
Kaf'Eene the Wicked, Demon Lord |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

My frustration with humanity grows...
TL;DR version: Everyone saw the exception in the California lockdown for "outdoor activities", so people are flocking to parks and beaches in greater numbers than ever before, leading to massive overcrowding.
Yeah. "It's a quarantine! I'm supposed to avoid other people! I know, I'll go to the beach with 10,000 other people! It'll be outdoors, so I'm sure it'll be fine."
These people won't learn until the lesson becomes painful and publicly shamed. It's time to start paintball-hunting these people that break self-isolation to gather in public places. My only suggestion would be to use the indelible dye that banks use in those exploding packs that ruins the bank-robbery money. That way they're dyed a permanent red ink along with the paintball welts.

Sharoth |
3 people marked this as a favorite. |

Wow, 3D printed stuff is expensive.
If you think that 3D stuff is expensive, wait until you see just how much 4D stuff costs!

Freehold DM |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

You know what's nice?
Having a contractor who you can trust and who does good work.
Our fireplace guy just gave us a quote for the deck that seemed astronomical, but we asked for FSC certified (theoretically rainforest friendly) ipe, so I went ahead and pulled the trigger and then did some Googling.
Expected price for the ipe: $4-$8 per linear foot. His price: $5.43
Expected price for labor: $25-$45 per square foot. His price: $27.89So, er, I'm paying, exactly what I should. *And* keeping my favorite contractor in business during a quarantine. *And* getting a deck that GothBard won't fall through.
Win-win-win!
(If anyone tries to nail him for violating quarantine, we'll point out that GothBard has already fallen through the deck once, so it's a proven safety hazard, and with the workers outside and us inside, I just don't see a lot of opportunity for cross-exposure...)
EDIT: Yeah, yeah, I know. Even FSC-certified ipe is iffy because you never know whether the certification is real. But I live in frigging Berkeley, and we have a local lumber company (Ashby Lumber and Hardware) that takes such things quite seriously. So I'm going to have some faith in the local people in the supply chain who should be paying attention to such things, just because of the city in which they do business.
OH MY GOD!
Is she alright?

Orthos |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

Yep. Essential. We have 6 rooms sold tonight, with 1 still to arrive (I'm betting he won't). Definitely essential.
Don't get me wrong, I'm glad I'm working. But "essential" may be a bit of a stretch.
Me in a nutshell. Just found out I don't get to quarantine because my company does taxes and is therefore considered essential.
Yaaaaaaay.
I'm grateful for the continuing paycheck, but I'm not sure the increased exposure risk is worth it.
At least I don't have any client interaction as part of my job.

NobodysHome |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

NobodysHome wrote:...If anyone tries to nail him for violating quarantine, we'll point out that GothBard has already fallen through the deck once...OH MY GOD!
Is she alright?
At its highest point the deck is only 3' (1m) off the ground, and this happened months ago, but it was a minor miracle that she didn't break a leg. her right leg went straight through, it went all the way to the ground, and she ended up with a nasty bruise up her entire leg that lasted for weeks. But she was lucky:
- No breaks- No lacerations
Just a big-a$$ painful bruise.

The Vagrant Erudite |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Life in TechLand:
A while ago, I got Amazon's "cheapest" noise-canceling Bluetooth headphones so I could listen to music while working on the house. I think they were all of around $60-$70, and they've worked well... EXCEPT they don't cancel out VOICES, which is rather astonishingly irritating.It's kind of eerie: I can hear the dishwasher, washing machine, and Impus Major going, I turn on the noise cancellation switch, and the dishwasher and washing machine go silent, but I can still hear Impus Major clear as day.
So yeah, I just Googled, "What are the best noise-cancelling headphones for human speech?" and got myself a pair. Going to ask my manager whether I can convince Global Megacorporation to shell out for them, but we'll see whether they're any better.
'Cause Impus Major is a LOUD BOY.
I'm new to fatherhood, but I'm pretty sure the phrase "son, can you keep it down" is relatively affordable.

