RAGE OF ELEMENTS AMA


Pathfinder Second Edition General Discussion

401 to 450 of 714 << first < prev | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | next > last >>

2 people marked this as a favorite.
magnuskn wrote:
Gotta say, the Kineticist makes that debate from a few months ago, that giving more spell slots per day to casters would terminally upset the balance of the game, look quite a bit silly.

Wonder how imbalanced it would be so that at a certain level you could just cast low level spells using low level spell slots at will


Deriven Firelion wrote:
PossibleCabbage wrote:
Deriven Firelion wrote:
gesalt wrote:
roquepo wrote:

Oh, absolutely. Casters are not going anywhere.

If anything, I think they are closer to fill the Summoner or Inventor niche. From the looks of it, quite better than those two.

Summoner is getting nerfed too with those changes to monster abilities.
what changes?
Monster abilities like Grab no longer succeed automatically, they just give you a MAPless athletics check.
So the God Maneuver Trip will no longer work so easily against big boss evil guys. That is a plus.

I mean, only on eidolons, if I'm understanding the change correctly. I don't think anything's been said about the wolf's Knockdown or the fighter's Knockdown or Greater Knockdown, much less the base Trip maneuver.


Laclale♪ wrote:
Xenocrat wrote:
There’s no class options at all but spells, barbarian instinct, and companions.
Eidolon is not a companion but there is.

There's also more familiars.

Gaulin wrote:
Burn it doesn't stack with blood magic bonus tho, they're both status. But yeah that's exciting.

If I read it right blood magic is an additional damage not a status bonus. The status bonus is for intimidation. The ", or" separate the sections. If you consider this damage as a status bonus it also breaks Dangerous Sorcery.

Source Core Rulebook pg. 196 4.0 - Elemental wrote:
Blood Magic Elemental energy surrounds you or a target. Either you gain a +1 status bonus to Intimidation checks for 1 round, or a target takes 1 damage per spell level. The damage is bludgeoning or fire, according to your elemental type (see below). If the spell already deals that type of damage, combine it with the spell’s initial damage before determining weaknesses and resistances.

Burn It! don't stack with Dangerous Sorcery because both are status bonuses.

MEATSHED wrote:
YuriP wrote:
magnuskn wrote:
Xenocrat wrote:
The kineticist is good at blowing up scrubs for many rounds of combat per day and picking up a few cool utility or crowd control abilities, but there's nothing OP about it. It's deadweight for most skill challenges, and a spellcaster with good high level slots ready to use them is usually going to contribute a lot more to a tough fight.

And then he is out of his three or four high-level blasting spell slots while the Kineticist can go on for the rest of day as long as he likes.

Not saying I'm against that, but I foresee a lot of salty "traditional" caster players in the near future.

Yes It's not only blast but utility too. The ability to repeat many utility impulses freely makes it very good no matter how trivial or dangerous is the situation.

Also blasts are very, very sustainable for kineticists. For example, comparing a top level Fire Elemental Sorcerer with Burn It! with a Fire Kineticists simple damage sum.

Fire Elemental Sorcerer:

  • 1st turn: Cast Fiery Body + Elemental Toss: 10d8 + 1d8 extra from Fiery Body + 5 from Burn It! + 10 from Blood Magic - AVG: 45 + 4,5 + 5 + 10 = 64,5 dmg
  • 2nd turn: Cast lvl 10 Flaming Sphere + Elemental Toss: Flame Sphere = 11d6 + 1d6 extra from Fiery Body + 5 from Burn It! + Elemental Toss = 10d8 + 1d8 extra from Fiery Body + 5 from Burn It! + 10 from Blood Magic - AVG: 38,5 + 3,5 + 5 + 45 + 4,5 + 5 + 10 = 111,5 dmg
  • 3rd turn: Cast lvl 10 Fireball + Sustain the Flame Sphere + Elemental Toss = 20d6 + 1d6 extra from Fiery Body + 10 from Dangerous Sorcery + 10 from Blood Magic + Flame Sphere = 11d6 + 1d6 extra from Fiery Body + 5 from Burn It! + Elemental Toss = 10d8 + 1d8 extra from Fiery Body + 5 from Burn It! + 10 from Blood Magic - AVG: 70 + 3,5 + 10 + 10 + 38,5 + 3,5 + 5 + 45 + 4,5 + 5 + 10 = 205 dmg

