Zedth's Keep on the Borderlands (Inactive)

Game Master Zedth

Party Health:
Brandt....18/18
Carith.....12/12
Eina........12/12
Erodin....22/22
Pinto......23/23
Taecuss...19/19

Map of the Borderlands
Current Tactial Map

Party Loot

Initiative and Perception:

Initiative:
[dice=Brandt]1d20+2[/dice]
[dice=Carith]1d20+1[/dice]
[dice=Eina]1d20+2[/dice]
[dice=Erodin]1d20+3[/dice]
[dice=Pinto]1d20+2[/dice]
[dice=Taecuss]1d20+3[/dice]

Initiative order:
1)
2)
3)

Perception checks:
[dice=Brandt]1d20+5[/dice]
[dice=Carith]1d20+3[/dice]
[dice=Eina]1d20+5[/dice]
[dice=Erodin]1d20+0[/dice]
[dice=Pinto]1d20+5[/dice]
[dice=Taecuss]1d20+7[/dice]


51 to 100 of 256 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | next > last >>

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Dunganagar the Mad wrote:

You could get a lordship out of this. You really want to be called 'Lord Bob?'

"King Bob!!!" *Mike drop*


Dwarf Barbarian 2 | HP: 38/38 | AC: 14, TAC: 10, FFAC 14, CMD: 15 | Fort: +7, Reflex: +0, Will: +3 (+2 vs poison, spells) | Perception: +8, S.M.: +8 | Init.: +0

Realized that when Courtland started handing out the silver brooches, I missed the chance to throw in "Badges? BADGES? WE DON' NEED NO STINKIN' BADGES!"


Tactical Map

Hey gang,

I feel like I need to say something because the tone of the some of the recent posts are getting a bit carried away. I'm a little taken aback by the resistance to what are honestly pretty vanilla terms of agreement, in what was meant as nothing more than a jumping off point for what is supposed to be an open-ended sandbox with the Keep at its hub.

Its starting to feel less like you're breaking Cortland's balls, and more like you're breaking my balls, like you're dissatisfied with the game I'm trying to open up. It has grown beyond good-natured ribbing or some discontent for RP's sake; it feels like hostility. I don't for a moment think it wasn't meant this way, but it is what I'm sensing.

Am I off base here? I hate to get all meta but from an RP perspective I feel like I'm running out of options to keep the game moving forward.


Male NG Human Brawler 2 | CMB: 5, CMD: 17 | F: +5, R: +5, W: +1 | Init: +2 | Perc: +5, SM +0 | Speed 30ft |

Hey sorry about that. I know some of that is my PC's fault.

Like I tried to say, it was not meant to derail anything, much less being confrontational with the GM of all people. :)

I've been (and continue being) on the other side of the screen too many times to be anything but a a cooperative player so sorry for whatever it's worth.


Tactical Map
Gamemaster Zedth wrote:
I don't for a moment think it wasn't meant this way

Oops, double negative. I meant to say I don't think it was meant that way.


Dwarf Barbarian 2 | HP: 38/38 | AC: 14, TAC: 10, FFAC 14, CMD: 15 | Fort: +7, Reflex: +0, Will: +3 (+2 vs poison, spells) | Perception: +8, S.M.: +8 | Init.: +0

I don't want you to think I am critical of the game. I am trying to act in character.

Throwing some politics into it can make it more interesting. Courtland is clearly an officious bureaucrat-type and may or may not reflect what life is actually like at the keep. But the way he talks is the kind of thing that makes you think that you better look at the fine print, and may the buyer beware. Which is kind of how I would play a LE cleric of Asmodeus in a game set in Golarion. I'm not sure if that is your intent but I had assumed that was deliberate.

For the record, if I was playing a Lawful Good Paladin or something my character likely would have said "Thank you sir, it's a honor!" and marched on. But here I am playing a pugilistic Chaotic character who was exiled from his home for fighting with his family and resents any impingement on his freedom, and who has been betrayed by members of the noble class before. And he's a dwarf and refuses to give up a copper piece more than he has to.

Dunganagar is also a little miffed that instead of the gratitude he expected to be given because he volunteered for this cause (which was certainly shown by Sowell), Courtland instead seems to think that Dunganagar should be grateful to him and Baroness Hellbane for being 'allowed' to help them.

You'll note though that I reined it in by finishing up with this:

Dunganagar the Mad wrote:
"If your 'paymaster' wants to pay me gold for choppin' off the heads of goblins, I'll take his money. But if this Baroness thinks she is entitled to what I earn, well, then we will have an interestin' conversation."

Which more or less indicates that he is willing to go along with the plan as long as there is money flowing his way, but if they try to start charging him money then things will change. It's possible that by that time Dunganagar will see Baroness Hellbane as more than just a "useless noble."

For the record Dunganagar wouldn't mind the idea of holding some kind of land or estate, but doesn't care a whit about whether he has a title or not, and would not be willing to pledge fealty to Baroness Hellbane unless she really impressed him somehow.

From a Meta standpoint though it is a little weird that we are expected to seek permission to go adventuring, especially in a land that is as wild as the Borderlands, where nobody could stop us from going even if they wanted to. But in a strictly sandbox game there's nothing wrong with the idea of players moving in and taking over when they reach a certain level where they can handle that. FYI The character I am playing is not really intended for the kind of game where you are in someone's employ and are being assigned "missions," though he would work as a mercenary on a strictly cash basis.


Tactical Map

Let me say a few things before I head back over to the gameplay thread.

A few things about in-game:
It is within the normal purview of any ruler to annex land adjacent to their own. In this circumstance the borderlands were governed by Hellbane's predecessor, but were lost during the war. The keep already stood there and was waiting to be retaken by those who built it, so it is not an unusual, evil, or malicious act for the current ruler to claim (reclaim) these lands. If that land is now claimed (the keep is under their control once again) it is also acceptable to place a semblance of rule of law upon the area, which could include limiting the capacity of would-be adventurers going rogue, acting outside the bounds and permission of the land's ruler.

The Baroness has not conscripted poor young lads to fight her battles and die for her glory. She has instead opted for a free-enterprise solution to attract volunteers with promised rewards for payment, which is as far from evil as I can fathom. I'm not seeing anything objectionable or remotely 'lawful evil' here.

You're only seeking permission to adventure there in the loosest sense. With hardly an interview they're willing to make you official officers with priority for land and title, and promised available bounties to jumpstart the taming of the borderlands. Elsewhere you could indeed adventure without any consent but you wouldn't have the benefit of a keep to shelter and resupply in, guaranteed bounties, promises of greater glory later -- all for what investment on your part? Literally nothing but effort, and maybe a small future levy upon spoils brought to the keep? It costs money to process spoils (items other than liquid cash have to be carted out and resold which requires man power, time, and protection, all of which cost money.) There are some legitimate and fair reasons why the keep might need to begin a small tax, and they don't include the Baroness thinking "she is entitled to what I[you] earn."

Dunganagar is making a pretty big show of his disdain for nobles and politics, when said nobles' only burden placed upon Dunganagar thus far would be possible taxes, in the future. (Side note - levies and taxes upon loot have been a part of many games I've played in over the years, so I guess I'm a bit surprised at the volume of pushback over the abstract notion of a possible future tax.) This seems like a profoundly small burden to be placed on someone in exchange for promises of treasure (both taken from enemies and paid for bounties/deeds of good) and more to the point - a chance to earn land and title. You've stated you don't care about the title, but title is valuable nonetheless whether Dunganagar chooses to value it. I'm just not seeing what Dungangar is seeing and I don't understand the level of his pushback.

A few things about out-of-game:
Roleplaying your character's personality is the bread and butter of this hobby and it is to be encouraged, but at some point the character's personality can't be a counter to the game's flow and everyone else's fun. I don't believe you meant for this to happen but Dunganagar's attitude has not only dragged the game to a near halt but I ask you to consider what kind of position it puts me in as the GM. After being spoken to that way, should Cortland still be okay with allowing Dunganagar to be a part of this excursion? As the GM I also have to RP my NPCs, or they become inconsequential and unbelievable. If I as the GM allow you walk all over the Baroness' personal representative, boldly insulting her and her cause without consequence, then I'm not RPing or doing a very good job. This is the position I feel I've been placed in as a result of Dunganagar's harsh RP pushback.

I guess what I'm trying to say is if you want him to be that "rage against the machine" rebel, that's totally cool with me, but all RP needs to be mitigated by what will allow the game to continue forward intact.


Tactical Map

I've said my piece.

I have no hard feelings as I don't believe for a moment that Peet meant any ill will. He was just RPing his character; I was just a little shaken up by the banter and the implications.

Let's forget about this and move forward with a good time.


Dwarf Barbarian 2 | HP: 38/38 | AC: 14, TAC: 10, FFAC 14, CMD: 15 | Fort: +7, Reflex: +0, Will: +3 (+2 vs poison, spells) | Perception: +8, S.M.: +8 | Init.: +0

OK, let's clear the air here.

I think there are some things that do require a response, but I'm spoilering this to avoid cluttering the thread.

Spoiler:
Gamemaster Zedth wrote:
It is within the normal purview of any ruler to annex land adjacent to their own...

Of course, of course. But the point is that Courtland is talking as if the annexation of this territory is already complete, even though it is adventurers like us who are going to do the "annexing." And we are not being paid by the Baroness at all for the land that we are "annexing." In Dunganagar's mind the land belongs to the one that conquered it, and "claim" be damned.

Gamemaster Zedth wrote:
The Baroness has not conscripted poor young lads to fight her battles and die for her glory.

What about the soldiers she retook the keep with? I had assumed that those were from the normal feudal levy (though they could be mercenaries), but now she doesn't have enough troops to do this the normal way and has now called for volunteers.

Gamemaster Zedth wrote:
You're only seeking permission to adventure there in the loosest sense.

Courtland said in no uncertain terms that if we started killing goblins in the borderlands without the baroness' permission we would be treated as criminals. That sounds pretty strict. Courtland is threatening Dunganagar with the law (and likely death) if he doesn't toe the line here.

