|
3 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Paizo. I love you. But what are you doing? No Skald in a book literally called Battlecry!? Maybe a Skald would break some design rules that you have internally for P2, but I had to break the rules of punctuation to even write that last sentence! No Skald in Battlecry! is like making a book called Arcane Spellcaster and not including anything for the Wizard! Ok, this post is a little tongue in cheek. But where is our Skald?
I don't know what a Skald achetype would do, honestly. Maybe you could try to give Bard the Battle Harbinger treatment and make it a wave casting class archetype, but Battle Harbinger is rather controversial, so I could understand Paizo being reluctant to try again so soon. It probably wouldn't be called Skald either unless it was purely about Scandinavian Poetry traditons.
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Honestly, bard with the commander archetype or vice versa might scratch your itch.
|
7 people marked this as a favorite.
|
I always thought that the Warrior muse for the bard was supposed to be the skald replacement.
|
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Squark wrote: I don't know what a Skald achetype would do, honestly. Maybe you could try to give Bard the Battle Harbinger treatment, but Battle Harbinger has not been well received by and large, so I can understand their reluctance to try again. It probably wouldn't be called Skald either unless it was purely about Scandinavian Poetry traditons. Bounded caster chassis bard. The battle harbinger was recieved poorly because didnt follow a number of design precedents set by martials and the magus, turned nearly every expected feature into a must take feat tax, and built a whole identity around a non scaling L1 spell that is easy to replicate in the system with other means (often with less actions and or no resources).
Whoever keeps making the balancing passes on these class archetypes (especially the harbinger) is way too conservative and is completely out of alignment with the user base expectations and fundemental game design.
People love the cleric+ bounded caster chassis design and consider it balanced (and it came out like 1-2 years before the harbinger). So its not like its impossible to execute the request for a bounded caster chassis bard class archetype.
IMO your more likely to get a satisfactory design out of team+ when they do bard+. Unfortunetly the next releases are set by community voting. So if you want that bard+ you have to vote it to the top. I suggest joining there discord.
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
What kind of skald is the game missing?
Thematically one can build a skald by flavoring Composition spells as a militant fervor in one's blood/songs/magic (and perhaps MCD Bard if wanting to balance more toward melee). So is there a specific mechanic you long for? If it's sharing Rage, that's high-level Barbarian territory that would be difficult to mirror in a low-level caster (unless as flavor as noted). Or is empowering weapons? What skaldy bits do you yearn for?
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Castilliano wrote: What kind of skald is the game missing?
Thematically one can build a skald by flavoring Composition spells as a militant fervor in one's blood/songs/magic (and perhaps MCD Bard if wanting to balance more toward melee). So is there a specific mechanic you long for? If it's sharing Rage, that's high-level Barbarian territory that would be difficult to mirror in a low-level caster (unless as flavor as noted). Or is empowering weapons? What skaldy bits do you yearn for?
Just go to the 1e skald archetypes and start importing ideas.
This is an off the top of the head list of what I want:
* Martial Weapon Progression
* Martial Weapon Specialization
* Martial Armour Progression
* Martial Armour Specialization
* Martial Save/Perception Progression
* Unique composition cantrips (e.g., giving out a rage like effect, weapon rune effect, providing a teamwork feat to multiple people, or a variety of design space not explored).
* Debuff compositions (e.g., the mesmerist in 1e was able to basically make themselves invisible from 1 person).
* Attack Compositions (it isn't just skald its all the martial focused 1e bard archetypes like thundercaller or sound striker that had fun compositions to do sonic/lightning damage).
Honestly a lot of the bard chassis/feats lead to really interesting options with strike + composition + move. Like house of the imaginary walls is so cool, but really a lost opportunity if you aren't in melee.
The problem with claims that a caster holding a weapon is basically equivalent to a bounded caster gish is that if you want to actually be good at swinging the weapon and part time on casting then they just don't scratch the itch or interface well with other martial archetypes. As well, you can't really achieve the same using bard as an archetype either because the cool feats people might want are so delayed (e.g., L12 for archetype for dirge of doom, L16 for something like songbird's call, L20 for house of the imaginary wall, or never for a L10+ feat).
