Can I cast invisibility on a door to see through it?


Rules Questions

1 to 50 of 63 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>

2 people marked this as a favorite.

The invisibility will be obvious for anyone on the other side, but that is beside the point. This is not about stealth.

Sovereign Court

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Maps, Rulebook, Starfinder Maps, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Looking at the spell, I do not see why not. As long as the door is not over 100 lbs/caster level.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Maps, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Maps, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber

This is one of those wonky questions that GMs may rule differently from game to game.

By RAW, a door is an object, and invisibility can be cast on any object so long as it doesn't exceed the weight limitation (100 pounds per level of caster). Most interior doors do not weigh more than 100-200 pounds. Massive fortress doors may be too heavy for low level casters.

The question becomes if a door attached to a structure is considered a separate object. With different GMs, your mileage may vary.

Great idea though, fool opponents into running into solid, invisible doors - or simply spying what is awaiting you.


A related question:

If I were to cast invisibility on a 100 gp gem and toss it somewhere, would it lose invisibility from hitting the ground?

My idea is to cast it on the gem, then cast magic jar and put my soul in the gem. Then have someone else toss the gem near a group of enemies.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Dropping an item only makes it visible if the Invisibility spell is cast on you, the holder of the item. If the object is the target of the spell, then it doesn't care whether anyone's holding it. It stays invisible.

Under what circumstances would you want to toss your gem into a group of enemies though? Magic Jar has a range of over 200ft, and most of the time, you buddies wouldn't be able to throw such an object anywhere near that far. Also, if you do end up that far away, what happens to you if, in the ensuing scuffle, your gem gets kicked away and falls in a crack or hole? None of your friends will be able to see where it landed and they'll have a pretty hard time finding it, even after the invisibility wears off, depending on terrain.


9 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

You can absolutely do both of these things.

A GM who rules that a door is a wall is being deliberately obtuse.

Scarab Sages

18 people marked this as a favorite.

Hmmm, an enemy creates a permanent invisible door. The group of bad guys sit in the other room and watch the party approach as their wizard attempts to chuck a fireball in the room of bad guys, hilarity ensues.

Sovereign Court RPG Superstar 2011 Top 32

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Heck I'd allow a player to cast invisibility on an individual brick in a wall to create a window. A door seems like no problem at all.


Cuuniyevo wrote:

Dropping an item only makes it visible if the Invisibility spell is cast on you, the holder of the item. If the object is the target of the spell, then it doesn't care whether anyone's holding it. It stays invisible.

Under what circumstances would you want to toss your gem into a group of enemies though? Magic Jar has a range of over 200ft, and most of the time, you buddies wouldn't be able to throw such an object anywhere near that far. Also, if you do end up that far away, what happens to you if, in the ensuing scuffle, your gem gets kicked away and falls in a crack or hole? None of your friends will be able to see where it landed and they'll have a pretty hard time finding it, even after the invisibility wears off, depending on terrain.

I wasn't planning on using it as a standard tactic. The idea is we're about to head into a castle, and I believe there is merit in potentially throwing the invisible stone over the castle walls. That way I can possess someone on the inside.

The Exchange Owner - D20 Hobbies

Ravingdork wrote:

You can absolutely do both of these things.

A GM who rules that a door is a wall is being deliberately obtuse.

So if I cast invisibility on your sword in a scabbard does just the sword go invisible or do you too?

If I cast invisibility on myself, does my gear become invisible?


5 people marked this as a favorite.
James Risner wrote:
So if I cast invisibility on your sword in a scabbard does just the sword go invisible or do you too?

Cast on attended object. It would only turn the sword invisible assuming the the swords attender (the one wearing it) failed the save.

James Risner wrote:
If I cast invisibility on myself, does my gear become invisible?

Cast on creature. Yes. Per the spell.

Edit: I legitimately and non-sarcastically don't understand why this is a question.


ryric wrote:
Heck I'd allow a player to cast invisibility on an individual brick in a wall to create a window. A door seems like no problem at all.

