| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
From Pathfinder Core Rulebook Errata (Part 2):
Page 75: Alchemical Alacrity lets you make three alchemical items, but you can't hold all three, so it's unclear what happens to the third one. Add to the end "and you automatically stow one of these new items as you create them."
From CRB Alchemist Features (emphasis added):
Alchemical Alacrity . . .
Your comfort in concocting items is such that you can create three at a time. When using the Quick Alchemy action, you can spend up to three batches of infused reagents to make up to three alchemical items as described in that action. These items do not have to be the same.
... and ...
Quick Alchemy . . .
You swiftly mix up a short-lived alchemical item to use at a moment’s notice. You create a single alchemical item of your advanced alchemy level or lower that’s in your formula book without having to spend the normal monetary cost in alchemical reagents or needing to attempt a Crafting check. This item has the infused trait, but it remains potent only until the start of your next turn.
While the errata addresses what happens with the odd item out, it does not address the fact that the third item goes piff! at the start of the Alchemist's next turn. So, Alchemical Alacrity requires the fourth level Class Feat, Enduring Alchemy, to actually be useful.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I assumed the third item is worn for some reason even after reading the change, but the fact that it is stowed, it's not really that action efficient even with Enduring Alchemy. I'd stick to Double Brew.
|
When they say stow I believe they mean worn, otherwise that would be making three items, then taking off your backpack, putting the item in it, and putting it back on all in one action. You're probably putting it in a bandolier.
Also, it's UP TO three, it does not have to be three items. The feat Enduring Alchemy allows for more versatile use for the items. You could make three bombs in one round, throw two and have another available the next round for a triple attack, assuming you have some already available.
Basically since it's a free ability, if you don't like it you don't have to use it.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
After the errata, I wish they could have used a different word for clarity if that's what they mean.
Also, Enduring Alchemy can't be used on bombs, right? It only applies to alchemical tools and elixirs. Unless I'm mistaken, I truly wish it did. The idea of crafting bombs or any other alchemical item and having enough time (more than the usual one turn) to plan out when and how to use them sounds fun and engaging. But you know, without having to take a feat.
When they say stow I believe they mean worn, otherwise that would be making three items, then taking off your backpack, putting the item in it, and putting it back on all in one action. You're probably putting it in a bandolier.
I don't disagree that would make it more reasonable, particularly since if I can act with such alacrity that I can make 3 alchemical items *and* still have time to put one into a backpack, all in 1 action, it seems odd that I can't also pull it right back out and do something with it next round and do *that* in 1 action.
But unfortunately it says "stowed". I guess we get to at least pick which container it gets stuffed into.
|
|
After the errata, I wish they could have used a different word for clarity if that's what they mean.
Also, Enduring Alchemy can't be used on bombs, right? It only applies to alchemical tools and elixirs. Unless I'm mistaken, I truly wish it did. The idea of crafting bombs or any other alchemical item and having enough time (more than the usual one turn) to plan out when and how to use them sounds fun and engaging. But you know, without having to take a feat.
Whoops, didn't read the feat close enough.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
As much as I agree with you, Shroudb, I think this whole issue is very limited due to the level you get Alchemical Alacrity.
Not a non issue, but still a minor one.
Alchemical Alacrity should be entirely removed, in my opinion. I hardly see how you can need 3 Alchemical items at once.
As much as I agree with you, Shroudb, I think this whole issue is very limited due to the level you get Alchemical Alacrity.
Not a non issue, but still a minor one.
Alchemical Alacrity should be entirely removed, in my opinion. I hardly see how you can need 3 Alchemical items at once.if anything, in my mind, it is more important due to that level.
it's a level 17 feature.
it should be powerful.
not outright unusable if you don't sink in precious class feats just to have it work at a base level.
Honestly, even with the feats, it's just plain useless. Double Brew has a clear use, as you have 3 actions per round, so there's a logic to use one to create 2 items and then 2 to use the created items. But Alchemical Alacrity just doesn't work. You need an extra action. And because now it's stowed (even if you consider it is worn), you need 5 actions. Even with the feats, you end up mostly screwed. Even with major fix, Alchemical Alacrity, the way it works now, is mostly useless.
I would have prefered a free action Quick Alchemy once per round. It would have been a real alacrity and a useful and powerful one.
p.s.
the solution isn't really that hard either. my own houserule as an example just gives the alchemist the ability to hold up to 3 infused items in hand alongside Alacrity.
He's a master of...
It was the easy solution before their "fix". But even with your fix, do you think Alchemical Alacrity is really worth it?
Every time I think about taking Enduring Alchemy to maximize my action economy, I always end up with the same issue: Alchemical Alacrity allows you to create more items for more Reagents. So, if the round after the one you created the items, you realize that the situation changed to much to use the extra item, you basically lost Reagents.I'm not against complex abilities, especially when they are high level ones, but this one seems just to hard to use for a very small gain. If I have 3 actions, I could use Double Brew. Otherwise, I'll certainly just pass.
|
So yeah, I don't see the need for the feat to make this work IF and only IF they mean worn and not stowed.
