Deceptive Monsters, the lure of sex, and humans: What does it mean?


Lost Omens Campaign Setting General Discussion

51 to 80 of 80 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Sindakka wrote:
John Kretzer wrote:
Sissyl wrote:
One idea I found very logical is that if the orc chieftain wants half-orcs because they are smarter, the orcs aren't going to go kidnap human WOMEN. That's worthless, yielding only a very few half-orcs. No, they will be going for a few strong young men.

While that would be logical I just don't see it in the way orc culture is often depicted. They are just too sexist.

Though it does spark a interesting idea for a tribe of Amazon Orcs....mmmm....

*mental image of female Orc trying to seduce male Human*

...I, just... I just don't see this working out well. Call me racist...

Based on what I have witnessed in bars, I have no problem seeing this happen if alcohol is involved...


Mikaze wrote:
Sindakka wrote:
John Kretzer wrote:
Though it does spark a interesting idea for a tribe of Amazon Orcs....mmmm....

*mental image of female Orc trying to seduce male Human*

...I, just... I just don't see this working out well. Call me racist...

I can totally see it working. Especially with a glance at the Internet.

That and it would be wonderful to have some more support for half-orc players that wanted their human/orc parentage to be loving and consensual.

I was kinda of going with evil amazon orcs...Stealing Our Men...as well according to myth amazons were not exactly good guys um...I mean gals.

I kinda of see a non-evil tribe of orcs really should have it's genesis be moving away from the sexist, raiding nature...not just flipping the coin.

Contributor

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Ambrosia Slaad wrote:

My biology is rusty (Todd Stewart could easily explain this, and more, much better), but for the first several weeks (month?) of gestation, all fetal humans are pretty much female until the specific epigenetic switches trigger and tell a male fetus to differentiate itself from a female fetus, although "complications" (not quite the right word choice) occasionally can and do occur. Maybe most of these "female"-appearing non-humanoids just don't have those triggers while gestating... heck, some of them don't even gestate, like the succubi from Abyssal reforging.

Disclaimer: I am not a developmental biologist.

Sort of. At least in human gestation we begin at a gender indeterminate point, and normally in genetic females you see progression of development down a female path, as in the absence of certain genes on the Y chromosome, there are male-specific genes on the X chromosome whose expression is repressed. In genetic males you have genes on the Y chromosome that push development down a male path and block female specific genes on the X chromosome from being expressed.

It's not entirely so much that humans have a female default state. In some respects females are repressed males and males are repressed females.

Hormones in the uterine environment affect genetic males and genetic females differently, based on the genes present and the genes expressed, and for instance there are XY fetuses with a genetic condition called total androgen insensitivity, and they development down a mostly standard female path since many of the male specific genes down get turned on, but they also lack expression of some female specific genes. They end up looking like genetic females, but with some internal anatomy that doesn't develop quite fully.


As I understand it, the chromosomes of the fetus aren't necessarily connected to its sex. It's more like a very strongly tied covariant marker, and not just because of the possibilities of androgen insensitivity. What determines the sexual characteristics of the fetus is the hormone cocktail it gets subjected to in the womb, not something from the fetus. Now, it's not quite true that we start out female and become male if we are, because our sexual apparatus begins from a neutral state and is developed into the sexually-tied expressions.

Sum total: In ALMOST all cases, the genes of the child go hand in hand with the eventual sex.

The truth about other species is of course that it's ludicrous to have the amount of crossbreeds that exist in the game. =)

Silver Crusade

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

It's not just interspeicial love, it's interSPECIAL too.

Scarab Sages

9 people marked this as a favorite.
Sindakka wrote:

*mental image of female Orc trying to seduce male Human*

...I, just... I just don't see this working out well. Call me racist...
Mikaze wrote:
I can totally see it working. Especially with a glance at the Internet.

Indeed.

(I don't think Valeros would need kidnapping...)

"Oh, woe. I cannot break free from these bonds."

