Project: J-ko
|
Map list not yet available.
Y'know, I'm gonna go dust off my museum map just in case. ;)
Seriously though, I've been waiting for Blakros something ever since The Daughter's Due. For all the "Oh God not this place again" that this scenario will inevitably receive...I'm actually pretty jazzed for this one.
Ivis Flanagan
Designer
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Davor Firetusk wrote:After 10+ years the Blackros' are finally questioning Nigel?I feel sad since the scenario where the party can vote to blame Nigel as incompetent it REALLY isn't his fault that time xD
True, but his years of incompetence and blaming others kinda led to it. I just have to wonder how much of my personal headcanon this is going to rewrite.
CorvusMask
|
The thing I like about this adventure is that
| HammerJack |
The map in the scenario is definitely wrong, yes. Prepping it to run online this weekend, I'm needing to find or make a similarly themed map to replace it with, because the image provided is actually unusable without changing the encounter more than substituting another map would.
There are also some incomplete statblocks. I don't dislike the adventure, but it seems like a lot slipped through the cracks.
Linda Zayas-Palmer
Organized Play Managing Developer
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Thanks for finding issues, folks. I've made corrections, and we will reupload shortly.
*Fixed runestone price/level to standard
*Fixed Elite template application on nightmare for high level range
*Fixed CP scaling in first encounter of high level range to list high level ranges.
*added number of spells to spontaneous casters (the standard, same as # listed)
*added missing checkbox to treasure bundle list
*added perception to Nigel's discovery skills (DC 2 higher than Arcana)
*blowgun damage normalized (technically NPCs don't have to do the same damage as PCs with weapons, though we generally try to have them do so)
*Map for Area B (added in previous revision)
CorvusMask
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
On sidenote, I feel bit annoyed when I feel like pointing out to players who make reviews that they should read the scenario themselves first before reviewing it, since sometimes their issue is that gm forgot the part where it says that npc explains the information from background section of scenario ^_^; Like yeah, this is latest in Blakros scenarios which continue plotline of Blakros scenarios from 1e, but I remember background section actually explaining basics of it. But then again perhaps I shouldn't comment before rereading it since I do have perspective of few 1e scenarios(I never played all Blakros ones but I did play ones that explain OA)