
| Bardess | 
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. | 
 
	
 
                
                
              
            
            A Shieldmaiden Warpriest, able to enhance her shield rather than her armor. Shield bonus feats and reduced blessings/spellcasting.
A Witchdoctor Shaman, with better access to necromancy divine spells and command over undead/negative channeling.
A Flying Duelist Shwashbuckler, expert in mid-air fencing duels.
A Wildblooded/crossblooded Bloodrager.
A savant arcanist able to gain more school/bloodline powers.
An option for CG/LG Hunters.
Please, mommy?

| Luthorne | 
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. | 
Neat concept. With all these new classes coming out, a Golarion book like this to anchor them to the setting and talk about how they fit in is probably a sound idea...and new archetypes, feats, traits, and spells that are unique to their Golarion editions to really make them feel like an integrated part of the setting, instead of just kind of tacked on. Be interesting to see the results!

| Evil Midnight Lurker | 
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. | 
 
	
 
                
                
              
            
            A Witchdoctor Shaman, with better access to necromancy divine spells and command over undead/negative channeling.
I would really, really love it if the term "witch doctor" were restored to its original meaning: not some kind of stereotypical "primitive tribal" witch, but someone who specializes in countering evil magic and curses. A doctor who undoes the work of evil witches.
...now I'm thinking an alchemist archetype.

| Luthorne | 
feels kind of soon since we haven't even seen what options they get in the hardcover book they appear in.
Well, Advanced Class Guide is coming out in August, right? So there's at least two months between the two if you want to see what's there to decide to preorder it...and plenty longer if you're fine with buying one or both after they're already out.

|  Usagi Yojimbo | 
 
	
 
                
                
              
            
            I would really, really love it if the term "witch doctor" were restored to its original meaning: not some kind of stereotypical "primitive tribal" witch, but someone who specializes in countering evil magic and curses. A doctor who undoes the work of evil witches.
...now I'm thinking an alchemist archetype.
Cool, didn't know that.
How about an Arcanist archetype, building off their dispel at a touch abilities? Add some Break Enchantment and you are good to go.

| Alexander Augunas Contributor | 
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. | 
 
	
 
                
                
              
            
            I feel like a lot of the hopes people have been expressing here are generic enough that they could be in the hardcover book.
I'm surprised that we're not seeing requests for things like:
– A Taldor Falcata/Buckler Swashbuckler
– An Aldori Swordlord Swashbuckler
– An Archlord of Nex arcanist (Members of that order are the ONLY spellcasters in Golarion that are specifically called out as being arcanists before being an arcanist meant something in the rules.)
And so forth.

| zergtitan | 
 
	
 
                
                
              
            
            I feel like a lot of the hopes people have been expressing here are generic enough that they could be in the hardcover book.
I'm surprised that we're not seeing requests for things like:
– A Taldor Falcata/Buckler Swashbuckler
– An Aldori Swordlord Swashbuckler
– An Archlord of Nex arcanist (Members of that order are the ONLY spellcasters in Golarion that are specifically called out as being arcanists before being an arcanist meant something in the rules.)And so forth.
I asked for that but misspelled the name.

|  Matthew Morris 
                
                
                  
                    RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8 | 
 
	
 
                
                
              
            
            Alexander Augunas wrote:I asked for that but misspelled the name.I feel like a lot of the hopes people have been expressing here are generic enough that they could be in the hardcover book.
I'm surprised that we're not seeing requests for things like:
– A Taldor Falcata/Buckler Swashbuckler
– An Aldori Swordlord Swashbuckler
– An Archlord of Nex arcanist (Members of that order are the ONLY spellcasters in Golarion that are specifically called out as being arcanists before being an arcanist meant something in the rules.)And so forth.
Same with me and the rondelro duelist (Falcata and Buckler)

| Irnk, Dead-Eye's Prodigal | 
 
	
 
                
                
              
            