<tugs feebly at grass ropes>

"Even my mighty thews are no match for these ironwood cords."

<tug>

"I must stay here, and be the plaything of my many, insatiable green mistresses."

"Oh, woe."


2 people marked this as a favorite.
John Kretzer wrote:
Mikaze wrote:
Sindakka wrote:
John Kretzer wrote:
Though it does spark a interesting idea for a tribe of Amazon Orcs....mmmm....

*mental image of female Orc trying to seduce male Human*

...I, just... I just don't see this working out well. Call me racist...

I can totally see it working. Especially with a glance at the Internet.

That and it would be wonderful to have some more support for half-orc players that wanted their human/orc parentage to be loving and consensual.

I was kinda of going with evil amazon orcs...Stealing Our Men...as well according to myth amazons were not exactly good guys um...I mean gals.

I kinda of see a non-evil tribe of orcs really should have it's genesis be moving away from the sexist, raiding nature...not just flipping the coin.

We already have moon succubi stealing our men...if I ever play Moonscar, I'm going to be pretty tempted to play a gunslinger or ranger with a blonde flat-top, a magnificent chin, and black-tinted goggles, then at the beginning bemoan the kidnappings with, "Damn it, why do they always take the hot ones?"


Luthorne wrote:
We already have moon succubi stealing our men...if I ever play Moonscar, I'm going to be pretty tempted to play a gunslinger or ranger with a blonde flat-top, a magnificent chin, and black-tinted goggles, then at the beginning bemoan the kidnappings with, "Damn it, why do they always take the hot ones?"

And then charge into combat proclaiming “Gonna rip ’em a new one!”, right? ;)


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Trace Coburn wrote:
Luthorne wrote:
We already have moon succubi stealing our men...if I ever play Moonscar, I'm going to be pretty tempted to play a gunslinger or ranger with a blonde flat-top, a magnificent chin, and black-tinted goggles, then at the beginning bemoan the kidnappings with, "Damn it, why do they always take the hot ones?"
And then charge into combat proclaiming “Gonna rip ’em a new one!”, right? ;)

"My boot, your face; the perfect couple." For some reason imagining a muscular, kind of masculine-looking female version of Duke Nukem who's determined to rescue all the hot men from various female monsters while tending to patronize the men themselves amuses me...probably because I'm a bad person.


I'm reminded of one of the Darklords of Ravenloft, a figure known as the Phantom Lover. He was a monster who would seek out a woman who had recently lost her lover, and then come to her in his guise in her bedroom in the middle of the night. Eventually, he would lure her into his world, a dark labyrinth of tunnels underneath a solitary tower, and devour her, body and soul, there.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

It is also interesting to speculate as to the emotional and social 'framing' of love, reproduction and passion in Golarion.

Elves, we are told, live long lives and eventually experience just about everything a relationship has to offer, but are still swept away by the intensity of human passion (albeit transient).

Gnomes are probably always going to be driven by their quest for new experiences however that expresses itself, but I can't see things lasting.

Dwarves are, well Dwarves, very communal, subsuming individual desires and deferring to their familial obligations... usually.

Reproduction in Orcs are probably driven by the need to protect yourself by having lots of strong kin and to dominate the best resources. Romance is unlikely to be a huge aspect of their courtship.

Halflings seem like mini humans (but with less ability to create hybrids) and a lot of other races seem to have an inbuilt social prejudice against their kind e.g. Tieflings.

So what does this say about humans? Perhaps we are emotionally 'gregarious' with different species and cultures (possibly unlike this world right now) and able to define love uniquely within each experience. Doesn't that sound, nicer than say we are easy?


1 person marked this as a favorite.
John Kretzer wrote:


I was kinda of going with evil amazon orcs...Stealing Our Men...as well according to myth amazons were not exactly good guys um...I mean gals.

Why does "death by snu-snu" pop to mind with this scenario?

