| Leo_Negri |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
So we get a Cryptids book, yay!!!
If this goes true to form with the other "Monsters Revisited" books we'll get 10.
Chupacabra
Sasquatch
Yeti
The Sandpoint Devil
Mothman
and. . .
beginning random speculation
Mokele M'bembe (sp)
Kongamato
Hodag
Slurrk
and . . . I got nothin'. Help me out folks, those are the only remotely cryptid type critters I can even think of.
Kvantum
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
We get a cryptids book before Fey? Seriously? I mean, it makes sense to have a cryptids book with as many as have been statted up for use in Pathfinder, but still... And this before a Monsters of the Dark Tapestry/Lovecraftian Nightmares book as well?
logic_poet
|
Sounds good, but looks like it's not in the proper spot in the auto display. I don't see a preorder date, but the subscription claims it goes out next month. Given the serial number, it should be further off.
| Dragon78 |
I have been waiting for a fey one since the first "revisted" book came out.
The interest in the Lovecraft stuff has more to do with actually seeing stats for these creatures for the first time when Paizo used them.
So we have:
Mothman
Chubacabra
Sasquatch
Yeti
Sandpoint Devil
We should have:
Water Orm
Sea Serpent
We might get:
Mokele M'bembe
Hodag
Slurrk
Kongamato
Peluda
Bunyip
Chickcharney
Globster
Grootslang
Lusca
Chemosit
Tatzlwyrm
| MMCJawa |
Aren't slurks a fictional invention? If so they wouldn't be in a cryptid book. And the Peluda is more of a legendary monster, than something people have seriously considered as a real beast.
Does Pathfinder have an analogue to the Beast of Gevaudan? Although I suppose any large wolf-like monster would work for that, like a Worg.
Lisa Stevens
CEO
|
| 4 people marked this as a favorite. |
We get a cryptids book before Fey? Seriously? I mean, it makes sense to have a cryptids book with as many as have been statted up for use in Pathfinder, but still... And this before a Monsters of the Dark Tapestry/Lovecraftian Nightmares book as well?
Patience. Patience. All good things come to those who wait.
:)
-Lisa
James Jacobs
Creative Director
|
Silly question time: is the title inspired at all by a very cheesy documentary movie from the 70's titled The Mysterious Monsters that was the first introduction many people had to Bigfoot, the Abominable Snowman, and Nessie?
Nope. Not on purpose, at least.
We came upon the title after we admitted to ourselves that "Cryptids Revisited" would confuse too many folks on the distribution side of things.
| Zaister |
I kind of agree... but there's a lot to be said for using the same word ("Revisited") in as many of these books as we can.
Too bad, but I understand the business strategy.
| Justin Franklin |
Stratagemini wrote:I wonder which one James Jacob Wrote...By "I can't write them all," I meant "I can't write every book we publish."
I'm not writing ANYTHING for this book, in other words.
Neither is that James Jacob guy who spells his name funny with no "s".
So then shouldn't it be named "James Jacobs presents Mystery Monsters Revisited"?
| Jim Groves Contributor, RPG Superstar 2010 Top 4 |
So then shouldn't it be named "James Jacobs presents Mystery Monsters Revisited"?
Ironically I was at physical therapy yesterday morning and was explaining what I freelance and discussing the hobby in general. My therapist poked fun of R.A. Salvatore for prostituting his name for other authors just like that.
(That is, "R.A. Salvatore's Book of Whatever, by Real-Author-Whose-Name-is-in-Small-Font-Right-at-the-Bottom-of-the-Cover")
:)
Food for thought.
Stratagemini
|
Stratagemini wrote:I wonder which one James Jacob Wrote...By "I can't write them all," I meant "I can't write every book we publish."
I'm not writing ANYTHING for this book, in other words.
Neither is that James Jacob guy who spells his name funny with no "s".
But did this James Jacob guy with no S want to write this entire book?
How about you? Did you want to write this book? Because I thought you would be eager to wade into Bigfoot Country and start writing?
| Justin Franklin |
Justin Franklin wrote:So then shouldn't it be named "James Jacobs presents Mystery Monsters Revisited"?Ironically I was at physical therapy yesterday morning and was explaining what I freelance and discussing the hobby in general. My therapist poked fun of R.A. Salvatore for prostituting his name for other authors just like that.
(That is, "R.A. Salvatore's Book of Whatever, by Real-Author-Whose-Name-is-in-Small-Font-Right-at-the-Bottom-of-the-Cover")
:)
Food for thought.