  • Why are they casting 10th level fireball and not like cataclysm

    To make the math a bit more simple and I was using Blood Magic to add additional damage that don't applies to Cataclysm (because Cataclysm isn't a bloodline spell). In the end both spell damages becomes closer. The main advantage of Cataclysm is it's larger range, area and the resistance reduction.

    If I made this example with Phoenix Bloodline I could use Meteor Swarm instead but it will loose Elemental Toss that's add a good amount of damage as 1-action bloodline focus spell.


    egindar wrote:
    Deriven Firelion wrote:
    PossibleCabbage wrote:
    Deriven Firelion wrote:
    gesalt wrote:
    roquepo wrote:

    Oh, absolutely. Casters are not going anywhere.

    If anything, I think they are closer to fill the Summoner or Inventor niche. From the looks of it, quite better than those two.

    Summoner is getting nerfed too with those changes to monster abilities.
    what changes?
    Monster abilities like Grab no longer succeed automatically, they just give you a MAPless athletics check.
    So the God Maneuver Trip will no longer work so easily against big boss evil guys. That is a plus.
    I mean, only on eidolons, if I'm understanding the change correctly. I don't think anything's been said about the wolf's Knockdown or the fighter's Knockdown or Greater Knockdown, much less the base Trip maneuver.

    I know they are changing the critical specialization knockdown effect. It sounds like all monster abilities. And the eidolon. It sounds like animal companions too.

    Likely that will be the new standard for all. Which as a DM it should be. Auto-tripping is too powerful. Trip is powerful enough with a high Athletics.


    Eh, even without bloodline bonus, cataclysm is still 21d10. Giving it at least a 10 point advantage over fireball+bloodline.

    Even if you downscale to 9th level spells, it still is ahead compared to pyro (just loses 8 damage on the fireball and 7 from the sphere).

    So you still have at least 3 3 combats that you are ahead in blasting and all of your 8th level and lower slots can be utility if you want.

    I find the comparison useful because it shows a dedicated blaster still has its place.


    YuriP wrote:

    To make the math a bit more simple and I was using Blood Magic to add additional damage that don't applies to Cataclysm (because Cataclysm isn't a bloodline spell). In the end both spell damages becomes closer. The main advantage of Cataclysm is it's larger range, area and the resistance reduction.

    I wouldn't say 90 (which is with blood magic) and 125 are particularly close, it's an over 30% increase to use cataclysm instead.


    magnuskn wrote:
    Gotta say, the Kineticist makes that debate from a few months ago, that giving more spell slots per day to casters would terminally upset the balance of the game, look quite a bit silly.

    That has always been silly, the kineticist didn't really make it more so.


    2 people marked this as a favorite.

    It's a common mistake but cataclysm isn't 21d10, it's 15d10. Note that 3 damage types are only to water, fly or land creatures.

    Core Rulebook pg. 322 4.0 - Cataclysm wrote:

    You call upon the unimaginable power of world-ending cataclysms, ripping a small piece of each cataclysm and combining them together into one horrifically powerful attack. The following effects come down upon all creatures in the area. Treat the resistances of creatures in the area as if they were 10 lower for the purpose of determining the cataclysm's damage. Each creature attempts one basic Reflex save that applies to all five types of damage.

