
Master Pugwampi |

GreenDragon1133 wrote:I have Saniflush. Is that the same thing, or not?Rysky wrote:What is 'sanity'?Master Pugwampi wrote:Why do caterpillars crawl?
Why is there a sky?
Why is there a world at all?
And why do I ask why?
No ranks in Fly yet.
So everyone without wings can be envious.
Hunt got drunk and did something stupid again.
Because you're the sane one here. Sowwy Wumpums.
That's it! Now to use properly, drink the whole thing.
...
Don't worry—those warning symbols are only suggestions. We'll wait.
>:D

![]() |

Limeylongears wrote:GreenDragon1133 wrote:I have Saniflush. Is that the same thing, or not?Rysky wrote:What is 'sanity'?Master Pugwampi wrote:Why do caterpillars crawl?
Why is there a sky?
Why is there a world at all?
And why do I ask why?
No ranks in Fly yet.
So everyone without wings can be envious.
Hunt got drunk and did something stupid again.
Because you're the sane one here. Sowwy Wumpums.
That's it! Now to use properly, drink the whole thing.
...
Don't worry—those warning symbols are only suggestions. We'll wait.
>:D
*waits expectantly*

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

* fades back into existence - with smoothies all 'round. *
So, my GMs tend to not want to use Succubi in their games. How do I make a game I'm playing in more Succubus-accessible?
Is there any particular reason your GMs don't want to use Succubi?
*sips on smoothie*
Mmmmm, orange sherbet....

GreenDragon1133 |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
GreenDragon1133 wrote:* fades back into existence - with smoothies all 'round. *
So, my GMs tend to not want to use Succubi in their games. How do I make a game I'm playing in more Succubus-accessible?
Is there any particular reason your GMs don't want to use Succubi?
*sips on smoothie*
Mmmmm, orange sherbet....
One considers them to be either too strong or too weak (never just right). But I'm wearing him down with Demonic Harlots - a book with Succubi for every occasion.
The other just doesn't like:
a) anything sexual, romantic, or not related to swat-team (or on alternating nights puzzle solving).
b) thinks that anything with a Will save is a useless spell/ability.
(Of course, conversely, his creatures never fail theirs' (legit dice rolls in theory) and Will saves are always pass/fail. And he doesn't understand why after a YEAR of playing a bard in his game, I was tired and wanted a new character. I buff. I use my one offensive spell. I get into melee and get shredded because I have low AC and ATK. I buff again. I get out of combat because I have no HP left, and just stand back and buff every x rounds, and take a nap. Oh wait, I'm a half-elf the most hated race in the setting, and everyone can sense this regardless of my disguise checks. So anyone not being engaged in melee will come at me. I can't imagine why I got tired of that character.)
His creatures are either tanks, finesse fighters, or long range blasters.

GreenDragon1133 |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
Actually, the first GM and I have worked out a character I may get to play in a future game. Based on the Warlock class from the WoW D20. A Synthesist Summoner, losing the Summons for Witch Hexes. Essentially, for whatever reason, there is a Succubus in her head, tempting her to follow her path, and become one herself. Though the character isn't evil to start, and wants to resist. But giving in means power, and attention, and lots of good things.
Maybe his next campaign. We are currently in Legacy of Fire part 5, and making some decent progress on escaping the Efreeti Palace. You know the place is hot when the Ifrit in the party starts feeling a bit warm.

![]() |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

Rysky wrote:GreenDragon1133 wrote:* fades back into existence - with smoothies all 'round. *
So, my GMs tend to not want to use Succubi in their games. How do I make a game I'm playing in more Succubus-accessible?
Is there any particular reason your GMs don't want to use Succubi?
*sips on smoothie*
Mmmmm, orange sherbet....
One considers them to be either too strong or too weak (never just right). But I'm wearing him down with Demonic Harlots - a book with Succubi for every occasion.
As for the too strong, too weak dilemma that just depends on how and when the GM uses certain creatures against certain groups.
The other just doesn't like:
a) anything sexual, romantic, or not related to swat-team (or on alternating nights puzzle solving).
b) thinks that anything with a Will save is a useless spell/ability.
(Of course, conversely, his creatures never fail theirs' (legit dice rolls in theory) and Will saves are always pass/fail. And he doesn't understand why after a YEAR of playing a bard in his game, I was tired and wanted a new character. I buff. I use my one offensive spell. I get into melee and get shredded because I have low AC and ATK. I buff again. I get out of combat because I have no HP left, and just stand back and buff every x rounds, and take a nap. Oh wait, I'm a half-elf the most hated race in the setting, and everyone can sense this regardless of my disguise checks. So anyone not being engaged in melee will come at me. I can't imagine why I got tired of that character.)
His creatures are either tanks, finesse fighters, or long range blasters.
That is an awesome book that I recommend to anyone who would like to see some variant Succubi :3
A) Not much you can do there if their not comfortable with anything mature or sexual.
B) That's dumb -_- Reading all of 2 it seems there's a lot more going on if they're not only nullifying your character but making a point to go after them.