Limeylongears |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

Wish I could fly you in Cap.
I have a ton of stuff to do around the house, the weather these few days has been amazingly sunny (and cold at the same time). And I know I can leave you alone with stuff.(I love MrT but he can not be left alone with certain tasks)
For some reason, I'm imagining MrT as the Synthesiser Home Improvements Wizard.
He puts on a glittery cape and pointy hat.
He fires up the VCS3.
He plays a couple of arpeggios, then behold!
SHELVES!

NobodysHome |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

NobodysHome wrote:I'm new to fatherhood, but I'm pretty sure the phrase "son, can you keep it down" is relatively affordable.Life in TechLand:
A while ago, I got Amazon's "cheapest" noise-canceling Bluetooth headphones so I could listen to music while working on the house. I think they were all of around $60-$70, and they've worked well... EXCEPT they don't cancel out VOICES, which is rather astonishingly irritating.It's kind of eerie: I can hear the dishwasher, washing machine, and Impus Major going, I turn on the noise cancellation switch, and the dishwasher and washing machine go silent, but I can still hear Impus Major clear as day.
So yeah, I just Googled, "What are the best noise-cancelling headphones for human speech?" and got myself a pair. Going to ask my manager whether I can convince Global Megacorporation to shell out for them, but we'll see whether they're any better.
'Cause Impus Major is a LOUD BOY.
We're back-to-back and he's in class and has to participate, so that isn't an option. I annoy him as well, so it's mutual.

NobodysHome |
7 people marked this as a favorite. |

So, this here's probably political, but what's wrong with
U.S. Payroll in 2018 was $17.5 trillion. So call it $20 trillion in 2020. The Feds work with the states to use unemployment funds and monetary injections to pay the entire U.S. payroll for 60 days. ($3.33 trillion, partially defrayed by unemployment funds.) At the same time, we have a national lockdown for 60 days.
This gives us:
(1) Everyone who was working has guaranteed income for 60 days.
(2) Everyone knows exactly when the lockdown will end.
(3) At the end of it, you will have 350 million stir-crazy Americans rushing out to buy everything in sight, producing a massive economic stimulus that might well drive us out of recession.
And this is apparently cheaper than the $4 trillion number that's getting thrown around right now.
Would it work? If not, why not?

Tacticslion |

You're not paying the bureaucracy “enough” with that figure to account for overhead, loss, mistakes, and general corruption.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? and all that.
(Though maybe it should be “qui pecunias tractat” instead of “custodios”? I’unno.)
To be clear, this isn’t a U.S. issue, it’s a real issue whenever you have people in charge of distributing cash.
Anything else would be rather explicitly political rather than general, but that’s the very short (and incomplete) answer for why that probably wouldn’t function in IRL, even if it’s a fantastic idea and should work exactly like that.
EDIT: note, "it wouldn't" is not the same as, "it couldn't" but I would expect a massive overhaul of political and financial infrastructure - one vastly different than most things people have tried in the past stopThereTL,stopThereTL,stopThereTL - in order to accomplish both in-budget and within sufficient timeframe.

NobodysHome |
3 people marked this as a favorite. |

Long post. Deleted for everyone's sanity.
Aw, that's what spoiler tags are for! I was interested in seeing your take on things.
Because yes, my statement is grossly naive and would require a great deal of actual thought to make it effective.
But watching the current negotiation of, "How many hundreds of billions do we give to grossly-mismanaged companies with no oversight on how they spend it, and what ridiculous unrelated riders can we attach?" makes me think, "There's GOT to be a significantly less convoluted way of doing things, and getting money directly to the consumer seems like the most no-brainer method of all."

