So far I've seen....

[David S. McCrae]

Irony:

Your item is named one thing.
Your item is called something else in its description.
Confusion is in your construction requirements.

[Luthia]

David S. McCrae wrote:

Terminalmancer wrote:

I am pretty sure infinitely-reusable resurrection effects should not be affordable by 4th-level characters. Time to vote for the opposition!

...wait, the opposition gives a ridiculous skill bonus for almost no money.

Argh!

There is that "both are equally good/bad button". I've hit that a couple of times.

Tah, resurrection is worse than skill bonus. Mostly. I do not like the equal button and so long as I do not feel something approach true awe for both items I refuse to touch it.

3 unique items to go to my goal for tonight. Could I stop seeing pairings of items I've already seen more than once each?

[James Casey]

Hmm... Why would anybody want that item? It doesn't say cursed but I would be hard-pressed to find someone who didn't think that item was cursed.

[Monica Marlowe]

David S. McCrae wrote:

Terminalmancer wrote:

I am pretty sure infinitely-reusable resurrection effects should not be affordable by 4th-level characters. Time to vote for the opposition!

...wait, the opposition gives a ridiculous skill bonus for almost no money.

Argh!

There is that "both are equally good/bad button". I've hit that a couple of times.

Oh David...please don't, that means someone else has to look at those items next to one another again! You couldn't find anything that made one item better than the other? Really!?

[David S. McCrae]

Wow...is it really that bad to hit that button? X.x

I'm sorry. :(

[Monica Marlowe]

David S. McCrae wrote:

Wow...is it really that bad to hit that button? X.x

I'm sorry. :(

Yup, we all suffer when you don't vote! It makes the baby goblins cry! :-)

[thunderspirit]

David S. McCrae wrote:

Wow...is it really that bad to hit that button? X.x

I'm sorry. :(

Think of it more as "throw these two back in the pile for someone else" rather than "these both suck, I can't choose which sucks worse."

[Eric Morton]

Whenever I get two equally terrible items, I just vote for the one on the left.

Neither one's going to the Top 32, so who cares which one I rank the lowest?

[Thunderbuckets]

600 unique items and 11 Keeps. I think I've been maintaining a pretty consistent 2% Keep rate throughout, so that's kinda cool.

My own item remains elusive.

[Pillbug Toenibbler]

mamaursula wrote:

David S. McCrae wrote:

Wow...is it really that bad to hit that button? X.x

I'm sorry. :(

Yup, we all suffer when you don't vote! It makes the baby goblins cry! :-)

{sings (badly):}

♩ ♫ "...Judges never satisfied (Judges never satisfied)
Why do we scream at both choices?
This is what it sounds like
When goblins cry..." ♪ ♬

[Terminalmancer]

mamaursula wrote:

David S. McCrae wrote:

Wow...is it really that bad to hit that button? X.x

I'm sorry. :(

Yup, we all suffer when you don't vote! It makes the baby goblins cry! :-)

Yeah, it's a sorting algorithm so even "least bad" votes are necessary to sort everything.

[Venitas Ethilist]

Pillbug Toenibbler wrote:

{sings (badly):}
♩ ♫ "...Judges never satisfied (Judges never satisfied)
Why do we scream at both choices?
This is what it sounds like
When goblins cry..." ♪ ♬

This singing is still better than some of the items I've seen.

[David S. McCrae]

"Sucks unless Paladin uses it" vs. "Sucks unless the worshipper of a good diety uses it"

BLLLLAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHHHHH!

If I hadn't just got scolded for hitting the "neither" button....

Good diety worshipper it is....

[BLUKnight]

What the...I just found an item that has a copyright notice at the bottom? What?

[Lightminder]

Lots of skull and shackles related items, must have been popular.

[Monica Marlowe]

I bet you are a really awesome unique item based upon the opening paragraph where you tell me you are a unique item, but this isn't the unique item voting contest.

[Sebastian Hirsch]

Just because antimagic field does not offer a DC is not an excuse not to ignore that bit if you incorporate it into an item ...

[frank gori]

Okay that's a real disease that is horrid to watch a family member go thru... You're as bad as the 2 racist items I've seen.

[David S. McCrae]

ALL OF OUR BLADED WEAPONS MUST BE KEEEEEEEENNNNNNNN!!!!! I MSUT HAEV CRITTT RAAANNNGGGGEEEEEE!!!!

Translation: my last five voting pairs had a keen bladed weapon.

[Luthia]

necromancy staff vs. necromancy staff.

The interest and lack of option called sleep should be winning here. Right, right, let's judge with necromancy staff is better, but I don't like that name, so I'll probably end up voting for the other one. But I ought to read them first.

Yep, it was better. The name tells.

[Matt Morris]

Lightminder wrote:

Lots of skull and shackles related items, must have been popular.

What does that logic say about Serpent's Skull? :P

[Luthia]

I have discovered that I cannot in good faith vote for an item that doesn't have even the smallest piece of the template. Once an item has an attempt at applying the template I am somewhat lenient, but no template application is just a touch too lazy.

[Monica Marlowe]

"Feint" is a combat move of deception, as in "to fake out."

"Faint" means slight, weak, pale, quietly or to pass out.

[Luthia]

Noting a nasty trend for armors to hurt their wearers and join with them. Sometimes with benefits. Always with so much hurting done by a protective item in the process. Is there not an unpleasant dichotomy, even if we do not call these armors cursed? I'm none too fond of the tendency at least.

Sure, one of them is/have been/will be this amazing idea.

[Anthony Adam]

Thunderbuckets wrote:

600 unique items and 11 Keeps. I think I've been maintaining a pretty consistent 2% Keep rate throughout, so that's kinda cool.

