The base rules for monster cohorts rules are from bestiary 1 pg.316 along with a table of levels for monsters within it. With similar tables in each other bestiary for monsters within that bestiary. However, I'll note that Ultimate Intrigue revised the cohort levels for monstrous allies from each bestiary (quite literally "Use the cohort levels presented here instead of those provided in earlier publications."), one of the quickest examples is that blink dog is a cohort level of 6, rather than the 4 that d20pfsrd shows.
A7 wrote:
The ability itself doesn't need to mention the limitation when it's in the effect it's imitating. Quote: This specific limitation indicates that such restrictions are explicitly stated when they apply. The absence of such wording in the "Shift" ability suggests that the user is free to take other actions, including move and standard actions, after using "Shift." No, it would need language that dimension door's effect doesn't apply, the lack of such means that dimension door's effect does apply. Quote:
Making an action a move action, does not mean that the rest of the effect does not apply. Dimensional Agility even shows your premise to be false. Dimensional Agility wrote: After using abundant step or casting dimension door, you can take any actions you still have remaining on your turn.
Uposyleas wrote:
markoleitte wrote:
Based on the random links that these posts have added (and changed) while 'quoting', I'm thinking the AI for sp@m b0ts is improving.
Supercharge wrote: when using gather power Supercharge alters the values of Gather Power for doing so as a full round action or a move action, it is not a separate effect. Gather Power wrote: Gathering power in this way allows the kineticist to reduce the total burn cost of a blast wild talent she uses in the same round by 1 point. The kineticist can instead gather power for 1 full round in order to reduce the total burn cost of a blast wild talent used on her next turn by 2 points (to a minimum of 0 points). If she does so, she can also gather power as a move action during her next turn to reduce the burn cost by a total of 3 points. Additionally, Gather Power sets how much it reduces by when you take that move action. It's like how Improved Spring Attack and Spring-Heeled Reaping don't stack because they set, rather than add. You only get a discount of 3 to the cost, not 5.
zza ni wrote:
Just don't roll a nat 1 (or use a cantrip to repair them after combat). Alternatively, you can also make them out of their default steel for 16gp, 16 lbs each. It's just a lot easier to carry obsidian with floating disk though, making it a more justifiable choice (especially when they're so cheap to replace).
Azothath wrote: A Worm-that-walks as a PC would mean we are not in core RAW anymore. That's not true, worshipping Yhidothrus as an evangelist lets you become a worm that walks.
OmniMage wrote: I'm under the impression that only the dice are affected, not the bonuses. Incorrect, there's an faq about it Quote:
Mariliths actually would count as a level 16 cohort if just using the bestiary entry, they only have 16 HD. Quote: Note that there are a number of effects and prerequisites that rely on a character’s level or Hit Dice. Such effects are always based on the total number of levels or Hit Dice a character possesses, not just those from one class.
TheApapalypse wrote:
A heightened spell uses the spell slot of the level of spell it's heightened to. if you heighten a Magic Missile to a level 9 spell, it counts as a level 9 spell for all purposes, including the slot needed to cast it.
Life Bubble wrote: This shell enables the subjects to breathe freely, even underwater or in a vacuum, as well as making them immune to harmful gases and vapors, including inhaled diseases and poisons and spells like cloudkill and stinking cloud. Radiation Rules wrote:
Radiation is a poison effect, but it's not an inhaled poison. Thus, Life bubble doesn't offer any protection against it.
1)
Possession Rules wrote: The possessor uses her skill ranks, along with any feats the possessor has for which she still qualifies in the host’s body. The possessor doesn’t gain any of the host’s feats or skill ranks, but does apply bonuses and penalties associated with the host’s body. For example, when attempting Fly checks, a character who possessed a bird would use her own ranks in the Fly skill, but the bird’s Dexterity modifier and racial, size, and maneuverability bonuses. You don't get the feats of the host body (nor skill ranks). 2) Class abilities are considered mental abilities, not physical abilities, thus you do not get any class abilities of the host when possessing them.
