Probably. I don't remember the specific script you're referring to, but it's the one I've been working on the last "three" months (really more like 1.5 with my procrastinating).
And we're back! I heard you guys don't like things that have high ACs. Knock yourselves out.
EDIT: Actually, it's getting late. I'll just call it a night here.
After this combat is over Astraden will cast air walk on Tanith, bear's endurance and bull's strength on herself, and shield of faith on Eben.
I'm just waiting to see if Eben wants to 5' step forward one square so Rodrigo and I can shift forward.
Slackers! Slackers everywhere!
That's our word.
We bards don't call it "stealing", but an "homage".
Mind if I revise my actions, KC?
It won't change what the spawn did on their turns, and the wraith didn't emerge, so go ahead.
Astraden, if you take a 5' step back, I can reach you on my turn and cut the worm out of you. Otherwise, I need to spend both of my actions to get to you.
EDIT: ...oh, wait. I just remembered I'm hasted. Derp.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Ah, I checked. There is this.
When in the body, it requires a DC 20 Heal check to remove each one (Standard action, and the target can't move around for the round). It also deals 1d4 damage to the subject, though Carina's Anesthetic ability minimizes the damage. You can target more than one worm with a check, but the DC increases by +5 per worm. Remove Disease is a kill-all—all worms inside the body are instantly slain.
So this round, you can try to cure Astraden as long as she holds still, but she was too mobile the previous turn.
Well, it's kinda moot--I slipped on Rodrigo's grease.
I will say this: Astraden is aware that mohrgs are Chaotic Evil creatures. She believes spawn to be the same.
Q: Can a monk do a Flurry of Blows during a grapple as it requires a full attack action?
A: (Jason Bulmahn 12/11/09) The RAW do allow the grappled to make a full attack action, assuming they can do so with only one hand. Since flurry does not require two hands to perform, a monk could flurry. Grappling is not always the best idea. Grappling a monk is one such example. I think folks need to remember that the grappled condition is not as severe as it once was. You are no longer draped all over the target. It is more like you got a hold on them, typically an arm (hence the restriction). The pinned condition is more of your greco-roman wrestling hold.
Yeah, the implication here seems to be that if the monk had to use two hands with the flurry, it wouldn't be possible. It also adds up with how it was in 3.5 (where you explicitly could not do this).
Yar. Like I said, forgot the Grappling.
Note that this means the Mohrg can't use his second Slam unless he releases the Grapple.
I think having to maintain the grapple precludes full attacks regardless, doesn't it?
It does depending on the abilities that interact. If it has a Feat or something like Greater Grapple it could be relevant.
Technically speaking I don't think he can Tongue either.
"You can inflict damage to your target equal to your unarmed strike, a natural attack, or an attack made with armor spikes or a light or one-handed weapon. This damage can be either lethal or nonlethal."
No damage. =p
Oh, s#%~, I haven't been accounting for this guy's five levels of Brawler. Okay, rewind, everyone...
:P
It does depending on the abilities that interact. If it has a Feat or something like Greater Grapple it could be relevant.
Technically speaking I don't think he can Tongue either.
"You can inflict damage to your target equal to your unarmed strike, a natural attack, or an attack made with armor spikes or a light or one-handed weapon. This damage can be either lethal or nonlethal."
No damage. =p
Right, and a snake with a grapple only gets to do bite damage, not poison. :P
Hey, you never know. Mohrg are Intelligent Undead, meaning their Feats can be different from what's listed.
Technically speaking, lunge probably shouldn't have worked (reach still requires your arms to enter the field), but since you spent an action point we'll say you just held the tippy-tip of the bardiche handle or something. That trick will only work once, however.
Bah. I guess I'll go beat up the morgh for a bit next round.
Is paralyzed Farrukh still giving cover to the priest from where I stand?
No, he's prone.
Incidentally, I think Astraden might have an item that could very specifically be of use in this situation.
Actually, being paralyzed does not automatically knock you prone.
I think if Farrukh dies here my next character is going to be someone with the Freedom Domain.
The mohrg deliberately set you down with the hopes you'd get wormed. You didn't.
Ahhh, gotcha. Surprised he had an action for that.
Standard action grapple, move action push over.
That's a bit odd considering moving a target is a function of Grappling, and requires a Standard action. He'd have to move me a whole square forward to do that. I could maybe understand a Move to just shove me so I fall over in my own square, but what he's doing is essentially a Reposition or Drag Maneuver.
I generally don't see paralyzed subjects as being subject to "maneuvers", honestly. When you can't move, you're basically an object.
Tanith should prep remove paralysis in the future.
I generally don't see paralyzed subjects as being subject to "maneuvers", honestly. When you can't move, you're basically an object.
That makes the bits about how Dex is equal to 0 and melee attacks get a +4 bonus fairly pointless, then, if everything automatically succeeds.
I still have a CMD of 10 (and an AC of 20), and he could roll a 1 on his combat maneuver (just like you can roll a 1 and miss an AC 5 object).
Tanith should prep remove paralysis in the future.
Astraden does keep scrolls.
I know but what if she gets paralyzed?
Isn't that the whole point of having it on a scroll? ;)
What if she gets paralyzed... in the dark?!
#nondemihumanproblems
Loafers! Loafers everywhere!
Hey! That's our wor-
...carry on.
Is the wraith visible out of the wall? Need to know before I act.
No, though you can assume Astraden lets you guys know it's around. She has a decent idea of its location—she's sort of triangulating.
So, are we waiting on Astraden now?
Yeah. Gark should be waking up fairly soon.
Hey, this is almost entirely unrelated save for the obvious connection, but I'm rethinking a certain extremely consequential ruling I made a while back. I'd probably allow "mouthing" with either a DC 15 Bluff/Linguistics check from the speaker or a DC 15 Sense Motive check from the listener. I don't see any point in being stricter than that, at least at close range.
I'm not arguing because a 10 foot radius is a 10 foot radius but even looking at your 3D diagrams I'd say Tanith would be in range. If Tanith's current position doesn't count as being in range you end up with the wonkiness of negating reach by approaching from corners.
The second map pretty clearly shows that Tanith is outside. You have to remember that Tanith is ten feet above, ten to the left, and five to the south. It's basically impossible to map, but it totals out to more than ten feet.
Tanith is currently fifteen feet away according to the West-East Map. He's actually a bit more, as previously discussed, but 15 feet is enough to render it moot. Seriously, I broke my brain trying to understand the 3D map I made. This is the only thing I'm sure of right now. Well, that and "Rodrigo is not getting hit by that breath attack." Pretty confident there.
As for "approaching from corners", I allow you to attack from 7.5 feet and don't allow you to attack from 15 feet. That's how I've always run it. I'm afraid this is just a symptom of "square maps kinda suck".