Is the Butchering axe an "orc weapon"


Rules Questions


So the description of the butchering axe says that it was invented by orcs, but it does not have "orc" in the name. Is it a martial weapon for half-orcs? It would be nice if weapon familiarity was finally worth something.

Specifically, is it an orc weapon in PFS?


Quote:
Weapon Familiarity: Half-orcs are proficient with greataxes and falchions and treat any weapon with the word "orc" in its name as a martial weapon.

Pretty clear.

It isn't a greataxe.
It isn't a falchion.
It doesn't have "orc" in the name.

It isn't covered in any way by the half-orcs Weapon Familiarity.


It is not, I believe the designers said that was intentional, but the orc hornbow was left as an orc weapon intentionally.

Edit:

wrote:

This was intentional, and for exactly that reason. (Orcs still have an easier time meeting the Strength requirement, of course, and many races simply won't be able to achieve the required Strength at low levels.)

Orcs and half-orcs get the hornbow instead, making them more competitive in a role that stereotypically belongs to elves. ^_^


1 person marked this as a favorite.

The above poster is correct. ^_^


1 person marked this as a favorite.

In addition, to touch on this point:

Knight Magenta wrote:
Specifically, is it an orc weapon in PFS?

Since Adventurer's Armory 2 does not appear on the Additional Resources page, all items that appear exclusively in that source are illegal for Pathfinder Society play at this time.


so its created specifically by orcs and is not an orc weapon? wtf so even the orcs that make the damb thing need to spend a feat just to use it.... why

Grand Lodge

Lady-J wrote:
so its created specifically by orcs and is not an orc weapon? wtf so even the orcs that make the damb thing need to spend a feat just to use it.... why

iirc, it's only created and used by orcs in a very specific area of Golarion. So it wouldn't exactly make sense for all orcs to have proficiency in it.


Jurassic Pratt wrote:
Lady-J wrote:
so its created specifically by orcs and is not an orc weapon? wtf so even the orcs that make the damb thing need to spend a feat just to use it.... why
iirc, it's only created and used by orcs in a very specific area of Golarion. So it wouldn't exactly make sense for all orcs to have proficiency in it.

ya but not every one plays in galorin so tying it to galorin lore places is not good

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Lady-J wrote:
Jurassic Pratt wrote:
Lady-J wrote:
so its created specifically by orcs and is not an orc weapon? wtf so even the orcs that make the damb thing need to spend a feat just to use it.... why
iirc, it's only created and used by orcs in a very specific area of Golarion. So it wouldn't exactly make sense for all orcs to have proficiency in it.
ya but not every one plays in galorin so tying it to galorin lore places is not good

It's from a player companion, which is not a setting neutral line. So tying it to Golarion lore is perfectly fine. If you don't play in Golarion then just present your case as to why it should be an orc racial weapon to your GM.

Part of the reasoning is definitely a balancing factor though. You probably shouldn't auto get proficiency in a 3d6 weapon without needing to use an alternate racial trait or feat.


Lady-J wrote:
so its created specifically by orcs and is not an orc weapon? wtf so even the orcs that make the damb thing need to spend a feat just to use it.... why

It was designed to be specifically more powerful than all other axes. Powerful enough to justify the Exotic Weapon Proficiency feat spent on it.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Lady-J wrote:
Jurassic Pratt wrote:
Lady-J wrote:
so its created specifically by orcs and is not an orc weapon? wtf so even the orcs that make the damb thing need to spend a feat just to use it.... why
iirc, it's only created and used by orcs in a very specific area of Golarion. So it wouldn't exactly make sense for all orcs to have proficiency in it.
ya but not every one plays in galorin so tying it to galorin lore places is not good

And not everyone has dwarves that hate giants, but that bit of fluff is tied into the racial stats. All elves, even those raised among humans by humans, receive training in swords and bows just because. Tying things to lore is already done, even if that lore does not hold true everywhere.

Those kind of learned things shouldn't be a built-in racial trait at all.


i just find it weird that a half elf can get easier access to a weapon made by orcs to be used by orcs than an orc can


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Lady-J wrote:
i just find it weird that a half elf can get easier access to a weapon made by orcs to be used by orcs than an orc can

How exactly? Unless I am missing something, both only need to take Exotic Weapon Proficiency (Butchering Axe).

