![]()
![]()
![]() I've played part 3 but not parts 1, 2, or 4. I'm currently playing Tsrvk in your game of Unleashing the Untouchable and very happy with your GM expectations. Characters in tier: Gronkh Maha: Level 4 Cavalier/Fighter/Monk, a lance warrior who rides around on an Axebeak. Fizzlebottom: Level 5 Mesmerist/Ninja. Xivio: Level 4 Wizard (with one level Rogue dip) Phidöe: Level 6 hodgepodge (Rogue/Paladin/Swashbuckler/Monk). He's a kitsune who spends all his time in fox form, disguised as a dog. Drukpa Marpo: Level 4 Bloodrager. Not the brightest. Vinnie Bandar: Level 5 Shaman (with one level Monk dip) Ivan D'Ifrit: Level 3 Paladin/Gunslinger ![]()
![]() After the battle is over Yuri catches his breath and then hands a stick to one of his comrades and asks them to use it to heal him from his wounds. CLW: 1d8 + 1 ⇒ (8) + 1 = 9
He also puts on a new Lesser Talisman of Freedom to replace the one that has crumbled to dust. And, just to be on the safe side, he actives his Sihedron Brand. 30 temp hp - the duration is a little unclear but consensus seems to be for 3 hours. He will remain Enlarged unless the group enters an area that requires him to be Medium. And now that they have encountered a threat he will keep his weapon in hand. ... Str is the only one of these checks that Yuri would be good at and it sounds like that is already taken care of. However he has a very high Sunder roll as well as the Spell Sunder rage power (which allows him to do a Sunder maneuver on an "ongoing spell effect."). Could he use either of these to clear one of the obstacles? If yes... Yuri gets angry again (Using another round of rage - 3/33) and attempts to smash the obstacle in their way! Sunder, Strength Surge rage power, +3 adamantine-dorn-dergar: 1d20 + 31 + 3 + 12 ⇒ (16) + 31 + 3 + 12 = 62 ![]()
![]() I'm Hiding In Your Closet wrote:
Btw, you are up in our Solstice Scar game. Fyi in case you missed it. ![]()
![]() I'll wait to see what we need before choosing my PC. My options in tier are: Dawa Kookpa: Lunar Oracle 8 + Bard 1 (with melee Tiger) Sir Mr. Proudefeets: 7 + Fighter 2 + Monk 2 (mounted on flying griffon) Hoprah: Sorcerer 9 Tull: Warpriest 9 + Bloodrager 1 Bon Jon Bovi: Unchained Monk 8 Birseko Naam: Psychic 9 ![]()
![]() Pirate Rob wrote:
I played a Swashbuckler in a PbP and I have to say that it was pretty annoying. Essentially every turn I had to post two contingencies: what I do if I achieve panache and what to do if I fail to achieve panache, with attempting to get panache usually being my first action. I haven't looked at the remastered swashbuckler yet to see how it may have changed but overall my impression of the premastered swashbuckler was that the play style was very repetitive and against foes that it was hard to get panache, pretty boring. I hope the remaster improved it. ![]()
![]() As I rebuild my characters for the Remaster, if I'm happy with the inventory of items they already have, can I just leave their items "as they are" (aside, of course, from any items that have been "Withdrawn") and keep the current tally of gold? This would be a lot less work for me than redoing everything so this would be preference and *I think* it's what the remaster rules permit but I'm just doublechecking. Thanks and my apologies if this question has already been asked/answered - I couldn't find it with a quick search. ![]()
![]() It is the hour of Sarenrae's Light
Location Power: Characters may not play allies Display Nulg Free exploration
Abandoned Shacks Card 3 is Wolf Pack:
Core Monster 0 Traits: Animal To Defeat: Combat 11 OR Survival 6 Before acting, a local character summons and encounters this monster. If the check to defeat has the Attack or Ranged trait, you may reroll. Giving the BYA to Mios since he'll benefit from the Animal trait (and botting since it seems straightforward).
Continuing on to the non-summoned Wolf Pack...
Discard Iomedae to explore Abandoned Shacks Card 4 is Rioting Mob:
Story Bane Type: Barrier Traits: Skirmish Veteran To Defeat: Charisma Diplomacy 6+# If undefeated, each character summons and encounters the story bane Thug. Discard Samurai 2
When Closing: Summon and defeat the danger.
