Katina Davis Webstore Coordinator |
The Gold Sovereign |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Come my Undine, come to me!
It would be awesome if among those ancestries or versatile heritages, there was a playable dragon. I love kobolds, and the way they are more draconic in 2E surely pleased me, but they aren't dragons.
It's one of my dreams to finally see Paizo's approach into something more akin to the dragonborns - an ancestry of humanoid dragons closely related to the true ones.
From now, alongside the geniekin and more informations of the other planar scions, the Sprite is my favorite inclusion in the book.
Rysky |
13 people marked this as a favorite. |
Come my Undine, come to me!
It would be awesome if among those ancestries or versatile heritages, there was a playable dragon. I love kobolds, and the way they are more draconic in 2E surely pleased me, but they aren't dragons.
It's one of my dreams to finally see Paizo's approach into something more akin to the dragonborns - an ancestry of humanoid dragons closely related to the true ones.
From now, alongside the geniekin and more informations of the other planar scions, the Sprite is my favorite inclusion in the book.
Undine descend from water elementals.
Brine Dragon are water elementals.
Undine can be water dragon girls.
YawarFiesta |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
It's one of my dreams to finally see Paizo's approach into something more akin to the dragonborns - an ancestry of humanoid dragons closely related to the true ones.
It would be awesome, specially since you get the looks since level 1 and can purchase all the cool stuff with your racial feats. There's already precedentes for gliding and breathweapon like abilities, but I don't think they would just give limitless flight.
Humbly,
Yawar
The Gold Sovereign |
6 people marked this as a favorite. |
The Gold Sovereign wrote:Come my Undine, come to me!
It would be awesome if among those ancestries or versatile heritages, there was a playable dragon. I love kobolds, and the way they are more draconic in 2E surely pleased me, but they aren't dragons.
It's one of my dreams to finally see Paizo's approach into something more akin to the dragonborns - an ancestry of humanoid dragons closely related to the true ones.
From now, alongside the geniekin and more informations of the other planar scions, the Sprite is my favorite inclusion in the book.
Undine descend from water elementals.
Brine Dragon are water elementals.
Undine can be water dragon girls.
*The prophecy is true cat reaction*
The-Magic-Sword |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
The Gold Sovereign wrote:Come my Undine, come to me!
It would be awesome if among those ancestries or versatile heritages, there was a playable dragon. I love kobolds, and the way they are more draconic in 2E surely pleased me, but they aren't dragons.
It's one of my dreams to finally see Paizo's approach into something more akin to the dragonborns - an ancestry of humanoid dragons closely related to the true ones.
From now, alongside the geniekin and more informations of the other planar scions, the Sprite is my favorite inclusion in the book.
Undine descend from water elementals.
Brine Dragon are water elementals.
Undine can be water dragon girls.
Now I'm wondering about Lineages for Geniekin
Jessica Redekop Contributor |
9 people marked this as a favorite. |
Rysky wrote:Now I'm wondering about Lineages for GeniekinThe Gold Sovereign wrote:Come my Undine, come to me!
It would be awesome if among those ancestries or versatile heritages, there was a playable dragon. I love kobolds, and the way they are more draconic in 2E surely pleased me, but they aren't dragons.
It's one of my dreams to finally see Paizo's approach into something more akin to the dragonborns - an ancestry of humanoid dragons closely related to the true ones.
From now, alongside the geniekin and more informations of the other planar scions, the Sprite is my favorite inclusion in the book.
Undine descend from water elementals.
Brine Dragon are water elementals.
Undine can be water dragon girls.
That right there is a high quality thing to wonder about.
The-Magic-Sword |
The-Magic-Sword wrote:That right there is a high quality thing to wonder about.Rysky wrote:Now I'm wondering about Lineages for GeniekinThe Gold Sovereign wrote:Come my Undine, come to me!
It would be awesome if among those ancestries or versatile heritages, there was a playable dragon. I love kobolds, and the way they are more draconic in 2E surely pleased me, but they aren't dragons.