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Actually, the first GM and I have worked out a character I may get to play in a future game. Based on the Warlock class from the WoW D20. A Synthesist Summoner, losing the Summons for Witch Hexes. Essentially, for whatever reason, there is a Succubus in her head, tempting her to follow her path, and become one herself. Though the character isn't evil to start, and wants to resist. But giving in means power, and attention, and lots of good things.
Maybe his next campaign. We are currently in Legacy of Fire part 5, and making some decent progress on escaping the Efreeti Palace. You know the place is hot when the Ifrit in the party starts feeling a bit warm.
Ooo, sounds interesting :3

![]() |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

I want to become a succubus...
kitty-pout
*rubs Kitteh's head* I'm sure I can convince Areelu to let me borrow a book of hers...
Or I could just Level Drain ya and hope you make that Fortitude save :3
Half-Succubus Catfolk is totally going to be a thing in my next Campaign :3

Master Pugwampi |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

♪♫ On the First Day of Christmas,
I sent to Rysky:
A Pugwampi in a Spruce Tree!* ♪♫
*Note that White Spruce (sometimes called cat spruce or skunk spruce) does not have that same smell as fir trees. It has a much more...interesting scent! >:)
*Over the next twelve days, a large number of pugwampis will be given out as a result of the current plan. Their dedication to a good running gag is hereby noted.*

![]() |

♪♫ On the First Day of Christmas,
I sent to Rysky:A Pugwampi in a Spruce Tree!* ♪♫
*Note that White Spruce (sometimes called cat spruce or skunk spruce) does not have that same smell as fir trees. It has a much more...interesting scent! >:)
*Over the next twelve days, a large number of pugwampis will be given out as a result of the current plan. Their dedication to a good running gag is hereby noted.*
Aww, thanks Wumpums ^w^
Now I get to play Krampus by finding someone to put this smelly tree upside their head alongside adorable Pukrampi sidekick!

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Rysky,
You mentioned in the Ask James Jacobs thread that Reign of Winter is your favorite AP. While I admit that particular AP (specifically book 5 of that AP) was the reason I subscribed to the AP line, the rest of that AP was rather hit or miss for me. What was it about the path that appealed to you?

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Rysky,
You mentioned in the Ask James Jacobs thread that Reign of Winter is your favorite AP. While I admit that particular AP (specifically book 5 of that AP) was the reason I subscribed to the AP line, the rest of that AP was rather hit or miss for me. What was it about the path that appealed to you?
I've always been a fan of Slavic mythology and folklore, plus the Dancing Hut is neat. And winter is my favourite time of the year :3

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Hello Mistress Rysky, How are you doing?
Anyway I noticed something from your posts lately....you seem to hate it when villain do....well evil things...so...a couple of questions.
What are some of your favorite villains?
Why do you hate some of things villains do?
Meh, Thankies for asking though ^w^
Hmm, I can't really think of any villains I've encountered lately (in any media) that I would favourite, I guess Nualia from Rise of the Runelords due to her "monster of your own making" backstory?
... the same reason everyone else hates them? I'm just petty and more aggressive in my hatred than others I suppose.
With the announcement of Hell's Vengeance I was, originally, interested to see what Paizo does with it, even though I hate Cheliax. But now after the first evil "iconic's" backstory was shown I now have to tack on that I hope it's at least interesting and enjoyable, but that hope isn't very high.
With making an iconic of this nature you would think they would make them a little more likable or something people could identify with and enjoy playing as on some level. Instead he's just an unlikeable douchebag that I don't even like as a villain, let alone someone to play as.
You can be Evil without being a douchebag, just like you can be likable without being an antihero or "Evil on paper only".