Barbarian with bard dedication (either through FA or the hard way) kind of does that.
Just take spells without concentration, anthemic performance, and you're good.
Well, apart from the fact that you won't give your friend rage powers (but there aren't any rage powers anymore, so...).
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Jason Bulmahn wrote a conversion document regarding what a 1e character would be when converted to 2e. Link Here
Barbarian with Bard dedication is indeed what a skald is, Just as Bloodrager is a Barbarian with Sorcerer Dedication or Sorcerer with Barbarian Dedication. It's an old document so some classes within has been released as actual classes or class archetypes.... investigator and kineticist
moosher12 wrote: I always thought that the Warrior muse for the bard was supposed to be the skald replacement. I mean, so was warpriest cleric for, well, the warpriest, yet we still got battle harbinger.
Yeah as NorrKnekten noted, we've had replacements for replacements by now. Arcanist is now arguably a flexible casting wizard, shaman is part of animist's schtick, spirtualist got rolled into summoner.
So I don't think a "skald" is forever out the question, it might just not look like or called a skald anymore. An occult wave caster (I.e Magus meets bard) could be really fun!
|
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
moosher12 wrote: I always thought that the Warrior muse for the bard was supposed to be the skald replacement. This is what I thought too.
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Deriven Firelion wrote: moosher12 wrote: I always thought that the Warrior muse for the bard was supposed to be the skald replacement. This is what I thought too. There are two camps. People that like a caster chassis subclass and people that like a bounded caster chassis. Generally, said camps dont enjoy playing the gish version of the other camp.
I think there have been enough repeated vocal requests (clearly I am one said proponent) for this across the many years of pathfinder 2e that we can stop being "surprised" that people want this. This should be even less "surprising" for 3/4 BAB, 1/2 caster classes from PF1e like the bard, skald, mesmerist, etc.
You dont have to be in the bounded caster "camp" to understand or appreciate that clearly others find value in it and can accurately self identify that they would enjoy it more than the current available options.
So lets stop glossing over the community/customer demand. You can enjoy your warpriest and I can enjoy my Cleric+ armorclad doctrine and we can all exist together and not yuck each others yums.
I am more surprised they didnt just publish a generico caster class archetype that can convert any caster into a bounded caster version with some generic gishy feats. It wouldnt be as satisfying as class specific class archetypes, but it would be future proofed from the masses asking for a class by class bounded caster version. Then we could have a skald, shifter,warpriest, etc. With whatever caster feat list you like most.
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Given the strength of composition cantrips on their own, I imagine a wave casting martial bard would be pretty potent. Would be cool to see
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Red Griffyn wrote: Deriven Firelion wrote: moosher12 wrote: I always thought that the Warrior muse for the bard was supposed to be the skald replacement. This is what I thought too. There are two camps. People that like a caster chassis subclass and people that like a bounded caster chassis. Generally, said camps dont enjoy playing the gish version of the other camp. While I can agree with that, from what I have experienced playing Skald in 1e it fell definitely into the camp of caster chassis. There are, from what I know, two Barbarian hybrid classes in 1e: Skald and Bloodrager. Bloodrager is about 75% Barbarian and 25% Sorcerer. Skald is about 85% Bard and 15% Barbarian.
Comparing Bard to Skald, Skald gains martial weapon proficiencies and reflavors its party buffs that the Bard gives out.
Bard with martial weapon proficiencies already exists in 2e: the Warrior Muse mentioned previously.
What the people in this thread are asking for is a new class or class archetype that is more martial than caster, and has a Bard flavor. While that is fine to ask for, that's not a 1e Skald.
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Red Griffyn wrote: Deriven Firelion wrote: moosher12 wrote: I always thought that the Warrior muse for the bard was supposed to be the skald replacement. This is what I thought too. There are two camps. People that like a caster chassis subclass and people that like a bounded caster chassis. Generally, said camps dont enjoy playing the gish version of the other camp.
I think there have been enough repeated vocal requests (clearly I am one said proponent) for this across the many years of pathfinder 2e that we can stop being "surprised" that people want this. This should be even less "surprising" for 3/4 BAB, 1/2 caster classes from PF1e like the bard, skald, mesmerist, etc.