It's one of my dreams to finally see Paizo's approach into something more akin to the dragonborns - an ancestry of humanoid dragons closely related to the true ones.
From now, alongside the geniekin and more informations of the other planar scions, the Sprite is my favorite inclusion in the book.
Undine descend from water elementals.
Brine Dragon are water elementals.
Undine can be water dragon girls.
O.o
o.O
Now that you mention it, that is VERY thought provoking, since they're Geniekin (ergo, descended from Genies) it hadn't occurred to me that it could really be a thing. The Dragon suggestion is neat, or they could reflect subelements the way Ice appears under Water, or if Golarion itself has a means of different action I'm unaware of that would work too.
Jessica Redekop Contributor |
8 people marked this as a favorite. |
Yeah I would prefer a new name for them, or Elemental Scions, since Geniekin is accurate as calling all Tieflings Devilspawn or Aasimar’s Azatakin.
Yeah, it's not an accurate name, though it's on par with the accuracy of the Genasi name in D&D. I think the best approach is probably to consider Elemental Scion an accurate term for OOC purposes, but we can reasonably believe Geniekin is used IC by most people, since the names people use in practice often aren't accurate.
Most Geniekin are descended from genies, so it makes sense for the general population to think that's how they should be named. Scholars likely stick their nose up and correct people with Elemental Scion, the same way they'd correct people with the proper names of outsiders (Velstrac instead of Kyton or Chain Devil, for instance) or the like.
Rysky |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Rysky wrote:Yeah I would prefer a new name for them, or Elemental Scions, since Geniekin is accurate as calling all Tieflings Devilspawn or Aasimar’s Azatakin.Yeah, it's not an accurate name, though it's on par with the accuracy of the Genasi name in D&D. I think the best approach is probably to consider Elemental Scion an accurate term for OOC purposes, but we can reasonably believe Geniekin is used IC by most people, since the names people use in practice often aren't accurate.
Most Geniekin are descended from genies, so it makes sense for the general population to think that's how they should be named. Scholars likely stick their nose up and correct people with Elemental Scion, the same way they'd correct people with the proper names of outsiders (Velstrac instead of Kyton or Chain Devil, for instance) or the like.
*nods*
Genasi has the advantage of being a made up word for the setting, similar to Aasimar, Tiefling, Ganzi, Duskwalker, and Aphorite.
Jessica Redekop Contributor |
Jessica Redekop Contributor |
16 people marked this as a favorite. |
My personal interpretation is that whenever you get something that fits into 2 or more categories (celestial AND elemental, dragon AND elemental, shadow AND fiend, chaotic AND good), you can have the same origin for multiple types of creatures.
Aasimar are descended from Good outsiders; Ganzi are descended from Chaotic outsiders. Azata are Chaotic Good outsiders, ergo mortals descended from them could be aasimar, ganzi, or some combination of the two, depending.
Likewise for the primal dragons. Because they are both dragons and creatures with elemental subtypes native to the inner sphere, they can be used as origins for characters with dragon features, and/or for characters with elemental features. This can also apply, if you want to go there, to fey with elemental themes. Oreads often get cast as stony chunks of living mountains, but I think a dryad-descended oread with tree-like features would be really compelling.
The-Magic-Sword |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
My personal interpretation is that whenever you get something that fits into 2 or more categories (celestial AND elemental, dragon AND elemental, shadow AND fiend, chaotic AND good), you can have the same origin for multiple types of creatures.
Aasimar are descended from Good outsiders; Ganzi are descended from Chaotic outsiders. Azata are Chaotic Good outsiders, ergo mortals descended from them could be aasimar, ganzi, or some combination of the two, depending.
Likewise for the primal dragons. Because they are both dragons and creatures with elemental subtypes native to the inner sphere, they can be used as origins for characters with dragon features, and/or for characters with elemental features. This can also apply, if you want to go there, to fey with elemental themes. Oreads often get cast as stony chunks of living mountains, but I think a dryad-descended oread with tree-like features would be really compelling.
