2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
NobodysHome wrote: Unfortunately, I qualify as a complete non-hacker (never tried) with only a few years of coding experience and I could write a bot that's doing this stuff. Just spend a few minutes as a human setting up an account, then turn the bot loose to spam the account.
On the other hand, that's a few minutes of someone's time every day which would make it a personal assault.
Far more likely they've figured out a way to have the bot create an account. That's what captchas (the strangely distorted characters when you create an account) are supposed to stop.
But at this point bots can solve captchas better than people.
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Y'know what's sad?
Quiet moments like this are starting to feel like the eye of the storm. :(
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Meh. I think this qualifies as a "first world problem."
4 people marked this as a favorite.
|
What do fey have to do wi-oh.
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
and Baba Ji had a small party I the Paizo Publishing General Discussion boards. Looks like it was around 3 hours ago.
Yet another one ...
Bengali be gone!
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Sadly there were some responses to this spam thread which are still present after the OP was removed. I flagged them but wanted to leave it here as well.
EDIT: Also This thread as well.
Wyntr wrote: Sadly there were some responses to this spam thread which are still present after the OP was removed. I flagged them but wanted to leave it here as well.
EDIT: Also This thread as well.
Thanks!
Pathfinder Maps, Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Starfinder Superscriber
Spammer ID Multiple threads. Flagging now.
http://paizo.com/people/jjrohitsharma
it's getting ridiculous! :(
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Is there not a way to disallow, or at least to limit the frequency of new threads being created by new accounts? These bots would be much less disruptive to the boards if they could only create a new thread every six hours or something.
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Mikaze: Hmm whenever you are active on the forums, the spammer also gets active..
hmmmm...... :)
And now welcome yatiram100
jotrambabaji is back. Is this a new tactic?
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Matthew Pittard wrote: Mikaze: Hmm whenever you are active on the forums, the spammer also gets active..
hmmmm...... :)
D:<
ANGRY MIKE PATTON NOISES
misskavitasharma is another spam account.
Woran wrote: misskavitasharma is another spam account. Linked for you.
There's 6 threads by yatarim100 on the Advice section 1/3rd way on the page.
yatiram100 is really annoying and I'm no longer able to flag his posts - after flagging several of them, it now just tells me, "Sorry, there was a problem adding your flag." after I select "Breaks other Guidelines".
Pathfinder Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Just a quick note: flagging every post isn't 100% necessary with these guys. Also, please try to refrain from posting more threads about the spam, as those kind of tend to end up also being kinda spammy. And again, thank you for your help with identifying these accounts! :)
Chris Lambertz wrote: Just a quick note: flagging every post isn't 100% necessary with these guys. Also, please try to refrain from posting more threads about the spam, as those kind of tend to end up also being kinda spammy. And again, thank you for your help with identifying these accounts! :) Wow, wish I read this like twenty minutes ago. I did both those things - started a new thread, and flagged every single post. Ooops….. Yay… me…. Feel free to delete the thread...
Perhaps a thread entitled "Post Spam thread/Spammers details here" that is stickied to the top of Website feedback?
Guess I shouldve read here first. My first instinct was to just flag them.
Why isnt 'Spam' listed as a reason for flagging? What would be the correct 'reason'?
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Stiehl9s wrote: Guess I shouldve read here first. My first instinct was to just flag them.
Why isnt 'Spam' listed as a reason for flagging? What would be the correct 'reason'?
That's what I asked in my unfortunately new thread. I posited perhaps a reason could be "I suspect this is SPAM"
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Yep, it's happening again. Good times.
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Stiehl9s wrote: Why isnt 'Spam' listed as a reason for flagging? What would be the correct 'reason'? "Breaks other guidelines" is traditional.
Indeed, the guy Tamago mentioned is dumping in Advice section
Rysky wrote: Nuuuuuuuuu! They've invaded the recruitment forums! That was the one I unfortunately created a new thread about...
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Chyrone wrote: Indeed, the guy Tamago mentioned is dumping in Advice section Astrologer is crapping in the Advice section, Astrologer1 is crapping in the General Discussion section. Either these people aren't very creative, or bots are creating the accounts in addition to the posts. Perhaps anti-bot measures should be put in place at profile creation. It is a natural choke point.
Thanks Steve Geddes. That was the option I chose.
This spammer hit a gaming forum I frequent about a month ago. Same astrology mumbo jumbo. Prepare for him to hit the site about 30-40 times a day for the next several days or so.
As if the babaji wasn't bad enough :/
what's this guy thinking?
everybody knows "Psychic Friends Network" with Dionne Warwick is the only place to go
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
|