Unlock the powers of your ancestors and combine the might of two worlds with Pathfinder Player Companion: Bastards of Golarion! Whether you’re the abandoned progeny of elven royalty or the feared result of hag trickery, your lineage is both strange and storied, and you must channel the brawn and guile of your forebears to prove yourself to a harsh and uncaring world—no matter the costs.
Inside this book, you’ll find:
Ten new heritages and alternate racial traits for half-elves and half-orcs—from the seafaring children of aquatic elves to the brash kin of desert orcs.
Details and new character options for adventurers from the famous half-elven refuge of Erages and the half-orc port city of Averaka.
Four character themes to represent bastards of all races and pasts, including the envied celebrity, the misbegotten illegitimate, the scorned outcast, and the neglected unfortunate.
A slew of generation tables to inspire grim character backgrounds and determine the physical features inherited from non-human progenitors.
New archetypes, feats, spells, magic items, traits and more for bastard characters of all walks!
This Pathfinder Player Companion is intended for use with the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game and the Pathfinder campaign setting, but can easily be incorporated into any fantasy world.
Written by Judy Bauer, Neal Litherland, Ryan Macklin, and David N. Ross.
Cover Art by Ralph Horsley.
Each monthly 32-page Pathfinder Player Companion contains several player-focused articles exploring the volume’s theme as well as short articles with innovative new rules for all types of characters, as well as traits to better anchor the player to the campaign.
ISBN-13: 978-1-60125-602-7
Other Resources: This product is also available on the following platforms:
This product would have gotten four stars were it half the price. At its listed retail, however, the value just isn't there.
There are some wonderful illustrations of the common fantasy half-breeds, especially half-orcs. However, the work itself seems a bit unfocused, with not enough material in some cases (gill men) and bland material in others. What crunch there is seems to be so minor or insignificant as to be an after thought.
The true "bastards" - half-tiefling, half-aasimars, etc. - are relegated to a paragraph apiece. A true shame and a missed opportunity.
A large swath of this work was devoted to character backgrounds - material that could have been condensed to one or two paragraphs per concept, leaving more room for discussion on actual half-breeds.
A work on this subject could have easily been double this size and packed with awesome information. It's very unlikely we'll ever get that chance again for Pathfinder.
After looking at this book again recently, I can say that it is much better then I thought it would be. Not only do half-elves and half-orcs get a lot of love but several other races get a little something cool as well.
Bastards of Golarion is a rather better book than I was expecting, even if it does at times seem unsure of its focus. It contains a lot of advice and suggestions for creating characters who are either half-human characters or outcasts from society in some way or another. As with any Pathfinder Player Companion, there are quite a few new mechanical options, but these are mostly limited to new traits that help support the “fluff” of the book. The emphasis of the book is very much on the background information, and this pleased me a great deal.
A disappointing book that tries to do too much. You get some good fluff and an occasional gem amidst a lot of chaff and a few real head-scratchers. Admittedly, Half-Elves are my favourite core race and I was hoping for better quality content than what I found here.
Positives: Good fluff all round. Half-Orc Subraces are well done. Great cover and I have to single out the Half-Orc pic on page 10 for making me consider playing my least favourite race.
Negatives: Most of the new options are forgettable. Far too many races with their own dedicated Players Companions are represented. Background and Distant Heritage options are things you could work out for yourself with little actual mechanics.
I have to call out some specifics now as examples; some of this stuff perplexes me. The Shoreborn give up Low-light Vision and Keen Senses for Swim and Sailing buffs; the buffs are understandable but you’d think Aquatic blood would make for better vision rather than worse. Spireborn are a little too good, they trade Adaptability for Spell-Like abilities. The rest generally trade Elven Immunities for terrain-specific skill buffs which are of questionable utility aside from very specific campaign settings.
The Unusual Origins feat is actually four feats, depending on which of the applicable races you are. Why isn’t it four separate feats? I don’t know, I can’t think of a single reason why. This one feat takes up an entire double page spread too with some seriously ugly artwork. I hate saying that but that particular piece of artwork rubs me in every wrong way possible.
You guys might want to change that title. Over here, the word "bastard" is usually understood as "son of a beach" first and "half-blood" second. Also, regardless it implies some sort of pejorative tingle.
This sounds interesting...as is most things. I am wondering though will it touch on changlings at all? What other Bastard races will it touch on...I mean Teiflings, Aasimars a dhampires have already been covered...mmmm
*reaches into pocket, pulls out money, cash on table*
Ready to lose it paizo just show me the awesome. And for the love of all things holy give me a replace option for multitalented that more classes can make use of.
You guys might want to change that title. Over here, the word "bastard" is usually understood as "son of a beach" first and "half-blood" second. Also, regardless it implies some sort of pejorative tingle.
I hope they keep the title. It'll make up for changing Brothels to Dance Halls in UCamp ;)
You guys might want to change that title. Over here, the word "bastard" is usually understood as "son of a beach" first and "half-blood" second. Also, regardless it implies some sort of pejorative tingle.
Agreed - it seems odd to imply that all people of mixed race are bastards, given the pejorative use of that term (in either meaning). It doesn't even correctly define one of mixed blood, simply of blood that was 'mixed' outside of wedlock.