Edit: Ah, I see. You mean half-elves who have taken the Ancestral Arms alternate racial trait.


Jeraa wrote:
Lady-J wrote:
i just find it weird that a half elf can get easier access to a weapon made by orcs to be used by orcs than an orc can

How exactly? Unless I am missing something, both only need to take Exotic Weapon Proficiency (Butchering Axe).

half elves can get it for free by trading out their skill focus while half orcs and normal orcs actually need to spend a feat on it


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Lady-J wrote:
Jeraa wrote:
Lady-J wrote:
i just find it weird that a half elf can get easier access to a weapon made by orcs to be used by orcs than an orc can

How exactly? Unless I am missing something, both only need to take Exotic Weapon Proficiency (Butchering Axe).

half elves can get it for free by trading out their skill focus while half orcs and normal orcs actually need to spend a feat on it

So? They can also choose the dwarven waraxe, dwarven urgrosh, or gnome hooked hammer and be proficient with it. Dwarves and gnomes do not automatically gain proficiency with those weapons (it just becomes easier to get).

You issue isn't with the weapon, it is actually with the half-elf alternate trait. It should be limited to elven and human weapons only. You know, their actual ancestors for Ancestral Arms.

Silver Crusade

Jeraa wrote:
Lady-J wrote:
Jeraa wrote:
Lady-J wrote:
i just find it weird that a half elf can get easier access to a weapon made by orcs to be used by orcs than an orc can

How exactly? Unless I am missing something, both only need to take Exotic Weapon Proficiency (Butchering Axe).

half elves can get it for free by trading out their skill focus while half orcs and normal orcs actually need to spend a feat on it

So? They can also choose the dwarven waraxe, dwarven urgrosh, or gnome hooked hammer and be proficient with it. Dwarves and gnomes do not automatically gain proficiency with those weapons (it just becomes easier to get).

You issue isn't with the weapon, it is actually with the half-elf alternate trait. It should be limited to elven and human weapons only. You know, their actual ancestors for Ancestral Arms.

Even then, it's not really free since you're trading out a Feat to get another Feat (and I really like Skill Focus).


^Yes, but Skill Focus is easier to qualify for than Exotic Weapon Proficiency (even if not by much, but it still matters quite noticeably when you are at 1st level).


wondering if it would be worth it to alter my barbarian build to duel wield butchering axes

Silver Crusade

UnArcaneElection wrote:

^Yes, but Skill Focus is easier to qualify for than Exotic Weapon Proficiency (even if not by much, but it still matters quite noticeably when you are at 1st level).

Eh, not really when I don't really see any non-full BAB class picking this weapon up due to the STR requirement as well. And even if it is easier to qualify for, it doesn't diminish the usefulness of SF.


Rysky wrote:
UnArcaneElection wrote:

^Yes, but Skill Focus is easier to qualify for than Exotic Weapon Proficiency (even if not by much, but it still matters quite noticeably when you are at 1st level).

Eh, not really when I don't really see any non-full BAB class picking this weapon up due to the STR requirement as well. And even if it is easier to qualify for, it doesn't diminish the usefulness of SF.

there are plenty of non full bab characters that could use it, str based rogue/ninja, magus, warpriest, sorc with the right bloodline(orc or abyssal), cleric, druid, alchemist, wizard, arcanist(with the orc or abyssal bloodline), hunter, investigator, shaman, scald, summoner, inquisitor, oracle vigilante and witch could all use the weapon

Silver Crusade

If you roll really well or have a gonzo PB then maybe (or have the Orc bloodline), outside of that I don't see many 9th level casters plunking points into Strength in order to use it (before they get the Transformation spell anyway). Oracle maybe.

Magi can't use it with their class stuff so I don't see them using it all.


Rysky wrote:

If you roll really well or have a gonzo PB then maybe (or have the Orc bloodline), outside of that I don't see many 9th level casters plunking points into Strength in order to use it (before they get the Transformation spell anyway). Oracle maybe.