    Flesh-dissolving acid rain deals 3d10 acid damage.
    A roaring earthquake shakes and bludgeons creatures on the ground, dealing 3d10 bludgeoning damage.
    A blast of freezing wind deals 3d10 cold damage.
    Incredible lightning lashes the area, dealing 3d10 electricity damage.
    Beating winds churn across the sky, dealing 3d10 bludgeoning damage to creatures flying in the area.
    An instant tsunami sweeps over creatures in the area, dealing 3d10 bludgeoning damage with the water trait (doubled for creatures swimming in the area).
    A massive wildfire burns in a sudden inferno, dealing 3d10 fire damage.

    OK I still have a doubt if the tsunami part also don't applies to land creatures too. But I have the impression that these bludgeoning doesn't stack.


    1 person marked this as a favorite.

    Based on how it's worded everything takes 6d10 bludgeoning, either 3d10 from the earthquake (if grounded) or wind(if flying) and then 3d10 from the tsunami, or they basically take the entire 6d10 from the tsunami damage being doubled if they're swimming as the tsunami doesn't have a targeting restriction, it's just doubled if they're swimming. It would be extremely odd if swimming creatures just took more for some reason.


    Getting back to the ama, 2 questions:

    A) For the impulse junctions, if you have them for 2 elements, do you get both on any 2 action impulse? Do you choose which one? Or are they linked to using a same element impulse (2 action air impulse to get the move, 2 action earth impulse to get the buckler and etc)?

    B) For the "changing impulse during prep" class ability, does it follow retraining rules as far as level of impulse is concerned or can you change a lower level impulse to a higher one?


    1 person marked this as a favorite.
    Deriven Firelion wrote:

    I know they are changing the critical specialization knockdown effect. It sounds like all monster abilities. And the eidolon. It sounds like animal companions too.

    Likely that will be the new standard for all. Which as a DM it should be. Auto-tripping is too powerful. Trip is powerful enough with a high Athletics.

    Yeah, except kineticist just had auto-prone printed for earth crit spec.

    shroudb wrote:

    Getting back to the ama, 2 questions:

    A) For the impulse junctions, if you have them for 2 elements, do you get both on any 2 action impulse? Do you choose which one? Or are they linked to using a same element impulse (2 action air impulse to get the move, 2 action earth impulse to get the buckler and etc)?

    B) For the "changing impulse during prep" class ability, does it follow retraining rules as far as level of impulse is concerned or can you change a lower level impulse to a higher one?

    A) It has to be their element. If you use a dual-type impulse (like with the two element infusion), you get both.

    B) It explicitly calls out using retraining rules. You also can't change into or out of a composite impulse. You must also retrain into the same element.


    Initially I disliked the earth autotripping based on principle. But thinking it over, in half of the levels until level 19 kineticists are 1-2 points behind martial accuracy, so autotripping with earth blasts is not as egregious as a fighter with maul (who would be 3-4 points ahead in accuracy at those levels).

    For accuracy, if I'm not wrong (their item bonus was at level 3 and 11,right?), you have:

    level 2 -1
    Level 5-6 -2
    Level 10 -1
    Level 13-14 -2
    Level 16-18 -1
    Level 19-20 +1

    Vs fighter reduce all those by 2 more.


    I feel like if there is any point that will lead to me disliking my time with kineticist it's gonna be it having spellcaster accuracy progression, I like so much of what I see and then I'm reminded of spellcaster progression


    3 people marked this as a favorite.
    Karneios wrote:
    I feel like if there is any point that will lead to me disliking my time with kineticist it's gonna be it having spellcaster accuracy progression, I like so much of what I see and then I'm reminded of spellcaster progression

    It's a bit smoother than full caster due to getting the +1/+2 Item bonuses.

    Still, as I pointed above, for a lot of levels you will be trailing a bit behind.

    I think it's a fair tradeoff when you consider that a normal routine will be a blast and a 2 action impulse, since those are Save based.

    So while your blast is a bit behind, you almost never have to do a -5 Attack.

    That said, the above means that relying purely on blasts is not optimal.