So if you meant to convey 'in the loosest sense' that totally didn't work.

From Dunganagar's standpoint, if he was doing that he would still be 'helping the cause,' so for them to care more about his getting permission than what he is actually doing makes it seem like they care more about law and control than they do about good. This is a big part of why he seems lawful neutral or maybe even lawful evil to Dunganagar (and to me, also).

Gamemaster Zedth wrote:
Elsewhere you could indeed adventure without any consent but you wouldn't have the benefit of a keep to shelter and resupply in,

This is the one and only reason Dunganagar can see that it is worth "playing along."

Gamemaster Zedth wrote:
guaranteed bounties,

A big part of the contention here is that from Courtland's behavior we now believe that the bounties are not guaranteed at all. He has indicated that they are subject to change without notice and he doesn't even know what the current bounties are. How could he not know? That is EXTREMELY fishy. He prevaricates on the subject and this makes him seem like a weasel. If you try to avoid talking about how much a job pays, it is usually because you think that the offer is not good enough and will be rejected if you bring it up.

How hard would it have been for someone to mention to him how much the bounties were before he came here? A bounty hunter never goes to work without knowing how much the job pays.

(Moved this next bit out of order because the subject matched the following bit.)

Gamemaster Zedth wrote:
With hardly an interview they're willing to make you official officers...

Here's part of the problem. Dunganagar doesn't want to be an "official officer" of anything and doesn't see why he would have to be one in order to kill goblins. Being a bounty hunter is one thing... being a sheriff is another altogether, and not a job Dunganagar is interested in.

Gamemaster Zedth wrote:
...when said nobles' only burden placed upon Dunganagar thus far would be possible taxes,

Oh, no, it's a lot more than that. What about this?:

Courtland wrote:

...granting you the rights and duties of officers of her law while within the borderlands region. Outside the keep's walls, you are the law, with the exception of officers operating from within the keep."

"Let it be known that this writ's validity is temporary and may be withdrawn if your behavior is judged to be ill-suited to this endeavor."

(emphasis mine)

Courtland has explicitly said that we won't just be free adventurers - we will be police. And we must adhere to a code of behavior determined by the Baroness.

This may work for lawful characters, but it had Dunganagar worried from the start since he knows that he doesn't "play well" in organized society. This makes it sound like he has to act like a paladin and he knows that this won't work out. Frankly this is not the job people should want Dunganagar to have anyway.

It is also a big departure from the concept behind the "Keep on the Borderlands" where nobody really cared what you did outside the keep, as long as you were fighting the enemy.

Gamemaster Zedth wrote:
(Side note - levies and taxes upon loot have been a part of many games I've played in over the years, so I guess I'm a bit surprised at the volume of pushback over the abstract notion of a possible future tax.)

Did you know that King Richard the Lionheart was killed in an argument over rights to found treasure? :)

It's fully in-character for a dwarf to resist the idea of taxes.

It was kind of stupid for Courtland to even bring it up, actually. It would have been much more sensible to just wait and bring it up later. Actually, if after adventuring for a while the Baroness approached the adventurers and said "I need money for X, can you help?" (assuming the Baroness is the kind of person it sounds like you mean her to be), Dunganagar would probably just give money to her, as long as it was actually a gift and not an obligation.

Marginally Relevant Stuff About Taxes:
Medieval taxes were mostly in the form of tolls and fees, and though Dunganagar doesn't want to spend money on anything he would grudgingly accept the notion. There is the sense of an exchange there - you are getting something for your money. There were other kinds of taxes too, but tax collectors were generally viewed to be basically the same as bandits, except you weren't allowed to just kill them. But stealing from them made you a hero... like Robin Hood.

"Income Tax" however is a very modern invention and when it was first imposed there was a great outcry. They were only permitted (at least in the UK, US, and Canada) because of the necessity to raise funds during war. So the idea that Dunganagar would have to pay money just because he has some would certainly seem offensive. Not just to him - to most people.

From a Meta perspective:

In 1e and AD&D (when Keep on the Borderlands was written), there wasn't a lot you could spend your money on once you got it. You couldn't buy magic items (unless you commissioned items which could take months or years). So you were mostly hoarding it until you had the chance to build a castle with it. So taxes just meant a smaller castle.

For 3.5/Pathfinder though, the core assumption is that adventurers will be funneling their money into magic items, because they need to. I am sure that as a GM you will be making sure a reasonable amount of treasure is found.

But Dunganagar doesn't know that. What he does know is that magic weapons are fantasically expensive, yet all the truly great heroes of yore had them. So he begrudges any delay in that process.

Gamemaster Zedth wrote:
...but I ask you to consider what kind of position it puts me in as the GM. After being spoken to that way, should Cortland still be okay with allowing Dunganagar to be a part of this excursion? As the GM I also have to RP my NPCs, or they become inconsequential and unbelievable.

I wasn't trying to derail the game, but let's look at what happened.

  • When Dunganagar asked Courtland to actually commit to something concrete in the "contract" (and Courtland used that term first), Courtland got evasive.

  • And then when Dunganagar asked Courtland why shouldn't he just go off on his own, Courtland threatened him, saying that he would:

    Courtland wrote:
    "be considered outlaws alongside the brigands and wicked folk that already roam there."
  • Considering that bounties are being placed for the heads of such creatures this amounts to a death threat.

Now if NPCs are going to threaten player characters, especially for doing something that is not evil at all, then you can't not expect a response.

If Courtland had instead said: "Well then if you do that they won't let you into the keep to resupply," that would have been entirely different. And Dunganagar would have seen a certain value in this "permission," and gone along.

When I GM I normally only have my NPCs act this way when I want there to be a fight scene. But I figured if you wanted there to be a fight in the tavern I had better let Courtland draw steel first.

I don't want to derail the game, but Dunganagar will not respond well to "if you don't play along we'll have you killed." Even my lawful characters wouldn't think highly of this.

Fair?

Peet/Dunganagar


Male NG Human Brawler 2 | CMB: 5, CMD: 17 | F: +5, R: +5, W: +1 | Init: +2 | Perc: +5, SM +0 | Speed 30ft |

FYI, I'm out of town for work but should be able post later tonight.


Tactical Map

Peet:

Suffice it to say that we're going to have to agree to disagree on most of these points. I feel like you're focusing upon what I see as inconsequential details for the sake of RP, mostly because we apparently disagree on the context and interpretation of these details.

What I'm seeing as benign and typical terms from a relatively inconsequential NPC you're seeing as draconian threats to your chaotic lifestyle and an opportunity to stand your figurative ground. What I'm seeing as a ruler's prerogative you're seeing as oppressive. What I'm seeing as a simple jumping off point for 1st level characters who should feel as if they're just starting out, you're seeing as belittling and marginalizing.

But to me all of those things are intellectual. Your character is entitled to those opinions, but we're here to game, not debate. Some debate is of course fine but if the character's RP initiates this much disagreement in the gameplay & discussion thread, it has entered disruptive territory. If the character is disagreeing so vehemently this early on with the way the game is set to play out, I am truly worried about issues that will predictably come up later. Are we going to have this argument again when the keep imposes a 10% levy on the goods you bring back? Dunganagar's feelings about taxes won't stop them from coming. This is what I'm worried about.

Peet, we've only just met (online, at least) and I think you're a good guy. I thoroughly enjoyed our PMs back and forth about my world map, game world history, and your enthusiasm in this game. With that said, I don't like this kind of argument and pushback in my games. Because of the amount of work and passion I put into my games situations like this feel like a slap in the face. I'm truly sorry but I need to ask you to step down from this game. I hope you will forgive me for doing so.


Inactive

I am here to say that while I can understand to some degree where Dunganagar is coming from, I ultimately respect and agree with GM Zedth's decision and reasoning.


Dwarf Barbarian 2 | HP: 38/38 | AC: 14, TAC: 10, FFAC 14, CMD: 15 | Fort: +7, Reflex: +0, Will: +3 (+2 vs poison, spells) | Perception: +8, S.M.: +8 | Init.: +0

GM Zedth:
Quote:
...Because of the amount of work and passion I put into my games situations like this feel like a slap in the face. I'm truly sorry but I need to ask you to step down from this game. I hope you will forgive me for doing so.

Hm. Okay, I'm sorry it came to this. Clearly I really misread what kind of game this was going to be. Obviously I can get passionate about RPing too, and clearly I went too far.

No, I won't have any hard feelings and I hope the game works out well.

Do you want me to RP an exit?


Tactical Map
Dunganagar the Mad wrote:
** spoiler omitted **

I would like that. Thank you for offering.


Female Human Oracle 1 HP: 12/12, NL: 0 | AC: 14/12/12 | F: +2, R: +4, W: +3 | Per: +5, Init: +2 | Channels: 4/4, 1st: 4/4 Arrows: 26 normal, 8 Cold iron, 10 silver
Little Thunderhead:
HP: 42/42, NL: 0 | AC 17/9/17 | F+8 R +4 W+1 | Per: +8 (Low-Light Vision, Scent) Init: 0

Going to wait until Dunganagar's exit before posting. I'm guessing that the drinking contest between he and Eina is off.


Tactical Map
Eina wrote:
Going to wait until Dunganagar's exit before posting. I'm guessing that the drinking contest between he and Eina is off.

We'll play it by ear.

Sorry for the hiccup, everyone. I'll get back on track.


Dwarf Barbarian 2 | HP: 38/38 | AC: 14, TAC: 10, FFAC 14, CMD: 15 | Fort: +7, Reflex: +0, Will: +3 (+2 vs poison, spells) | Perception: +8, S.M.: +8 | Init.: +0

Okay guys, you should be good to go.

Sorry it worked out this way but it was fun while it lasted.

GM: Zedth If you want Dunganagar back as a rival or a villain and want me to RP him, let me know by PM. He would probably decide to range around the area adventuring on his own and might attract a band of rogues. Also: please use the campaign tab to mark Dunganagar as "inactive." I think that will take this game off my campaign tab.

Have fun guys.


