Sister Perversion

Rysky the Dark Solarion's page

1,929 posts. Alias of Rysky.


RSS

1 to 50 of 1,929 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

Box BEEG


If you're familiar with DnD's DM's Guild, like that.

It let's people publish content using Pathfinder/Starfinder lore and assets for those games and settings.


Marco Massoudi wrote:

I can say that Starfinder is pretty much dead here in Germany.

I don't think it will reach AP issue 100 as it is.
Sad.

What have we told you about working with numbers you don't understand?


1 person marked this as a favorite.
John Mangrum wrote:
Kinda wild to me to dismiss "species lore" as stuff for GMs. I'm a GM and I have a savage hunger for that stuff.

Same, GIMME THAT INSPIRATION AND PLOT HOOKS.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I Meant to type 2) Yes, but oh well.

JiCi wrote:
Rysky the Dark Solarion wrote:
JiCi wrote:
Really depends on your budget though... Would you want to purchase an AP just for extra rules, or would you rather purchase a core book with those extra rules?
1) this had nothing to do with what you just said.
Let me rephrase that: while it's good to get APs with mech rules, it would have been nicer to get more in later core books, to avoid making it look like the mechs were a one-shot thing, because mechs should be as "equally supported" as vehicles and starships in those.

That doesn't make any sense.

You're getting it an adventures, where all SF gets it support after it's published. And as Driftbourne pointed out there's only been 2 books since.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
JiCi wrote:
I was not aware of that, because the later Bestiaries featured mythical monsters.

Yes they still used it a handful of times for demigods and the like, which is a small fraction of all content. And even less when you factor in them actually seeing use.

Unchained saw a lot more use, since it supplanted 3 classes that continued to build on.

JiCi wrote:
Really depends on your budget though... Would you want to purchase an AP just for extra rules, or would you rather purchase a core book with those extra rules?

1) this had nothing to do with what you just said.


4 people marked this as a favorite.

1) Starfinder has a much lower output than Pathfinder.

2) Mythic was not well received, as opposed to Unchained, which was well received and fixed a lot of issues with the system in the eyes of not only the players but the designers having to work with htose rules as well.

3) If they hated the rules as you claim, they wouldn't be putting out any support for them, when we're getting an adventure.

4) Why are you just ignoring Thursty's post right above yours?


… yes?

It’s coming out next month in Interstellar Species like has always been the plan.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

yay!!!!


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Yessssssssssss


What are the new critters?


2 people marked this as a favorite.

While it might not appeal the most to SFS players who have already played through this, it will definitely appeal to people who don't do SFS but love having more adventures in a curated edition like hardcovers/APs, which I believe is the intended audience for this HC treatment.


Yeah can’t say that’s anything that’s that big of a deterrent for me honestly.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Elysium the Chaotic Good plane.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

GANZI!!!!!!!!!!


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Cr1ms0nsh4d3 wrote:
Maryssa Mari wrote:
Just a heads up that we're moving this thread from Starfinder General Discussion to Third-Party Starfinder Products
This isn't a "third party product." Paizo endorsed them and gave them the licensing rights. Just as much Paizo's responsibility as Ninja Divisions.

But it is though, or rather, all licensed products go in here, like the Alexa game as well.

The rest of your post doesn't have anything to do with the first part.


Yeah I have no interest in Sci-fi or WH stuff for the most part but they're not under contract with Paizo to only make Paizo games.

There's no betrayal. There's no bad blood. There's no abandonment. Unless Paizo or Owlcat one steps up and says otherwise, it's just a game company that wanted to make a game with they IP they were allowed access to, they're not forced to make Pathfinder or Starfinder games.


There’s more factors to it and it might not necessarily make it load slow but adding hyperlinks do indeed make the PDFs dummy thicc.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
keftiu wrote:
Stoked about any videogame that lets me play an android or lashunta, though I do wish their next project was Iron Gods.

Counter Offer: Triune


Ello Ello what have we here?


