|Paizo Pathfinder® Paizo Games|
|About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ|
When I was in college, one of my room-mates filched a can of ether from the science lab. We kept it in the closet all year, where it whispered our names as seductively as that slot machine in the episode of "The Twilight Zone" they made out of that Harlan Ellison story, but we never had the balls to actually sample it.
Yeah, I didn't want to ruin it for you by even mentioning that a spoiler might be required, but at some point you were talking about how it was the it the only Irving movie you liked, maybe because you hadn't see the book, and I was all, "Wow, he's going to be really surprised by how much goes on after Wally gets back."
Don't bogart that ether can, Doodles!
Ooh, ooh, I have a question: is there anyway I can physically reach through the internet and slap people who claim Watchmen was a Frank Miller comic? :P
Not to mention the premature twins. They totally chose that misfortune by feeding the kids with $15 a can formula rather than letting them waste away in the first few weeks.
There's no such thing as trained only skills in 5e, so the binary difference you're talking about is just your ability bonus (any ability check in the game) or your ability bonus plus your proficiency bonus (for ability checks on skills you're proficient in.) That is, in PF Knowledge (Arcana) is a trained only skill and that's that, but in 5e anyone can make an Intelligence (Arcana) check, they just only get to apply their proficiency bonus in addition to their Int modifier if they're proficient in the Arcana skill.
I did mean Heady Topper!
The owner of my local packey (that's what we call the dedicated alcohol stores here in Rhode Island, 'cause they don't sell indecent libations, just, like, packages) gave me a can one time. I think he'd gone up to Vermont and loaded up the way-back of his station wagon or something.
However he came by them, he had enough to spare. I know he did, 'cause he slipped one into my bag and said, "Just drink it from the can, cold but not too cold. There's instructions on the back."
Sez I, "I'm not the sort sort of person who drinks beer from a can; that's plebeian!"
He was all, "Dude, just do it."
So I went home, and drank this purportedly magic beer straight from the can at cellar-if-not-room-temperature and it was the single best beer I've ever tasted in my life. I kept the can to look at while I drink other beers, but they all taste too salty now. Salty from the tears I weep into my mug remembering how good that fricken beer was!
'Cause there's monkeys in India? 'Cause wines with animals on the label outsell wines without animals on the label, and everyone's hoping the same thing will work with beer? 'Cause if you pay your graphic design firm with all the beer they can drink, they always just end up doodling monkeys, regardless of what you requested?
Maybe the question is, "Why aren't there monkeys on more beers?"
Samnell: Dude, you want The Hotel New Hampshire; That's the Irving book (or movie for that matter; it's no wonder Rob Lowe's life was ruined by a sex tape!) you want to read.
Doodles: I just wonder how much ended up on the cutting room floor. If ever there was a book that deserved a six hour Best of Youth type adaptation, it was The Cider House Rules. I enjoyed the movie, I just really would have enjoyed all the parts of the book they didn't include, and I'm perfectly willing to sit on the couch watching TV for 6 to 8 hours all in a row like a fat slob.
What, I read a book once; the cover was blue. :P
Have any of you tried anything from this brewery? I had one tallboy one time, and it was the single best beer I have ever tasted in my life. I'm actually a bit hesitant to link their site on a public forum like this, but the brewery is apparently closed to the public, so, no harm, no foul.
Speaking seriously, I guess they're a small brewery that doesn't sell to distributors, but that junk was delicious! It's worth going to find it. :)
Matt Thomason wrote:
Interesting indeed. Very interesting.
What does an RPG system "passing" even mean? 'Cause if we're talking about it passing away, as in a euphemism for dying, it was never alive to begin with and you can just say "goes out of production." Though personally I think D&D is so closely associated with RPGs that even if it did go out of production, people would still talk about D&D the way they talk about dialing a phone, even though phones don't have dials on them anymore.
The question in my mind is whether this might trigger a Pathfinder 2e design cycle; there is very little in D&D Next that can't be emulated with existing Open Gaming Content.
I think you're right about the emulation through the OGL, but I I also think that Paizo has a loyal (like, emotionally invested, level of loyalty) fanbase, and isn't just going to start producing Next/5e material at the drop of hat.
It's not up yet, but brick and mortar stores that are a part of the WotC play network (or whatever they call it) are selling the Starter set earlier than regular retailers, so Wizards is releasing the PHB section of Basic today. I'm not entirely sure if this was the plan all along, or just WotC's best effort not to disappoint any fans after promising to have the Basic PDF available for download once the Starter Set is available for purchase.
Freehold DM wrote:
You only just noticed?
Kirth Gersen wrote:
Ugh, without your recommendation. I meant to say without, but the time limit on the edit button has passed me by.
About Delany, the worm stuff only goes on in one book, but if you won't read about pederasty, you've denied yourself about half of his novels right there. Look, it's not like that, the dude's way too intellectual to write porn . . . Well, most of the time; You might find no little porn mixed in there with the poetic prose, but it will have literary meaning, mmkay?
I just feel like this conversation was a lot simpler back when we were talking about beer, but that was another thread.
Kirth Gersen wrote:
Listen man, I'm drinking Ommegang's Fleur De Houblon Summer Ale right this very moment* and I never would have tried it with your recommendation of the brewery; you can read all the footnotes you want. I was only lashing out 'cause I'm grumpy in the morning.
*Yeah, I'm talking about beer on the books thread. How's that for footnote?!
The problem is, Kirth has such an bad footnote habit that he'll go to some really ugly places to get his fix. Look, Kirth, this isn't an intervention, but just answer this question for me: When's the last time you enjoyed yourself without reading any footnotes?