As a houserule/gm ruling, I would have them roll again with all the same modifiers as their initial bull rush attack (i.e. same as their attack roll's modifiers) with a -4 on top. RAW though, they roll as if making a bull rush attempt against the stirge, except that they also have a -4. This means no TWF penalty, but everything else you've listed would apply.
nightfox the lost wrote: willuwontu believes that the concentration check is a form of caster level check and is part of the spell. Small correction, I believe that the caster level used as part of the concentration check is the same as the spell's caster level, not that a concentration check is a form of caster level check. Same way that a dispel check is not a caster level check, but uses the caster level of the spell. nightfox the lost wrote:
I too, have given my answer upthread.
Class features don't stack unless they say they do so. Mutation warrior doesn't say that it stack, therefore it doesn't stack.
bbangerter wrote: The counter question: If the 20th level wizard down casts a spell targeting a creature with SR what does the caster level check to overcome SR look like? I don't believe the SR check is a level-dependent feature of the spell. Although thematically I could see this working as a lowered caster level check, as the caster is putting less effort or force into their spell so has a lower chance of overcoming the creatures innate resistance. So I wouldn't really object to this ruling. Caster level of the spell. Heh, I almost asked you that question last night, but: UMR - Spell Resistance wrote: To affect a creature that has spell resistance, a spellcaster must make a caster level check (1d20 + caster level) at least equal to the creature’s spell resistance. It doesn't specifically call out that it's "your caster level" (same wording as concentration uses) like dispel does, and it does a pretty good job of linking itself to the spell's power a bit further down. Quote: Spell resistance has no effect unless the energy created or released by the spell actually goes to work on the resistant creature’s mind or body. So yeah ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. bbangerter wrote:
Eh, I can understand that.
nightfox the lost wrote:
Cool, but I was asking in the context of your own spells. We already know that feats and abilities only apply to spells you cast. BBangter realized what I meant though in their response.
bbangerter wrote:
I still disagree with you (I still think checks involving caster level of a spell should be based off the spell's caster level), but I appreciate the consistency in the way you rule. Ultimately, I think our stances are just too far apart to convince each other. As a last ditch attempt though, I know what you quoted above, but: Dispel Magic wrote: Targeted Dispel: One object, creature, or spell is the target of the dispel magic spell. You make one dispel check (1d20 + your caster level) and compare that to the spell with highest caster level (DC = 11 + the spell's caster level). If successful, that spell ends. If not, compare the same result to the spell with the next highest caster level. Repeat this process until you have dispelled one spell affecting the target, or you have failed to dispel every spell. If a level 20 wizard cast dispel magic at CL 5 for a targeted dispel, what would be the CL they'd use for their dispel check, 5 or 20? Note, casting at a lower level isn't a class feature or special ability, but something you can innately do. Also, is there a difference if they do have something like spell specialization?
bbangerter wrote:
If concentration was a skill (like it was in 3.5), I would wholeheartedly agree with you, but that was changed in Pathfinder. Query, how do you rule bonuses to caster level when casting a spell (such as through Spell Specialization, Varisian Tattoo, alchemical power components, circlet of the moon, etc.) affecting your concentration check with that spell? Do they simply have no effect on your concentration check?
nightfox the lost wrote:
Sure, let's look at the action it's typically a part of, Cast a spell. You can also concentrate to maintain a spell, but both times concentration is used, it's part of a spell, not something you just randomly take an action for in the middle of the day. You do not declare "I make a concentration check to cast defensively", roll concentration, and then declare what spell you're casting. Instead you declare that you're casting a spell, and make a concentration check as part of doing so in order to cast defensively. nightfox the lost wrote:
Ah, let's quote the caster level section in whole: Caster Level wrote:
Adjustments to your caster level are what set the caster level of a spell. This is even supported by the various texts of feats and traits. Quote: Treat your caster level as being two higher for all level-variable effects of the spell. Quote: Treat your caster level as 1 higher when casting spells and spell-like abilities with the mind-affecting descriptor. Quote: Treat your caster level as 1 higher to determine the duration of spells you cast that call or summon genies or outsiders with the elemental subtype. Quote: If you cast such a spell or spell-like ability at night, as long as the sky is clear and the stars are visible, treat your caster level as 1 higher when determining the spell’s duration.
