|Paizo Pathfinder® Paizo Games|
|About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ|
What I notice about this discussion is that GenCon is expected to solve the problems of institutional racism in isolation of the institutions themselves changing, which strikes me as about as reasonable as not carrying an umbrella because you don't want it to rain. I'm not trying to argue with A.A.George's experience or observation; I, too, think that the numbers of minority service staff as compared to minority attendees are very telling. However, it seems to me that the headline could have easily as read, "This year's GenCon is no more racist than baseline U.S. society, and given the history and stereotypes of the hobby, that's progress!"
Given how many times he said Tor.com, I feel like Correia has issues with that website/publisher, or possibly the author of the article he's responding to. I think the established RPG companies (yes, I mean most of the GenCon exhibitors) are more inclusionary than exclusionary, and beyond that, I don't know what to tell you.
Diff, how different would those be from the quick build entries that are already included with every class? If you follow those, the only choices you're required to make are race and class. As for two levels of "meh," I'm a grognard who thinks Fantasy Viet Nam is a feature not a bug, so "meh" me up! :P
I don't think level should matter, but given that you'll only have six students, I don't see how there could be any level disparity to gradethem on. (Or maybe I've misunderstood the question?)
No one ever went wrong with a vocab quiz, and rules are a perfect opportunity to test reading comprehension, like math word problems, but with a much more engaging subject than two trains heading towards each other from different cities.
Anyhow, this is great news; congratulations! :)
Read 'Heart of Darkness', 'Pride and Prejudice', 'Sense and Sensibility', and have moved on to 'Agnes Grey'. I need to return to 'Moby Dick' and 'Heart of Darkness' though, because I'm finding what I read affects how I write. I'm sure Wayfinder doesn't need the story of a poor but virtuous and spirited half-orc girl's adventures with beaux and balls.
I'd read it; Hell, we may have just welcomed a new cast member to the halls of Manse Dice!
This might be a stupid question as I haven't read through the entire basic guide, but how are NPCs created? Do they obey standard character creation rules?
At this point there's a list of generic NPCs in DM Basic, with a section on customizing them with racial abilities and whatnot. The NPC statblocks don't list class or level, but they all (Mage, Priest or Knight) have a d8 hit die, and the proficiency to hit dice advancement doesn't appear to line up with PC advancement. I assume (well, maybe "really hope" is a better description) from scratch rules will be in the DMG.
James Jacobs wrote:
No insult, but if you had to ballpark it, how many genre-ready homebrew settings would you say you had exactly? :P
I don't disagree with any of that, Jeff, but I don't think emotional conditions like trust and betrayal enter into informed consumer behavior. I mean, you can support whoever you choose, but giving a corporation enough trust that they're even in a position where betrayal is possible is playing with fire, y'know? I'm saying all the reason you might or might not trust a human being aren't how a business functions.
Sort of, Marcus, but "willful evil" also means that, so long as the Paladin doesn't say ". . .And I'm doing that just for the sake of evilness!" then she's probably on pretty safe ground. I'd just roll untrained on Survival as many times as I could before I considered killing and eating a fellow PC.
In a world with intelligent, ambulatory plants like Golarion, I really don't think vegetarianism has anything to with morality; there are probably gnoll tribes that regard vegepygmies as a delicacy because they scream all the more shrilly. :P
What about turpentine, though? All that requires is distillation, so alchemical, sure, but perfectly preindustrial.
Really, I'm agreeing with TheJeff, here; you can reflavor it as whatever you want to, but that's how oil works mechanically in 5E, and the price per flask is listed right there in the equipment chapter. Mind you, I'm fine with DMs tricking out the equipment list if they want to.
So long as the DM doesn't require me to make the saves to avoid the penalties while picking up the caltrops etc, I'm more than willing to spend the time. The oil's consumable, but that's cool, I can't see a problem with adventuring with a backpack full of oil flasks while the wizard spams Fire Bolt. Should be fine.
To hell with it it, I'm just gonna outfit myself with 1 bag of "ball bearings" and 4 bags of caltrops, and rules lawyer whoever's DM-ing that night into double saves for monsters to even approach me!