    5 people marked this as a favorite.

    If you aren't level 20 doing five agile melee blasts on a single target I don't even want to know you.

    gesalt wrote:


    shroudb wrote:


    A) For the impulse junctions, if you have them for 2 elements, do you get both on any 2 action impulse? Do you choose which one? Or are they linked to using a same element impulse (2 action air impulse to get the move, 2 action earth impulse to get the buckler and etc)?

    A) It has to be their element. If you use a dual-type impulse (like with the two element infusion), you get both.

    Unfortunately, this is wrong. Impulse junctions state that you can never apply more than one to an impulse in a round (so even if they later allow a way to do two separate qualifying impulses in a round only one will get it), even if it's a composite or two element infusion with two actions and two elemental traits that match impulses you have.

    What two element infusion feat says is that you can apply both critical effect junctions if you have both. Impulse junctions are the one type of junction that you can't double up (or triple up, with aura/resistance/skill) on, everything else is free game.


    3 people marked this as a favorite.
    shroudb wrote:
    Karneios wrote:
    I feel like if there is any point that will lead to me disliking my time with kineticist it's gonna be it having spellcaster accuracy progression, I like so much of what I see and then I'm reminded of spellcaster progression

    It's a bit smoother than full caster due to getting the +1/+2 Item bonuses.

    Still, as I pointed above, for a lot of levels you will be trailing a bit behind.

    I think it's a fair tradeoff when you consider that a normal routine will be a blast and a 2 action impulse, since those are Save based.

    So while your blast is a bit behind, you almost never have to do a -5 Attack.

    That said, the above means that relying purely on blasts is not optimal.

    Basically the main difference is:

    Default Martial:
    LvL 1: LvL + 2 (trained)
    LvL 2: LvL + 2 (trained) + 1 item bonus
    LvL 5: LvL + 4 (expert) + 1 item bonus
    LvL 10: LvL + 4 (expert) + 2 item bonus
    LvL 13: LvL + 6 (master) + 2 item bonus
    LvL 16: LvL + 6 (master) + 3 item bonus

    Kineticist Blasts:
    LvL 1: LvL + 2 (trained)
    LvL 3: LvL + 2 (trained) + 1 item bonus
    LvL 7: LvL + 4 (expert) + 1 item bonus
    LvL 11: LvL + 4 (expert) + 2 item bonus
    LvL 15: LvL + 6 (master) + 2 item bonus
    LvL 19: LvL + 8 (legendary) + 2 item bonus

    Fighter:
    LvL 1: LvL + 4 (expert)
    LvL 2: LvL + 4 (expert) + 1 item bonus
    LvL 5: LvL + 6 (master) + 1 item bonus
    LvL 10: LvL + 6 (master) + 2 item bonus
    LvL 13: LvL + 8 (legendary) + 2 item bonus
    LvL 16: LvL + 8 (legendary) + 3 item bonus


    So... kineticist is basically at base martial or lagging behind by 1 for almost all of its career and then jumps to martial +1 at level 19?

    Huh.


    4 people marked this as a favorite.
    Sanityfaerie wrote:

    So... kineticist is basically at base martial or lagging behind by 1 for almost all of its career and then jumps to martial +1 at level 19?

    Huh.

    5 levels -1 and 4 levels -2, and 2 levels +1


    2 people marked this as a favorite.

    I think the reason that the Kineticist has sub-martial accuracy vs. AC is because there are infusions that let you target defenses other than Armor (I think I've seen some reflex ones). That's not something that martials normally get.


    PossibleCabbage wrote:
    I think the reason that the Kineticist has sub-martial accuracy vs. AC is because there are infusions that let you target defenses other than Armor (I think I've seen some reflex ones). That's not something that martials normally get.

    The big bulk of non-blast infusions target reflex, a few are fort, a few are attack.


    shroudb wrote:
    Sanityfaerie wrote:

    So... kineticist is basically at base martial or lagging behind by 1 for almost all of its career and then jumps to martial +1 at level 19?