Orthos |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

... watching the current negotiation of, "How many hundreds of billions do we give to grossly-mismanaged companies with no oversight on how they spend it, and what ridiculous unrelated riders can we attach?" makes me think, "There's GOT to be a significantly less convoluted way of doing things, and getting money directly to the consumer seems like the most no-brainer method of all."
That would require having some level of trust in the average citizen, and being willing to let them have that money without strings attached and favors owed.
That last part is probably the main sticking point. Too many of the people with the authority to distribute that kind of money are unwilling to do so without some promise of a "return on their investment" of some kind.
Giving it to companies, lobbies, lower governments, etc. can be leaned on later for retributive favors. Giving it straight to individuals, not so much.

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Woran wrote:Wish I could fly you in Cap.
I have a ton of stuff to do around the house, the weather these few days has been amazingly sunny (and cold at the same time). And I know I can leave you alone with stuff.(I love MrT but he can not be left alone with certain tasks)
For some reason, I'm imagining MrT as the Synthesiser Home Improvements Wizard.
He puts on a glittery cape and pointy hat.
He fires up the VCS3.
He plays a couple of arpeggios, then behold!
SHELVES!
Kinda?
But with more act first, think or measure later?
Nylarthotep |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

Nylarthotep wrote:Long post. Deleted for everyone's sanity.Aw, that's what spoiler tags are for! I was interested in seeing your take on things.
Because yes, my statement is grossly naive and would require a great deal of actual thought to make it effective.
But watching the current negotiation of, "How many hundreds of billions do we give to grossly-mismanaged companies with no oversight on how they spend it, and what ridiculous unrelated riders can we attach?" makes me think, "There's GOT to be a significantly less convoluted way of doing things, and getting money directly to the consumer seems like the most no-brainer method of all."
I may revisit if I have time this afternoon. Clients are actually still working, so I am still working some.

Freehold DM |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Freehold DM wrote:NobodysHome wrote:...If anyone tries to nail him for violating quarantine, we'll point out that GothBard has already fallen through the deck once...OH MY GOD!
Is she alright?At its highest point the deck is only 3' (1m) off the ground, and this happened months ago, but it was a minor miracle that she didn't break a leg. her right leg went straight through, it went all the way to the ground, and she ended up with a nasty bruise up her entire leg that lasted for weeks. But she was lucky:
- No breaks
- No lacerationsJust a big-a$$ painful bruise.
thank god shes okay.

Ragadolf |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

Ragadolf wrote:Well I just went and spent a BUNDLE
MEANWHILE,...
I wear two pairs of glasses, both bifocals,
Cant wait to get new (correct) glasses. Its been so long, it will be delightful.
Yep. Last year my optometrist insisted on giving me progressive lenses.
Hate them.
So this year I insisted on getting a "normal" pair, and ordered them in December. Then:
- Frames got backordered. Had to have them re-order them
- Frames came in but lenses had been forgotten. Had to have them re-order them
- Glasses arrived on Thursday, 3 days after the lockdown started. Along with a note from my optometrist that they're closed for the duration.*SIGH*
Ah yes, I have had two pairs of bifocals for 4 years now. I still HATE them, but I have gotten used to them.
THIS time I was talked into a progressive pair for my 'desk' pair of glasses. My mother wears a progressive pair, just one for everything, and she likes it, says its like wearing trifocals without having 3 lines on your lenses. ;P
We'll see how they work out.
Well,.. EVENTUALLY we'll see how it works out. When they FINALLY get here, and I can FINALLY get them. ;P

Freehold DM |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

NobodysHome wrote:Ah yes, I have had two pairs of bifocals for 4 years now.Ragadolf wrote:Well I just went and spent a BUNDLE
MEANWHILE,...
I wear two pairs of glasses, both bifocals,
Cant wait to get new (correct) glasses. Its been so long, it will be delightful.
Yep. Last year my optometrist insisted on giving me progressive lenses.
Hate them.
So this year I insisted on getting a "normal" pair, and ordered them in December. Then:
- Frames got backordered. Had to have them re-order them
- Frames came in but lenses had been forgotten. Had to have them re-order them
- Glasses arrived on Thursday, 3 days after the lockdown started. Along with a note from my optometrist that they're closed for the duration.*SIGH*
HA! You're old!