Serious walls would be more than 1 brick thick. But it could potentially work on a regular house type brick wall.

I don't know if I would allow it on a single brick in a wall or not. It has never been brought up before.

Grand Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.

A door is obviously not a wall. If I try to sunder a thick wooden door and the GM declares if has stone hardness because it's part of the wall there's a problem. It's a separate object and a this is a legitimate, colorful use of the spell that obviously works both ways as any chance of surprise by either side is gone. I can imagine the Barbarian who held his turn in order to attack the 1st thing through the door (I doubt he has spell craft to ID the effect, and the party wizard/cleric are about to announce the spell, but simply decide otherwise seeing the Barb charge =) Ahhh, good times...

As for the gem question, invisibility is only dropped when the object is used for an attack. The Magic Jar attempt would qualify, but simply being thrown over a wall would not. I was going to say you might need See Invisibility, but line of sight is not a prerequisite to enter the gem so I see no problems at all with this approach other than you may attempt to dominate a stray dog, or the street urchin, rather than Guard_NPC_027 since you don't know whats on the other side of the wall at all.


Ganryu wrote:

A related question:

If I were to cast invisibility on a 100 gp gem and toss it somewhere, would it lose invisibility from hitting the ground?

My idea is to cast it on the gem, then cast magic jar and put my soul in the gem. Then have someone else toss the gem near a group of enemies.

It may be required that you are able to see the gem in order to use it for magic jar (though that's trivial to get around with a see invisibility if your of sufficient level to be casting magic jar).


I think it's technically within the rules, but I don't know that I'd allow it as a GM as I don't think it's within the spirit.

Are there any spells that do something similar to this and at what spell level?


invisible walls and doors still block line of effect.

The Exchange Owner - D20 Hobbies

Claxon wrote:

I think it's technically within the rules, but I don't know that I'd allow it as a GM as I don't think it's within the spirit.

Are there any spells that do something similar to this and at what spell level?

+1 against the spirit.

See Through Stone is a 4th level Druid spell, so this is a full 2 spell levels early.

Grand Lodge

James Risner wrote:
Claxon wrote:

I think it's technically within the rules, but I don't know that I'd allow it as a GM as I don't think it's within the spirit.

Are there any spells that do something similar to this and at what spell level?

+1 against the spirit.

See Through Stone is a 4th level Druid spell, so this is a full 2 spell levels early.

Gloves of Reconnaissance, and I think a Cleric domain provides this ability, as well.

I believe nosig has a party who use this tactic regularly.


4 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Maps, Rulebook Subscriber; Starfinder Charter Superscriber
James Risner wrote:
Claxon wrote:

I think it's technically within the rules, but I don't know that I'd allow it as a GM as I don't think it's within the spirit.

Are there any spells that do something similar to this and at what spell level?

+1 against the spirit.

See Through Stone is a 4th level Druid spell, so this is a full 2 spell levels early.

Except, See Through Stone doesn't let everything on the other side see you right back, so, I'm not really sure that comparison makes much sense.

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

See Through Stone also doesn't have a weight limit attached, just a depth limit.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

So…if a 9th level Mountain Druid (immune to petrification) under the effect of Life Bubble were swallowed whole (4-point evolution) by an Eidolon that subsequently had Flesh to Stone cast on it, would they be allowed to concentrate on casting See Through Stone on the Eidolon? What if the Summoner cast Invisibility on their Eidolon? Since the Eidolon's an object now, would the Druid be visibly hanging, contorted, in mid-air?

Spoiler:
I'm kidding (I already know the answers at my table would be yes, but instead of using the standard concentration check 10 + Eidolon's CMB + spell level, it would probably be house-ruled to 25 + spell level), but it's the first thing that popped into my head after the last few posts. =P

Dark Archive

Trimalchio wrote:
invisible walls and doors still block line of effect.

So, do you mean that say I make an invisible door and then a wizard tries to throw a fireball through the door (that he can't see) with a point beyond the door and the spell simply fails, or does it work but then the bead of the fireball hits the door and BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM the wizard and his friends get barbecued?