Magi can't use it with their class stuff so I don't see them using it all.

there are some archetypes that will let them use 2h, or get something that makes the weapon a 1h weapon there are at least 3 ways a magus can use the weapon

Silver Crusade

Lady-J wrote:
Rysky wrote:

If you roll really well or have a gonzo PB then maybe (or have the Orc bloodline), outside of that I don't see many 9th level casters plunking points into Strength in order to use it (before they get the Transformation spell anyway). Oracle maybe.

Magi can't use it with their class stuff so I don't see them using it all.

there are some archetypes that will let them use 2h, or get something that makes the weapon a 1h weapon there are at least 3 ways a magus can use the weapon

I know of the Quarterstaff archetype but I don't know how that would help, I don't think there's any other Archetypes that let a Magus use a 2 handed weapon or let them treat it as a 1 handed.


8 people marked this as a favorite.

Hello! I'm just dropping in to say that the idea orcs are naturally good with weapons like this is a little bit problematic.

Why, just because humans invented the Fauchard, it doesn't mean we should call it a Human Fauchard and assume that all humans are natural Fauchard-users!

Personally, I do use a Butchering Axe for butchering my foes, but I had to work long and hard to get any good at it, and it's a little bit irritating to have people make the somewhat racist assumption that it was easy for me! Yes, it was invented by an orc, but he created it as a test of strength and skill, not a convenient weapon that anyorc could use.

Remember: killing orcs may be an important part of being an adventurer, but hurting our feelings isn't.


Rysky wrote:
Lady-J wrote:
Rysky wrote:

If you roll really well or have a gonzo PB then maybe (or have the Orc bloodline), outside of that I don't see many 9th level casters plunking points into Strength in order to use it (before they get the Transformation spell anyway). Oracle maybe.

Magi can't use it with their class stuff so I don't see them using it all.

there are some archetypes that will let them use 2h, or get something that makes the weapon a 1h weapon there are at least 3 ways a magus can use the weapon
I know of the Quarterstaff archetype but I don't know how that would help, I don't think there's any other Archetypes that let a Magus use a 2 handed weapon or let them treat it as a 1 handed.

At 13th level, the Mindblade archetype can use a two-handed weapon with Spell Combat. (12th 7th level if it is a double weapon being used for TWF.)


Rysky wrote:
Lady-J wrote:
Rysky wrote:

If you roll really well or have a gonzo PB then maybe (or have the Orc bloodline), outside of that I don't see many 9th level casters plunking points into Strength in order to use it (before they get the Transformation spell anyway). Oracle maybe.

Magi can't use it with their class stuff so I don't see them using it all.

there are some archetypes that will let them use 2h, or get something that makes the weapon a 1h weapon there are at least 3 ways a magus can use the weapon
I know of the Quarterstaff archetype but I don't know how that would help, I don't think there's any other Archetypes that let a Magus use a 2 handed weapon or let them treat it as a 1 handed.

there's one that lets them use it with a 2h weapon and it gives them fighter weapon training as well so double bonus, 2 level dip into barb will get them the weapon as a 1h weapon as will lighten weapon

Silver Crusade

Gisher wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lady-J wrote:
Rysky wrote:

If you roll really well or have a gonzo PB then maybe (or have the Orc bloodline), outside of that I don't see many 9th level casters plunking points into Strength in order to use it (before they get the Transformation spell anyway). Oracle maybe.

Magi can't use it with their class stuff so I don't see them using it all.

there are some archetypes that will let them use 2h, or get something that makes the weapon a 1h weapon there are at least 3 ways a magus can use the weapon
I know of the Quarterstaff archetype but I don't know how that would help, I don't think there's any other Archetypes that let a Magus use a 2 handed weapon or let them treat it as a 1 handed.
At 13th level, the Mindblade archetype can use a two-handed weapon with Spell Combat. (12th level if it is a double weapon being used for TWF.)

Cool.

Silver Crusade

Lady-J wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lady-J wrote:
Rysky wrote:

If you roll really well or have a gonzo PB then maybe (or have the Orc bloodline), outside of that I don't see many 9th level casters plunking points into Strength in order to use it (before they get the Transformation spell anyway). Oracle maybe.