No, a horoscope is keyed to a specific creature when it's created. If you had the slots for 5 1st-level horoscopes, you could create a horoscope for 5 different creatures (that are willing to have a horoscope created for them, and are present when the star watcher is preparing it). The creature for which the horoscope is attuned can then use their horoscope as a standard action, though if they're not the star watcher, they'll need to have it in hand first like if they were using a scroll.
nightfox the lost wrote: Since the user must have the spell on her class list, one can assume that the attribute just needs to be whatever attribute you use for casting spell from that class list. i.e.: a sorcerer would use charisma, even if the spell was created by a wizard since the only factor is that it is Arcane. Rather, you could actually be able to use int/wis/cha for any sorc/wiz spell in a scroll, since you can get all 3 stats for those classes. Cuts out a UMD check if one of those is high enough for you. nightfox the lost wrote: I'm still not sold that a caster pulling their punch (casting a spell at lower caster level) would also become less able to concentrate and focus. Think of it as them needing to concentrate harder to manipulate power that's not intrinsically theirs. nightfox the lost wrote: Again, do we have any sources: RAW, errata, tweets from creators, etc., that directly equate Concentration checks to something besides the spell level? Tons of stuff, like damage, vigorous motion, etc. See Concentration. If you mean for the bonus to the check, you use caster level. Concentration wrote: When you make a concentration check, you roll d20 and add your caster level and the ability score modifier used to determine bonus spells of the same type. And sure, ignoring the fact that the rules for concentration are in the rules for casting a spell, we can ignore the link it has when casting a spell, and use the character's caster level. So a cleric 3/oracle 1 would be able to use the higher of their wis and cha, since like scrolls it only looks for the spell type and not the class. They'd also be able to choose the higher of their caster levels. Similarly, anything that help the caster specialize in a spell and increase its caster level would be ignored as well. nightfox the lost wrote: Or directly links the thousands of scrolls adventuring parties find in dungeon loot to specific classes beyond just Arcane or Divine? Nothing usually specifies the loot as arcane or divine either (unless I'm forgetting something). Typically people use the SLA rules to determine which it is, which also determine the class it's from.
Feral Hunter wrote: Wild Shape (Su): At 4th level, a feral hunter gains the ability to change shape. This ability functions like the druid wild shape ability, except the hunter can take only animal forms (not elemental or plant forms). The hunter’s effective druid level is equal to her class level. This ability replaces the bonus tricks, improved empathic link, greater empathic link, master of the wild, and raise animal companion class abilities. They do not get the Change Shape ability, the blurb about them gaining the ability to change shape is flavor text. Instead they get the ability to wild shape like a druid (with the limitations listed in the ability).
They're mentioned upthread, but here's a couple. Magic item saving throws
He'd use the scroll's stats. Same as if an Efreeti picked up a scroll of wish.
Mechanical Pear wrote: I was under the impression that you can count yourself as "an ally", in Pathfinder. FAQ wrote:
Outflank wrote: Whenever you and an ally who also has this feat are flanking the same creature, your flanking bonus on attack rolls increases to +4. In addition, whenever you score a critical hit against the flanked creature, it provokes an attack of opportunity from your ally. Most gms will file this usage under the "makes no sense" clause, but ymmv. Ask your GM if the combination works for you.