            I feel like a lot of the hopes people have been expressing here are generic enough that they could be in the hardcover book.
I'm surprised that we're not seeing requests for things like:
– A Taldor Falcata/Buckler Swashbuckler
– An Aldori Swordlord Swashbuckler
– An Archlord of Nex arcanist (Members of that order are the ONLY spellcasters in Golarion that are specifically called out as being arcanists before being an arcanist meant something in the rules.)And so forth.
.
Pretty sure the Iron Mount guys in Numeria have always been called Arcanists as well, even back before the Inner Sea World Guide.
|  graywulfe | 
 
	
 
                
                
              
            
            I feel like 32 pages is lacking to cover new material for 10 new classes. Why wasn't this given an exception and pumped to 64 pages?
Because then it wouldn't be a Player Companion.
It would jump the price for one issue of a line that has had a steady reliable price for most of its existence.
Maybe they could have done it in 2 installments, but they did not. We have the 32 page book, which I have no doubt will be good.

| Liz Courts Webstore Gninja Minion | 
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. | 
 
	
 
                
                
              
            
            I think this line:
with specific attention to fitting the classes into the Pathfinder Campaign Setting
is most relevant. As we did with the Advanced Player's Guide, additional content for these classes will be added as appropriate where it makes the most sense in our campaign setting.

| Barachiel Shina | 
Barachiel Shina wrote:I feel like 32 pages is lacking to cover new material for 10 new classes. Why wasn't this given an exception and pumped to 64 pages?Because then it wouldn't be a Player Companion.
It would jump the price for one issue of a line that has had a steady reliable price for most of its existence.
Maybe they could have done it in 2 installments, but they did not. We have the 32 page book, which I have no doubt will be good.
Then a 2 parter it should be. I really am trying to figure out, outside of the fluff content going in, how much crunch each class will really get in this?
Ideally, my hope is 4 feats per class, 4 spells per class, 2 archetypes per class, 3 magic items per class. Which would amount to 40 feats, 30 magic items, and 20 archetypes and I dunno how many spells, I know a few of them have their own spell list...of which I highly doubt could ever fit in 32 pages unless you took all the fluff out.

|  graywulfe | 
 
	
 
                
                
              
            
            graywulfe wrote:Barachiel Shina wrote:I feel like 32 pages is lacking to cover new material for 10 new classes. Why wasn't this given an exception and pumped to 64 pages?Because then it wouldn't be a Player Companion.
It would jump the price for one issue of a line that has had a steady reliable price for most of its existence.
Maybe they could have done it in 2 installments, but they did not. We have the 32 page book, which I have no doubt will be good.
Then a 2 parter it should be. I really am trying to figure out, outside of the fluff content going in, how much crunch each class will really get in this?
Ideally, my hope is 4 feats per class, 4 spells per class, 2 archetypes per class, 3 magic items per class. Which would amount to 40 feats, 30 magic items, and 20 archetypes and I dunno how many spells, I know a few of them have their own spell list...of which I highly doubt could ever fit in 32 pages unless you took all the fluff out.
With those expectations in mind I think you should be prepared for disappointment. This book will likely focus of the Flavor of where these classes (best) fit into the world of Golarion. There will no doubt be Crunch options that help illustrate how these classes fit into Golarion, but by no means will those be an exhaustive list of every place and option appropriate for these classes in Golarion. That has never been the way Paizo does things.
Note I am not being mean here, just pointing out what I think we can expect.

| Azazyll | 
 
	
 
                
                
              
            
            I wish we'd had this for the APG. I still don't feel as comfortable dropping those six into a campaign as I do the older classes (especially the Summoner, whose mechanics, while well done, clash with a decade or more of established outsider lore). I look forward to the crunch, but for once I may actually be more interested in the fluff.

| Monkeygod | 
 
	
 
                
                
              
            
            I wish we'd had this for the APG. I still don't feel as comfortable dropping those six into a campaign as I do the older classes (especially the Summoner, whose mechanics, while well done, clash with a decade or more of established outsider lore). I look forward to the crunch, but for once I may actually be more interested in the fluff.
I thought about this too, but then I remembered James Jacob's saying that, with the exception of the Summoner, all the APG classes have been kicking around in Golarion from I believe the beginning, or not much longer after.
Least, I'm pretty sure that's what I recall.