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Pardon my ignorance, but do you, Rysky (or does anyone else) have a link to said iconic? I've been... out of it, lately.
(Also, I kind of thought whas's'name, magus <previously eldritch knight>-guy was the first evil iconic? Was I wrong?)
And yeah while Seltyiel was the first official Iconic who was evil (and so far much more likable than these) these are effectively the Villian Iconic's made for the Hell's Vengeance AP.

John Kretzer |

John Kretzer wrote:Hello Mistress Rysky, How are you doing?
Anyway I noticed something from your posts lately....you seem to hate it when villain do....well evil things...so...a couple of questions.
What are some of your favorite villains?
Why do you hate some of things villains do?
Meh, Thankies for asking though ^w^
Hmm, I can't really think of any villains I've encountered lately (in any media) that I would favourite, I guess Nualia from Rise of the Runelords due to her "monster of your own making" backstory?
... the same reason everyone else hates them? I'm just petty and more aggressive in my hatred than others I suppose.
With the announcement of Hell's Vengeance I was, originally, interested to see what Paizo does with it, even though I hate Cheliax. But now after the first evil "iconic's" backstory was shown I now have to tack on that I hope it's at least interesting and enjoyable, but that hope isn't very high.
With making an iconic of this nature you would think they would make them a little more likable or something people could identify with and enjoy playing as on some level. Instead he's just an unlikeable douchebag that I don't even like as a villain, let alone someone to play as.
You can be Evil without being a douchebag, just like you can be likable without being an antihero or "Evil on paper only".
So it is not so much the evil actions as it is the 'douchebag factor' ?

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

♪♫ On the Third Second Day of Christmas, Non existing, who came up with it, btw?)
I sent to Rysky:Two wump collars
And a young maiden to exert succubi stuff upon to her heart's content! ♪♫
Noooo Wampis should be free. They're fun to chase :3
And how did you get ahold of my favourite Kitty?

![]() |

Rysky wrote:So it is not so much the evil actions as it is the 'douchebag factor' ?John Kretzer wrote:Hello Mistress Rysky, How are you doing?
Anyway I noticed something from your posts lately....you seem to hate it when villain do....well evil things...so...a couple of questions.
What are some of your favorite villains?
Why do you hate some of things villains do?
Meh, Thankies for asking though ^w^
Hmm, I can't really think of any villains I've encountered lately (in any media) that I would favourite, I guess Nualia from Rise of the Runelords due to her "monster of your own making" backstory?
... the same reason everyone else hates them? I'm just petty and more aggressive in my hatred than others I suppose.
With the announcement of Hell's Vengeance I was, originally, interested to see what Paizo does with it, even though I hate Cheliax. But now after the first evil "iconic's" backstory was shown I now have to tack on that I hope it's at least interesting and enjoyable, but that hope isn't very high.
With making an iconic of this nature you would think they would make them a little more likable or something people could identify with and enjoy playing as on some level. Instead he's just an unlikeable douchebag that I don't even like as a villain, let alone someone to play as.
You can be Evil without being a douchebag, just like you can be likable without being an antihero or "Evil on paper only".
Pretty much. I've played an Antipaladin of Szuriel and a Morhg serial killer so I have no problems with evil characters and evil campaigns.
I don't like douchebags. I don't like Cheliax. So the "Evil Douchebags helping House Thrune" plot doesn't really appeal to me. Moreso since it's at the expense of the Glorious Reclamation, an awesome group that was apparently solely made in order to be torn down in HV.

GreenDragon1133 |
I personally don't like that these two APs seem to be diametrically opposed in order to maintain status quo. Chaos gains in one area, but Law gains in another.
I also don't like that it is a Law vs. Chaos issue. So Lawful Goods can't oppose a Lawful Evil government? The choice is Tyranny or Anarchy?

![]() |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

I personally don't like that these two APs seem to be diametrically opposed in order to maintain status quo. Chaos gains in one area, but Law gains in another.
I also don't like that it is a Law vs. Chaos issue. So Lawful Goods can't oppose a Lawful Evil government? The choice is Tyranny or Anarchy?
I actually don't see it as anarchy vs tyranny even though tyranny is what you're up against (HR) and then helping (HV), you can choose how anarchic you are (Hell, play a paladin in HR, "LEGITIMATE AUTHORITY MOTHERF#%!ER!") and there's no restriction on what you play in HV aside form non-good I guess, and the "enemy" is a group of Paladins so...
So no I don't see it as Chaos vs Law, nor anarchy vs tyranny.
I see it as Hope vs Tyranny.