Silver Crusade

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Ambrosia Slaad wrote:
Cheapy wrote:
Raise your hand if you were surprised that Mikaze can see it working.
Mikaze is understudying as Shelyn's herald, focused on interhumanoid races Love.

That this requires watching is almost entirely coincidental.

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.
John Kretzer wrote:

I was kinda of going with evil amazon orcs...Stealing Our Men...as well according to myth amazons were not exactly good guys um...I mean gals.

I kinda of see a non-evil tribe of orcs really should have it's genesis be moving away from the sexist, raiding nature...not just flipping the coin.

I was referring more to Sindakka's general "can an orc seduce a human" scenario. :)

I actually agree that just flipping gender dynamics wouldn't make the culture non-evil, though I'm now wondering how the Crossed Soul concept in place with the Belkzen tribes might eventually lead towards sexism being eroded or if it's only going to continue enforcing it...hmmm...


2 people marked this as a favorite.
KahnyaGnorc wrote:
Humans are the most predominant race.

Particularly when discussing the demographics of those who play Role-playing games.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Mikaze wrote:
John Kretzer wrote:

I was kinda of going with evil amazon orcs...Stealing Our Men...as well according to myth amazons were not exactly good guys um...I mean gals.

I kinda of see a non-evil tribe of orcs really should have it's genesis be moving away from the sexist, raiding nature...not just flipping the coin.

I was referring more to Sindakka's general "can an orc seduce a human" scenario. :)

I actually agree that just flipping gender dynamics wouldn't make the culture non-evil, though I'm now wondering how the Crossed Soul concept in place with the Belkzen tribes might eventually lead towards sexism being eroded or if it's only going to continue enforcing it...hmmm...

This whole discussion sent me digging around for the Earthdawn book on their orks, The Ork Nation of Cara Fahd.

ED presented orks as a diaspora trying to rally to their ancestral home and build a defensive, anti-slavery monoculture, a sort of proto-Andoran but with an orkish bias.

Spoiler:
Their home happens be strategically located near the border of the aggressive, expansionist empire everyone else hates.

That leads to an ork nation that's militarily capable but economically and culturally fragile, struggling with questions of whether to build up their resources by allying themselves with other kingdoms--some of which had subjugated and enslaved orks in the past--or to become aggressive raiders themselves and take what they need to survive.

(Also, I just like that both the current and legendary leaders in that setting are women, but out of competent leadership in a meritocracy rather than through some artificial matriarchy. Krathis leads Cara Fahd because she has initiative, tactical prowess, and charisma--the muscle is just a bonus. It set a different tone right off the bat.)

What you end up with, from a story- or character-building perspective, is the ability to let characters determine what kind of orks they'll be. The whole culture is at a crossroads, and one adept ork could find themselves being drafted to fill the closest thing to a central role in ork society.

If they want to be stereotypical orks pillaging the defenseless, they'll have backers. If they want to talk softly and carry a big sword on top of a huge mount, they'll have support. But ork culture in ED isn't defined to the point where they have to be either.

There's not much room to retrofit that idea into Belkzen, but Golarion does leave open the ability to unify the orcs behind a common cause. (And it'd be nice to have the orcs unified by an orc instead of a human or dragon or whatever more than once every 10,000 years!)


Wiggz wrote:
KahnyaGnorc wrote:
Humans are the most predominant race.
Particularly when discussing the demographics of those who play Role-playing games.

Met a few who weren't.


I've stated before that out of all half-creature possibilities in the game, among the most prevalent is half-human, second only to half-dragon which can be applied to any living creature. Near every PC race at least has at least a decent dose of human. Therefore we can deduce one or both of two things. Either:

1) Humans, and by extension dragons, are the horniest creatures in the game.

And/or

2) Humans are the race that gives every other class the vapors.

Silver Crusade

The reason is obviously that evil knows it cannot tempt the forever-true heart of a tengu such as Reiji Nakami!