It seems to me it would NEED to be the latter, otherwise how do you tell a player they can't target that spot because... what... ? What do you tell them?


5 people marked this as a favorite.

If the bead hits an object it explodes.

Dark Archive

wraithstrike wrote:
If the bead hits an object it explodes.

Right, I know that but if an invisible door still blocks line of effect, can you still target past the door, not realizing that the door is going to prematurely detonate the Fireball, or do you have to tell the player You cannot target that orc, but I cannot say why. You just can't. is what I am asking

Sovereign Court

1 person marked this as a favorite.
wraithstrike wrote:
If the bead hits an object it explodes.

yes... yes it does :)

I'm so using that next time I GM...... :)

Sovereign Court

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Zelda Marie Lupescu wrote:
wraithstrike wrote:
If the bead hits an object it explodes.
Right, I know that but if an invisible door still blocks line of effect, can you still target past the door, not realizing that the door is going to prematurely detonate the Fireball, or do you have to tell the player You cannot target that orc, but I cannot say why. You just can't. is what I am asking

No!! you let him target that orc! that's what illusion spells are for! for foooooolin' fools!

Sovereign Court

2 people marked this as a favorite.

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Zelda Marie Lupescu wrote:
wraithstrike wrote:
If the bead hits an object it explodes.
Right, I know that but if an invisible door still blocks line of effect, can you still target past the door, not realizing that the door is going to prematurely detonate the Fireball, or do you have to tell the player You cannot target that orc, but I cannot say why. You just can't. is what I am asking

Even if you can see someone and something like a wall of force(also invisible) is in the way, that does not change anything. You aim the bead to where you want it to detonate. However if it hits something it explodes. Most spell targeting just makes someone a victim. With fireball you have to send the bead to them. You can even make attack rolls if shooting it through a small space.

Grand Lodge

Tiny Coffee Golem wrote:
James Risner wrote:
So if I cast invisibility on your sword in a scabbard does just the sword go invisible or do you too?

Cast on attended object. It would only turn the sword invisible assuming the the swords attender (the one wearing it) failed the save.

James Risner wrote:
If I cast invisibility on myself, does my gear become invisible?

Cast on creature. Yes. Per the spell.

Edit: I legitimately and non-sarcastically don't understand why this is a question.

just to add my 5 cents:

Gear of invisible person becomes invisible, BUT :
* dropped item becomes visible
* items picked up disappear if tucked into the clothing or pouches worn by the creature

so :
* your own sword is invisible
* if you're disarmed, the sword becomes visible
* picking it back up does not make it invisible


Cuuniyevo wrote:


Under what circumstances would you want to toss your gem into a group of enemies though?

You can't target specific enemies with magic jar


CWheezy wrote:
Cuuniyevo wrote:


Under what circumstances would you want to toss your gem into a group of enemies though?

You can't target specific enemies with magic jar

Understood, but normally, you'd keep your gem off to the side, out of harm's way. Whether you're 15ft away or 150ft away doesn't change the effectiveness of the spell, just the odds of losing/damaging your gem.

Ganryu's example of tossing the gem over a wall is an interesting one. Not really useful underground, but a legitimate tactic in some locations.

RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

1 person marked this as a favorite.

One of my favorite ideas for a trap is a long, sloping hallway that has an invisible wall with spears (also invisible) sticking out of it. When the PCs enter the hall, a portcullis slams shut, and the rear wall, on rollers and with illusions over 'slots' for the spears to go into, starts rumbling after them. Mind, there are gaps in the wall of spears for someone to get through...but it's a nasty surprise. Plus, the spears aren't making attack rolls on people who run into them, so they shouldn't lose their invisibility (though blood drying on them might).

Edit: Illusions over slots, not invisible.


Very Grimtooth, that trap.


Cool ideas! I'd say yes, you can.