I don't think any Paizo books tend to natively have hyperlinks?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

If they want to hype us up for/sell us an Absalom Station book, first they'd need to make it not be boring. With all the planets and species and wonderful awe inspiring locations in Starfinder the bland space station hub doesn't register for most people past it being the hub.

Like the Citadel in ME, you went there cause it was the Hub for the game, not because it was cool.

Case in point, the Absalom hardcover for P2 was a letdown, but the Grand Bazaar book was awesome! It was a much better Absalom book, and actually made it interesting and cultivated ideas.


Just adding to the pile of reasons I don't play Starfinder.


Neat, thankies


In broad strokes what are the sections of this book? The shop blurb mentions factions and adventure seeds.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Sasha Laranoa Harving wrote:
Ooh, Con Air? Can I be Nic Cage?

Put. The Skittermander. Back in the box.


Rereleasing an adventure path as a combined hardcover is not an insignificant amount of work though.


On the Interstellar Species product page.


6 people marked this as a favorite.

*gasp IN SPACE*


"I still don't get the who value of calling out necro post"

I just explained it last month if you bothered to read the post.


It's my understanding Q-Workshop and Paizo aren't making any more AP dice sets.


Yay Ziggy!

Also love that symbol.


Vlaka yay!


4 people marked this as a favorite.

Also the Drift Crisis isn’t destroying the setting so…


Galactic Magic


2 people marked this as a favorite.

"Hey was this ever answered?" is a valid necro.

"Well, I disagree with you person who posted 2 years actually because..." is not.

If you're resurecting a question fine, if you're jumpstarting a convo like it's ongoing then not so much, cause the convo isn't ongoing. They're talking to people who aren't there, naturally people are gonna point this out.


You can’t pick and choose when “reality” is applied if your argument is for realism.

If the premise is tech/magic items altering the setting and a realistic outcome then pricing comes of that too, as well as numerous other factors.


Huh


Possibly a spell gem? The tentacles though are just something Raxilite have.


7 people marked this as a favorite.
keftiu wrote:
Eloritu looks... a little like Razmir, no? I understand there's only so many ways to be a mage in a cloak and mask, but even still.

*sad Magaambya noises*


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Yeah this came up constantly during the Playtest, them having Dexterity as their sole stat on top of being a really good class, was not only broken, but also very silly.


4 people marked this as a favorite.

Turns out The Devourer is really just the picture frame itself.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

It's a syfy knife in a syfy setting with leveled loot emphasis on weapons and goes to level 20. A tactical knife isn't what a midwife would use either, and also doesn't advance like the Zero Knife.


Ye!


2 people marked this as a favorite.

I love Duellona (LG)

Standing against near insurmountable Odds? Chronic Ailments? Bigoted government? Kaiju? She’s got your back.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Hylax indeed be a Shirren.

Got better than the Devourer, it’s its own antithesis.

Spoiler:
It’s a painting XD


House of Ashes all over again. Get some battys!


3 people marked this as a favorite.

Woohoo! Desna!


4 people marked this as a favorite.

Ayup, and that’s nothing to say of compatibility and rejection for medicines and grafts.

For gameplay purposes your character’s body has 100% acceptance rates for replacement organs and grafts and using medicine, when outside of gameplay that wouldn’t be true no matter how advanced the science got.

And then as Big Lemon brought up.

Me for example, I can walk without assistance. But say Something happened to me and now I have the choice between using a wheelchair or chopping my legs off for prosthetics. People are presenting as jumping at the second option, but would you? I don’t know if could make that choice.

If I’m in wheelchair, I’d still have my legs, could still feel them, could still wiggle my toes.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

That reads to me that there shouldn’t be representation, which I disagree with verily.

I’m probably overstepping but I’ll still say There’s numerous problems with making disabilities “realistic” like your asking, in that it won’t be “realistic” enough for people and so they’ll ask for the penalties to be worse to possibly having the characters be unplayable, in the name of “realism”.

“until one starts conflating real world accomplishments/ goals/ achievements.”

This doesn’t make any sense, and feels elitist to me. It’s a fantasy game, characters with disabilities can be superheroes in it.

1 to 50 of 1,929 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>