Edit: Hey, wait, There's AoE rules for that oil that's way to viscous to dry after a minute, too . . . :P
I've heard those calls, but given how few of the playtest feats had prerequisites, I don't think feat tax is really an accurate description. I mean, if the choice you have to make is between a stat increase increase and a feat, rather than between an immediately cool, useful feat and a nigh useless feat that's a prerequisite for something cool two or three feats later on in your level advancement, I don't think that's a feat tax so much as having to decide whether you're happier with +2 Con or War Caster. Of course, I don't know anything about War Caster beyond the name, so it may be a really obvious choice; at this point I'm sticking with, "We'll see."
Edit: ZOMG, back in the playtest ball bearing were 100 to the gp, and I hadn't even noticed the difference! To hell with everything, at my table it's just a reasonably sized sack of marbles, same mechanical effect.
Not to quibble over the Concentration issue, but list of feat names released this week contained one called War Caster. I'm guessing it'll deal with the DC somehow. Well, and few more things, given the super feats we saw in the playtest.
Never mind concentration checks, how about death saves: unmodified DC 10 rolls on a d20 are terrifying!
When I was in college, one of my room-mates filched a can of ether from the science lab. We kept it in the closet all year, where it whispered our names as seductively as that slot machine in the episode of "The Twilight Zone" they made out of that Harlan Ellison story, but we never had the balls to actually sample it.
Yeah, I didn't want to ruin it for you by even mentioning that a spoiler might be required, but at some point you were talking about how it was the it the only Irving movie you liked, maybe because you hadn't see the book, and I was all, "Wow, he's going to be really surprised by how much goes on after Wally gets back."
Don't bogart that ether can, Doodles!
Ooh, ooh, I have a question: is there anyway I can physically reach through the internet and slap people who claim Watchmen was a Frank Miller comic? :P
Not to mention the premature twins. They totally chose that misfortune by feeding the kids with $15 a can formula rather than letting them waste away in the first few weeks.
There's no such thing as trained only skills in 5e, so the binary difference you're talking about is just your ability bonus (any ability check in the game) or your ability bonus plus your proficiency bonus (for ability checks on skills you're proficient in.) That is, in PF Knowledge (Arcana) is a trained only skill and that's that, but in 5e anyone can make an Intelligence (Arcana) check, they just only get to apply their proficiency bonus in addition to their Int modifier if they're proficient in the Arcana skill.
I did mean Heady Topper!
The owner of my local packey (that's what we call the dedicated alcohol stores here in Rhode Island, 'cause they don't sell indecent libations, just, like, packages) gave me a can one time. I think he'd gone up to Vermont and loaded up the way-back of his station wagon or something.
However he came by them, he had enough to spare. I know he did, 'cause he slipped one into my bag and said, "Just drink it from the can, cold but not too cold. There's instructions on the back."
Sez I, "I'm not the sort sort of person who drinks beer from a can; that's plebeian!"
He was all, "Dude, just do it."
So I went home, and drank this purportedly magic beer straight from the can at cellar-if-not-room-temperature and it was the single best beer I've ever tasted in my life. I kept the can to look at while I drink other beers, but they all taste too salty now. Salty from the tears I weep into my mug remembering how good that fricken beer was!
'Cause there's monkeys in India? 'Cause wines with animals on the label outsell wines without animals on the label, and everyone's hoping the same thing will work with beer? 'Cause if you pay your graphic design firm with all the beer they can drink, they always just end up doodling monkeys, regardless of what you requested?
Maybe the question is, "Why aren't there monkeys on more beers?"
Samnell: Dude, you want The Hotel New Hampshire; That's the Irving book (or movie for that matter; it's no wonder Rob Lowe's life was ruined by a sex tape!) you want to read.
Doodles: I just wonder how much ended up on the cutting room floor. If ever there was a book that deserved a six hour Best of Youth type adaptation, it was The Cider House Rules. I enjoyed the movie, I just really would have enjoyed all the parts of the book they didn't include, and I'm perfectly willing to sit on the couch watching TV for 6 to 8 hours all in a row like a fat slob.