Tactical Map

Note- If you folks are waiting for something in-game to occur before posting your action/words, and you know you won't be able to post again for awhile, please at least chime in on the discussion thread to say "hey guys, just waiting on the GM's answer for my last question" or "sorry for no post, I'm waiting on X to get resolved", etc. This way we all stay on the same page and stay up to date with our 1/day posting schedule. I know the last couple of days have been weird, so I'm not bothered by people missing a day or two this week.


Female Human Oracle 1 HP: 12/12, NL: 0 | AC: 14/12/12 | F: +2, R: +4, W: +3 | Per: +5, Init: +2 | Channels: 4/4, 1st: 4/4 Arrows: 26 normal, 8 Cold iron, 10 silver
Little Thunderhead:
HP: 42/42, NL: 0 | AC 17/9/17 | F+8 R +4 W+1 | Per: +8 (Low-Light Vision, Scent) Init: 0

I've actually been doing better posting wise than I thought I would be able to. I hope that I'm not hogging too much of the spotlight and that Eina is as fun to read as she is to write.

That said, I'm wondering what rolling a natural 1 on her "sober up" roll is going to entail. I also managed to roll max for the number of rounds she's staggered. What a great start to this campaign! :D


Inactive

That was an incredibly appropriate set of rolls, Eina. :P

-Posted with Wayfinder


Female Human Oracle 1 HP: 12/12, NL: 0 | AC: 14/12/12 | F: +2, R: +4, W: +3 | Per: +5, Init: +2 | Channels: 4/4, 1st: 4/4 Arrows: 26 normal, 8 Cold iron, 10 silver
Little Thunderhead:
HP: 42/42, NL: 0 | AC 17/9/17 | F+8 R +4 W+1 | Per: +8 (Low-Light Vision, Scent) Init: 0

Yup. :)


Tactical Map
Eina wrote:
I've actually been doing better posting wise than I thought I would be able to. I hope that I'm not hogging too much of the spotlight and that Eina is as fun to read as she is to write.

Hog away! Lots of posts are good. And yes, lol @ your rolls.


Human Paladin 1 (Tortured Crusader) (Iomedae)| AC 20 T 12 FF 18 | HP 13/13 | CMB +4| CMD 16 | | F +4 R +2 W +4 | Initiative +4 | Perception +6

Hello everyone! GM Zedth has been kind enough to invite me to join you guys. I look forward to RPing with you all. :)


Tactical Map

Welcome! I'll get you added to the combat map shortly.

I added you right behind the two gate guards at the southeast of the map.


Inactive

Welcome Cairth! Look forward to gaming with you as well.

*Edit* - I am viewing the solar eclipse tomorrow, then making a looooong drive home. Please bot me as needed. Should be back Tuesday.


Female Human Oracle 1 HP: 12/12, NL: 0 | AC: 14/12/12 | F: +2, R: +4, W: +3 | Per: +5, Init: +2 | Channels: 4/4, 1st: 4/4 Arrows: 26 normal, 8 Cold iron, 10 silver
Little Thunderhead:
HP: 42/42, NL: 0 | AC 17/9/17 | F+8 R +4 W+1 | Per: +8 (Low-Light Vision, Scent) Init: 0

Allow me to second Erodin in his welcome. Looking forward to gaming with you as well.


Welcome aboard, Carith!


Male Human Skald (Totemic) 2. HP 18. AC16. T12. FF14. Fort 4. Ref 2. Will 4. Init + 2. Perception 5.

Welcome to the party.


Human Paladin 1 (Tortured Crusader) (Iomedae)| AC 20 T 12 FF 18 | HP 13/13 | CMB +4| CMD 16 | | F +4 R +2 W +4 | Initiative +4 | Perception +6

Thank you all for your welcome. :)


Inactive

I'm back! Eclipse was fantastic. Thanks for helping me charge!


Tactical Map

Eina,
I don't like to go back on my rulings unless I made a clear mistake, but I feel like I was too heavy handed with your drunk penalties. I couldn't find any actual rules on intoxication and at a glance the "sickened" condition didn't sound firm enough for someone who just finished a drinking competition. That assessment may be correct but at the same time we're here to have fun, not find the best rules to simulate reality.

For the sake of fun I hereby relieve you if your staggered status. I'm sorry if it has made this combat a drag so far.


Tactical Map
Pinto Donasetti wrote:

sorry about my early move. I saw you post so I went ahead assuming you would ask for actions. My bad. :(

No harm done!


Tactical Map

Question for you guys -

I have searched for an official answer on this in the FAQs to no avail. I have read multiple threads on the subject and they're filled with opinions that lean toward one side or the other, both sides I can see good points made on.

The question is - When do Attacks of Opportunity 'refresh'? In other words, when does a PC, NPC, or monster gain the ability to use their AoO(s) again? The answer is either 1) at the top of the Combat Round, or 2) when that PC, NPC, Monster's initiative comes again, meaning their combat round has cycled.

I'm not convinced that either one is more correct than the other. The rules are not specific on this.

What are your thoughts? It will probably be good for us all to be on the same page now for future reference, but for disclosure's sake this will affect the next combat round because Pinto provoked an AoO, and since he's at the top of the round one could argue that the Ogre's AoO ability has refreshed, even though it feels wonky because he just used his AoO at the end of the current combat round.


Male Human Skald (Totemic) 2. HP 18. AC16. T12. FF14. Fort 4. Ref 2. Will 4. Init + 2. Perception 5.

I always use the 'Refresh on it's initiative' rule myself. It's had it's shot and now has to wait for it's action to come round again is the logic.


Human Paladin 1 (Tortured Crusader) (Iomedae)| AC 20 T 12 FF 18 | HP 13/13 | CMB +4| CMD 16 | | F +4 R +2 W +4 | Initiative +4 | Perception +6

I second Brandt's opinion. we've always used the initiative of the PC or NPC as the recharge point in my home games.


Male NG Human Brawler 2 | CMB: 5, CMD: 17 | F: +5, R: +5, W: +1 | Init: +2 | Perc: +5, SM +0 | Speed 30ft |

Without having read the Gameplay thread (so I don't know what you really did), I have always played that AoOs refresh 'individually' right before the PC/NPC is up for his initiative.

I really don't know how you could argue otherwise (although I haven't read any threads on the subject).


Inactive

I agree with this consensus.

-Posted with Wayfinder


Female Human Oracle 1 HP: 12/12, NL: 0 | AC: 14/12/12 | F: +2, R: +4, W: +3 | Per: +5, Init: +2 | Channels: 4/4, 1st: 4/4 Arrows: 26 normal, 8 Cold iron, 10 silver
Little Thunderhead:
HP: 42/42, NL: 0 | AC 17/9/17 | F+8 R +4 W+1 | Per: +8 (Low-Light Vision, Scent) Init: 0

Same. It makes more since than refreshing at the top of the round.


Tactical Map

Right on. We will proceed with the consensual decision to "refresh" your available AoO(s) upon the individual's initiative. I personally prefer refreshing at the top of the round because it occurs for everyone at the same time, but I can understand the preference to go the other route, and so we will.


That was a really good question. I had to go back and re-read the rules. In all of the PbP games I've been in, we've always done it the consensus way, but actually looking at the text of the rules it doesn't explicitly say that.


Tactical Map

Does anyone want to volunteer for keeping track of group loot? Please make clear what items you individually want from the spoils, and make it clear that you're taking them/adding them to your sheet. Setting aside "good" loot that gets claimed, I would appreciate someone stating that the other loot is being taken, so I'm not left to wonder.

You guys have at least one pack animal in the group. If you're trying to carry 8 suits of platemail, 10 suits of leather, 2 large dragonhides, 4 greatswords, 8 longswords, and everyone's rations on the one yak, then I'll take issue with that. But (with Eina's permission, of course) if you guys want to stash your typical spoils there or on another animal, I'm not going to get too worried about encumbrance. Tracking specific weight for every little thing is not fun for me, but I would appreciate if someone would write down what is in the "group loot" pile at any given time.

Would you like me to set up a Google Document link that you guys can edit? Would you rather just put group loot on one person's character sheet to prevent any outsider from editing it?

Let me know your thoughts.


Human Paladin 1 (Tortured Crusader) (Iomedae)| AC 20 T 12 FF 18 | HP 13/13 | CMB +4| CMD 16 | | F +4 R +2 W +4 | Initiative +4 | Perception +6

I think I would be happy with a Google Doc that we all can edit. That way we can assign our name to whatever we might want, haggle over any multiple claims that might arise, then liquidate the remainder.


Inactive

Unless people want to do fancy accounting, I can set up a pretty basic Google Sheet. Plan to do that shortly.

Random question - is Eina a Shaman again? I wasn't entirely sure if she's a Shaman or Oracle.


Tactical Map
Erodin Stark wrote:
Unless people want to do fancy accounting, I can set up a pretty basic Google Sheet. Plan to do that shortly.

Right on. Let me know when you're done. If you can set up a google doc link or something similar, that'd be great. If not we'll figure out another solution.

Erodin Stark wrote:
Random question - is Eina a Shaman again? I wasn't entirely sure if she's a Shaman or Oracle.

Doh! Going back to the thread to edit the wands again...lol

Eina, please update your header line as it still says your class is shaman.


Inactive

Loot table is now up and also linked to my profile. Feel free to link it into the gamethread. Let me know if you can't see or edit.

The way I usually do things is that when we get to a selling point, we sell or claim everything, I tell everyone to add X gold and ABC items to their sheets, and then I start a new sheet. That way there's an accounting of the past loot, albeit not a very fancy one.


Female Human Oracle 1 HP: 12/12, NL: 0 | AC: 14/12/12 | F: +2, R: +4, W: +3 | Per: +5, Init: +2 | Channels: 4/4, 1st: 4/4 Arrows: 26 normal, 8 Cold iron, 10 silver
Little Thunderhead:
HP: 42/42, NL: 0 | AC 17/9/17 | F+8 R +4 W+1 | Per: +8 (Low-Light Vision, Scent) Init: 0

Oops.

No, she's an oracle. although, with Carith here, I think I'm going to have her multiclass into Electrokinetic, if that's alright with the GM. Speaking of which, are we using the fractional bonuses from unchained?