| poiuyt | 
 
	
 
                
                
              
            
            Azazyll wrote:I wish we'd had this for the APG. I still don't feel as comfortable dropping those six into a campaign as I do the older classes (especially the Summoner, whose mechanics, while well done, clash with a decade or more of established outsider lore). I look forward to the crunch, but for once I may actually be more interested in the fluff.I thought about this too, but then I remembered James Jacob's saying that, with the exception of the Summoner, all the APG classes have been kicking around in Golarion from I believe the beginning, or not much longer after.
Least, I'm pretty sure that's what I recall.
Yes, for what I recall, they have been hinted at since the 3.5 days.

| j b 200 | 
 
	
 
                
                
              
            
            This will be helpful for the flavor, maybe even changing the class of some NPCs to better fit their concept. However, to the "casual" observer, there is little obvious difference between a Fighter, Swashbuckler or Brawler, except their choise of weapons or armor. Even a Cavalier just looks like a Fighter with a nice horse. Same goes for Clerics and Warpriests or Wizard/Sorcerer/Arcanist.

|  Shisumo | 
 
	
 
                
                
              
            
            Alexander Augunas wrote:Calling an Aldori Swordlord archetype for Swashbucklers now.Matthew Morris wrote:I suppose a rondelero duelist archetype for the swashbuckler is too much to ask for?These two things are what I want most out of this book.
A 4th level human playtest swashbuckler could qualify for (and use effectively) the Taldan Duelist feat as written.

| Adam B. 135 | 
 
	
 
                
                
              
            
            Adam B. 135 wrote:A 4th level human playtest swashbuckler could qualify for (and use effectively) the Taldan Duelist feat as written.Alexander Augunas wrote:Calling an Aldori Swordlord archetype for Swashbucklers now.Matthew Morris wrote:I suppose a rondelero duelist archetype for the swashbuckler is too much to ask for?These two things are what I want most out of this book.
I know, but I would still like an archetype. There is a fighter archetype for both of these fighting styles, so I figure there is design space to give the Swashbuckler (and maybe even the Slayer) these archetypes as well.
Though as zergtitan said, Slayer should get a Red Mantis Assassin archetype for maximum cool.

| Insain Dragoon | 
 
	
 
                
                
              
            
            Adam B. 135 wrote:A 4th level human playtest swashbuckler could qualify for (and use effectively) the Taldan Duelist feat as written.Alexander Augunas wrote:Calling an Aldori Swordlord archetype for Swashbucklers now.Matthew Morris wrote:I suppose a rondelero duelist archetype for the swashbuckler is too much to ask for?These two things are what I want most out of this book.
They have to take exotic weapon prof with the sword, then take a feat to allow it to work with precise strikes. An archetype would probably reduce the feat burden at the cost of restricting class features to Dueling Sword only.

| Necromancer | 
| 3 people marked this as a favorite. | 
 
	
 
                
                
              
            
            zergtitan wrote:I just hope it's filled to the brim with crunch and very little fluff.I don't know, man.
I for one would love to see how the team manages to fit bloodragers into the campaign setting. In my opinion, they're the most exotic of the new classes.
Definitely getting this for flavor alone.
mind explodes with possibilities
- sin magic tainted bloodragers, specialties for each type
- Numerian bloodrager develops from alien substance exposure
- fleshforged Nexian bloodrager (resists transformation, manifests in offspring); possible drow fleshwarp variant
- Worldwound bloodrager...possibilities squared
- Kaer Maga bloatrager
- obligatory primal magic bloodrager
All I see is dozens of empty little bloodrager-shaped slots all over Golarion...

|  Landon Winkler | 
 
	
 
                
                
              
            
            My exact words when I saw this: "Wow, this is the best idea for a book ever. I wonder if it'll be a GenCon... nope, October. Drat."
Now "best idea" is certainly an exaggeration, but this sounds awesome.
Cheers!
Landon
 
	
 
     
     
    

 
	 
	
  
	
  
	
  
 
                
                 
	
  
 
                
                 
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
 