|Paizo Pathfinder® Paizo Games|
|About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ|
David Bowles wrote:
Doesn't the GM decide what "legitimately" means?
I'm not trolling or being snarky, I'm really asking: doesn't the door you choose to begin with get just as more likely as the the one you didn't choose? Assuming that the location of the prize is set at the beginning, rather than decided after Monty's discard.
That's always been my question: Does Monty ever discard the door I've picked? If not, wasn't my choice always 1 out of 2? (Three statisticians are hunting in the woods and they see a deer. The first one shoots and missed by ten feet on the left. The second shoots and misses ten feet on the right. The third one jumps up and screams "I hit it, I hit it!")
Heroes of Shadow was a 4e Suppliment, so Hitdice, you are correct. Not for 5e.
. . . And everyone else involved in the conversation knew what they were talking about, when I stormed in and embarrassed myself in the style of a late-to-the-party, loud jackass? That certainly sounds like something I'd do.
I was talking about the "Democrats redistribute wealth to make more Democrats from poor people" bit. My personal opinion is a lot more, "Any functional society provides for the working class, because otherwise nothing works," regardless of party affiliation.
I don't disagree with you about the rightwing attack line, but my state has closed primaries, so I have to choose party affiliation by which primary I'd rather vote in.
I can love without a OGL. We were still gaming before Wotc bought out TSR and created one and my group still will if they don't for 5E. OGL allows for 3pp products which I do sometimes buy. It also runs the risk of creating the comptetion. So I don't blame Wotc for taking their time with it. PDFs they should release them eventually. It's a smart business decision and one way or another pirated versions will appear. Yet again we were gaming before with them and we still will.
I wonder if it's less creating the competition than what has been seen cannot be unseen, vis-à-vis The Book of Erotic Fantasy; WotC withdrew the license for that one, and it's still infamous with the D20 logo on it, y'know?. . .
I can love without an OGL too, Memorex, I just can't love without you! (I'm sorry man, I had to, that's a once in lifetime typo right there.)
Jeez, I hadn't even thought of that, GE, but I get it. Just don't ask me about the time the UK exchange student looked up halfway through a really hard algebra problem to exclaim, "I need a rubber!"
'Cause she was pretty hot, and all the dudes in class were like, "I got a rubber in my wallet right now!"
. . . I think this thread used to be about the sort beer we enjoy, but I'm not ashamed of myself. :P
The beer/wine and liquor segregation always baffled me; here in RI we have Package Stores, or, in the common vernacular, "Packies," as in, "Hey, I'm running down to the packey for a sixer, you need anything?" Packies also sell mixers like ginger beer, all under one roof. Just a few years ago we over threw the blue laws so that Packies can stay open on sunday; what a time to be alive!
Kirth Gersen wrote:
I've noticed that the catcalling/public isolation (we need a simpler term than "social contracts forbidding speaking to others in public" and that's my best effort) remain the same in direct proportion, but vary a lot depending on background noise level, regardless population level.
. . .
I hope that made sense; I should probably just be posting everything in the beer thread at this point.
There's also the question of martial classes who take the Magic Initiate feat. If they've blown an ability score increase, they certainly shouldn't be stuck at caster level zero until they multi class.
No, I haven't changed my mind about anything, I still just think 5e depends on player/DM communication in a way that rules heavy systems don't.
I'd go with level as calculated for spell slots slot per day in the multclassing section. I don't think it talks about cantrip scaling specifically, but it does talk about having access to spell slots of a higher level than you know.
An eldritch knight would add 1/3 of their levels to the total whereas any other fighter subclass would add 0.
I don't think anything from 5e should be translated into Pathfinder, exactly; Pathfinder is a very successful system that totally groks its own market share/fan base. I personally prefer the simplified (yes, in the past tense, it's been a couple of decades at this point) mechanics of 5e, but to each their own.
In my experience, 5e relies on DM fiat, whereas PF depend on player empowerment.
