
Rhedyn |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Rhedyn wrote:Quick! Everybody make fun of the guy that doesn't get it!I allow Ultimate Psionics, some of my homebrew, and the PRD in my games. Everything else has to be ran by me.
I am very close to out-right banning the Summoner and the rogue.
I banned getting it a long time ago.
Now to read over all this meaningful discussion!

![]() |
4 people marked this as a favorite. |

I banned the following feats:
Sunder Underpants
Improved Sunder Underpants
Flower Attack
Combat Malpractice
Extra Character
Hamatulu on Strike
Dudley Aim
Sh!# on the Run
Improved Complaining
Greater Complaining
Combat Gardening
Razor Sharp Turkey Leg
Furry-ous Focus
Weapon Misplacement
Will post more when I find my list...

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

I personally ban Rogue and Monk. They're so OP that no-one at my group can even bring themselves to play them; it just wouldn't be fair to the rest of the table. I've considered banning Fighter, but people have been good about only using it with archetypes that appropriately reduce its power.
I also ban Banners, which leaves the Cavalier without its most powerful ability, but that's fine.
Oh, and I ban any character not based on anime. If you can't point to an anime character that's similar to your character, you're not allowed to play. And smart-asses that point out that anime covers all genres and periods get stabbed. To doom.

Rhedyn |

Oh, and I ban any character not based on anime. If you can't point to an anime character that's similar to your character, you're not allowed to play. And smart-asses that point out that anime covers all genres and periods get stabbed. To doom.
Name one D&D character concept that is not represented by DBZ's Mr. Satan.

![]() |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

StabbittyDoom wrote:Oh, and I ban any character not based on anime. If you can't point to an anime character that's similar to your character, you're not allowed to play. And smart-asses that point out that anime covers all genres and periods get stabbed. To doom.Name one D&D character concept that is not represented by DBZ's Mr. Satan.
Commoner. Nothing about Mr. Satan is common.

Rhedyn |

Rhedyn wrote:Commoner. Nothing about Mr. Satan is common.StabbittyDoom wrote:Oh, and I ban any character not based on anime. If you can't point to an anime character that's similar to your character, you're not allowed to play. And smart-asses that point out that anime covers all genres and periods get stabbed. To doom.Name one D&D character concept that is not represented by DBZ's Mr. Satan.
Or maybe the commoners we run across in D&D are secretly the strongest fighter's in the WORLD.
They just pretend to need our help so we can feel special. Meanwhile they are off befriending the primordial evils of the world.

Broadhand |

I typically ban the "Dodge Ground" feat.
Even though, RAW, it was designed for characters to be able to roll an Acrobatics check to avoid hitting the ground from a fall of any height, I know some @$$hole is going to try to use it to automatically dodge any attacks from Earth-based creatures (elementals, golems, etc.).

The Alkenstarian |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

I ban players who do not try to bribe me, as their almighty, all-knowing and generally benevolent GM (although benevolence is optional, pending suitable bribes)
I also ban bribes, because obviously, bribes are bad and make it look as if I'm not impartial. Instead, I accept graciously offered gifts, given without expectations of recompense.
I occasionally ban myself, if I'm feeling pony and not able to give my players a 100% effort. This ban is not permanent and usually only lasts the exact duration of 1 GS (Game Session ... the standard unit of time-keeping in my world)
Sometimes, I ban the whole world. On general principle. Unless bribes.
Mmmh ... bribes ... erh, I mean gifts.

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

My friend Rez is banned from playing wizards. I'm not altogether fond of the wizard class in general (I'd much prefer someone play an Arcanist instead), but Rez is just not allowed to play wizards.
He can't be given that much power. It would destroy us all.
Destroy us all! Destroy us all! Destroy us all! Destroy us all!
On an entirely unrelated note: I ban saying the same thing more than 7 times in a row. Or more than 10 times out of any sequence of 15 phrases. Punishment is character death via a nuke that gets a 100x "I don't understand how nukes work and they scare me" damage multiplier.
Unfortunately that nuke will, in fact, Destroy us all! Destroy us all! Destroy us all! Destroy us all!

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Smartphones at the table. Have seven damn minutes of patience when it isn't your frickin' turn so I don't have to explain, yet again, what happened while you were checking your Facebook!
Hey, no srs bans!
I actually use my smartphone to look up spells and such when it's not my turn.
I ban DM explanations to catch people up when they weren't paying attention. Not paying attention? I guess this session is now in media res for you.

PathlessBeth |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
LazarX wrote:I don't believe in ban lists.
It's more of a matter of what I generally ALLOW for my campaigns, and for all of them, that list is custom and unique to each one.
Oh Lazar, skipping over the OP and missing the point since 2008.
The funnies part is that my second footnote in the OP (**) was added because while writing the OP, I remembered LazarX, specifically, arguing over the semantics of calling something a ban vs "not allowing". He actually got a shout-out (though not by name) in the OP that he didn't read:P
I ban mysel
Good thing you didn't ban yourself!
- Deranged maniacs*
Fine then, I'll just ban Guardian Presses!
* except ones named "Ben"
Oh, uh, except for Forest Guardian Presses
I do a lot of Cali bans. (<--Tempest reference.)
Hold on there, you do....you sexually exploit half-devil slaves? You MONSTER! That's it, I'm banning Staves! Now you lost your control over Cali bans!
Oh, that reminds me of something else I ban:
Anyone who intentionally misinterprets words as sexual jokes.

Ivan Rûski |
5 people marked this as a favorite. |

Purple Dragon Knight wrote:What is, "herolabs" ?PDK's ban list:
- create pit spells
- anything more advanced than emerging guns
- herolabs
- actions that take more than 20 seconds to decide when it's your turn
Herolabs™ Adventurer Cloning Facilities. Bringing you Drizzt clones since 1988.

Ivan Rûski |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

BigDTBone wrote:A character creation program.Purple Dragon Knight wrote:What is, "herolabs" ?PDK's ban list:
- create pit spells
- anything more advanced than emerging guns
- herolabs
- actions that take more than 20 seconds to decide when it's your turn
I believe BigDTBone was making fun of the fact that the program is "Hero Lab" not "herolabs".

BigDTBone |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

BigDTBone wrote:A character creation program.Purple Dragon Knight wrote:What is, "herolabs" ?PDK's ban list:
- create pit spells
- anything more advanced than emerging guns
- herolabs
- actions that take more than 20 seconds to decide when it's your turn
Oh! Hero Lab! Ok!
I have found a strong positive correlation between people who don't like hero lab and people who call it "herolabs."

bookrat |

No Ninjas or Samurai, as there is no "Oriental" setting in my homebrew and no Gunslingers.
I ban people who ban ninja, samurai, and gunslinger classes (ok, so just the mechanics, but still).