![]()
![]()
![]() I Meant to type 2) Yes, but oh well. JiCi wrote:
That doesn't make any sense. You're getting it an adventures, where all SF gets it support after it's published. And as Driftbourne pointed out there's only been 2 books since. ![]()
![]() JiCi wrote: I was not aware of that, because the later Bestiaries featured mythical monsters. Yes they still used it a handful of times for demigods and the like, which is a small fraction of all content. And even less when you factor in them actually seeing use. Unchained saw a lot more use, since it supplanted 3 classes that continued to build on. JiCi wrote: Really depends on your budget though... Would you want to purchase an AP just for extra rules, or would you rather purchase a core book with those extra rules? 1) this had nothing to do with what you just said. ![]()
![]() 1) Starfinder has a much lower output than Pathfinder. 2) Mythic was not well received, as opposed to Unchained, which was well received and fixed a lot of issues with the system in the eyes of not only the players but the designers having to work with htose rules as well. 3) If they hated the rules as you claim, they wouldn't be putting out any support for them, when we're getting an adventure. 4) Why are you just ignoring Thursty's post right above yours? ![]()
![]() … yes? It’s coming out next month in Interstellar Species like has always been the plan. ![]()
![]() Cr1ms0nsh4d3 wrote:
But it is though, or rather, all licensed products go in here, like the Alexa game as well. The rest of your post doesn't have anything to do with the first part. ![]()
![]() Yeah I have no interest in Sci-fi or WH stuff for the most part but they're not under contract with Paizo to only make Paizo games. There's no betrayal. There's no bad blood. There's no abandonment. Unless Paizo or Owlcat one steps up and says otherwise, it's just a game company that wanted to make a game with they IP they were allowed access to, they're not forced to make Pathfinder or Starfinder games. ![]()
![]() If they want to hype us up for/sell us an Absalom Station book, first they'd need to make it not be boring. With all the planets and species and wonderful awe inspiring locations in Starfinder the bland space station hub doesn't register for most people past it being the hub. Like the Citadel in ME, you went there cause it was the Hub for the game, not because it was cool. Case in point, the Absalom hardcover for P2 was a letdown, but the Grand Bazaar book was awesome! It was a much better Absalom book, and actually made it interesting and cultivated ideas. ![]()
![]() "Hey was this ever answered?" is a valid necro. "Well, I disagree with you person who posted 2 years actually because..." is not. If you're resurecting a question fine, if you're jumpstarting a convo like it's ongoing then not so much, cause the convo isn't ongoing. They're talking to people who aren't there, naturally people are gonna point this out. ![]()
![]() Ayup, and that’s nothing to say of compatibility and rejection for medicines and grafts. For gameplay purposes your character’s body has 100% acceptance rates for replacement organs and grafts and using medicine, when outside of gameplay that wouldn’t be true no matter how advanced the science got. And then as Big Lemon brought up. Me for example, I can walk without assistance. But say Something happened to me and now I have the choice between using a wheelchair or chopping my legs off for prosthetics. People are presenting as jumping at the second option, but would you? I don’t know if could make that choice. If I’m in wheelchair, I’d still have my legs, could still feel them, could still wiggle my toes. ![]()
![]() That reads to me that there shouldn’t be representation, which I disagree with verily. I’m probably overstepping but I’ll still say There’s numerous problems with making disabilities “realistic” like your asking, in that it won’t be “realistic” enough for people and so they’ll ask for the penalties to be worse to possibly having the characters be unplayable, in the name of “realism”. “until one starts conflating real world accomplishments/ goals/ achievements.” This doesn’t make any sense, and feels elitist to me. It’s a fantasy game, characters with disabilities can be superheroes in it.
|