What, I read a book once; the cover was blue. :P
Have any of you tried anything from this brewery? I had one tallboy one time, and it was the single best beer I have ever tasted in my life. I'm actually a bit hesitant to link their site on a public forum like this, but the brewery is apparently closed to the public, so, no harm, no foul.
Speaking seriously, I guess they're a small brewery that doesn't sell to distributors, but that junk was delicious! It's worth going to find it. :)
Matt Thomason wrote:
Interesting indeed. Very interesting.
What does an RPG system "passing" even mean? 'Cause if we're talking about it passing away, as in a euphemism for dying, it was never alive to begin with and you can just say "goes out of production." Though personally I think D&D is so closely associated with RPGs that even if it did go out of production, people would still talk about D&D the way they talk about dialing a phone, even though phones don't have dials on them anymore.
The question in my mind is whether this might trigger a Pathfinder 2e design cycle; there is very little in D&D Next that can't be emulated with existing Open Gaming Content.
I think you're right about the emulation through the OGL, but I I also think that Paizo has a loyal (like, emotionally invested, level of loyalty) fanbase, and isn't just going to start producing Next/5e material at the drop of hat.
It's not up yet, but brick and mortar stores that are a part of the WotC play network (or whatever they call it) are selling the Starter set earlier than regular retailers, so Wizards is releasing the PHB section of Basic today. I'm not entirely sure if this was the plan all along, or just WotC's best effort not to disappoint any fans after promising to have the Basic PDF available for download once the Starter Set is available for purchase.
Freehold DM wrote:
You only just noticed?
Kirth Gersen wrote:
Ugh, without your recommendation. I meant to say without, but the time limit on the edit button has passed me by.
About Delany, the worm stuff only goes on in one book, but if you won't read about pederasty, you've denied yourself about half of his novels right there. Look, it's not like that, the dude's way too intellectual to write porn . . . Well, most of the time; You might find no little porn mixed in there with the poetic prose, but it will have literary meaning, mmkay?
I just feel like this conversation was a lot simpler back when we were talking about beer, but that was another thread.
Kirth Gersen wrote:
Listen man, I'm drinking Ommegang's Fleur De Houblon Summer Ale right this very moment* and I never would have tried it with your recommendation of the brewery; you can read all the footnotes you want. I was only lashing out 'cause I'm grumpy in the morning.
*Yeah, I'm talking about beer on the books thread. How's that for footnote?!
The problem is, Kirth has such an bad footnote habit that he'll go to some really ugly places to get his fix. Look, Kirth, this isn't an intervention, but just answer this question for me: When's the last time you enjoyed yourself without reading any footnotes?
Personally, I wouldn't mind a system for investigation and puzzle solving that's as involved as combat; that is, where each puzzle has an equivalent for AC, HP and attacks of its own against the players. (Modeling frustration levels or something, I guess?) I've homebrewed something similar for social interactions, and find it strikes a nice balance between the possibility of roadblocking with a puzzle that's too hard for the players, and the monotony of a single roll on Knowledge (esoteric bulls**t) DC 40.
About fifteen years ago, my roommate who was majoring in Modern Culture and Media at Brown University noticed that I was read The Madman by Samuel R. Delany. Delany, as a black gay science fiction writer whose life spans the various revolutions of the 60s, and the AIDS epidemic, is a darling of the academic intellectual set, but The Madman not for the timid. Like, at all. The main character's into watersports, and watersports are the most user friendly of the sexual acts you read about in that book.
My poor roommate borrowed the book only to return it the next morning, saying, "...And then I got to the park where they're in the park, drinking out of the milk carton, and that was just gross."
I was all, "Take that, Modern Culture and Media, my aesthetic sensibility is too real for you squares!"
Plus, it's gonna be really dark in there . . .
Y'know what's funny, the only thing I remember from that show was a scene where the Cavalier used his magic shield to save everyone from falling rocks, and another character was surprised that he'd saved everyone when he was always so negative. Lil Hitdice understood it as a wonderful lesson about how those who dissent from the popular view are still valuable members of society, but going by Fergie's link, I guess I was watching it wrong.