    Huh.

    5 levels -1 and 4 levels -2, and 2 levels +1

    Hmnn. Three fewer -1 levels and one less +1 level than an Alchemist. Closer than I was expecting.


    6 people marked this as a favorite.

    Man I really dislike asymmetrical proficiency growths like this.


    6 people marked this as a favorite.

    (Monkey's paw curls) Remaster will change martial weapon proficiency to match caster so that it goes away.


    2 people marked this as a favorite.

    Martial and caster proficiency scales at different levels because AC and saves scale at different levels. And yeah that's weird for spell attack rolls but there is a reason for it


    Xenocrat wrote:
    (Monkey's paw curls) Remaster will change martial weapon proficiency to match caster so that it goes away.

    I didn't know about this. Do you still have the source?


    2 people marked this as a favorite.
    YuriP wrote:
    Xenocrat wrote:
    (Monkey's paw curls) Remaster will change martial weapon proficiency to match caster so that it goes away.
    I didn't know about this. Do you still have the source?

    It was a joke. That was what he meant by "(Monkey's paw curls)". The point of the Monkey's paw is that it always gives you your wish in the worst possible way.


    Just got my copy. How does the at will protector tree ability scale? Not sure if "spell rank" is a remaster term. There's no way it scales like I think it does right? Seems pretty OP.


    aobst128 wrote:
    Just got my copy. How does the at will protector tree ability scale? Not sure if "spell rank" is a remaster term. There's no way it scales like I think it does right? Seems pretty OP.

    10hps every other level (3,5,7etc).


    aobst128 wrote:
    Just got my copy. How does the at will protector tree ability scale? Not sure if "spell rank" is a remaster term. There's no way it scales like I think it does right? Seems pretty OP.

    Does it leave a normal living tree like a (limited per day) spell does by the way?


    Yes, it can leave trees behind when the effect ends. And yes, it scales at the same speed the spell does.

    It's a very good option for soaking damage to the party, with the caveat of it only working in those 9 squares where you slap it down.


    Wild. For a first level ability, I can tell why people have been talking about it.


    Xenocrat wrote:

    If you aren't level 20 doing five agile melee blasts on a single target I don't even want to know you.

    How would you do this? I could see 4 using Kinetic Pinnacle, but I'm not seeing how you get the 5th.


    FlySkyHigh wrote:
    Xenocrat wrote:

    If you aren't level 20 doing five agile melee blasts on a single target I don't even want to know you.

    How would you do this? I could see 4 using Kinetic Pinnacle, but I'm not seeing how you get the 5th.

    It requires that you be able to somehow drop your aura as a free action. You then you get it back as a free action at the beginning of your turn (with a free kinetic blast) with one of your class features. Then there's a level 18 or so feat that gives you haste (for kinetic blast and maybe something else).


    Sanityfaerie wrote:
    FlySkyHigh wrote:
    Xenocrat wrote:

    If you aren't level 20 doing five agile melee blasts on a single target I don't even want to know you.

    How would you do this? I could see 4 using Kinetic Pinnacle, but I'm not seeing how you get the 5th.
    It requires that you be able to somehow drop your aura as a free action. You then you get it back as a free action at the beginning of your turn (with a free kinetic blast) with one of your class features. Then there's a level 18 or so feat that gives you haste (for kinetic blast and maybe something else).

    Ahaaa. Gotcha. Yeah that'd make sense.


    So... can you drop your aura as a free action? Is there some way to do it just prior to your turn, rather than during your turn?


    Sanityfaerie wrote:
    So... can you drop your aura as a free action? Is there some way to do it just prior to your turn, rather than during your turn?

    There are a couple Overflow reactions that would allow you to drop out of your aura in between rounds.


    Sanityfaerie wrote:
    So... can you drop your aura as a free action? Is there some way to do it just prior to your turn, rather than during your turn?