Charles Evans 25 wrote:
The bit above was exactly my point when I posted earlier about Sutter speaking (yes, BNW, speaking) as a managing editor rather than an author, or whatever the hell I said. While ASoIaF and Paizo's APs are booth epic in scope and have a huge cast of characters, ASoIaF is a series of novels, and the APs are a periodical. The audience for periodicals have a reasonable expectation for timely delivery of the next installment, but I don't think the same can be said for a series of novels.
Like everyone else who's posted on this thread, I want to have the most enjoyable experience possible when I read a book; If timely delivery of the next installment is a part of that experience for you, I won't tell you you're wrong, but no one owes you that experience, no matter how many books they've written in the past.
Wait, Eragon is Alfie Allen, not the CGI dragon; Like, the dude ride the dragon, and not the dragon? Never mind reading the book, I should probably just watch the movie with the sound on to learn the characters' names. If you interpret that sentence to mean that I was so unimpressed with the visuals of the movie that I neither read the book, nor was even interested enough to turn on the dialog, I will not correct you. ;)
Never Let Me Go is such a fun book that I ended up reading it into the wee hours and crying myself to sleep. (Well, I thought it was fun.)
Freehold DM wrote:
What can I tell you Freehold, most people on this earth aren't so discriminating. :(
Good Freaking Lord! Never mind corporate, call the Better Business Bureau!
Taught his great-grandfather how to fight? The elves in my homebrew selected his great-grandparents on both sides because they were trying for best in breed at the Westminster Human Show. Okay, look, that's one of those things that sounds worse than it is when you say it out loud. It's certainly less exploitive than a "wandering minstrel" who leaves a trail of half-elves across the countryside.
Oh, right, a chart that wasn't in an RPG book; I would have thought of that eventually. :P
I think you're right about the starting ages. It seems like this topic gets a new thread every three to four months, but no one worries about what the dwarf clerics were doing for the first seventy years of their lives when a human starts at twenty-seven. Don't ask me.
GWL, I think you should report it to the chain's website, just make an effort to describe it as calmly as you have here instead of putting racism in the subject line. Starting the conversation with accusations of racism can have a distancing effect, but if store policies are being applied at the local level in a fashion that leaves potential (or maybe that should be dissuaded) customers wondering if racism is at work, the higher-ups will want to know.
Which Chart was that Gnomez? From everything I've seen, elves' slow maturation rate is physical in PF/Golarion (as in, the child character rules in Ultimate Campaign give the same attribute mods to a human eight year old and an elven fifty-five year old) and cultural in D&D (as in, elves mature at roughly the same rate as humans and declare themselves adult at around one hundred years old). Different systems handle it differently, which can get a bit weird when PF, an OGL system, has a different take than D&D, the originator of the OGL, but everything I can think of from PF supports "dog years."
Worked for Dallas, right? ;P
These conversations always seem to use, I don't know what, legal terms like owe and right, when that's just not the sort of relationship authors and readers have. I enjoyed the hell out of Vurt by Jeff Noon, but thought Pollen sucked like a vacuum cleaner, so I didn't read the rest of the series, and I felt that was the appropriate response to my disappointment. I think Matt Ruff is an entertaining writer, and I wish he'd publish more often than once a decade (fine, he'd did better than than in the 2000s, but time will tell on the 2010s) but that enjoyment of his work doesn't contain any obligation aside from the one that I have to myself to read books that I enjoy. That is, readers are going to be upset by whatever upsets them, but I don't know how relevant that is to what the author writes.
If you're saying that GRRM would benefit from an editor who says, "George, at this point another series of POV chapters showing what a reeking hellhole the Riverlands are is just overkill," instead of, "George, given the performance of this series so far, you can just write whatever the hell you want to and rake in millions," I don't disagree. I couldn't help but laugh (pretty fricken ruefully) when I read the last chapters of book five and thought back to the afterword of book four, where GRRM said he had to split them into two volumes because saying To Be Continued halfway through would have been frustrating for his readers.