Magi can't use it with their class stuff so I don't see them using it all.

there are some archetypes that will let them use 2h, or get something that makes the weapon a 1h weapon there are at least 3 ways a magus can use the weapon
I know of the Quarterstaff archetype but I don't know how that would help, I don't think there's any other Archetypes that let a Magus use a 2 handed weapon or let them treat it as a 1 handed.
there's one that lets them use it with a 2h weapon and it gives them fighter weapon training as well so double bonus, 2 level dip into barb will get them the weapon as a 1h weapon as will lighten weapon

Aside from the Midnblade (which requires 13th level) and the Staff one (which doesn't let them use their spell stuff when 2handing) I don't know of any others' that lets them use 2handers, and the only archetypes I found that gave them weapon training was Kensai and Myrmidarch, neither of which let them use 2handers with their spell stuff.

And yeah Multiclassing with Barbarian could fix it, but then that fixes lots of things... but you're also multiclassing.


Rysky wrote:
Gisher wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lady-J wrote:
Rysky wrote:

If you roll really well or have a gonzo PB then maybe (or have the Orc bloodline), outside of that I don't see many 9th level casters plunking points into Strength in order to use it (before they get the Transformation spell anyway). Oracle maybe.

Magi can't use it with their class stuff so I don't see them using it all.

there are some archetypes that will let them use 2h, or get something that makes the weapon a 1h weapon there are at least 3 ways a magus can use the weapon
I know of the Quarterstaff archetype but I don't know how that would help, I don't think there's any other Archetypes that let a Magus use a 2 handed weapon or let them treat it as a 1 handed.
At 13th level, the Mindblade archetype can use a two-handed weapon with Spell Combat. (12th level if it is a double weapon being used for TWF.)
Cool.

Oops. It's 7th level for TWF. It is a cool archetype. You already mentioned that the Staff Magus can use Quarterstaves one-handed. The Kapenia Dancer can use Bladed Scarves one-handed. I can't think of any other Paizo archetypes that can use two-handed weapons with Spell Combat, and only the Mindblade would be able to use the Butchering Axe.

Edit: We cross-posted. The Myrmidarch is the only Magus archetype that gets Fighter Weapon Training. Kensai don't.


Gisher wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Gisher wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lady-J wrote:
Rysky wrote:

If you roll really well or have a gonzo PB then maybe (or have the Orc bloodline), outside of that I don't see many 9th level casters plunking points into Strength in order to use it (before they get the Transformation spell anyway). Oracle maybe.

Magi can't use it with their class stuff so I don't see them using it all.

there are some archetypes that will let them use 2h, or get something that makes the weapon a 1h weapon there are at least 3 ways a magus can use the weapon
I know of the Quarterstaff archetype but I don't know how that would help, I don't think there's any other Archetypes that let a Magus use a 2 handed weapon or let them treat it as a 1 handed.
At 13th level, the Mindblade archetype can use a two-handed weapon with Spell Combat. (12th level if it is a double weapon being used for TWF.)
Cool.
Oops. It's 7th level for TWF. It is a cool archetype. You already mentioned that the Staff Magus can use Quarterstaves one-handed. The Kapenia Dancer can use Bladed Scarves one-handed. I can't think of any other Paizo archetypes that can use two-handed weapons with Spell Combat, and only the Mindblade would be able to use the Butchering Axe.

*nods*


Rysky wrote:
Lady-J wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lady-J wrote:
Rysky wrote:

If you roll really well or have a gonzo PB then maybe (or have the Orc bloodline), outside of that I don't see many 9th level casters plunking points into Strength in order to use it (before they get the Transformation spell anyway). Oracle maybe.

Magi can't use it with their class stuff so I don't see them using it all.

there are some archetypes that will let them use 2h, or get something that makes the weapon a 1h weapon there are at least 3 ways a magus can use the weapon
I know of the Quarterstaff archetype but I don't know how that would help, I don't think there's any other Archetypes that let a Magus use a 2 handed weapon or let them treat it as a 1 handed.
there's one that lets them use it with a 2h weapon and it gives them fighter weapon training as well so double bonus, 2 level dip into barb will get them the weapon as a 1h weapon as will lighten weapon

Aside from the Midnblade (which requires 13th level) and the Staff one (which doesn't let them use their spell stuff when 2handing) I don't know of any others' that lets them use 2handers, and the only archetypes I found that gave them weapon training was Kensai and Myrmidarch, neither of which let them use 2handers with their spell stuff.