    Not that I've been able to find? Right now it has "Your kinetic aura automatically deactivates if you’re knocked out, you use an impulse with the overflow trait, or you Dismiss the aura." Dismiss is a single Action, not a free action.

    Body of Air, Calcifying Sand, Volcanic Escape are all overflow reactions, so that'd be about the only way to fully achieve the "5 agile blasts per round" strat by triggering one of those reactions every round.


    So what I'm hearing is that in order to pull this off, you really want to have a second friendly kineticist who's willing to include you in the blast radius of their impulses so you have something to react to?

    Also, the "overflow vs aura" build choice makes a major swerve to the "overflow" side at very high levels.

    That's a bit annoying, given that which side of the line you're on is one of those things that you can't retrain, given that a significant part of it is "how many aura junctions did you take"


    2 people marked this as a favorite.
    aobst128 wrote:
    Just got my copy. How does the at will protector tree ability scale? Not sure if "spell rank" is a remaster term. There's no way it scales like I think it does right? Seems pretty OP.

    I believe "spell rank" is precisely synonymous with "spell level". So you'd say 5th rank spell instead of 5th level spell.

    The whole "level means so many different things in these games" has been a problem for 20+ years.


    PossibleCabbage wrote:
    aobst128 wrote:
    Just got my copy. How does the at will protector tree ability scale? Not sure if "spell rank" is a remaster term. There's no way it scales like I think it does right? Seems pretty OP.

    I believe "spell rank" is precisely synonymous with "spell level". So you'd say 5th rank spell instead of 5th level spell.

    The whole "level means so many different things in these games" has been a problem for 20+ years.

    So it scales half as quickly as a max level spell would for your level? That's the way I'm reading it. You get a plus 1 spell level per 4 levels I think. That seems more likely than an at will max level protector tree


    Sanityfaerie wrote:
    FlySkyHigh wrote:
    Xenocrat wrote:

    If you aren't level 20 doing five agile melee blasts on a single target I don't even want to know you.

    How would you do this? I could see 4 using Kinetic Pinnacle, but I'm not seeing how you get the 5th.
    It requires that you be able to somehow drop your aura as a free action. You then you get it back as a free action at the beginning of your turn (with a free kinetic blast) with one of your class features. Then there's a level 18 or so feat that gives you haste (for kinetic blast and maybe something else).

    You'd just overflow at the end of the previous round with your final set of actions and not restore it before your turn ends. Then you start the next turn without any channeled elements, get the free one w/blast, three actions, and your quickened blast.

    So you can do five blasts (ignoring chain blast feat) every other round.

    Dark Archive

    1 person marked this as a favorite.
    Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber
    aobst128 wrote:
    PossibleCabbage wrote:
    aobst128 wrote:
    Just got my copy. How does the at will protector tree ability scale? Not sure if "spell rank" is a remaster term. There's no way it scales like I think it does right? Seems pretty OP.

    I believe "spell rank" is precisely synonymous with "spell level". So you'd say 5th rank spell instead of 5th level spell.

    The whole "level means so many different things in these games" has been a problem for 20+ years.

    So it scales half as quickly as a max level spell would for your level? That's the way I'm reading it. You get a plus 1 spell level per 4 levels I think. That seems more likely than an at will max level protector tree

    No, it scales the same as any caster using the spell would scale it if they kept it in their highest level slot. It scales at "a rank half your level rounded up" which is precisely when full casters get a new spell rank. So it would heighten at character levels 3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17 & 19


    Invictus Fatum wrote:
    aobst128 wrote:
    PossibleCabbage wrote:
    aobst128 wrote:
    Just got my copy. How does the at will protector tree ability scale? Not sure if "spell rank" is a remaster term. There's no way it scales like I think it does right? Seems pretty OP.

    I believe "spell rank" is precisely synonymous with "spell level". So you'd say 5th rank spell instead of 5th level spell.

