
Aster Diagef |

Immediate Foresight
You cannot be surprised. Your natural armor class is 3, as you instinctively avoid foreseen blows. Armor and shields don’t aid this AC.
Conversion
You have uncanny dodge as a bonus feat. You have a natural armor bonus of +9. Armor and shields provide no benefit to you.
"You cannot be surprised." is poorly worded when two people have immediate foresight. If you already have uncanny dodge then receive improved uncanny dodge instead.

Nikolaus de'Shade |

Immediate Foresight
You cannot be surprised. Your natural armor class is 3, as you instinctively avoid foreseen blows. Armor and shields don’t aid this AC.Conversion
You have uncanny dodge as a bonus feat. You have a natural armor bonus of +9. Armor and shields provide no benefit to you."You cannot be surprised." is poorly worded when two people have immediate foresight. If you already have uncanny dodge then receive improved uncanny dodge instead.
Thank you. I figured it would be something like that but I wasn't sure.

![]() |

The old THACO of Baldur's Gate games and 2nd edition was confusing at first. Wearing more armor gave you less THACO and playing 3.5 before Baldur's gate, I had thought that running around without armor was the best thing. Though when I became older, I learned that I didn't have to know the system, and just trust that wearing more armor was better than not.
Also, that's a lot of conversioning to do. There's some funky abilities in the Godbound stuff, but when one's a demigod, these things happen I suppose.

Mugmuff Darktalon |

so when do we get to know if our gifts need to be modified to suit pathfinder rules... I put mine in my profile as they exist in the godbound book, but of course, with the expectation that they might be changed... and I might need to either modify them or choose something different... just wondering.

stormcrow27 |

Well that sucks! No two-minute warning?
I still had an unresolved clarification which was holding up my submission.
:_(
I think they're closing recruitment to any new posters, but not existing posters or character submissions that haven't been created yet.
I gather that is the case from the way the last announcement was posted.
Broken Monkeygod |

**IF YOU HAVE POSTED INTEREST, EVEN WITHOUT A CHARACTER, YOU'LL STILL BE CONSIDERED, ONCE WE GET TO THAT**
Pin, what still needs to be answered for your character? Same with you Storm, if there's anything that you are waiting on, please reminds us. There's been a ton of questions, plus other stuff we are handling behind the scenes, so we might have overlooked it, or just forgot to give an answer.

pinvendor |

Are you saying Vanished = Dead for your canon? A couple of my examples are "fate unknown" instead of dead including Amaznen the one who my idea was originally centering around.
Not arguing, just clarifying. And since Nikolaus de'Shade and his collaborator indicated they were planning a concept around deities who were also attempting a return or resurgence...would this stance on dead/vanished/obscure gods also apply to player created or just those specifically mentioned in Paizo sources?
As for dead gods being dead, makes sense to me... though I do share Pin's question on ones presumed missing but not officially dead per the Inner Sea Gods splatbook (ex: they list The Peacock Spirit as being dead, as all who knew his name or the mysteries of his worship died in Earthfall. Lissala, however, they list as forgotten... and, fun note, per the canon of this apocalyptic world you guys have brought to us to play in, at least one person has awoken that remembers her. Between that and her rune magic seeming to work again, I would argue that she may very well be alive and active once more, even if the peacock isn't.)
As a side note, I believe I was mixing up the Peacock Spirit with Lissala if she's the one with the sihedron head.

DM Fnord |
By extension, if gods have been missing, you still can't be them, reincarnated, reborn, or any other method imaginable. The only relation to a god you have is you may or may not have worshiped one, still worship one, might have been killed by one, and you know you were given a second chance at life by one.

stormcrow27 |

**IF YOU HAVE POSTED INTEREST, EVEN WITHOUT A CHARACTER, YOU'LL STILL BE CONSIDERED, ONCE WE GET TO THAT**
Pin, what still needs to be answered for your character? Same with you Storm, if there's anything that you are waiting on, please reminds us. There's been a ton of questions, plus other stuff we are handling behind the scenes, so we might have overlooked it, or just forgot to give an answer.
Mostly if Magdh was still alive. Divine characters, whether inspired by or directly wielding divine magic, are usually my characters of choice. The words and such I'm not as worried about, as I have used a number of different nascent godlings style rules sets in the past (Suzerain, Exalted, Rifts, etc), so I'll shape those to the character.