![]() |

Rysky wrote:You ever try and throw a spruce tree?Master Pugwampi wrote:... doesn't the whole Spruce Tree make the stink bombs redundant?♪♫ On the Third Day of Christmas,
I sent to Rysky:Three Stink Bombs,
Two Rabid Dogs,
And a Pugwampi in a Spruce Tree! ♪♫
Yes.
So again, doesn't it make the stink bombs redundant?

Master Pugwampi |

*sigh*
OK, yes, one can throw a spruce tree, but you can't wire a trap with one, set a timer for one, or hide it in a nook and/or cranny to surprise someone.
Admittedly, having a spruce tree lobbed at you could be very surprising (at the very least, unexpected). But you will still see it coming once the tree is picked-up.

![]() |

*sigh*
OK, yes, one can throw a spruce tree, but you can't wire a trap with one, set a timer for one, or hide it in a nook and/or cranny to surprise someone.
Admittedly, having a spruce tree lobbed at you could be very surprising (at the very least, unexpected). But you will still see it coming once the tree is picked-up.
I'm disappointed Wumpums, you're not trying hard enough.
Plus, I know a few AT-STs that would disagree with you.

Master Pugwampi |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

Master Pugwampi wrote:*sigh*
OK, yes, one can throw a spruce tree, but you can't wire a trap with one, set a timer for one, or hide it in a nook and/or cranny to surprise someone.
Admittedly, having a spruce tree lobbed at you could be very surprising (at the very least, unexpected). But you will still see it coming once the tree is picked-up.
I'm disappointed Wumpums, you're not trying hard enough.
Plus, I know a few AT-STs that would disagree with you.
If you're strong enough to throw one of those trees, you're no succubus...you're a glabrezu!!!

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Rysky wrote:If you're strong enough to throw one of those trees, you're no succubus...you're a glabrezu!!!Master Pugwampi wrote:*sigh*
OK, yes, one can throw a spruce tree, but you can't wire a trap with one, set a timer for one, or hide it in a nook and/or cranny to surprise someone.
Admittedly, having a spruce tree lobbed at you could be very surprising (at the very least, unexpected). But you will still see it coming once the tree is picked-up.
I'm disappointed Wumpums, you're not trying hard enough.
Plus, I know a few AT-STs that would disagree with you.
*narrows eyes*
Or maybe this Succubus took levels in Bloodrager? And read a couple Manuals of Gainful Exercise...

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

I thought the whole point of being a succubus was that you could get any number of glabrezu to throw anything you want them to merely by raising one perfectly shaped eyebrow...
Well yeah but I didn't think I needed to state the obvious :3
The people who frequent this thread are too awesome for that.

John Kretzer |
4 people marked this as a favorite. |

Rysky wrote:If you're strong enough to throw one of those trees, you're no succubus...you're a glabrezu!!!Master Pugwampi wrote:*sigh*
OK, yes, one can throw a spruce tree, but you can't wire a trap with one, set a timer for one, or hide it in a nook and/or cranny to surprise someone.
Admittedly, having a spruce tree lobbed at you could be very surprising (at the very least, unexpected). But you will still see it coming once the tree is picked-up.
I'm disappointed Wumpums, you're not trying hard enough.
Plus, I know a few AT-STs that would disagree with you.
Or she could be a Scottish Succubus who is the Mistress of the Caber.

![]() |

Master Pugwampi wrote:Or she could be a Scottish Succubus who is the Mistress of the Caber.Rysky wrote:If you're strong enough to throw one of those trees, you're no succubus...you're a glabrezu!!!Master Pugwampi wrote:*sigh*
OK, yes, one can throw a spruce tree, but you can't wire a trap with one, set a timer for one, or hide it in a nook and/or cranny to surprise someone.
Admittedly, having a spruce tree lobbed at you could be very surprising (at the very least, unexpected). But you will still see it coming once the tree is picked-up.
I'm disappointed Wumpums, you're not trying hard enough.
Plus, I know a few AT-STs that would disagree with you.
Good stool! You get a treat later :3

![]() |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

Does the Rysky have an adequate number of pugwampis stashed safely away in her seller? Inquiring minds want to know! I want to buy one as a... gift, yes, that's what we call it, for someone!
What, no. I prefer free-range Wampis.
And no. You can't have any.
For they are mine, and you can't have none.