Erodin Stark wrote:
Unless people want to do fancy accounting, I can set up a pretty basic Google Sheet. Plan to do that shortly.

Thank you, Tazo!


Female Human Oracle 1 HP: 12/12, NL: 0 | AC: 14/12/12 | F: +2, R: +4, W: +3 | Per: +5, Init: +2 | Channels: 4/4, 1st: 4/4 Arrows: 26 normal, 8 Cold iron, 10 silver
Little Thunderhead:
HP: 42/42, NL: 0 | AC 17/9/17 | F+8 R +4 W+1 | Per: +8 (Low-Light Vision, Scent) Init: 0
Taecuss dyn Bru wrote:
Erodin Stark wrote:
Unless people want to do fancy accounting, I can set up a pretty basic Google Sheet. Plan to do that shortly.
Thank you, Tazo!

Allow me to second this! Thanks a ton!


Inactive

@GM Zedth - I think Pinto has a question / request pending. From the Gameplay thread:

Pinto Donasetti wrote:

GM, I think I made a mistake and I used my handaxe with two hands, something that was pointed out to me was a no-no for a 'light weapon'. I really like the image of that handaxe (don't care that it's only 1d6) as opposed to say a morningstar or a heavy mace (both 1d8). Can I continue to use the handaxe with two hands or do I need to get another simple weapon?

Carith: thanks for taking up treasurer duty. Pinto is not interested in any of the loot except maybe the morningstar, depending on what the GM rules.

This is where I admit I'm just asking to clean up my new loot table. :P


Human Paladin 1 (Tortured Crusader) (Iomedae)| AC 20 T 12 FF 18 | HP 13/13 | CMB +4| CMD 16 | | F +4 R +2 W +4 | Initiative +4 | Perception +6

Uh oh! Looks like our first dispute is at hand. Although I don't think Taecuss meant it as such. I had already claimed the potion of cure mod, but if you really want it I will choose something else. :)

1 to 50 of 256 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Online Campaigns / Play-by-Post Discussion / Zedth's Keep on the Borderlands Discussion All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
1 to 50 of 121 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>

1 person marked this as a favorite.

This adventure is inspired by the classic D&D adventure "B2 - Keep on the Borderlands" by Gary Gygax. This is similar in tone and theme but with some heavy-handed customization in an endeavor to take a fresh look at a classic. There is no overarching meta-plot here; the borderlands are an adventurer's paradise filled with opportunities that don't necessarily link together, making the players' choices the guiding force that determines the course of events that unfold.

This is a home-brew setting using the Pathfinder rule set.

I'm looking for 4-6 players. My prediction is for this game to run up to about character level 6 or 7 before this adventure comes to a conclusion. Decisions can be made at that time whether or not to continue on or start anew.

Most combats will be represented via google slides.

Please read all of the information below before posting. Character submissions that do not adhere to the guidelines presented will not be considered.

Happy applying!

------------

Gamemaster Zedth presents,

Keep on the Borderlands

Outside the realm of mankind, the hallmarks of civilization are narrow and constricted. Always the forces of chaos press upon its borders, seeking to enslave it populace and steal its treasures. If it were not for a stout few, many in the borderlands would fall prey to the evil which surrounds them. Yet, there are always certain exceptional and brave members of humanity and its allies - dwarves, elves, gnomes, halflings, and more - who rise above the common level and join battle to stave off the darkness which would otherwise overwhelm the land.

A generation has passed since the Hellwar came to a end, marking the close of more than a century of conflict between the goodly folk of Atma and the unleashed minions of hell. Recent years have been spent rebuilding what used to be. On the eastern borderlands of the free realms of Mylosia rests a keep that had lain dormant for many years, as its garrison was withdrawn an age ago to join in the war effort. The lands surrounding the keep are rich in precious minerals and rare lumbers, and so the loss of the hub from which these resources could be gathered stung deeply.

The absence of the firm hand of order has allowed evil to again threaten to engulf these wild lands. Tribes of kobolds, goblins, and gnolls - once pushed back by hearty folk of the old keep - have reclaimed their ancestral homes and stomping grounds. Roaming bandits, unruly wildlife, and myriad other dangers have likewise moved into the area, safe in the knowledge that the goodly races had left the countryside behind.

Recent weeks had changed the status quo. A strike force had been sent to retake the forsaken keep and drive out those who had claimed it for themselves. While the assault had indeed been a success, the new garrison lacked the manpower to accomplish much more than hold the keep's walls. These recent initiatives have breathed new life into the castle, but it will take the vigilance of heroes willing to maintain the supply lines and fight back against the unruly neighbors if the keep is to remain in the hands of goodly folk.

Myrtle Hellbane, local baroness and retired adventurer, has issued a decree that willing and able folk eager for adventure and treasure should report to the village of Sowell's Orchard, found two weeks march east of the free city of Broaklesh, where they can enlist with a caravan traveling to the once-lost keep on the borderlands. There are promises of generous bounties to be claimed, lands and title to be earned, and glory enough to go around.

------------

Please read the information below to ensure that you are familiar with my house rules:

  • GM's Prerogative I reserve the right to hand-wave, rewrite, re-flavor, or ignore any rules that I find unhelpful, distasteful, or clunky. This will be done sparingly but always in an attempt to further game momentum and/or overall fun. I routinely customize/reflavor/rework monsters, so expect the unexpected!
  • XP I don't track XP. I will arbitrarily level you up, typically at milestones.
  • Hit Points Maximum HP for your class at level 1. Roll class HD for level up HP, but minimum HP gain = 1/2 HD.
  • Iterative attacks Each iterative attack tier grants an additional 5' of movement to a "5' step." Example - a level 6 Fighter can "5' step" up to 10' and a level 11 Fighter can "5' step" up to 15'.
  • Critical Hits For players (and select powerful enemies) a natural 20 always results in at least a x2 damage critical hit without having to confirm with a 2nd roll. Extended critical hit ranges/modifiers (19-20/18-20 or x3/x4) still must confirm in the normal fashion. The idea is to make natural 20s more exciting. This is also a nod to other editions of D&D.
  • Feats:
    -Weapon Focus/Weapon Specialization (and their future progressions) now apply to a weapon group (see Fighter in the CRB) instead of a single weapon.
    -Weapon Finesse may be taken as a Trait instead of a Feat at character creation -or- may be obtained via Favored Class Bonus (any class) at a rate of 1/3.
    -Combat Expertise no longer has the "Int 13" prerequisite. Furthermore, this feat may be taken as a Trait instead of a Feat at character creation -or- obtained via Favored Class Bonus (any class) at a rate of 1/3.
  • Fighters The Fighter class now gets 4 skill ranks per level (up from 2) and may take the Combat Stamina feat as a free bonus feat at 1st level.
  • Dragon hides and scales When harvesting dragon hides/scales for the creation of armor/shields, if the harvester makes a successful Craft:(appropriate) check DC 20 or Survival check DC 25, the harvested dragon corpse is counted as 1 size category larger than it actually is when using the accepted Pathfinder rules. Furthermore, any suits of armor (not shields) made of dragon hide/scales have an armor bonus equal to the armor type +1. (Example - A white dragon hide breastplate has an armor bonus of +7.)
  • Rule of Cool This is an ambiguous notion that doing something awesome occasionally trumps the rules as written. Subject to GM discretion but player input is welcomed on when a "Rule of Cool" may apply.

    ------------

    Starting character information:

  • This game is set in Atma, my homebrew world. For most intents and purposes it is a typical high-fantasy world with some regions closer to low-magic sword and sorcery. It can be described as a "points of light" world, meaning that the goodly races have eked out a few nooks where they have relative safe and calm, but the forces of wilderness and evil are always surrounding these areas. The timeline takes place about 20 years or so after a realm-wide war has ended - a war that was fought between the devils of hell and the folk of this eastern continent. This has left many young men dead and those left behind to clean up and rebuild. Please feel free to take liberties with your character's backgrounds based on this. For those who really want to add some setting flavor to their backstory, here is a link to another PbP game set in this world that has a wealth of information about the larger cities and goings-on of the war mentioned above. Peruse the "Campaign Info" on that link for details.
  • All character options must originate from Paizo published Pathfinder products; No 3rd Party Materials, no exceptions.
  • No Gunslingers or Summoners.
  • 15-point ability buy. Nothing below 7 or greater than 18 after racial adjustments at 1st level.
  • Maximum HP for your class at level 1. Roll class HD for level up HP, but minimum HP gain = 1/2 HD.
  • Core races & Featured races from the Advanced Race Guide are acceptable. Uncommon races and Custom races will not be considered.
  • Two traits may be selected.
  • Average starting gold for your class.
  • Evil Alignments will be considered but heavily scrutinized. If you choose to play an evil character you (the player) are also consenting to not being a dick. I have no tolerance for inter-player backstabbing or pvp.
  • Write a background story. Make it fun and/or interesting. It doesn't have to be huge.
  • All characters must include a header with basic combat information, see one of my characters as an example. (I use the "Race" and "Class/levels" lines under the "Edit my Profile" options at the character profile screen.)
  • All character sheet data must be present on the alias' character profile. Please make citations on your character sheet about what book was used for archetypes or other relatively obscure character options/spells. This helps me with quick character audits and saves time in the future.