Now, the Bastards of Erebus were proper bastards, but I don't think that their parentage was ever actually specified.
So, is the intention with the title to say that all mixed race characters are disreputable and verging on evil, or that the only way that a mixed-race character would arise is if someone couldn't keep it in their pants - not from a monogamous relationship?
I don't want the orc sorcerer bloodline explained I just want bloodlines for the other races like elf, dwarf, gnome, catfolk, lashunta, etc.
Well at least this book as some interest but I hope that it covers all the half human races.
I suspect that it is largely due to many of the other Core Rules (and even several from the ARG) races already have a bloodline that captures the 'feel' of the race in question, both the stereotyped Tolkienesque version and the Golarion version. Orcs didn't seem to, at least to me. Catfolk and Dwarves still are left out IMO.
Of course, I'd also like weapon feats as awesome as Dervish Dance for the 'not-a-scimitar', but that is for a different book.
I'll admit, I agree with a name change. Not because it's offensive, but because when I think of Bastards of Golarion, I think of a book of villains, con-men, bounders, and ne'er-do-wells. I don't think of a book of half-breeds.
Also still wondering how Brothel got changed, but this title somehow made it through.
If this was a UK forum then 'bastard' would be censored in the same way that 't+$!', 's!$&' and 'wanker' would be.
I've been turning it over in my head all evening, and the only place where I've heard the word used to represent a 'mixture' would be in 'bastardise', and even then it implies corruption and pollution.
If this was a UK forum then 'bastard' would be censored in the same way that 't+$!', 's!$&' and 'wanker' would be.
I've been turning it over in my head all evening, and the only place where I've heard the word used to represent a 'mixture' would be in 'bastardise', and even then it implies corruption and pollution.
To be fair, it's used often in faux mediaeval literature to denote illegitimate - I'd be astonished if it hasn't appeared in Game of Thrones, for instance. Of course it still carries a pejorative tone, hence the corruption of the original word into one of abuse.
Yes, a name change would probably be in better tastes as well as actually convey what the book is intended to be. Bastards of Golarion implies either 1.) a book that will focus on NPC's born out of wedlock or B.) a book about truly vile NPC's. I fail to see the connection between "bastards" and either Half-Orcs or Half-Elves, nor any of the other half-blooded races that may also be included.
The word "bastard" is used in the Core Rulebook to describe how humans and elves generally view half-elves. Being labeled "bastard" is likely a part of life for many, if not most, half-elves and half-orcs in Golarion and as such, the title seems fitting enough to me. It's not a terribly flattering word, perhaps, but it's something both half-breeds have to deal with, I reckon. It's a large part of what the two races have to offer roleplayingwise.
Also, I'd really hate to see a repeat of the Dance Hall incident.
The word "bastard" is used in the Core Rulebook to describe how humans and elves generally view half-elves. Being labeled "bastard" is likely a part of life for many, if not most, half-elves and half-orcs in Golarion and as such, the title seems fitting enough to me. It's not a terribly flattering word, perhaps, but it's something both half-breeds have to deal with, I reckon. It's a large part of what the two races have to offer roleplayingwise.
Also, I'd really hate to see a repeat of the Dance Hall incident.
I agree about not changing it for censor reasons (don't get me started on censorship). But, I'd want to see a title change because I'd actually rather see the title for a book about villains. I don't really think of half-bloods when I think bastards and I think Bastards of Golarion just fits better with a book about ne'er-do'wells and cads.
In reference to Half-Elves, only Tanis comes to mind, and it's a lot less that he was a Half-Elf than it was that he was an actual bastard. He mother was raped and he was not raised with the father. I can honestly see it much more as a Tiefling thing, where most Tieflings are disowned.
Now, on there other hand, I would guess that most Half-Elves and many Half-Orcs these days are probably the products of two Half-Elf (or half-Orc) parents rather than the alternatives.
Now, on there other hand, I would guess that most Half-Elves and many Half-Orcs these days are probably the products of two Half-Elf (or half-Orc) parents rather than the alternatives.
Do the specifics of a half-elf/orc's parentage (elf/human or half-elf/half-elf) really matter in social situations where merely being a half-elf means that person is somehow inferior socially? Something that, according to the Core Rulebook at least, seems to be relatively widespread among human and elven societies. It's still a half-breed or, in the eyes of those for whom its mixed blood is an issue, a bastard.
This, of course, is largely a matter of how we perceive the role and social status of half-breeds in our campaigns. For me, the word "bastard" makes sense because being a half-breed in Golarion does come with a lot of social baggage.
Admittedly, I secret have an agenda to rename this so that Paizo will release Inglorious Bastards of Golarion, an RPG centered around guerrilla fighters and partisan warriors of Golarion that fight Chelaxians.
Anyway, I think people are taking the term bastard far more negatively than this particular usage is. Using bastard for irregular origin is not nearly as negative as using it for other reasons.
Especially considering the description of the book is positively positive.
Anyway, I think people are taking the term bastard far more negatively than this particular usage is. Using bastard for irregular origin is not nearly as negative as using it for other reasons.
Especially considering the description of the book is positively positive.
Aggreed especialy considering that what people want Bastards of Golarion to be book of evil kinda haves the negative meaning that people borned out of wedlock are evil....my two sweet and kind nieces would disagree with that.