Perhaps the monsters exist but we just don't get the stories, given a humanocentric bias on bestiary stories. Why does a pseudodragon look like a wyrmling and have a sleep venom sting? What stories do winter wolves tell of werewolves?


A lot of the beautiful female monsters I see when I look in the bestiary are nature-themed like dryads, nereids, pixies, swan maidens, etc. Is this because nature gods have traditionally been female in the past like Artemis and Gaia? Is it the result of ecofeminism? Is it both?


Welllll... according to one greek origin myth, humans were originally all male, and begat the next generation on nymphs, which were semi-divine and immortal nature spirits.

Silver Crusade

Sarcasmancer wrote:
Given the existence of ifrit, undines, oreads, sylphs, janni, tieflings, aasimar, dhampirs(!), and all the "half" races (in which the half is always understood to be humans), maybe they are right.

But you can have at the very least tiefling and aasimar who have pretty much any humaniod in their bloodline. I think there's an aasimar type that is decended from orcs.

As for the female monsters seeming to be more common. We're getting more sexy males who use being sexy to their advantage.

Fauns, who seem to be happy to sleep around with any willing being

The Fossegrim, pretty much an evil male nymph

Then there's the incubi

Oh and the Ostiarius Kytons, dear lord talk about being able to use that pure sexyness to lure people to the shadow plane to do horrible things to them.

Silver Crusade

Spastic Puma wrote:
A lot of the beautiful female monsters I see when I look in the bestiary are nature-themed like dryads, nereids, pixies, swan maidens, etc. Is this because nature gods have traditionally been female in the past like Artemis and Gaia? Is it the result of ecofeminism? Is it both?

Well, we have the semi-good if you don't go tromping about destroying his home, Erlking. He was sexy beyond words.

for one that's not pretty but most def a nature god there's the Maintu, which I suppose if it felt like it could be sexy

Scarab Sages

Cosi fan tutte.


Recently rereading the Malleus Mailificarum.

If I understood it correctly then Incubi outnumber Succubi more than 10 to 1 as apparently it's the female of the species that's easier to seduce.

Apparently Hell saw this as a more efficient arrangement.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
MMCJawa wrote:
Sindakka wrote:

*mental image of female Orc trying to seduce male Human*

...I, just... I just don't see this working out well. Call me racist...
Based on what I have witnessed in bars, I have no problem seeing this happen if alcohol is involved...

I dunno, if it was the right half-orc, it'd likely work on me sober.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Ambrosia Slaad wrote:
MMCJawa wrote:
Sindakka wrote:

*mental image of female Orc trying to seduce male Human*

...I, just... I just don't see this working out well. Call me racist...
Based on what I have witnessed in bars, I have no problem seeing this happen if alcohol is involved...
I dunno, if it was the right half-orc, it'd likely work on me sober.

Even the right pure blooded orc may have a lower cha, but that just means he lacks social skills. With all those physicals buffed....

mmmmm yummy indeed.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Garrett Guillotte wrote:

What you end up with, from a story- or character-building perspective, is the ability to let characters determine what kind of orks they'll be. The whole culture is at a crossroads, and one adept ork could find themselves being drafted to fill the closest thing to a central role in ork society.

If they want to be stereotypical orks pillaging the defenseless, they'll have backers. If they want to talk softly and carry a big sword on top of a huge mount, they'll have support. But ork culture in ED isn't defined to the point where they have to be either.

Oh God THIS.

I really really wish this was the direction Pathfinder had taken with their orcs. :(

Silver Crusade

Mystic_Snowfang wrote:
But you can have at the very least tiefling and aasimar who have pretty much any humaniod in their bloodline. I think there's an aasimar type that is decended from orcs.

There's an aasimar feat that's all about this, supporting a sort of "chosen one" to lead certain races out of darkness. Boosts diplomacy and such when dealing with members of that race.

51 to 80 of 80 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Lost Omens Campaign Setting / General Discussion / Deceptive Monsters, the lure of sex, and humans: What does it mean? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in General Discussion