Personally, I wouldn't mind a system for investigation and puzzle solving that's as involved as combat; that is, where each puzzle has an equivalent for AC, HP and attacks of its own against the players. (Modeling frustration levels or something, I guess?) I've homebrewed something similar for social interactions, and find it strikes a nice balance between the possibility of roadblocking with a puzzle that's too hard for the players, and the monotony of a single roll on Knowledge (esoteric bulls**t) DC 40.
About fifteen years ago, my roommate who was majoring in Modern Culture and Media at Brown University noticed that I was read The Madman by Samuel R. Delany. Delany, as a black gay science fiction writer whose life spans the various revolutions of the 60s, and the AIDS epidemic, is a darling of the academic intellectual set, but The Madman not for the timid. Like, at all. The main character's into watersports, and watersports are the most user friendly of the sexual acts you read about in that book.
My poor roommate borrowed the book only to return it the next morning, saying, "...And then I got to the park where they're in the park, drinking out of the milk carton, and that was just gross."
I was all, "Take that, Modern Culture and Media, my aesthetic sensibility is too real for you squares!"
Plus, it's gonna be really dark in there . . .
Y'know what's funny, the only thing I remember from that show was a scene where the Cavalier used his magic shield to save everyone from falling rocks, and another character was surprised that he'd saved everyone when he was always so negative. Lil Hitdice understood it as a wonderful lesson about how those who dissent from the popular view are still valuable members of society, but going by Fergie's link, I guess I was watching it wrong.
Orfamay Quest wrote:
Orf, I think I want to marry you just for mentioning Linear B; It's cool if you're a dude, I'm American and we can do that in my state. :P
James Jacobs wrote:
I would probably play a one-handed character as someone who has an eventual goal to get his/her hand back.
. . . And, if your eventual goal was to get your hand back, you'd probably enjoy it if the GM reintroduced your had as an artifact level magic item for the party to fight over like in The Hand of Vectra! episode of KoDT, right? ;)
Do you like to roll dice when you DM? Personally, I like to, but find opposed rolls way too swing-ey to just let everyone roll all the time on everything, y'know?
Edit: And let's just enter that under the thread topic. I think opposed rolls are bad way to handle skill contests, and that whoever instigates the contest should make a skill roll against DC 10 + opponent's relevant modifiers.
Jason Beardsley wrote:
I heard they're going to call them "Realms fragmenting" from now on, so technically . . . :P
Edit @ Misery: Y'know, it's not that I don't enjoy looking at breasts (I do!), it's that TheJeff came up with two ideas about female dragonborn in ten minutes that were better than anything I saw from WotC*, and they're the professionals. But then, I'm also one of those annoying people who reacted to the line in Avatar about hybrid Navi and human DNA with, "So the big blue aliens from a planet with a toxic atmosphere have DNA? That's some fricken coincidence!" As i said above, alien DNA, or breasts on female lizard-ish races don't bother me in and of themselves, but it's kind of the job of the creative types to explain stuff like that.
*Full disclosure, I didn't buy anything after the first three, core books of 4e, so they may have have some next level ecology articles that I missed.
I heard it was just a lightbulb, but one that was powered by a briefcase sized perpetual motion motion machine; that thing's not like a refrigerator light it's on all the time in there! I also had some explain to me that, because Marcel has a band aid on the back of his neck (where the Devil pulls out a dude's soul) it was obviously Marcel's soul in there.
Or, backing up Kirth's point, Tarintino never says, so anyone can imagine it's anything, and no one's imagination is any more correct that anyone else's.
Dragons can be many things, reptile (as a species) may not necessarily be one of those things
That's true, but you have to explain that, if it's going to be true in the baseline standard D&D game world. If dragon milk's a thing, that's fine, but coming up with a draconic PC race because dragons are cool and then drawing the females of the species with breasts because "that's what girls look like" is uncreative to say the least.
Oh, gotcha; no, I was just talking about the times when you agree with someone, but they take issue with it, and then the whole conversation takes a left turn, and then twenty minutes later a mod has removed the whole derail, and the world is better place for it.
I don't think the mechanism to know that is available to anyone but mods, if even them. (If I'm wrong, please, anyone, tell me where to find that button!)
I'm not sure that's the case, Dungrun, I think posts about specific posters are probably deleted based on whether the poster who's named feels that the post is flag-worthy. (Aaand I just used the word "post" so many times, that sentence doesn't make sense at all; Well done, Hitdice!) I guess my point is that over-familiarity is flame bait. Some of the people on these boards (Doodlebug) will favorite some very insulting posts which specifically name him, because we both know it's all in fun. Other posters (nameless to protect the innocent) will flag my most innocuous statements of agreement, just because I rub them the wrong way. My point is, different treatment doesn't have to be a conspiracy of the mods, it could well be a ghost in the machine.
Edit: On the other hand, that dude Matt Thomason probably oughtta be burned at the stake out of hand just for ninja-ing me and ruining the flow of conversation. :P
Ambrosia Slaad wrote:
Speaking of LS: ** spoiler omitted **
I was a bit puzzled, too; Sansa mentioned that her body had been thrown in the river in episode one of this season, and Little Finger and Lysa have mentioned her enough to keep her a constant presence. Really sorta thought it was leading up to something, but maybe next season, I guess.
Andrew Turner wrote:
I don't know, Andrew, aside from being mature and polite yourself, and hoping that everyone else behaves the same, it doesn't sound like there's really a solution to the problem. It's a very fuzzy line between debate pro and imbecilic troll, and if Paizo has noticed that a few specific thread topics are problematic enough to warrant preemptive locking to keep the boards civil on the whole, I think that's reason to be happy, rather than complain.
Y'know Cimbria, I don't think I've seen someone bullied for voicing disagreement in a civil tone; I can think of dozens of examples of both sides of the conversation (yes, myself included) going from zero to stupid in no time flat, but in cases like that it usually takes two (or the entire thread) to tango.