell-less ranger.
Luthorne |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
My favorite shifter is Everyman Gaming's shapeshifter from Paranormal Adventures, personally, but I certainly can't play that in Pathfinder Society. I'm definitely curious as to how Paizo will approach it. I'm hoping for a full BAB non-spellcaster myself with the ability to assume at least some forms indefinitely, or at least 10 minutes/level if not 1 hour/level. I think it might be better if possible to move away from the polymorph spells, granting a wider array of smaller bonuses that can be selected, talent-like, allowing you to customize your shifter in various ways. But who knows? I'm a big fan of shapeshifting, so I'm interested to see what the final product is like regardless of whether or not it meets my current mental concept.
Will Huston |
I hope the archetypes for other classes aren't mostly just a mix of the shifter class with the base class. I get bored of those really quickly.
I mean, the last book that had a class in it, Ultimate Intrigue, there really was only like one or two archetypes that were grafting Vigilante onto another class.
Brinebeast |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
Brinebeast wrote:Just thought I would mention that several years ago Kobold Quarterly did a spelless shfter druid class for PRPG rules and I am very excited to see how this Shifter class is both similar and different and how they compliment each other!Did they? I completely bypassed that. I only remember the spell-less ranger.
Kobold Quarterly issue 15 has 3 alternate versions of the Druid class.
Ventnor |
JoelF847 wrote:I hope the archetypes for other classes aren't mostly just a mix of the shifter class with the base class. I get bored of those really quickly.I mean, the last book that had a class in it, Ultimate Intrigue, there really was only like one or two archetypes that were grafting Vigilante onto another class.
To be fair, a lot of vigilante archetypes are basically grafting the wizard/inquisitor/gunslinger/etc. to the vigilante.
JoelF847 RPG Superstar 2008 Top 32, 2011 Top 16 |
Will Huston wrote:To be fair, a lot of vigilante archetypes are basically grafting the wizard/inquisitor/gunslinger/etc. to the vigilante.JoelF847 wrote:I hope the archetypes for other classes aren't mostly just a mix of the shifter class with the base class. I get bored of those really quickly.I mean, the last book that had a class in it, Ultimate Intrigue, there really was only like one or two archetypes that were grafting Vigilante onto another class.
True, there weren't as many in Ultimate Intrigue, but as Ventnor points out the actual Vigilante ones were mainly other classes onto vigilante. But Occult Adventures and Advanced Class Guide seemed almost entirely of adding the classes from those books to other classes.
The Gold Sovereign |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Cthulhusquatch wrote:Ultimate Dungeon?Ultimate Suburban?
Well... I suppose Ultimate Urban has to come first....
John Kretzer wrote:I am excited for this book...maybe we will see Ultimate City book?
I would totally support ultimate dungeons if it came with tips for building them, options to "dress" them, systems to implement adventures in them, treasures and traps, some monsters and a new class based on crafting constructs or dungeoneering.
But if had to suggest a new Ultimate after this one I would suggest Ultimate Dra-
Ok... Never happening... T-T
Kalindlara Contributor |
8 people marked this as a favorite. |
Sovereign, you might want to check out the late-3.5 product Dungeonscape - it does almost everything you're asking for, and it's pretty much all either general enough to be system-neutral or easily used in Pathfinder games with minimal alteration.
Of course, if Paizo decides to take their own stab at the topic, I strongly support this endeavor. ^_^
The Gold Sovereign |
Sovereign, you might want to check out the late-3.5 product Dungeonscape - it does almost everything you're asking for, and it's pretty much all either general enough to be system-neutral or easily used in Pathfinder games with minimal alteration.
Of course, if Paizo decides to take their own stab at the topic, I strongly support this endeavor. ^_^
Thanks Kalindlara! ;)
I will give it a look, for it will certainly be helpful. Although, as you said, I would also like to see Paizo's approach.
BMO |
Although it's too early to predict what it can and can't do, If the shifter can only shift into animals, vermins and plants (wilderness related creature types), I'm sure there are going to be archetypes for changing into celestials, fiends, dragons and elemental in no time. ;)
I'm also really happy to see a new system for weather hazards. It's going to be really useful in my homebrew draconic realm.
I was thinking this as well. Its awesome to wildshape a la beast shape, elemental body, form of the dragon, etc. But I'd REALLY like to see some love for transforming into celestials, infernals, lawful,and chaotic outsiders. Think the Eidolon subtypes from unchained Summoner, but maybe encompassing even more outsiders that didn't get any love in Pathfinder Unchained, like kami, kytons, qlippoth, etc. In fact, why not introduce these eidolon subtypes in the hardcover as well?
Also, does anyone else think of the Harmonixer class from the Shaodw Hearts series when they think of the shifter?