And yeah Multiclassing with Barbarian could fix it, but then that fixes lots of things... but you're also multiclassing.

arcane merauder

Silver Crusade

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Lady-J wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lady-J wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lady-J wrote:
Rysky wrote:

If you roll really well or have a gonzo PB then maybe (or have the Orc bloodline), outside of that I don't see many 9th level casters plunking points into Strength in order to use it (before they get the Transformation spell anyway). Oracle maybe.

Magi can't use it with their class stuff so I don't see them using it all.

there are some archetypes that will let them use 2h, or get something that makes the weapon a 1h weapon there are at least 3 ways a magus can use the weapon
I know of the Quarterstaff archetype but I don't know how that would help, I don't think there's any other Archetypes that let a Magus use a 2 handed weapon or let them treat it as a 1 handed.
there's one that lets them use it with a 2h weapon and it gives them fighter weapon training as well so double bonus, 2 level dip into barb will get them the weapon as a 1h weapon as will lighten weapon

Aside from the Midnblade (which requires 13th level) and the Staff one (which doesn't let them use their spell stuff when 2handing) I don't know of any others' that lets them use 2handers, and the only archetypes I found that gave them weapon training was Kensai and Myrmidarch, neither of which let them use 2handers with their spell stuff.

And yeah Multiclassing with Barbarian could fix it, but then that fixes lots of things... but you're also multiclassing.

arcane merauder

Explains why I wasn't able to find it, it's a 3pp archetype.


^That said, it is possible to find worse archetypes that are not 3pp (Greensting Slayer, I'm looking at you).


Rysky wrote:
Lady-J wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lady-J wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lady-J wrote:
Rysky wrote:

If you roll really well or have a gonzo PB then maybe (or have the Orc bloodline), outside of that I don't see many 9th level casters plunking points into Strength in order to use it (before they get the Transformation spell anyway). Oracle maybe.

Magi can't use it with their class stuff so I don't see them using it all.

there are some archetypes that will let them use 2h, or get something that makes the weapon a 1h weapon there are at least 3 ways a magus can use the weapon
I know of the Quarterstaff archetype but I don't know how that would help, I don't think there's any other Archetypes that let a Magus use a 2 handed weapon or let them treat it as a 1 handed.
there's one that lets them use it with a 2h weapon and it gives them fighter weapon training as well so double bonus, 2 level dip into barb will get them the weapon as a 1h weapon as will lighten weapon

Aside from the Midnblade (which requires 13th level) and the Staff one (which doesn't let them use their spell stuff when 2handing) I don't know of any others' that lets them use 2handers, and the only archetypes I found that gave them weapon training was Kensai and Myrmidarch, neither of which let them use 2handers with their spell stuff.

And yeah Multiclassing with Barbarian could fix it, but then that fixes lots of things... but you're also multiclassing.

arcane merauder
Explains why I wasn't able to find it, it's a 3pp archetype.

You're not really surprised by that, are you?

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Gisher wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lady-J wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lady-J wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lady-J wrote:
Rysky wrote:

If you roll really well or have a gonzo PB then maybe (or have the Orc bloodline), outside of that I don't see many 9th level casters plunking points into Strength in order to use it (before they get the Transformation spell anyway). Oracle maybe.

Magi can't use it with their class stuff so I don't see them using it all.

there are some archetypes that will let them use 2h, or get something that makes the weapon a 1h weapon there are at least 3 ways a magus can use the weapon
I know of the Quarterstaff archetype but I don't know how that would help, I don't think there's any other Archetypes that let a Magus use a 2 handed weapon or let them treat it as a 1 handed.
there's one that lets them use it with a 2h weapon and it gives them fighter weapon training as well so double bonus, 2 level dip into barb will get them the weapon as a 1h weapon as will lighten weapon

Aside from the Midnblade (which requires 13th level) and the Staff one (which doesn't let them use their spell stuff when 2handing) I don't know of any others' that lets them use 2handers, and the only archetypes I found that gave them weapon training was Kensai and Myrmidarch, neither of which let them use 2handers with their spell stuff.

And yeah Multiclassing with Barbarian could fix it, but then that fixes lots of things... but you're also multiclassing.

arcane merauder
Explains why I wasn't able to find it, it's a 3pp archetype.
You're not really surprised by that, are you?