    ------------

    Important, please read:

  • I insist that players post more than "I attack with my battle axe." in their combat posts. You don't need to pen a novel for each and every post, but I am looking for descriptive/substantive posting, both in and out combat. Let's tell a story together! If you don't think you're up for this, please do not apply.
  • Good posting habits in your profile's history, positive attitudes, and fun character concepts are far more important to me than a min/maxed kick ass PC.
  • I am looking for players who post with "nudges" and "hooks" that generate energy by allowing ample room for other players and the GM to grab the baton and move forward. Momentum is the single most important ingredient of a successful PbP game, and that responsibility is on the shoulders of every player as well as the GM.
  • I want players who want to post often. (Preferably 2+ times a day, but minimum posting requirements are 1/day on Mon-Thur, and at least 1 post for Fri-Sun.)
  • Lethality is always on the table! Have fun with your character but be ready to draw up a new one if it comes to that. Reward without risk is unsatisfying!
  • I welcome players who are new to Pathfinder and/or Play-by-Post. I don't mind helping someone learn the game. All I ask is that you do your best to learn and read up on the rules.
  • If you are already playing in a lot of PbP games, please think if you have sufficient time/energy before applying. I want players to be able to dedicate energy to this game, and I have seen too many players stretch themselves thin which causes their games to suffer.
  • Poor spelling and grammar are irritating things to me. No one is perfect, myself included of course, but try not to suck at these things.
  • This is intended to have an "old school" vibe, and as such please do not expect that every encounter must be level-appropriate. Sometimes running like hell is a good option.
  • I'm not a big fan of Ye Old Magic Shoppe despite it being an assumption by most Pathfinder groups. I do my best to supply players with enough magic items to keep most of my players happy, and there likely will be magic items available for trade/sale at certain points, but not always. Not only do I not like the concept in general due to flavor reasons, but this game is supposed to be on the borderlands of civilization, meaning resources are limited.

    -----------

    Please make your submissions below and feel free to ask questions. I do ask that you try to keep posting to a minimum, as recruitment threads with high post numbers often get overlooked.

    I look forward to meeting you folks.


  • Dot! Curious to play a classic adventure, but need to catch up on a bunch of things before deciding about the commitment.


    Dotting, I am thinking some kind of archer with lots of survival skills, or maybe a druid. Either way I won't be able to do much until monday.


    I was previously in a promised Keep game that folded because the DM stopped posting, playing this weirdo! A skilled archer and survivalist, and also super-creepy. Would be happy to rebuild her in a fashion that suits your needs.


    Dotting. Thinking of a wilderness themed Witch. Or a skill monkey good at survival.


    All of those sound fun and definitely suitable for this adventure.

    Regarding the comment about not being able to do anything by Monday -- I will keep recruitment open for a few more days at the least, so you should have time.


    Change of plan, going with a Skald (Totemic archetype). Feels the call of nature and believes this area will be a rich source of new heroic sagas.


    Big dot! Very interested in experiencing classic modules like this. Not sure what character yet but probably something that feels more traditional. Dwarf cleric maybe.


    Mf. Just realized 15 point buy. Not sure I can make this character viable on that.


    Orono the Black Widow wrote:
    Mf. Just realized 15 point buy. Not sure I can make this character viable on that.

    Can I ask why you think that? Viable in the context of your previous incarnation? I can't speak to that, but 15-pt buy characters are plenty viable. One reason I'm going for 15-pt is to simulate the lower stats of a more typical character in the old days when your rolled 3d6, but even then a 15-pt buy character will be much more optimized and powerful than the average PC generated with 3d6 in order.


    The rules aren't the same. For instance, spell casting is limited by your stats - which it was not in Basic D&D; you could play a magic-user with 9 intelligence and have the same casting abilities as someone with an 18 (remember, minimum intelligence to cast didn't show up until AD&D). And this character in particular suffers from MAD due to the need for Wisdom to cast, Dex for archery, Con for hit points, Cha to use an animal companion (to make Handle Animal checks), and at least a modicum of Str just because of encumbrance.

    I'm running a Basic D&D game at the office and the dynamics are very different. One player rolled no stats above 12 and has a 5 Cha and 6 Int, and this has No Effect on her thief skills. The games have different expectations.


    Dot. Already have an idea.

    Will convert one of my 5e characters to pathfinder.


    Dot!

    Yeah, I have some ideas.


    When you say featured races are allowed, does this include Drow? I don't normally ask to play one of those but it could be interesting.


    Orono the Black Widow wrote:

    The rules aren't the same. For instance, spell casting is limited by your stats - which it was not in Basic D&D; you could play a magic-user with 9 intelligence and have the same casting abilities as someone with an 18 (remember, minimum intelligence to cast didn't show up until AD&D). And this character in particular suffers from MAD due to the need for Wisdom to cast, Dex for archery, Con for hit points, Cha to use an animal companion (to make Handle Animal checks), and at least a modicum of Str just because of encumbrance.

    I'm running a Basic D&D game at the office and the dynamics are very different. One player rolled no stats above 12 and has a 5 Cha and 6 Int, and this has No Effect on her thief skills. The games have different expectations.

    Your points are correct but my point wasn't to say 1st edition is comparable to PF. I ran this same adventure for a group of buddies at our weekly game. My good friend played a hunter who was extremely effective with a 15-pt buy character chassis. Are hunters MAD? Certainly. Are they not viable because their stats are a little lower from 20 to 15 points? The answer is no.

    Ultimately the choice is yours whether to submit a hunter or any character at all, and I hope you won't let a 5 point difference in stats prevent you from doing so.


    Peet wrote:
    When you say featured races are allowed, does this include Drow? I don't normally ask to play one of those but it could be interesting.

    Good question. It refers to the Featured Races introduced by the advanced race guide, and drow are indeed on that list. As the party will be doing a fair amount of overland travel (most likely during the day) I would think a drow might be at a disadvantage due to their light sensitivity.


    I think I will go with Dunganagar The Mad, dwarf barbarian. I have been trying to get him into some other games and he might be a good fit.

    Dunganagar is built on the concept of having a comically low DEX and AC but having lots of HP to make up for it, and he has the Fey Foundling feat and the Invulnerable Rager archetype so as not to be such a big drain on party healing. He has a signature weapon, a cold iron waraxe. It is actually painful for him to handle because of his fey background, but the constant pain helps send him over the edge into rage. The weapon is large-sized (i.e. for a large creature) much in the same way that Amiri the iconic barbarian wields a large bastard sword.

    Two things:

    1: Dunganagar's background was originally set in Brevoy (he was originally made for a Kingmaker game) and assumes a feudal country where petty wars between nobles within the kingdom are fairly common. Is there a place like that in your campaign world, and do you want to give me names of places and nobles? Or can I just make something up?

    2: I haven't bought mundane gear like rope and backpacks and rations yet. Would it be all right to leave that to after the selection process is done? I find that process fairly tedious.

    About Me: I played the Keep on the Borderlands module for a while when it actually came out, though in those days I DM'ed more than I played. So there's definitely some nostalgia there.

    I work nights and most of the time when I am at work I have several hours of down time when I can go over my games. I respond to everything I need to, and then often finding myself looking at my campaign tab and hitting "refresh" to see if anyone has posted anything. So I can handle a lot of games though my posting times might be a bit strange (I live in EST).

    I have been in PbP gaming here on the boards for almost 3 years, and have never dropped out of a game (though a number have died on me, usually from the GM disappearing).

    I am a big fan of sandboxy environments and if you plan to do that kind of thing after the module is complete that would be awesome.


    Hi there Dunganagar, I see we both made our way here after not getting in DM Default's game. (I applied with Noro in that game)

    anyway here is the alias I am applying with for this game, only the crunch part is done, I am working on the backstory some more to match the intro presented in this thread.

    as far as other games, I have several listed as active, but be aware that 5 of them are dead or just a recruitment type thread for PFS, and 1 is a PFS scenario which is a short term game.


    DBH here with my Skald Brandt Holgarson.

    Basic at the moment. Still need to get his equipment and give him a backstory.

    Crunchie bits:

    BRANDT HOLGARSON

    Male Human (Ulfen) skald 1. NG medium humanoid (human)

    Init +2; Senses Perception +4,

    Languages Common, Skald

    AC 15, touch 12, flat-footed 13. hp 9 (1HD)

    Fort +3, Ref +2, Will +2, +2 trait bonus to Fortitude saves vs. poison and drugs, +4 trait bonus to Fortitude saves to avoid the effects of alcohol

    Speed 30 ft. (6 squares)

    Ranged crossbow, light +2 (1d8/19-20), within 30 ft. +3 (1d8+1)
    Melee battleaxe +2 (1d8+2/x3)

    Base Atk +0; CMB +2; CMD 14

    Prepared Spells Prepared Spell List
    Skald (CL 1st):
    1st - cure light wounds (DC 13) , ear-piercing scream (DC 13)

    Abilities Str 14, Dex 14, Con 12, Int 11, Wis 10, Cha 14

    Special Qualities Bardic Knowledge, Bonus Feat, Inspired Rage, Raging Song, Skilled, Weapon and Armor Proficiency,

    Feats Point-Blank Shot, Scribe Scroll, Skald's Vigor

    Skills
    Acrobatics +5,
    Bluff +2,
    Diplomacy +2,
    Intimidate +2,
    Knowledge (Arcana) +5,
    Knowledge (History) +5,
    Knowledge (Untrained) +1,
    Perception +4,
    Perform (Oratory) +6, Perform (Untrained) +2,
    Spellcraft +4,
    Stealth +1,
    Survival +1,
    Swim +1,

    Possessions studded leather; battleaxe; Crossbow, Light ; Backpack, Common [ Survival Kit (Common); Blanket (Winter); ];

    Bardic Knowledge (Ex) A skald adds half his class level (minimum 1) (the current bonus is +1) on all Knowledge skill checks, and may make all Knowledge skill checks untrained.

    Cantrips Skalds learn a number of cantrips, or 0-level spells, as noted on Table 1-11: Skald Spells Known. These spells are cast like any other spell, but they do not consume any slots and may be used again.

    Inspired Rage (Su) At 1st level, affected allies gain a +2 morale bonus to Strength and Constitution and a +1 morale bonus on Will saving throws, but also take a -1 penalty to AC. While under the effects of inspired rage, allies other than the skald cannot use any Charisma-, Dexterity-, or Intelligence-based skills (except Acrobatics, Fly, Intimidate, and Ride) or any ability that requires patience or concentration. (Unlike the barbarian's rage ability, those affected are not fatigued after the song ends.) If an ally has her own rage class ability (such as barbarian's rage, bloodrager's bloodrage, or skald's inspired rage), she may use the Strength, Constitution, and Will saving throw bonuses, as well as AC penalties, based on her own ability and level instead of those from the skald (still suffering no fatigue afterward). However, inspired rage does not allow the ally to activate abilities dependent on other rage class abilities, such as rage powers, blood casting, or bloodrager bloodlines; the ally must activate her own rage class ability in order to use these features.