Liberty's Edge

Purple Dragon Knight wrote:
Zelda Marie Lupescu wrote:
wraithstrike wrote:
If the bead hits an object it explodes.
Right, I know that but if an invisible door still blocks line of effect, can you still target past the door, not realizing that the door is going to prematurely detonate the Fireball, or do you have to tell the player You cannot target that orc, but I cannot say why. You just can't. is what I am asking
No!! you let him target that orc! that's what illusion spells are for! for foooooolin' fools!

I am soooooo going to troll my players with this.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

You can't target a creature with fireball. It is an area of effect. ;)

You can choose a specific target with magic jar, and that specific target is "one creature," per the spell (the fact that you might not be able to tell who is who is besides the point). :P

Liberty's Edge

I cast fireball at the space directly behind the guy I actually want to target. The fact that the bead hits my intended target and then explodes is heretofore irrelevant.

Sovereign Court

1 person marked this as a favorite.
HangarFlying wrote:
Purple Dragon Knight wrote:
Zelda Marie Lupescu wrote:
wraithstrike wrote:
If the bead hits an object it explodes.
Right, I know that but if an invisible door still blocks line of effect, can you still target past the door, not realizing that the door is going to prematurely detonate the Fireball, or do you have to tell the player You cannot target that orc, but I cannot say why. You just can't. is what I am asking
No!! you let him target that orc! that's what illusion spells are for! for foooooolin' fools!
I am soooooo going to troll my players with this.

Then, after they fall for that trap, have all the other hallways in the rest of the dungeon show the same enemy party but via silent image. They'll be like "we know there's a door there" whereas in fact, there's an actual enemy party or monster right behind the silent image... when they detect magic they'll even see the illusion school, for further foolin'...


Ganryu wrote:
The invisibility will be obvious for anyone on the other side, but that is beside the point. This is not about stealth.

Depends entirely on the kind of door, though experience tells me you're going to have a bit of a difficult time finding a working 'door' that isn't connected to the greater whole of the building somehow. If this is a sheet or curtain draped over an entrance and is only fastened at a few points on top, that seems like it would work. For just about any other scenario, though, hinges and whatnot would really make the door a feature of the building to which it's attached.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

The real question is, can you defeat obscuring mist or fog cloud by making it invisible?

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Quote:
Can I cast invisibility on a door to see through it?

I dunno, can you cast invisibility on your fighter to see through him?


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Merm7th wrote:
The real question is, can you defeat obscuring mist or fog cloud by making it invisible?

Can I cast invisibility on an illusionary door?

Sovereign Court

a spell is not an object

mist is not an object

fog is not an object

gases are not objects... liquids are not objects... objects must be in solid form to be objects

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Can I cast invisibility on your objection?

Sovereign Court RPG Superstar 2011 Top 32

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Purple Dragon Knight wrote:

a spell is not an object

mist is not an object

fog is not an object

gases are not objects... liquids are not objects... objects must be in solid form to be objects

Not quite sure I agree...a puddle of water should be an object IMO.

I would say that an object must be contiguous so something as ephemeral as fog would be a no-go.

I mean, if you have an invisible ice cube and it melts I would think the resulting water would still be invisible.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Merm7th wrote:
The real question is, can you defeat obscuring mist or fog cloud by making it invisible?

I sincerely hope this is an attempt at humor.

Sovereign Court

liquids being objects - I'd say no

although one could hide his elixirs with it and pretend to carry empty bottles... (Al Capone would have loved this during prohibition! LOL)

Lantern Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Purple Dragon Knight wrote:

a spell is not an object

mist is not an object

fog is not an object

gases are not objects... liquids are not objects... objects must be in solid form to be objects

So Obscuring Mist is a no-go, but Solid Fog is kosher. Gotcha.

Sovereign Court

I don't think solid fog is a solid. But that would make for an interesting flytrap :)

It's a spell though and nothing in the wording of invis says you can target spells


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Is fire an object? 'Cause you can shrink it with the shrink item spell. Could you target gases/air with the spell for similar reason?

1 to 50 of 63 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Rules Questions / Can I cast invisibility on a door to see through it? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.