Ruggs |
Just wool-gathering at this point. What do you consider some of PF's "Popcorn Topics" to be? Some I can think off off-hand are:
- Wizard versus fighter
- Alignment
- Dang-fartin'* DMs|Players|etc.
- Caster versus noncaster (slightly separate from wizard v fighter)
- The fighter is boring
- The rogue is AUUUUUUGGH!
- The monk is AUUUUUGGHHH!
- Rollplayer versus roleplayer
- RAW versus RAI
- ______ is broken
- Kobold tail feats
- It isn't realistic/well it's a fantasy game
- High-level play versus mid and low
* This is my word. It is a very precious word. You cannot steals it.
But have I left any out?
Popcorn topics are sort of cyclic topics. Topics that come up from time to time and repeat, repeat, repeat...because they've effectively become part of the culture. It's akin to asking, "What is art?" in Design 101. Everyone does, and they can't stop talking about it, all the way through 401. Or, you know, they're the gamer equivalent of that chat by the watercooler. You know the type. It starts with: "Hey...so. How are the Wildcats this season, Bob?"
Lincoln Hills |
I don't mind seeing any of these topics come up - I just regret the fact that sooner or later a few of the contributors lose interest in the actual topic and concentrate on chewing holes in each other. And the rest of us have to slide through screens of hatescreech* just to try to follow the actual topic... We need a Dueling Arena forum for these people. First guy to lose six points (in the eyes of the judges) loses forum access for a month. ;)
*That is my word. But you can steal it if you want.
Ruggs |
I don't mind seeing any of these topics come up - I just regret the fact that sooner or later a few of the contributors lose interest in the actual topic and concentrate on chewing holes in each other. And the rest of us have to slide through screens of hatescreech* just to try to follow the actual topic... We need a Dueling Arena forum for these people. First guy to lose six points (in the eyes of the judges) loses forum access for a month. ;)
*That is my word. But you can steal it if you want.
Ha ha. May not be a bad idea, there.
I definitely have to give points to 'hatescreech.' That is an awesome word and it is descriptive sometimes.
James F.D. Graham RPG Superstar 2009 Top 8 |
I don't mind seeing any of these topics come up - I just regret the fact that sooner or later a few of the contributors lose interest in the actual topic and concentrate on chewing holes in each other. And the rest of us have to slide through screens of hatescreech* just to try to follow the actual topic... We need a Dueling Arena forum for these people. First guy to lose six points (in the eyes of the judges) loses forum access for a month. ;)
*That is my word. But you can steal it if you want.
Tell me about it.
For me, there is also the fact that these thread topics come up so often that they have accumulated a lot of jargon - which I am not really familiar with at all..
Makes a good discussion difficult.
EDIT: But to answer your question, there are usually large post counts under the threads asking for/claiming to have the secret recipe for ranged flanking.
Silent Saturn |
Fighters, monks, rogues, and paladins all draw crowds at their mere mention. I feel like next time I want a thread to get 10,000 hits I need to find a way to mention one of them.
Also, re-creating pop culture characters as Pathfinder PC's.
Also, I wouldn't count Kobold Tail feats. I can't remember the last time I saw a thread about them.
Charlie Bell RPG Superstar 2013 Top 16 |
Corvino |
TarkXT wrote:I've managed to channel the power of a rogue thread into actual constructive optimization.How much you want for that man?
It can be found here. It is indeed a useful thread, and has made me rethink aspects of the rogue class and how to play one. It specifically limits its scope to within the current rules though, so doesn't address wider mechanical problems.
TarkXT |
BabaJiBlackMagicLoveSpecialist wrote:It can be found here. It is indeed a useful thread, and has made me rethink aspects of the rogue class and how to play one. It specifically limits its scope to within the current rules though, so doesn't address wider mechanical problems.TarkXT wrote:I've managed to channel the power of a rogue thread into actual constructive optimization.How much you want for that man?
I'd be almost tempted to do the same with fighters and monks.
But, frankly, they're problems lie outside the scope of optimization.
Sindalla |
Here is one of my favorite popcorn threads
What....happened??? That's not a popcorn thread, that was an atomic bomb gone wrong.
Brandon Hodge Contributor |
Charlie Bell RPG Superstar 2013 Top 16 |
Kydeem de'Morcaine |
Tin Foil Yamakah wrote:Here is one of my favorite popcorn threadsWhat....happened??? That's not a popcorn thread, that was an atomic bomb gone wrong.
That was just wierd.
blahpers |
Sindalla wrote:That was just wierd.Tin Foil Yamakah wrote:Here is one of my favorite popcorn threadsWhat....happened??? That's not a popcorn thread, that was an atomic bomb gone wrong.
I CAST FIST
Scavion |
Tin Foil Yamakah wrote:Here is one of my favorite popcorn threadsGold, Jerry! Pure comic gold.
I concur, absolutely hilarious.
Lemmy |
Simon Legrande wrote:I concur, absolutely hilarious.Tin Foil Yamakah wrote:Here is one of my favorite popcorn threadsGold, Jerry! Pure comic gold.
I actually LOL'd while reading that thread. Thanks for showing me this thread, guys.
Rynjin |
This one.
*Munches loudly*
Here is one of my favorite popcorn threads
Ow. That was painful.