    Iron Liver You gain a +2 trait bonus on Fortitude saves against poison and drugs, and a +4 trait bonus on Fortitude saves to avoid the effects of alcohol.

    Militia Veteran (any town or village) (Survival) Your first job was serving in a civilian militia in your home town. Skills learned through daily drilling and protecting your fellow townsfolk gave you special insight into military life. Select one of the following skills - Profession (Soldier), Ride, or Survival. You gain a +1 trait bonus on that skill, and it is always a class skill for you.

    Raging Song A skald is trained to use music, oration, and similar performances to inspire his allies to feats of strength and ferocity. At 1st level, a skald can use this ability for a number of rounds per day equal to 3 + his Charisma modifier. For each level thereafter, he can use raging song for 2 additional rounds per day. Starting a raging song is a standard action, but it can be maintained each round as a free action. A raging song cannot be disrupted, but it ends immediately if the skald is killed, paralyzed, stunned, knocked unconscious, or otherwise prevented from taking a free action each round to maintain it. A raging song counts as the bard's bardic performance special ability for any effect that affects bardic performances. A skald may learn bard masterpieces (Pathfinder RPG Ultimate Magic 21). A raging song has audible components, but not visual components. Affected allies must be able to hear the skald for the song to have any effect. A deaf skald has a 20% chance to fail when attempting to use a raging song. If he fails this check, the attempt still counts against his daily limit. Deaf creatures are immune to raging songs. If a raging song affects allies, when the skald begins a raging song and at the start of each ally's turn in which they can hear the raging song, the skald's allies must decide whether to accept or refuse its effects. This is not an action. Unconscious allies automatically accept the song. If accepted, the raging song's effects last for that ally's turn or until the song ends, whichever comes first. At 7th level, a skald can start a raging song as a move action instead of a standard action. At 13th level, a skald can start a raging song as a swift action instead. You have 7 rounds of raging song per day.

    Scribe Scroll At 1st level, a skald gains Scribe Scroll as a bonus feat.

    Weapon and Armor Proficiency A skald is proficient with all simple and martial weapons, light and medium armor, and shields (except tower shields). A skald can cast skald spells while wearing light or medium armor and use a shield without incurring the normal arcane spell failure chance. Like other arcane spellcasters, a skald wearing medium or heavy armor incurs a chance of arcane spell failure if the spell in question has somatic components. A multiclass skald still incurs the normal arcane spell failure chance for arcane spells received from other classes.

    Any problems or questions let me know.


    I've got a character concept that I want to play. I'm thinking a Druid with a particular hatred of kobolds, goblins, and gnolls after they burned down her grove.

    Also in the running is a tiefling ranger, but I think I'm going with the Druid.

    By the way, are we using Background Skills, or no.


    I'm expressing interest, also. I have an idea for an Arcanist, but I still need to stat him up. Here is his background, though:

    Background:
    Niadroub Kliip ("KNEE-ah-droob kleep") was born on a small, rural farm located in a backwater country to very poor farmers. He grew up learning how to till the earth, trap for meat, and brew some moonshine. During adolescence, Niadroub Kliip developed a talent for harnessing arcane energy, but nobody on the farm knew anything about arcane studies (and to be honest, the whole thing made them a little nervous). So, Niadroub Kliip's parents did the only thing they knew to do to get him the teaching he'd need to maybe rise above his station in life: they tied him up while he slept, tossed him into the back of their turnip cart, and rode three days to the nearest town, whereby they volunteered him for military service. Gods bless 'em.

    In the military, Niadroub Kliip's training was subpar. He learned the basics of wizardry, but he never had a regular teacher for very long, and his training was always directed towards the craft of war, not the broader, more universal training that a proper mage receives. Due to his limited training, Niadroub Kliip relied heavily on his innate talent to learn his spellcraft, but he developed habits and logical shortcuts that might fluster a more traditional practitioner.

    When he was deemed ready, Niadroub Kliip was given the rank of Battalion Mage, and assigned to a regiment that was shipped overseas to fight for the army. He hated the army, what with everyone telling him what to do and to shave his beard and to maybe stop being such a backwater hick all the time. Niadroub Kliip just wants to take the time to figure out his magic, but he didn't want leave the army because he he didn't have the savings or the knowledge to do anything other than be a frontier farmer. All of this was offset somewhat by the fact that Battalion Mages are comparatively rare soldiers in any regiment, and that combined with his thick backwater accent let Niadroub Kliip enjoy an unofficial prestige among the rank and file. Unfortunately, this caused him to develop a touch of arrogance to go along with his poor attitude.

    In the end, the army was defeated, and Niadroub Kliip spent a few months as a prisoner of war. The victorious army had a long march back to their homeland, so they released their prisoners in small groups in the middle of the wilderness to avoid having to care for them on the long march home through dangerous lands. What's left of Niadroup Kliip's group made it to Mylosia before going their separate ways. He knows his nation expects him to try to make his way back home, but it's not a priority for him.

    Description: 5' 9"; 155 lbs; sun-darkened skin; unkempt, thick black hair and beard; military-issue pants and boots, but he always cuts the sleeves off of whatever tunic he's given, exposing his wiry arms.

    Any of that can be re-worked to fit into the campaign world.

    I'll get him statted as soon as I can, and I'll update in this thread when that's done. I play in three other campaigns on this board, but two of them post infrequently. About myself: I've been playing since 1st edition D&D (barely), GMing since 2nd edition, and have been involved in a number of related, continuous PbPs since... dang, since 2006. Most of them haven't been on the Paizo boards, but I do recognize the effects that a non-involved player can have on a PbP campaign. I'm pretty laid back about the rules as a player, and I enjoy playing flawed characters that aren't supposed to be taken too seriously.

    Let me know if there are any questions, and good luck to everyone!


    Tundran wrote:
    Big dot! Very interested in experiencing classic modules like this. Not sure what character yet but probably something that feels more traditional. Dwarf cleric maybe.

    I love traditional. I wouldn't want anyone to feel like they need to make a super unique roguish one-off that's never been done before. I enjoy seeing unique characters but I'm no more inclined to pick someone because of it. Classics are classic for a reason, and I'm a sucker for classics.

    Dunganagar the Mad wrote:

    *snipped concept text*

    Two things:

    1: Dunganagar's background was originally set in Brevoy (he was originally made for a Kingmaker game) and assumes a feudal country where petty wars between nobles within the kingdom are fairly common. Is there a place like that in your campaign world, and do you want to give me names of places and nobles? Or can I just make something up?

    2: I haven't bought mundane gear like rope and backpacks and rations yet. Would it be all right to leave that to after the selection process is done? I find that process fairly tedious.

    That concept sounds fun! Your background will not be of paramount importance but is always helpful, of course. This game's focus will be more on sandbox exploration and player choice, so the background places likely won't come into our game other than by mention or historical context. The timeline sets the realm in a post-war recovery time period, and so much of what was once "noble" is now bankrupt, dead, or destroyed. Feel free to make up names/places but if you want to set yourself from a city to the west, here is a link to a PbP game that took place during the war, and the 'Campaign Info' tab (scroll down to "Places of Note" and/or "Factions of Note") has quite a few nuggets of info ready to weave into a character background.

    Yes it is totally fine to pick your mundane gear later if you want to.

    AdamWarnock wrote:
    By the way, are we using Background Skills, or no.

    I didn't put Background Skills into the character creation standards, however I'm not opposed to them. Feel free to add them. When all characters have been selected we'll make sure everyone is on the same page. For any reading this - feel free to add Background Skills to your character submissions.

    ----------

    I will take a closer look at those submitted characters later tonight. Keep them coming!


    I am also interested. Having been in one the GM's previous campaigns, you are all in for a treat.

    I'll throw my hat in the ring with a grumpy woodsman with a grumpier dog (mechanically a brawler with the wildchild archetype).

    I'll start posting stuff as I develop the concept in my mind.


    Animal companion HD 2d8 ⇒ (1, 1) = 2 Welp, that's definitely below half.


    I'm interested, although you look like you've got plenty of applications already. I must warn you that I've never done play by post before.

    I've had a heavy armour + large weapon bloodrager/paladin or bloodrager/warpriest stuck in my head for a while (not sure which is better). I do have a backstory. I also feel an urge to add that she is not lawful stupid, but a good person who wants to help and redeem people far more than she wants to follow the law.

    Do I make a character sheet now, or wait for approval? (obligatory reminder I'm new at this)


    I definitely like the old school vibe you're going for here. I'll work on a wizard bent on pushing out the boundaries of civilization.


    So, settled on a shaman character. There are a couple of questions I'd like to ask.

    - What languages would it be appropriate for a barely civilized shaman to know?
    - There's a trait, Uskwood Hunter, that I'd like to take, but it is specific to Nidal in Golarion. would it be possible to reflavor this in someway?
    - Does the Weapon Proficiency work the same way as the Weapon Focus feat?
    - Alternatively, is there way for a Shaman to get proficiency with bows that doesn't eat a feat? I'm worried that my character is going to be nigh useless in combat until Level 3 if that's the case.


    Adam, I had the same issue when I made a shaman for a kingmaker game. nearly the same concept, was a witch doctor based on native American tribe.

    I did a level dip to fighter at level 2 to get the weapon proficiencies I needed.


    Goddity wrote:

    I'm interested, although you look like you've got plenty of applications already. I must warn you that I've never done play by post before.

    I've had a heavy armour + large weapon bloodrager/paladin or bloodrager/warpriest stuck in my head for a while (not sure which is better). I do have a backstory. I also feel an urge to add that she is not lawful stupid, but a good person who wants to help and redeem people far more than she wants to follow the law.

    Do I make a character sheet now, or wait for approval? (obligatory reminder I'm new at this)

    Welcome!