Not really, there's a lot of s&!$ out there, I can't keep track of it all and where its from XD


Lady-J wrote:
Jurassic Pratt wrote:
Lady-J wrote:
so its created specifically by orcs and is not an orc weapon? wtf so even the orcs that make the damb thing need to spend a feat just to use it.... why
iirc, it's only created and used by orcs in a very specific area of Golarion. So it wouldn't exactly make sense for all orcs to have proficiency in it.
ya but not every one plays in galorin so tying it to galorin lore places is not good

Paizo makes the game to be played in Golarion.

But they're also nice enough to make the system adaptable enough to use for other settings as well. That doesn't mean that not everything plays nicely when you start trying to remove the context.


Julbo the Nice Orc wrote:

Hello! I'm just dropping in to say that the idea orcs are naturally good with weapons like this is a little bit problematic.

Why, just because humans invented the Fauchard, it doesn't mean we should call it a Human Fauchard and assume that all humans are natural Fauchard-users!

Personally, I do use a Butchering Axe for butchering my foes, but I had to work long and hard to get any good at it, and it's a little bit irritating to have people make the somewhat racist assumption that it was easy for me! Yes, it was invented by an orc, but he created it as a test of strength and skill, not a convenient weapon that anyorc could use.

Remember: killing orcs may be an important part of being an adventurer, but hurting our feelings isn't.

Thank you, Mr. Nice Orc. I was going to say the exact same thing - but I see you've beaten me to the punch. Your speed at posting thoughtful responses is only exceeded by your kindness on consideration towards others.


The one edge case where "orcs and half-orcs have a harder time using the Butchering Axe than do Half-Elves and others who can get an EWP with a racial trait" I think is a Vital Striking Warpriest.

Though, probably the better house rule for fixing that is to waive the BAB:+1 requirement for EWP. Come to think of it the Greatsword might still be better since it has support by virtue of being some deities' favored weapons so you can use things like Greater Weapon of the Chosen with it.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Oddman80 wrote:
Thank you, Mr. Nice Orc. I was going to say the exact same thing - but I see you've beaten me to the punch. Your speed at posting thoughtful responses is only exceeded by your kindness on consideration towards others.

Thank you, friend. A kindly halfling couple raised me to be considerate of the feelings of others. There is never a sufficient reason in this world to abandon politeness! And while it is true that my adoptive parents were taken by the slavers who burned their village and I swore bloody vengeance upon humanity, I have never disregarded the lessons they taught me.

Should we ever run into one another in person, I will endeavor to use my butchering axe with careful precision so as to give you the cleanest possible death. Good luck!

Sovereign Court

Jurassic Pratt wrote:
Lady-J wrote:
so its created specifically by orcs and is not an orc weapon? wtf so even the orcs that make the damb thing need to spend a feat just to use it.... why
iirc, it's only created and used by orcs in a very specific area of Golarion. So it wouldn't exactly make sense for all orcs to have proficiency in it.

However, it does have the Orc Trait tag.

Sovereign Court

Lady-J wrote:
wondering if it would be worth it to alter my barbarian build to duel wield butchering axes

Are you going to have 4-arms? The Butchering Axe is a 2-handed weapon, therefore you would have to have 4 hands to dual-wield it. Unless you are like a race that is large size or larger, I suppose.

Sovereign Court

My bad, somehow I was looking up discussion for the Butchering Axe for 2e and got here instead.


the 2nd & 3rd posts answer the question (back in 2017) and
it is not legal in PF1 Org Play (see link below), just like being an Orc (current Org Play decision for PF1).

actually any creature can use a [!]butchering axe, they'll just suffer non-proficiency penalties {-4} to hit along with possible penalties from the weapon description. The main complaint stems from the fact that weapon proficiency is overpriced in the game. Bestow Wpn Prof:E2 can fix the proficiency problem. For magus/wizards one handed weapons(bastard sword, estoc, etc) or light weapons(gladius, tonfa, etc) are more practical due to spellcasting.


Andrew the Warwitch wrote:
My bad, somehow I was looking up discussion for the Butchering Axe for 2e and got here instead.

Eh. It happens. Surprised they already have these in 2E

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Rules Questions / Is the Butchering axe an "orc weapon" All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.