Bandit:
Story Bane Type: Monster Traits: Bandit Human Veteran To Defeat: Combat 9+## OR Banish A Random Boon Before acting, recharge a card. If undefeated or evaded, bury the bottom card of your deck. BYA: recharge Mirror Image Combat 9+2+2=13, naginata (and discard it), banish wolf pack 2: 1d10 + 2 + 2d8 + 1d6 + 2d4 ⇒ (5) + 2 + (6, 2) + (5) + (3, 4) = 27
Abandoned Shacks is closed.
Nulg power: banish Bandit 1 to draw a card: Black Spot End of Turn
Recovery Phase: Reset Hand Board Status
Notes for Quinn: Quinn buries an item for Thargrap; Moved to Shrine
" Thargrap wrote:
Deck, Discard, Buried:
Reloaded:
Middle of Deck (Unknown Order): Banner, Magic Chain Shirt (Core), Falconer, Falcon, Blessing of the Samurai 1, Unerring Weapon, Blessing of Gorum Recharged: Mirror Image (Core), Discard Pile: Buried Pile: Skills and Powers: " SKILLS
Strength d10 ☐ +1 ☐ +2 ☐ +3 ☐ +4 Melee: Str +2 Dexterity d6 ☐ +1 ☐ +2 Constitution d8 ☐ +1 ☐ +2 ☐ +3 Fortitude: Con +2 Intelligence d4 ☐ +1 Wisdom d6 ☐ +1 ☐ +2 Charisma d8 ☐ +1 ☐ +2 ☐ +3 Arcane: Charisma +2 Traits: Half-Orc, Summoner Favored Card: Weapon Hand Size: 4 ☐ 5 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Proficiencies: Arcane, Weapons POWERS: On your (☐ or a local) check against a monster, you may bury a card from your discards or banish a buried card to add 1d6 (☐ 1d8). When a local character defeats a monster and would banish it, you may bury it instead. ☐ You may banish a boon to draw a card; this power cannot be used during an encounter. (When you gain this feat, also check a feat box on your cohort Blood God Nulgreth.) ![]()
![]() I'm interested in playing though I have no idea what I'll play. I could use suggestions for that. The last few characters I've played have been casters so I think I'm ready for a non-caster and generally I'm fond of characters with powers that make for interesting play. I've had a blast playing Aric/Red Raven or Radovan, for example. EST time zone. I'm fine with you picking the wildcards or doing random. Mostly I just enjoy that they make the game more challenging and complex. ![]()
![]() I'm at an in-person convention (Dragoncon) all weekend so I won't have a chance to fill in the slides etc. until Monday. It looks like we are going high tier. Do we have a sense of any party roles that we are missing? For melee I can offer my level 10 warpriest or my level 11 paladin cavalier. For arcane casting I have a level 9 sorcerer or a level 10 wizard. My level 9 oracle offers divine casting, bardic inspiration, and a melee tiger. If no one has a preference or if there's no obvious need, I think I'll go with the warpriest just because I haven't played him in a long time and for pbp he's relatively straightforward to manage. ![]()
![]() I have multiple character options that I can bring to this game - I'll choose when we get closer to the start date depending on the party composition and what is needed. Lunar Oracle 9 (does double duty as an Inspire Bard and also has a melee tiger) Cavalier/paladin 11 (flying mount is a griffon) - very fun but can be difficult to play in tight quarters - will defer to the GM if they think it's better not to bring for this scenario. Sorcerer 9 Wizard 10 Warpriest 10 Monk 7 ![]()
![]() An EDITING REQUEST: it would make the rules much more readable if the same baseline things weren't repeated over and over. For example, instead of giving the exact same rules for when you get new skill feats for every core class (except the rogue), just define that once in a section called something like "The Skill Feats That Every Class Gets" and then add a section for the rogue (and later the investigator, swashbuckler, etc.) that indicates that they get some EXTRA skill feats. This wouldn't be changing anything from how things already are now, but it would draw the reader's attention to the fact that there is something unusual from the norm for the Rogue, and it would also allow the reader to not have to read the same baseline pattern over and over again, wondering if there is anything different that they need to note. ![]()
![]() Shadow Dragon wrote: I haven't played any Special - ever. I recommend playing specials in PbP over face to face. In a noisy convention ballroom it is usually impossible to follow much of the story of what is going on and therefore specials end up being a tedious slog of trying to get through as many combats and skill encounters as quickly as possible, with no real idea of what the story driving it all is. In contrast, PbP enables you to follow the action of what is usually a very compelling narrative. ![]()