    You're going to want to read the GM's requirements carefully (on his first post) and prepare the proposed PC's crunch (stats) and fluff (backstory, personality, etc.). You can post those here on the thread with spoilers. If/when you get selected, you'll want to make an alias for the PC.

    There are a couple of very useful guides that you'll want to read about playing PBPs. You can find them on the sticky threads here.

    Other than that, good luck and feel free to ask anything (this GM is the friendly type). :)

    Game on!


    Will you be using background skills or allow a Drawback for a third trait?


    OK, Liam is completed and all is in the profile.


    OK, I made this aasimar ranger. I debated on whether to put in for this, I'm more of a once a day poster. More on the weekends, but that's when everyone else seems to post less.

    Gamemaster Zedth, if the 1 a day posting rate is too slow I understand.


    Alec Fuornkiln wrote:
    Will you be using background skills or allow a Drawback for a third trait?

    He said go ahead and add them and things would get sorted after he'd made his selections.

    For now, just going to have my character use a sling. I'm going with a hawk as her familiar, but I'm wondering if a raven might not be more fun. (IIRC, they can talk.)


    Fabian Benavente wrote:
    I am also interested. Having been in one the GM's previous campaigns, you are all in for a treat.

    Slips Fabian a $20 for the kind words :)

    AdamWarnock wrote:
    Animal companion HD 2d8 Welp, that's definitely below half.

    Go ahead and call that 1/2 HD then, so total of 8 hp before Con bonuses.

    Goddity wrote:
    I'm interested, although you look like you've got plenty of applications already...

    I want anyone who wants to play to submit a character, if that means 5 or 50.

    Goddity wrote:

    I've had a heavy armour + large weapon bloodrager/paladin or bloodrager/warpriest stuck in my head for a while (not sure which is better). I do have a backstory. I also feel an urge to add that she is not lawful stupid, but a good person who wants to help and redeem people far more than she wants to follow the law.

    Do I make a character sheet now, or wait for approval? (obligatory reminder I'm new at this)

    Fabian's answer was perfect. I need to see your submission in full to make a decision but if you don't want to commit an alias/avatar to the character before being accepted, simply place your character submission in a post (probably best if in a spoiler box) here in this thread.


    AdamWarnock wrote:

    So, settled on a shaman character. There are a couple of questions I'd like to ask.

    - What languages would it be appropriate for a barely civilized shaman to know?
    - There's a trait, Uskwood Hunter, that I'd like to take, but it is specific to Nidal in Golarion. would it be possible to reflavor this in someway?
    - Does the Weapon Proficiency work the same way as the Weapon Focus feat?
    - Alternatively, is there way for a Shaman to get proficiency with bows that doesn't eat a feat? I'm worried that my character is going to be nigh useless in combat until Level 3 if that's the case.

    RE: languages) Just go with your gut on this one. There will be multiple traditionally-evil humanoid enemies in the borderlands, so that might be a good place to start.

    RE: trait) I don't have a problem with you taking that trait.

    RE: weapon proficiency) For now I'm going to say 'no' on that.

    RE: I am no expert on the vast array of options that the different PF books offer, so I don't know off the top of my head a way for your shaman to get 'bow' proficiency (without spending a feat) unless you wanted to play as an elf.

    Alec Fuornkiln wrote:
    Will you be using background skills or allow a Drawback for a third trait?

    I actually just answered this question in a recent post but I understand it can be easy to miss things in a thread.

    I didn't originally ask for 'background skills' but I'm okay with allowing them. We can double check the final submissions to make sure everyone does have them, since the original character submission instructions did not make mention of them.

    I'm not a fan of drawbacks for a third trait, so I'm going to say 'no' on this one.

    Liberty's Edge

    Hey there Hedgerow!! Long time no see...this is Rook from that dust of War game a year or so ago. Looking to make a character for this game (I just love old D&D modules!!) Will try to get something posted ASAP.


    What deities are in your world? Looking at your other campaign, I think my dwarven cleric would be a member of the Consortium of Light who fled Craddock when it was invaded. Are you using regular Pathfinder deities? Your own? Should I make up my own?


    What about the Extra Traits feat? It allows you to get two more traits.

    Anyway, first pass on Eina the Shaman. She's the lone survivor of a goblin raid that saw the rest of her tribe captured or killed. I'll refine things later, but now I really should be going to bed. I should point out that the yak, Little Thunderhead, isn't meant to fight. He's just a pack animal because Eina isn't strong enough to haul around 200+ lbs. of gear.

    Eina:

    Eina
    Female human shaman 1 (Pathfinder RPG Advanced Class Guide 35)
    NG Medium humanoid (human)
    Init +2; Senses Perception +3
    --------------------
    Defense
    --------------------
    AC 14, touch 12, flat-footed 12 (+2 armor, +2 Dex)
    hp 8 (1d8)
    Fort +0, Ref +2, Will +5
    --------------------
    Offense
    --------------------
    Speed 30 ft.
    Melee dagger +0 (1d4/19-20) or
    . . quarterstaff +0 (1d6) or
    . . spear +0 (1d8/×3) or
    . . unarmed strike +0 (1d3 nonlethal)
    Ranged sling +2 (1d4)
    Shaman Spells Prepared (CL 1st; concentration +4)
    . . 1st—bless, cure light wounds; alter winds[S,APG] (DC 14)
    . . 0 (at will)—create water, dancing lights, mending
    . . S spirit magic spell; Spirit Wind Wandering Spirit
    --------------------
    Statistics
    --------------------
    Str 10, Dex 14, Con 10, Int 12, Wis 16, Cha 13
    Base Atk +0; CMB +0; CMD 12
    Feats Point-Blank Shot, Precise Shot
    Traits talented, uskwood hunter (nidal)
    Skills Craft (sculpture) +5, Craft (woodworking) +5, Perform (dance) +5, Perform (percussion instruments) +5, Perform (sing) +6, Perform (wind instruments) +5, Profession (cook) +7, Stealth +7, Survival +7
    Languages Common, Sylvan
    SQ shocking touch, spirit animal (raven named Howl)
    Other Gear leather armor, dagger, quarterstaff, sling, sling bullets (10), spear, belt pouch, flint and steel, spell component pouch, wooden holy symbol of Hawk, yak, backpack, bedroll, bird feed (per day), bowyer tools, candle, cold weather outfit, Cutting board, wooden (2 lb), explorer's outfit, feed (per day), hemp rope (50 ft.), Knife, cutting (0.5 lb), Ladle (0.5 lb), mess kit, pack saddle, pot, sculpting tools, Seasonings, local (0.5 lb), Skewer (1 lb), skillet, soap, Tinder packet (0.5 lb), torch, trail rations, Tripod, iron (3 lb), waterskin, winter blanket, 2 gp, 9 sp
    --------------------
    Special Abilities
    --------------------
    Empathic Link with Familiar (Su) You have an empathic link with your Arcane Familiar.
    Familiar Bonus: +3 to Appraise checks You gain the Alertness feat while your familiar is within arm's reach.
    Point-Blank Shot +1 to attack and damage rolls with ranged weapons at up to 30 feet.
    Precise Shot You don't get -4 to hit when shooting or throwing into melee.
    Share Spells with Familiar Can cast spells with a target of "You" on the familiar with a range of touch.
    Shocking Touch (4/day) (Su) As a standard action, melee touch deals electricity damage.
    Spirit Animal (spirit animal (raven named Howl)) If spirit animal is slain, cannot use spirit magic or prepare new spells.

    --------------------

    Howl
    Male raven (Pathfinder RPG Bestiary 133)
    N Tiny magical beast (animal)
    Init +2; Senses low-light vision; Perception +9
    --------------------
    Defense
    --------------------
    AC 15, touch 14, flat-footed 13 (+2 Dex, +1 natural, +2 size)
    hp 4 (1d8-1)
    Fort +1, Ref +4, Will +4
    Resist electricity 10
    --------------------
    Offense
    --------------------
    Speed 10 ft., fly 40 ft. (average)
    Melee unarmed strike +4 (1 nonlethal) or
    . . bite +4 (1d3-4)
    Space 2 ft.; Reach 0 ft.
    --------------------
    Statistics
    --------------------
    Str 2, Dex 15, Con 8, Int 6, Wis 15, Cha 7
    Base Atk +0; CMB +0; CMD 6
    Feats Skill Focus (Perception), Weapon Finesse
    [b]Skills
    Acrobatics +2 (-6 to jump), Fly +6, Perception +9, Stealth +14, Survival +3
    Languages Common
    SQ improved evasion
    --------------------
    Special Abilities
    --------------------
    Energy Resistance, Electricity (10) You have the specified Energy Resistance against Electricity attacks.
    Fly (40 feet, Average) You can fly!
    Improved Evasion (Ex) No damage on successful reflex save; half on failed save.
    Low-Light Vision See twice as far as a human in dim light, distinguishing color and detail.

    --------------------

    Little Thunderhead
    Male bison (Pathfinder RPG Bestiary 174)
    N Large animal
    Init +0; Senses low-light vision, scent; Perception +8
    --------------------
    Defense
    --------------------
    AC 17, touch 9, flat-footed 17 (+8 natural, -1 size)
    hp 42 (5d8+20)
    Fort +8, Ref +4, Will +1
    --------------------
    Offense
    --------------------
    Speed 40 ft.
    Melee unarmed strike +10 (1d4+8 nonlethal) or
    . . gore +10 (2d6+12)
    Space 10 ft.; Reach 5 ft.
    Special Attacks stampede, trample (2d6+12, DC 20)
    --------------------
    Statistics
    --------------------
    Str 27, Dex 10, Con 19, Int 2, Wis 11, Cha 4
    Base Atk +3; CMB +12 (+14 bull rush); CMD 22 (24 vs. bull rush, 26 vs. trip)
    Feats Endurance, Improved Bull Rush, Power Attack
    Skills Acrobatics +0 (+4 to jump), Perception +8
    Other Gear backpack, bedroll, bird feed (per day) (5), bowyer tools, candle (10), cold weather outfit, cutting board, wooden (2 lb), explorer's outfit (2), feed (per day) (5), hemp rope (50 ft.), knife, cutting (0.5 lb), ladle (0.5 lb), mess kit[UE], pack saddle, pot (2), sculpting tools, seasonings, local (0.5 lb), skewer (1 lb), skillet[UE], soap, tinder packet (0.5 lb), torch (10), trail rations (5), tripod, iron (3 lb), waterskin (3), winter blanket
    --------------------
    Special Abilities
    --------------------
    Endurance +4 to a variety of fort saves, skill and ability checks. Sleep in L/M armor with no fatigue.
    Improved Bull Rush You don't provoke attacks of opportunity when bull rushing.
    Low-Light Vision See twice as far as a human in dim light, distinguishing color and detail.
    Power Attack -1/+2 You can subtract from your attack roll to add to your damage.
    Scent (Ex) Detect opponents within 15+ feet by sense of smell.
    Stampede (Ex) Trample improves with multiple tramplers.