On teh other hand James Patterson does it all the time with great success, and there is always VC Andrews who has been dead for years and still putting out books. ;)
| Jim Groves Contributor, RPG Superstar 2010 Top 4 |
On teh other hand James Patterson does it all the time with great success, and there is always VC Andrews who has been dead for years and still putting out books. ;)
Oh I wouldn't argue that it makes money.
I regretted posting that after I did, because I didn't want to imply anything about James or Paizo.
But let me put some context to it. What the physical therapist was really trying to get across was that he really liked R.A. Salvatore. He never really considered a role-playing game, but he enjoyed the author's novels. Then he bought a couple "R.A. Salvatore Presents.." books and he was disappointed. He felt tricked.
That's all. Make of that what you will.
I'm going to stop here, so we don't derail the thread.
If nothing else, maybe James had a hand in developing this book, and therefore it will have some measure his love of the topic in it.
James Jacobs
Creative Director
|
James Jacobs wrote:Stratagemini wrote:I wonder which one James Jacob Wrote...By "I can't write them all," I meant "I can't write every book we publish."
I'm not writing ANYTHING for this book, in other words.
Neither is that James Jacob guy who spells his name funny with no "s".
But did this James Jacob guy with no S want to write this entire book?
How about you? Did you want to write this book? Because I thought you would be eager to wade into Bigfoot Country and start writing?
I would have LOVED to write the book. But since my current freelance time is already spoken for by things like the kickstarter project and convention season and a few other things... I couldn't. Just didn't have time.
| Justin Franklin |
Justin Franklin wrote:On teh other hand James Patterson does it all the time with great success, and there is always VC Andrews who has been dead for years and still putting out books. ;)Oh I wouldn't argue that it makes money.
I regretted posting that after I did, because I didn't want to imply anything about James or Paizo.
But let me put some context to it. What the physical therapist was really trying to get across was that he really liked R.A. Salvatore. He never really considered a role-playing game, but he enjoyed the author's novels. Then he bought a couple "R.A. Salvatore Presents.." books and he was disappointed. He felt tricked.
That's all. Make of that what you will.
I'm going to stop here, so we don't derail the thread.
If nothing else, maybe James had a hand in developing this book, and therefore it will have some measure his love of the topic in it.
I mostly meant it as a joke idea anyway. No offense taken or given, I hope. And now back to teaming up to convince JJ to announce the Irrisen AP. ;)
Stratagemini
|
Are skyfish/rods cryptid enough for you, JJ, or has their extremely thorough debunking dropped them off the list?
Typically the Revisited Line has used Monters already in the bestiaries (whether the main 3, or from Adventure Paths, Module, companions and setting books). I can't remember Skyfish or rods in any of the bestiaries.
| DungeonmasterCal |
Evil Midnight Lurker wrote:Are skyfish/rods cryptid enough for you, JJ, or has their extremely thorough debunking dropped them off the list?Typically the Revisited Line has used Monters already in the bestiaries (whether the main 3, or from Adventure Paths, Module, companions and setting books). I can't remember Skyfish or rods in any of the bestiaries.
Well, I'd say that's a starting place for a sequel book!
Kevida
|
Well, my Christmas present is set. I run a non-Golarion campaign setting, but I'm sure I can still find room for things like the Sandpoint Devil there.
Add me to the list of folks calling for a Fey Revisited book, too.
In case you didn't know (and if you do then please accept my most humble apology) the Sand Point Devil is based on "The Jersey Devil" which is a legend here on the East Coast.
James Jacobs
Creative Director
|
Evil Midnight Lurker wrote:Are skyfish/rods cryptid enough for you, JJ, or has their extremely thorough debunking dropped them off the list?Typically the Revisited Line has used Monters already in the bestiaries (whether the main 3, or from Adventure Paths, Module, companions and setting books). I can't remember Skyfish or rods in any of the bestiaries.
That's true too. One of the reasons we took so long to do this book was we had to wait until we finally got Absolutely Required Cryptid #10 in print in Bestiary 3!
Kevida
|
Charlie Brooks wrote:In case you didn't know (and if you do then please accept my most humble apology) the Sand Point Devil is based on "The Jersey Devil" which is a legend here on the East Coast.Well, my Christmas present is set. I run a non-Golarion campaign setting, but I'm sure I can still find room for things like the Sandpoint Devil there.
Add me to the list of folks calling for a Fey Revisited book, too.
Charlie Brooks, I misread your post. disregard my response.