![]() Thanks for running this, GM Otha! I've got three PCs available in tier and I thoroughly enjoy all of them so I'll decide based on our party composition. Yuri is a level 15 superstitious Barbarian (chained) 12/Fighter 3. He rage cycles, has pounce, spell sunders, has reach 20', and wrecks havoc with come and get me. Tsrvk is a level 15 Magus (Magus 14/Dawnflower Dervish Bard 1) who is also a melee type. He has the dimensional dervish feat chain for hopping around the battlefield. Agata is a level 17 Witch with the usual array of hexes and spells. Squishy but lots of support. I love all three of these characters and would be happy to play any of them. ![]()
![]() GM Ietsuna wrote:
I've played part 1 but if you have a spot available when you get to parts 2 and 3 my level 9 oracle would be interested in finishing the story arc. ![]()
![]() The Dire GM wrote: Looks like we have two no-shows. I'll blame that on myself for starting us so late. My apologies - I'm one of the no-shows - I've been trying to find the time every day to pull my character together but have to recognize that I just don't have time right now. I hope you all have fun and I look forward to joining one of your tables another time. ![]()
![]() My two high tier (level 9) characters both have a lot of overlap with two of the characters that are already posted - I have a lunar oracle with a companion, and I have a sorcerer. So I'm kind of inclined to play one of my other options just so we don't have too much similarity. I have a level 7 psychic but I haven't leveled them up yet and won't be able to until Sunday night or Monday. My level 6 monk (maybe 7, I have to check) would provide some melee, which maybe we need? I think maybe I'm leaning towards the monk unless there are other opinions. In any case, I still won't be online much (and unable to post character details) until Sunday night or Monday. ![]()
![]() Looks like my bloodrager will still be tied up in another game so my options are: Cavalier 4
Since it looks like we are likely low tier I'll probably do one of the latter three but will wait to see what fits the party best. I won't be home until Sunday so I won't be able to look at my actual PC folders until then. ![]()
![]() I'm heading out of town in the morning for a two week trip. Likely will have very limited time to post until the end of the month but I am onboard for this game - I should be able to post regularly by May 31 (when I think this is scheduled to start?). I'll play my level 3 Bloodrager (presuming that the game he's currently in is finished by that time). If he's not available I've also got: Cavalier 4
![]()
![]() I'm heading out of town in the morning for a two week trip. Likely will have very limited time to post until the end of the month but I am onboard for this game - I should be able to post regularly by May 31 (when I think this is scheduled to start?). I'll play any of the characters I mentioned in my previous post (the psychic is now level 7) depending on party need. ![]()
![]() I've got different PC options depending on whether we go high or low: High tier:
Low tier:
Happy to play any of these PCs as best fits the rest of the party. ![]()
![]() Tyranius wrote:
On closer examination, it looks like the tables that I haven't been able to join are Author tables. I had missed that they have a different deadline. Thanks for the clarification! ![]()
![]() For the upcoming PaizoCon, I'm able to sign up on Warhorn for PbP games for 1e games but not 2e or SF (both of which say "not permitted to sign up"), or at least some games. Some tables seem to be open and some not. Anyone have any idea why that is? Are these other tables due to open at a later date? Or is it perhaps a glitch in the system? ![]()
![]() For the upcoming PaizoCon, I'm able to sign up on Warhorn for PbP games for 1e games but not 2e or SF (both of which say "not permitted to sign up"), or at least some games. Some tables seem to be open and some not. Anyone have any idea why that is? Are these other tables due to open at a later date? Or is it perhaps a glitch in the system? ![]()
![]() Meranthi wrote:
Got it - many thanks! ![]()
![]() Two questions about signing up for the PbP games that are part of this year's PaizoCon online: 1) I thought I had seen a notice that player sign ups begin on April 16. However, when I look on warhorn it seems to indicate that the seats open on May 7. Is that correct? 2) Once we purchase the badge for PaizoCon online, do we need to *do anything* to let warhorn know that we have it? Or will that automatically be processed through the system so that we can register for PbP games (once the seats are open for players)? Many thanks!
|