You dont have to be in the bounded caster "camp" to understand or appreciate that clearly others find value in it and can accurately self identify that they would enjoy it more than the current available options.
So lets stop glossing over the community/customer demand. You can enjoy your warpriest and I can enjoy my Cleric+ armorclad doctrine and we can all exist together and not yuck each others yums.
I am more surprised they didnt just publish a generico caster class archetype that can convert any caster into a bounded caster version with some generic gishy feats. It wouldnt be as satisfying as class specific class archetypes, but it would be future proofed from the masses asking for a class by class bounded caster version. Then we could have a skald, shifter,warpriest, etc. With whatever caster feat list you like most.
I certainly won't mind the option. You've probably seen me fighting for us getting a ninja, so I can understand the want. And a more martial version of a bard with a diminished spell list seems appreciable, especially one that can cast spells while raging, so I do hope Paizo considers. It's not a camp I've got a personal stake in, but I can understand the appeal. I was just pointing out that I thought that that was the original intention of the Warrior muse. Cleric gave us both Warpriest Cleric and Battleharbinger Cleric, so there is precedent for a Warrior Bard and a... Not sure what a more agnostic term for skald would be, Warchanter Bard? Either way, there is probably room for both.
Yeah, I feel like we say skald but we mean martial forward bard/skald/mesmerist/spirtualist. There are a lot of 'manifestations' with unique/untrodden design space in PF2e still. Quick glance at AON 1e shows archetypes like the ones below (some are more replicatable than others but many aren't really feasible if we're talking about martial forward gishes):
Skald
* Belkzen War Drummer (turns massive clubs/drums sonic siege weapons)
* Fated Champion (divination future seer/seeing warrior)
* Herald of the Horn (Commander style strategist using a war horn)
* Hunt Caller (raging song imbues animal senses/traits and ultimately wildshapes to people)
* Spell Warrior (singing runes onto weapons and counter-spelling/dispelling magic)
* Urban Skald (and alternative raging song that doesn't impact concentration/magic/mental skills but empowers them)
* Wyrmsinger (Song grants dragon like abilities and powers)
* Warpainter (Shifting Body Paints that empower spells/songs)
Martial Forward Bard
* Arcane Duelist (literally sings a versatile list of runes onto weapons like keen, elemental runes, speed, etc. and gains an arcane bond).
* Arrowsong Minstrel (basically a cooler starlight span/eldritch archer with the bard spell list or in this case occult list/bard feats).
* Dawnflower Dervish (enters a fluid trance dance state to fight)
* Flamesinger (singing flaming weapon runes onto everyone's weapon)
* Sound Striker (Literally turning words into projectile weapons)
* Thunder Caller (Calling down thunder, lightning, and raging)
Mesmerist
* Enigma (uses their hypnotic stare to become invisible to its target)
* Vexing Daredevil (psychic powers + martial mix fighting style)
* Vox (Uses their voice to empower their weapons or debuff enemies)
Spirtualist
* Phantom Blade (psychic black blade sentient weapon that grows with you)
* Ectoplasmatist (uses ectoplasm whip tendrils to attack
* Exciter (merges with a phantom to empower their martial abilities)
IS there any new Archetypes in Battlecry! ?
There has been a lot of talk about how to make a Skald that involve the Bard (warrior muse Bard, Bard dedication, etc.), but I feel that this misses the fantasy of wanting to play a Skald. It is not about being a spellcaster. It is about wanting to play a Barbarian who has support effects rather than being pure Hulk Smash. I actually wouldn't care if they dropped the spellcasting component completely. Take a Barbarian and give them altered composition style cantrips and I would be good. They could even find some way to tie in the Charisma more heavily into the class. Of course, you would have to take something away from the Barbarian. But you might even be able to make this work as a Barbarian Instinct.
I do think there is room for a Skald class archetype, though I question how rage-y they can be made to be in 2e: if you want a class archetype that doesn't use spells at all except for compositions, that would probably be more of a Barbarian class archetype, but if the intent is to have a Bard that sends allies into a battle frenzy, except they're still allowed to concentrate actions... well, that's basically courageous anthem. This probably means there may even be room for two class archetypes here, not just one.
Recent threads in General Discussion
|