![]() |

And it comes down to this! One can easily make 5 parties out of all of these characters, easily. So good luck everyone! What a scene though, to realize that no one worships your once worshiped god, because he's dead.
But say we still have that paladin-like motive and wish to convince others to "have faith and stand strong in so-and-so's love!", could we run around and spread word for others to still believe in so-and-so, even though they may be verily dead?

Broken Monkeygod |

I'll confer with the other GMs, but I am inclined to give everybody till either Sun(the 30th) or Mon(the 1st) to post up characters. They do not need to be 100% finished stat wise, but you do need to at least give us some basics. Most importantly, we request a solid background. We'll then choose our starting group.
After we pick the PCs, we'll likely give you several more days to fully finalize your PC, including making sure we have the Words finished.
What I need from all of you is a post saying you're still interested, who your PC is, what AP they died during, and what you're two words will be.
**IF** you're waiting on a Word to be converted, please note that very few of the gifts are being changed, and most of them for the better. Ie, go ahead and pick your words, as chances are pretty high they will either be unaltered or better.
**FINALLY**
If you are waiting on something to be answered, please, ask again. There has been a lot of questions, and lots of stuff going on behind the scenes. It's entirely possible we have an answer for you, but just forgot to post it.

The Emerald Duke |

Still interested:
Playing Sedelion (character page here) who died in a modified version of Way of the Wicked shortly after escaping Branderscar prison. Words would be Journeying and Sword, subset gifts on the page.
Only question at this point is if the modified WoW is acceptable in this timeline... to me it makes sense that the island would have started evil and then descended into further chaos during the Really Awful times, but given it was a custom swap by my former GM I suppose it does need approval by y'all. If not I will have to modify my story a tad, but that could be as simple as saying the WoW folks actually succeeded and Sed was caught up in the aftermath.

Mugmuff Darktalon |

What I need from all of you is a post saying you're still interested, who your PC is, what AP they died during, and what you're two words will be.
I'm still interested (this is JAF0)
PC: Mugmuff Darktalon
Died in: Rise of the Runelords
Words: Alacrity and Sword
Background has been rewritten, it's in the profile.
So looking forward to playing this.. hope I make the cut
Good luck to all!

DM Fnord |
@The Emerald Duke: Way of the Wicked is not a Paizo AP. Nor is it an AP that is included in Ruins of Pathfinder (which is linked in the first post). Probably because we already said no to 3rd party material.
@pinvendor: Without sounding like a broken record. It doesn't matter where the god comes from. You may not be a god reborn, rebirthed, lost and then found, or any other incarnation thereof. Is that clear enough? Player created gods would need to be submitted for approval and inclusion into the existing pantheon.

pinvendor |

Hmm...that answer is surprising since a few of the proposed backstories for some of the applications are for avatars or mortal incarnations of some player-created divine beings, and no cease & desist comments were made.
It's not that you sound like a broken record...it's that it seemed like there was some dividing line that separated acceptable deity incarnations and unacceptable (such as dead), and I was merely attempting to discover its edges.
Since I had not already invested too heavily in the concept—why I have been so patient :) —I doubt this will be problem for me, but some others seem to have already poured quite a bit into just such a background about divine avatars of a banished deity or a resurgence of some godly entity or another.
At least there is no ambiguity from this point forward. Thank you, DM Fnord.

![]() |

Let it be known that my character cannot replace Abadar, and cannot be Abadar, but mourns his death without knowing he's doing so. Lawful good and lawful neutral have different ideals and I'm going for something different in Mandello's design this time around. Instead of pretending to be LG, Mandello will truly be LG. Love, and Peace!
I don't know who pin was referring to, but it could be anyone! It could be...even me! Bum bum bum

The Emerald Duke |

@DM Fnord:
Wow, didn't know it wasn't accepted... no one spoke up about it when I clarified Sed's background all the way back here so I assumed it was kosher.
Hm...
A minor change would have been easy, but this would pretty much require that I rewrite his entire backstory (and somehow have it make sense with how he became the elf he was prior to death).
Think I am going to have to bow out, not sure that I can pull that off and keep true to the character. Good luck all.