I like that a lot actually
Evan Tarlton |
My personal interpretation is that whenever you get something that fits into 2 or more categories (celestial AND elemental, dragon AND elemental, shadow AND fiend, chaotic AND good), you can have the same origin for multiple types of creatures.
Aasimar are descended from Good outsiders; Ganzi are descended from Chaotic outsiders. Azata are Chaotic Good outsiders, ergo mortals descended from them could be aasimar, ganzi, or some combination of the two, depending.
Likewise for the primal dragons. Because they are both dragons and creatures with elemental subtypes native to the inner sphere, they can be used as origins for characters with dragon features, and/or for characters with elemental features. This can also apply, if you want to go there, to fey with elemental themes. Oreads often get cast as stony chunks of living mountains, but I think a dryad-descended oread with tree-like features would be really compelling.
I've had the same thought myself, and for the same reasons. It just opens so much story potential, and can make for some very interesting characters.
Rysky |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
My personal interpretation is that whenever you get something that fits into 2 or more categories (celestial AND elemental, dragon AND elemental, shadow AND fiend, chaotic AND good), you can have the same origin for multiple types of creatures.
Aasimar are descended from Good outsiders; Ganzi are descended from Chaotic outsiders. Azata are Chaotic Good outsiders, ergo mortals descended from them could be aasimar, ganzi, or some combination of the two, depending.
Likewise for the primal dragons. Because they are both dragons and creatures with elemental subtypes native to the inner sphere, they can be used as origins for characters with dragon features, and/or for characters with elemental features. This can also apply, if you want to go there, to fey with elemental themes. Oreads often get cast as stony chunks of living mountains, but I think a dryad-descended oread with tree-like features would be really compelling.
Hmmm
graeme mcdougall |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
I'm hoping for Grippli & expecting to be disappointed. I have a Griplli Inquisitor in my campaign & couldn't contemplate a conversion to 2E until those building blocks are in place. (though will definitely start any new campaign in 2E)
Anyway, I'll be buying this anyway, can't get enough of new races & sure the crunch/ fluff balance here will be to my liking, as it was in the 1st half of Character Guide.
The-Magic-Sword |
6 people marked this as a favorite. |
I really like diverging heritage sources, where Geniekin can be the result of a Primal dragon. Like, it's seperate from a full dragon themed option, but I really dig it as a possible origin and flavor. Especially for a character taking some of the other dragon themed options (Dragon Sorcerer, Barb, etc), or maybe allowing a character to take Dragon Disciple because of it.
Elfteiroh |
Is this the book we're going to get anadi added? All I want is my spider people please.
Sadly, the outline for this book was started before they realized the Anadi would end up being this popular. They are looking closely for a good opportunity to release them. Same reason there’s no Shoony option in the book.
Sporkedup |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
tricklet wrote:Is this the book we're going to get anadi added? All I want is my spider people please.Sadly, the outline for this book was started before they realized the Anadi would end up being this popular. They are looking closely for a good opportunity to release them. Same reason there’s no Shoony option in the book.
That seems weird to me. Anadi appeared (and were very excitedly received) at the same time as versatile heritages were floated. Those heritages within a year became a focal method for approaching many ancestries. I am pretty sure in the last year and a half, if they'd wanted to, they could have snuck Anadi into the Ancestry Guide timetable. Especially since we a) don't know how big of a book it will be and b) know they can make these Lost Omens offerings at variable size.
But you may be right. I dunno.
Elfteiroh |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
Arachnophobia is also one of the most common phobia. Enough that we see “spider warning” in lot of product threads.
And my info from above come from a stream with one of the people that worked on that book, and they were asked about Anadi and answered that. I still need to find the exact source because I saw it asked a lot of times, and I would love to have a more precise answer.