My own item remains elusive.

I'm not far behind you, 578 items and haven't seen mine - but it is on the item list other voters have compiled, so I know it's there. I just have to keep voting... :D

[Ambrosia Slaad]

mamaursula wrote:

"Feint" is a combat move of deception, as in "to fake out."

"Faint" means slight, weak, pale, quietly or to pass out.

{makes notes for next year to submit "armor of the opossum" that allows wearer to faint feint}

[Woody Elliott]

GM_Solspiral wrote:

Okay that's a real disease that is horrid to watch a family member go thru... You're as bad as the 2 racist items I've seen.

Ya, I know which item you are talking about. My wife has the disease very severely (I can't say more as to not hint at the item). I will never vote for it ever, no matter what it is against.

[David S. McCrae]

Woody Elliott wrote:

GM_Solspiral wrote:

Okay that's a real disease that is horrid to watch a family member go thru... You're as bad as the 2 racist items I've seen.

Ya, I know which item you are talking about. My wife has the disease very severely (I can't say more as to not hint at the item). I will never vote for it ever, no matter what it is against.

I sincerely dread to see whatever item you guys are talking about...

[Matt Morris]

Ambrosia Slaad wrote:

mamaursula wrote:

"Feint" is a combat move of deception, as in "to fake out."

"Faint" means slight, weak, pale, quietly or to pass out.

{makes notes for next year to submit "armor of the opossum" that allows wearer to faint feint}

You may be too late...

[Luthia]

Of the 418 unique items I have seen, I am getting just a teensy bit tired of the ones I've seen five times. Honestly, yes, I'll probably download that spell-in-a-can, un-formatted nonsense, boredom item this time as well. But don't you have an item that might not make my vote almost pre-decided?

On an unrelated note, who invited Lara Croft? Or is that just me seeing it?

[frank gori]

Woody Elliott wrote:

GM_Solspiral wrote:

Okay that's a real disease that is horrid to watch a family member go thru... You're as bad as the 2 racist items I've seen.

Ya, I know which item you are talking about. My wife has the disease very severely (I can't say more as to not hint at the item). I will never vote for it ever, no matter what it is against.

I want to say a lot more about this but yeah won't break the rules of the contest. A google search will get you my real name pretty easily my email is my first and last name @gmail.com

My GF went thru it with her grandmother while her dad was going thru ALS. Being the one that takes care of someone like that is really hard. If you ever need to correspond with someone that has an idea of how hard that is feel free to email me or pm me here.

[Cthulhudrew]

I'm pretty sure I wouldn't want this item, and I'm 100% sure my party wouldn't want me to have it, either.

[Alexander Bennett]

Oh, that was a cool item. Too bad you completely f-d the formatting.

[Luthia]

I have a feeling that some players, who really just want to play an undead, just once, have submitted. But honestly, an item that forces you to become undead one or another way is not the solution. It's just not.

[James Casey]

Very nice low word count sword. I applaud you and award you an upvote over an item that I have upvoted in the past.

[xiahoudas]

I'm seeing a lot of color changing stones on rings. Mood rings must be the fad this year in Golarion

[James Casey]

Ahhh there is the Dresden weapon! I was wondering what peeps were talking about.

[frank gori]

ok that's an amazingly good ring

[Lightminder]

Shouldn't a cursed item be balanced by an upside?
I guess one man's weight is just a dobermans paws on.

[frank gori]

James Casey wrote:

Ahhh there is the Dresden weapon! I was wondering what peeps were talking about.

"Polka will never die"

[Winterwalker]

Lightminder wrote:

Shouldn't a cursed item be balanced by an upside?

I guess one man's weight is just a dobermans paws on.

Should a cursed item even be entered? Hrm? :)

[James Casey]

GM_Solspiral wrote:

James Casey wrote:

Ahhh there is the Dresden weapon! I was wondering what peeps were talking about.

"Polka will never die"

Where's the toast?

:-)

[elcoderdude]

"It's" means "it is". "Its" is the possessive.

So many entries get this wrong.

[Thomas LeBlanc]

Yo designer! Do you even Pathfinder?

[James Casey]

Thomas LeBlanc wrote:

Yo designer! Do you even Pathfinder?

What you mean? I Pathfinder good!

[Nazard]

Boring item vs auto-win item.

Vote for boring.

So, I guess the auto-win item lost.

Bah-dum-dum! Ching!

[Feros]

But...but...you already had it do that there...

It didn't need another, it...

*Sigh*

[xebeche]

GM_Solspiral wrote:

Woody Elliott wrote:

GM_Solspiral wrote:

Okay that's a real disease that is horrid to watch a family member go thru... You're as bad as the 2 racist items I've seen.

Ya, I know which item you are talking about. My wife has the disease very severely (I can't say more as to not hint at the item). I will never vote for it ever, no matter what it is against.

I want to say a lot more about this but yeah won't break the rules of the contest. A google search will get you my real name pretty easily my email is my first and last name @gmail.com

My GF went thru it with her grandmother while her dad was going thru ALS. Being the one that takes care of someone like that is really hard. If you ever need to correspond with someone that has an idea of how hard that is feel free to email me or pm me here.

:(

[Monica Marlowe]

END OF PAGE 40 SHAKE IT OFF!!!

EVERYONE STOP VOTING!

Get up, go walk around, shake it off! This is for fun and we're all here to have a good time! I know I'm guilty of getting bogged down too.

Go back to your keeper list, find something you really liked and marvel at it.

Get a drink, watch a holiday show, hug your SO/child/pet/pillow and get some air.

We'll reconvene later!

Good Job everyone!

[Mystic Lemur]

Your "special ability" is to do something literally every item of your type can already do...