One of the things I do at the start of every encounter is to "remind" my party that which side my healing potions are on. At level 17, you are likely making enough items that you welcome other players to grab what they need.
Yeah, letting the fighter grab the extra bomb when his sword would just split the ooze is a great choice, or you could just throw all three while quickened.
|
|
You are seemingly misunderstanding Double Brew and Alchemical Alacrity. They are not actions you can "use", they are abilities gained that modify Quick Alchemy. Just like how you don't "Use" your weapon expertise, it just modifies your weapon attacks, or how how Evasion modifies your Reflex Saves. All Alchemical Alacrity does is allow you to choose to make a third item with Quick Alchemy.
Secondly, this is a minor nitpick but still one, it's granted at level 15 not 17. At least that's what's showing up on AoN and the most recent CRB Printing.
Third, by level 15 you will have a lot more available to help with action economy. Feats like Quick Bomber and Enduring Alchemy help, but are by far not the only available feats to help increase economy. It also allows bombers to make full use of being quickened, or a Chirurgeon can create three huge healing elixirs on the fly for their allies to make use of by just dropping two, and drinking the other. There's a lot of uses for the ability, we should think "What CAN we do with this ability" rather than "What CAN'T we do".
Finally, when the FAQ says "stow" I believe they are not saying it becomes a "stowed" item. The verb stow is used in many way to simply put things away, but was not defined in any way. For example, lets look at Quick Stow. It states that you "You Interact to stow a weapon and then Interact again to draw a readied item or weapon." This implies you put your weapon in your sheath, or some other method to store it in a way that it's what we now call "worn". What needs to be done is either change "stowed" items to something else, or define what "stowing" an item really means.
|
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Why would someone spend 3 actions to drink an elixir on the ground? One to pick up, and one to drink, exactly the same as if they drew their own elixir. Yes, they have to stride to it if they weren't near it, but you would have to stride if you were feeding elixirs to your teammates.
Yes they are "optional" but they're highly recommended to get for particular specializations. A Bomber without Quick Bomber is just nerfing themselves, and Enduring Alchemy is great for a Chirurgeon and Mutagenist. They aren't "required" for it to work, they're feats that you will likely have that help make use of the OPTION to make a third elixir.
As for the stow thing, I simply explained that I don't believe that was their intent, and stated what needs to be clarified to fix the issue. I was not suggesting we simply ignore it because it doesn't make sense.
What needs to be done is either change "stowed" items to something else, or define what "stowing" an item really means.
If they clarify that "stowing" (the verb) does not necessarily mean it becomes "stowed" (the adverb) then there won't be an issue. They could also use a different word, or maybe change the corrected language to "you store the third item so that it is "worn", or drop it on the ground."
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Unless I'm missing something, Quick Bomber vs Enduring Alchemy is an odd comparison since even without Quick Bomber, striking with bombs still functions independently. Inefficient but it still works within a lone Alchemist's single turn.
Alchemical Alacrity's third concoction is rather irrelevant by itself without involving interactions outside of the user's control or extra mechanics, Enduring Alchemy in this case. If the Alchemist had a natural way to make use of all three items before the item expires (via reaction, free action, class feature, etc.), it would be a different story.
More and more, I wish Enduring Alchemy followed the same path as Powerful Alchemy in the errata or just have its item potency duration be completely baked into Quick Alchemy. But at this point, I'm honestly content at topping off at Double Brew and have Alacrity become something completely different.
| 6 people marked this as a favorite. |
At this point, I’d pay for a book with an unchained alchemist. This slow drip of half-fixes is agonizing. I know it’s not Paizo’s fault, there’s only so much time that can be devoted to errata, and other issues have to be addressed too. But that doesn’t make it any less frustrating.
| 3 people marked this as a favorite. |
Update Alchemical Alacrity to provide one additional action, usable only in the round Alchemical Alacrity was used, and only to use one alchemical item created that round by Alchemical Alacrity. Any unused alchemical items created by Alchemical Alacrity beyond the number of free hands become stowed (or worn or whatever they intended).
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
At this point, I’d pay for a book with an unchained alchemist. This slow drip of half-fixes is agonizing. I know it’s not Paizo’s fault, there’s only so much time that can be devoted to errata, and other issues have to be addressed too. But that doesn’t make it any less frustrating.
Agreed, on all counts. I’d pay for that over paying the Enduring Alchemy feat tax.
IMHO if Alchemical Alacrity allows you to stow the third item, it should also allow you to hand the third item to the person next to you.
Even the Hasted Bomber model of Alchemical Alacrity is flawed, as there are folks who argue that as Double Brew/Alchemical Alacrity call out using Batches of Infused Reagents, you can't use either one with your Perpetual Infusions (which don't use Batches.) I know I for one have no interest in throwing away an entire Batch on a third-strike Bomb at -10...