
markofbane |

Dumah could take it for now, but I'm not sure how likely he is to use it either. We also have the mace we need to re-allocate. If we came to an opponent that could only be hurt by magical weapons, I think it would make sense to have our best melee combatants armed with these items. If we found superior weapons for them later, then we could pass the dagger to Dumah. But with five first level spells and 7 uses of force missiles a day, I'm hoping to not have to resort to melee very much....

Sniggevert |

Quzman could use one or the other for now, and can pass them on as needed/wanted later. I can't remember if it was a light mace or regular mace right now, but he could use a light weapon in the off hand to maybe have a chance to be more effective in combat at the moment. However, if others would like them, that is fine too.

MythrilDragon RPG Superstar 2008 Top 16 |

I like Garavels idea of giving the party a "name" and I think it needs to come out of the role play. If Garavel starts calling us the Scarlet Brigade then thats what we will end up being called. If we want to pick something else we should suggest it here and then maybe our DM will work it in or we can work it into to the role play ourselves. I think it would be neat if we all agreed on something the represents the party well. What suggestions do you all have, maybe something involving Kyra's name.

Cyruss |

I have read your PbP from page 1 and want to say that it is one awesome read. If it is improper for me to jump in here and post I apologize but I wanted to voice my pleasure in this read. Furthermore, is there a thread where I can brush up on the rules? I was interesting in playing one of these Play by Posts. I have the general gist down from watching and reading your adventure. Id like to say that your styles mesh very well, and Lucendar is a great DM.. Again, keep up the great stuff.

Lucendar |

I like Garavels idea of giving the party a "name" and I think it needs to come out of the role play. If Garavel starts calling us the Scarlet Brigade then thats what we will end up being called.
I know it's hard to convey emotion in words, but I hope you understood he was being silly and sarcastic with the name of "Scarlet Brigade", as he was drunk. It was the first thing I thought of, hope that came across on the post. But if you guys want a real group name, cool, go for it.

Lucendar |

I have read your PbP from page 1 and want to say that it is one awesome read. If it is improper for me to jump in here and post I apologize but I wanted to voice my pleasure in this read. Furthermore, is there a thread where I can brush up on the rules? I was interesting in playing one of these Play by Posts. I have the general gist down from watching and reading your adventure. Id like to say that your styles mesh very well, and Lucendar is a great DM.. Again, keep up the great stuff.
Hey Cyruss, thanks for the post and the compliment. Glad you are enjoying it as much as I am. Brush up on the rules? If you are referring to making a character, combat, etc., then I suggest PRD Link. Enjoy!

markofbane |

I have read your PbP from page 1 and want to say that it is one awesome read. If it is improper for me to jump in here and post I apologize but I wanted to voice my pleasure in this read. Furthermore, is there a thread where I can brush up on the rules? I was interesting in playing one of these Play by Posts. I have the general gist down from watching and reading your adventure. Id like to say that your styles mesh very well, and Lucendar is a great DM.. Again, keep up the great stuff.
Cyruss, also look for a post in the Gamer Connection by JZ. He always has games he runs specifically for players new to PbP. He is a good DM and very patient. I'm not sure how long his waiting list is, but I'm finishing up Carrion Hill with him now and have really enjoyed it!

MythrilDragon RPG Superstar 2008 Top 16 |

I thought I was going to see some bardic action, but no go. I think the inspire courage will help offset the -1 to damage you have when you use it.
I thought about it but it can only be used for 7 rounds each day and I didn't want to waste them on lone bird which I figured we would be able to take out fairly easily. If things had not gone that way I would have kicked it in. I am hoping that I will always be able to flank so that I get that extra die of damage to offset my weak strength. I am also thinking about working towards the duelist prestige class to be a little more effective in combat.

Lucendar |

How about this: switch out deceitful (really, how often do you think you will use disguise?), take combat expertise. 3rd level, go rogue and take skill focus: bluff and then use your 2nd level rogue talent to take a combat feat (improved bluff). Then as a move action you can feint and deal +1d6 sneak attack damage with your standard action without needing to depend on anyone for the flank. Or you can spend them on requisites for duelist, like dodge and mobility?

MythrilDragon RPG Superstar 2008 Top 16 |

How about this: switch out deceitful (really, how often do you think you will use disguise?), take combat expertise. 3rd level, go rogue and take skill focus: bluff and then use your 2nd level rogue talent to take a combat feat (improved bluff). Then as a move action you can feint and deal +1d6 sneak attack damage with your standard action without needing to depend on anyone for the flank. Or you can spend them on requisites for duelist, like dodge and mobility?
Thanks for the idea, I just read the bluff skill and I had forgotten I could use the feint trick. I only took deceitful to get the +2 to bluff for the gambling aspect and figured it might be nice to have the disguise bonus as well. Based on the campaign so far skill focus should have been the way to go. If you don't care I will change it.

MythrilDragon RPG Superstar 2008 Top 16 |

MythrilDragon wrote:If you don't care I will change it.You have not used the disguise skill in game and skill focus:bluff seems to make more sense with your character, so I have no problem with it.
Okay I made the change. Thanks for letting me do it. What feat were you suggesting Improved Bluff?

Lucendar |

Okay I made the change. Thanks for letting me do it. What feat were you suggesting Improved Bluff?
You need combat expertise first, but you get a feat at 3rd level. If you go rogue at 3rd, you can take a combat talent to get improved bluff. Or you can wait to get it at 5th, if you go bard.

MythrilDragon RPG Superstar 2008 Top 16 |

MythrilDragon wrote:Okay I made the change. Thanks for letting me do it. What feat were you suggesting Improved Bluff?You need combat expertise first, but you get a feat at 3rd level. If you go rogue at 3rd, you can take a combat talent to get improved bluff. Or you can wait to get it at 5th, if you go bard.
OH, Improved Feint. Yeah that looks good. I might do that.

MythrilDragon RPG Superstar 2008 Top 16 |

Yeah, I think I am going to go that route and take Rouge at my next level and use the rouge talent to take a combat feat. With my 3rd level feat and that I can take both combat expertise and improved feint so I will be able to use the ability right away to my advantage. If I keep the idea of the Duelist I can take dodge and mobility at 5th and 7th levels, alternating bard and rogue until I meet all the pre recs for the prestige class. I will just have to see how the role play goes, I am a big fan of letting the story dictate how I advance my character.