Azih |
3 people marked this as a favorite. |
So I think we can all agree that the Pathfinder name, for all of its merits, is kind of terrible when it comes to being easily searchable and identifiable. 'Pathfinder' is a really generic term and is more associated with Nissan than Paizo! Plus it's used in dozens of different things as well which means Pathfinder game stuff on social media is harder to find than it should be..
Of course over the past ten years its built up a good reputation and a fair bit of brand recognition among RPG gamers. But if Paizo wishes to be bold then why not change the name entirely?
Instead of calling it Pathfinder Second Edition, why not call it... AdventureSeeker or something?
Wei Ji the Learner |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Then, they can switch it back to Pathfinder Classic!
To do that they'd need to call it New Pathfinder, have it bomb critically and have market share evaporate in a dangerous fashion, then bring it back as you say.
But actually, y'know, not bring it back but bring back Pathfinder Classic using the mechanics discovered in New Pathfinder 'just like we used to remember it'.
Ssalarn |
2 Furious 2 Pathfinder?
You're on the right track, but I prefer 2 Path 2 Furious. It doesn't really form a proper phrase, but it sounds right.
...Or it could be "Valorous" and the first blog post for the announcement could have Valeros, the iconic fighter, with a can of paint in hand turning the first "o" into an "e" and crossing out the "u."