    The whole "level means so many different things in these games" has been a problem for 20+ years.

    So it scales half as quickly as a max level spell would for your level? That's the way I'm reading it. You get a plus 1 spell level per 4 levels I think. That seems more likely than an at will max level protector tree
    No, it scales the same as any caster using the spell would scale it if they kept it in their highest level slot. It scales at "a rank half your level rounded up" which is precisely when full casters get a new spell rank. So it would heighten at character levels 3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17 & 19

    I need to reread it when I get home. That's good af


    1 person marked this as a favorite.
    aobst128 wrote:
    PossibleCabbage wrote:
    aobst128 wrote:
    Just got my copy. How does the at will protector tree ability scale? Not sure if "spell rank" is a remaster term. There's no way it scales like I think it does right? Seems pretty OP.

    I believe "spell rank" is precisely synonymous with "spell level". So you'd say 5th rank spell instead of 5th level spell.

    The whole "level means so many different things in these games" has been a problem for 20+ years.

    So it scales half as quickly as a max level spell would for your level? That's the way I'm reading it. You get a plus 1 spell level per 4 levels I think. That seems more likely than an at will max level protector tree

    It scales as quickly for you as a max heightened protector tree would be for a druid of the same level. It's just that the tradeoff is "you spent a feat on one spell" while the druid has access to the entire primal list.

    So at 3rd level it's a 2nd rank spell, at 5th level it's a 3rd rank spell, at 7th level it's a 4th rank spell, etc.

    The Kineticist is supposed to be better at certain things specific to their element than a spellcaster gets to be at those things.


    Xenocrat wrote:

    You'd just overflow at the end of the previous round with your final set of actions and not restore it before your turn ends. Then you start the next turn without any channeled elements, get the free one w/blast, three actions, and your quickened blast.

    So you can do five blasts (ignoring chain blast feat) every other round.

    Okay, but you're actually losing damage that way, because you're *not* getting your free blast for any round following the one where you took 5. (...unless you're doing it with the previously noted reaction overflows)

    Basically, your rotation is

    - two blasts, two-action overflow impulse
    - five lasts
    - repeat.

    producing a two-action overflow attack, two full attack bonus blasts, two -4s, and three -8s every two turns.

    when you *could* be
    - three blasts, two-action overflow impulse
    - repeat

    producing two two-action overflow attacks, two full attack, two -4s, and two -8s. Pretty sure that cashing in a blast at -8 for a two-action overflow attack is a win. Alternately, in any of those rounds you coudl cash in the -8 for that round turnign your two-action overflow into a three-action overflow... which seems that it might sometiems be worthwhile.

    Oh, and technically you can't have five agile attacks regardless, as there's no way to make that first free-action channel-and-blast agile... not that it matters.


    Sanityfaerie wrote:
    Xenocrat wrote:

    You'd just overflow at the end of the previous round with your final set of actions and not restore it before your turn ends. Then you start the next turn without any channeled elements, get the free one w/blast, three actions, and your quickened blast.

    So you can do five blasts (ignoring chain blast feat) every other round.

    Okay, but you're actually losing damage that way,

    Five blasts was a meme/gimmick, I'm not serious.


    I'm surprised fire doesn't have any persistent damage effects. At least none I could spot. Am I missing a composite impulse or something that does persistent fire?


    Just the critical blast junction.


    aobst128 wrote:
    I'm surprised fire doesn't have any persistent damage effects. At least none I could spot. Am I missing a composite impulse or something that does persistent fire?

    The blast critical junction? It's not great, but it qualifies.


    1 person marked this as a favorite.

    Yeah I saw that. Just looking for something so I don't need to take oracle dedication for incendiary aura lol.

    401 to 450 of 714 << first < prev | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | next > last >>
    Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder Second Edition / General Discussion / RAGE OF ELEMENTS AMA All Messageboards

    Want to post a reply? Sign in.