But, speaking as a failed amateur cartoonist with an unfinished minicomic epic sitting on the shelf next to my computer, I don't think authors owe their audience anything. The author gets to write whatever and however he wants to, and the audience gets to decide whether or not to keep reading his work, and that's the ballgame. I really don't think GRRM's slow creative process is the start of an industry-ruining slippery slope.
I don't know, it doesn't bother me if an author keeps writing about the same characters and/or setting until they die.
O'Brian died with an uncompleted Master and Commander novel; I've got the published rough drafts of Herge's last volume of Tintin; Not be morbid, but I assume the same thing will happen with C.J. Cherryh's Foreigner series, and I'm gonna keep enjoying that one until she keels over at her word processor.
I suppose there's an implicit promise to finish a series you publish the first volume of, but I feel like Sutter's judgement is colored by the fact that he works for a company that sells its products through subscriptions. If you write a book and never finish the sequel, your fans will be disappointed, but if someone buys a subscription and you only deliver one book, that's legally actionable. It's just a different set of obligations.
I'm pretty sure my dog looks at me and thinks, "That dude took a whole lifetime to reach maturity? Did he spend all that time learning how not to roll around in garbage and have a really great time?"
Personally, I role play elves who adventure with humans as doing something similar to running the Iditarod. They depend on the humans around them, and the relationship's about as equitable as humanly (elvenly?) possible, but different rate of maturation is the least of the differences between them.
That's right, Jeff, you get proficiency in trained skills, not advantage. Inspiration (page 35 Basic) goes into the "RP your way to Advantage" approach, but given that Inspiration doesn't stack, I've found it a better ideal to bankroll inspiration and try to gain Advantage situationally.
. . .Dude, if you mix up a Frenchman and a German, they'll join forces to beat you up for not knowing the difference, and World War Two. In my experience, no one cares if you identify as european-american, french-american or german-american, but it's boorish (not Beor-ish, different thing) to say, "You're african-american, that dude's hispanic-american, and I'm just american."
Freehold DM wrote:
Racism can be obvious, but it's more dangerous when it's subtle. That's just my experience, though.
I don't disagree; subtle racism is certainly harder to tease apart and deal with, and I say that as a patrician New England WASP; if it weren't for subtle discrimination, I wouldn't have any cultural identity at all! :P
I mean honestly, having introduced the term majority privilege, now I'm thinking that white privilege is a different thing, and that both should be defined, but I don't have the energy to dance around so many hot button terms this early in the morning.
Freehold DM wrote:
Y'know, I've been think that majority privilege might be a better phrase since the last thread on this subject.
I've also gotta say that, having read the CNN article (and I'm going to quote here, but I hope the profanity filter is working) however much of an eye-opener an minority majority experience is, calling black people pickaninnies and Puerto Ricans spics, or wiping off a soda can because you don't know if a black person touched it are not subtle examples of racism. I mean, there are members of my extended family who are that racist, but they're not confused about what they're doing.
Limey, have you heard of a book called The Iron Dream? It sort of combines the best (I use that word advisedly) parts of Gor with a fascist rip-off of Throngor, as written by Adolf Hitler if he'd set his sights on writing pulp science fiction instead of world domination. It's a pretty weird reading experience, but it might be right up your alley.
There is *a* PDF option. It's just not the full PHB but still enough to form an opinion about the game itself and its design philosophy.
I'm curious as to whether the Basic pdf will contain enough info to play/run the various setting books and other supplements. Given that the various class archetypes are described as one option of archetype in Basic, rather than a "Basic class" which functions as an archetype once you get to the PHB, I think it will. If so, it will be possible to buy Dark Sun (or whichever) and play it with Basic until some archetype for a PHB class is so awesomely awesome that you buy the PHB to fulfill the desperate nerd yearning in your heart.
Um, I meant to say that I think having a free pdf as entry level D&D rather than a shoddily made cheap paperback is a good idea.