You get the skill points retroactively for increasing int with the ASIs from levels. Similarly increasing your con from 17 to 18 at level 4 grants you +1 additional hp from levels 1-3. Stuff in PF 1e applies retroactively unless stated otherwise. The headband is the exception to this rule as they had to FAQ it. If you homebrew it another way, that's nice. But please don't come into the rules forum with that homebrew and potentially confuse people who might think that's true.
Chell Raighn wrote: Do you have a rules source to back up this claim? Because again, as stated the FAQ you provided does NOT affect what happens when the spell is stored. It affects what you can do when it is cast again after it was stored. As far as I can tell the closest rule source to this issue is potion making, in which, yes a potion crafted by a sorcerer would apply the effect of the sorcerer’s arcana if it was applied during the creation of that potion. Sure do, it's that FAQ I keep bringing up. The item is casting the spell, not the person. Therefore, whatever feats and abilities the person has are not of any help for the item casting the spell. Thus it casts a normal version of that spell. Do you have any sources to back up the claim that items created by people with abilities that affect spells retain those abilities? As far as I can tell the closest rules source is the magic item creation rules for wands, scrolls, potions, and the like. Which has no rules on pricing spells affected by those abilities, nor mention of those items retaining those abilities. (Or are you saying that players are always able to purchase wands of magic missile made by an orc sorcerer with the blood havoc mutation for the same 750gp that a normal wand of magic missile would cost?)
Mechanical Pear wrote: How do you know that last mention of a "monk weapon" was a weapon with the monk ability, and not a weapon from the monk fighter group? This discussion has occurred a few times on the board, so it should be simple to look up. But essentially, there's various bits and pieces everywhere throughout the rules that show that "monk weapon" = "weapon with the monk special weapon quality", here's a couple of them. Weapon Rules wrote: Monk: A monk weapon can be used by a monk to perform a flurry of blows (see Chapter 3). FAQ wrote:
Chell Raighn wrote: Again… we are not in disagreement when the spell is cast FROM the weapon… the question was about when the spell is cast INTO the weapon, which that FAQ has no baring on. The original question was if any of the original caster's abilities would apply to the output spell, to which the answer is no. The sorcerer could cast a fireball with +3 damage per die that deals cold damage into it, but when the weapon then casts that spell later, it'll still come out as a regular fireball, because the spell that was stored in it was fireball. The item does not have those abilities, nor does you having those abilities allow the item to use them (as per my linked FAQ). Therefore, whether or not those abilities were used when storing the spell have no difference when the item then casts the spell.
Chell Raighn wrote: The FAQ you linked for 3 would apply in the event that a sorcerer activated a spellstoring weapon to cast the stored spell. They would be unable to apply their arcana or any other abilities to the spell cast this way. But that FAQ has no baring on how things work the other direction, when the sorcerer is the one casting the spell to be stored. Spell Storing wrote: Anytime the weapon strikes a creature and the creature takes damage from it, the weapon can immediately cast the spell on that creature as a free action if the wielder desires. The weapon is the caster of the spell when it's used, therefore the FAQ is relevant and answers the question.
1) Never been anything officially stated, and varies by the table. IMO the caster level of the caster. 3) FAQ says no.
1) No. The monk weapon group is different from the monk special weapon quality which lets monks flurry with a weapon. 2) A monk with ascetic form would already be able to use it with all monk weapons regardless of the chosen weapon for Ascetic Style, because of the special line in Ascetic Style. Also note, monk weapon refers to weapons with the monk special weapon quality, not weapons in the monk fighter weapon group.
3) Vestigial Limbs does not let you make more attacks than you normally would without the discovery. If you're using it to graft for an extra attack, that's still more attacks than you normally would get, thus it falls under this faq. 4) No interaction with greater/grand mutagens, or if there is one, it would replace their benefits. Also note, you do not need to be level 10 to utilize the preparation ritual, you merely need to prepare 3 formulae from a formula book with the ritual in it. The levels and classes associated with the spellbooks are not requirements, I'm unsure why AoN displays them as such.
|