    Applying with this character, if you're not using Pathfinder gods i can rewrite the backstory with less deity specific stuff.


    GM:

    Please consider Pinto Donasetti for inclusion in your game.

    His fluff and crunch are spoilered below; I'll of course make an alias if selected to start playing.

    I originally wanted to make this PC with an animal companion (small dog) but it looks like other applicants have the same idea and we'll look like a zoo if we all get selected. :)

    So below is the PC without an animal companion. If selected, I'll take a look at the other PCs selected and evaluate whether to add an animal companion to the party at that time.

    Let me know if you have any questions.

    Thanks for hosting.

    Game on!

    ----------

    crunch:
    Pinto Donasetti
    Male human brawler 1
    NG Medium Type
    Init +2; Perception +4
    --------------------
    DEFENSE
    --------------------
    AC 16, touch 12, flat-footed 14 (+4 armor)
    HP 15
    Fort +4, Ref +4, Will +1
    --------------------
    OFFENSE
    --------------------
    Speed 30 ft.
    Melee
    Handaxe +4, 1d6+3, x3, S
    Punching dagger +4, 1d4+3, x3, P
    Hunting knife +4, 1d4+3, 19-20, x2, 10’, P/S

    Ranged
    Sling +3, 1d4+3, x2, 50’, B

    Space 5 ft., Reach 5 ft.
    --------------------
    SPECIAL ABILITIES
    Brawler’s Cunning (count as INT=13 for combat feats)
    Martial Flexibility (obtain combat feat as move action that lasts for 1 minute, 3+lvl/2=4/day)
    Martial Training (count as both fighter and monk for feats)
    Unarmed Strike (1d6 damage, even with hands full)
    STATISTICS
    --------------------
    Str 16, Dex 14, Con 14, Int 10, Wis 10, Cha 10
    Base Atk +1; CMB +4; CMD16

    Traits:
    Indomitable faith , +1 to will save
    On your own +1 on survival and survival is class skill (reskinned the orphaned trait to reflect his being on his own in the wilds)

    Feats:
    Toughness
    Dirty Fighting (when flanking, forego the +2 flanking bonus to not provoke AoO, if already not provoke then +4 bonus; count as DEX 13, INT 13, combat expertise, and unarmed strike)

    Skills (5/lvl + 2/background):
    Acrobatics +3 (1 rank, 2 DEX, class -3 ACP)
    Craft (leather) +4 (+1 rank, class), background
    Climb +4 (1 rank, 3 STR, class-3 ACP)
    Handle animal +4 (1 rank, class)
    Perception +4 (1 rank, class)
    Profession (trapper) +4 (1 rank, class), background
    Survival +5 (1 rank, class, trait)

    Racial Modifiers:
    Extra feat at 1st level, +1 skill rank per level, +2 to any ability (STR)
    Languages: Common
    --------------------
    GEAR/POSSESSIONS
    --------------------
    Location: On Person
    Hand axe (6 gp)
    knife (2 gp)
    punching dagger (2 gp)
    hide armor (15 gp)
    sling + 10 bullets (1 gp)
    brawler’s kit (9 gp); backpack, bedroll, belt pouch, flint and steel, rope, torches (10), trail rations (5 days), and waterskin
    Left over: 70 gp


    --------------------------------------------------
    combat stats:
    HP 15/15
    AC 16, touch 12, flat-footed 14
    Conditions: n/a
    Melee (hand axe): +4 = +1(base) +3(STR)
    Melee Damage (hand axe): 1d6+3 = +3 (str), x3
    4/4 Martial Flexibility

    ===================================================

    Background:
    A trapper by trade and an outdoorsman by vocation, Pinto was born in a small village to family of hunters. He remembers hunting with his father and brothers until late in his teen years when the War was still ravaging the land. Having lost his brothers to that ordeal, he stayed home to take care of his aging parents. When the War ended, Pinto had his aging parents settle in the outskirts of Broaklesh with one of his sisters. Pinto went along but did not stay very long; the outdoors was too ingrained in him and he left on his own.
    With the War over, he started to work as a trapper in the forest and shipped his pelts down the river to the ‘big city’ of Broaklesh. This allowed him to keep in touch with his family. However, trapping was far better the further out he went so he started to ply his trade upriver and eventually became a frequent visitor to the villages of the area.
    Trapping kept him interned in the wilds so he never quite settled in the villages. He even started a small company with a couple of other trappers and built a couple of cabins out in the woods so his visits to the villages started to become less and less frequent.
    Then disaster struck. His company had started to become too successful and caught the attention of local bandits. A simple attempt at extortion turned ugly when Pinto maimed the messenger. The bandits came back in full force and attacked his company. They locked his trapper friends in their cabins and burned them to the ground. Pinto was left alive, barely, but with a nasty burn scar on his face.
    That was over ten years ago and he still bears the scars and the grudge of that fateful day. He harbors a deep hatred and thirst of revenge for those bandits. He continued to ply his trapping trade, alone this time, and his visits to the villages become more and more frequent.
    He never rebuilt his business, only trapping to make enough to survive. It was in one of these visits that the add in the tavern wall caught his attention. A simple man, he did not care for riches or titles but he like the idea of heading out East and starting new again.

    Personality:
    Pinto has always been an even-tempered man. Slow to anger, he seems like a very serious man at first. Once you get to know him, he strikes you as a man who likes to live the moment and enjoy life to the fullest. He enjoys a wry sense of humor, which may take some time to get used to.
    Uncomplicated in his desires. Loyal to his peers and to his internal value systems, but not overly concerned with respecting laws and rules if they get in the way of getting something done. He excels at finding solutions to practical problems.
    Adaptable, action-oriented. Focused on immediate results. Living in the here-and-now, he's a risk-taker who lives fast-paced lifestyles. Impatient with long explanations.
    Assertive and outspoken - he is driven to lead. Excellent ability to understand difficult organizational problems and create solid solutions. Intelligent and well-informed. He values knowledge and competence, and usually has little patience with inefficiency or disorganization.
    Not that he cares to admit it, but Pinto is definitely uneasy around fire, given the tragedy that befell his friends.

    Description:
    Ht: 6' 2"
    Wt: 230 lbs
    Age: 40
    Hair: Black
    Eyes: Brown
    Skin: Tan
    Dark hair, heavy eyebrows, and ample facial hair frame Pinto’s face. A nasty burn scar mars an otherwise handsome face. A drab brown tunic covers his hide shirt; leather pants and boots complement his simple attire.
    He is called a big-boned man and his ample girth attests to that. However, living in the outdoors, has kept him in excellent shape. He carries a handaxe strapped to his waist next to a large skinning knife.

    Liberty's Edge

    Here is the crunch for my wizard submission. Hope you like him.

    Fregault the Wizard:

    Fregault the Wizard
    Male human evoker 1 (Pathfinder Player Companion: Familiar Folio 8)
    NG Medium humanoid (human)
    Init +2; Senses Perception +4
    --------------------
    Defense
    --------------------
    AC 17, touch 13, flat-footed 14 (+4 armor, +2 Dex, +1 dodge)
    hp 11 (1d6+2)
    Fort +1, Ref +2, Will +3
    --------------------
    Offense
    --------------------
    Speed 30 ft.
    Special Attacks intense spells (+1 damage)
    Arcane School Spell-Like Abilities (CL 1st; concentration +4)
    . . 6/day—force missile (1d4+1)
    Evoker (Pact Wizard) Spells Prepared (CL 1st; concentration +4)
    . . 1st—mage armor, magic missile, sleep (DC 14)
    . . 0 (at will)—acid splash, detect magic, prestidigitation
    . . Opposition Schools Abjuration, Illusion, Necromancy
    --------------------
    Statistics
    --------------------
    Str 10, Dex 15, Con 12, Int 16, Wis 12, Cha 9
    Base Atk +0; CMB +0; CMD 13
    Feats Alertness, Dodge, Scribe Scroll, Weapon Finesse
    Traits gifted adept, precocious spellcaster
    Skills Knowledge (arcana) +7, Knowledge (history) +7, Knowledge (planes) +7, Linguistics +7, Perception +4, Sense Motive +3, Spellcraft +7, Stealth +3, Survival +2
    Languages Celestial, Common, Elven, Goblin, Orc
    SQ arcane bond (Gilgamesh, toad), pact, pact summons
    Other Gear wizard starting spellbook, 50 gp
    --------------------
    Special Abilities
    --------------------
    Abjuration You must spend 2 slots to cast spells from the Abjuration school.
    Empathic Link with Familiar (Su) You have an empathic link with your Arcane Familiar.
    Evocation Evokers revel in the raw power of magic, and can use it to create and destroy with shocking ease.
    Familiar Bonus: +3 to Hit Points You gain the Alertness feat while your familiar is within arm's reach.
    Force Missile (1d4+1, 6/day) (Sp) As a standard action, magic missile strikes a foe.
    Illusion You must spend 2 slots to cast spells from the Illusion school.
    Intense Spells (+1 damage) (Su) Evocation spells deal listed extra damage.
    Necromancy You must spend 2 slots to cast spells from the Necromancy school.
    Pact (Angel) (Ex) Extraplanar being grants magic power and growth.
    Pact Summons (Ex) May summon outsiders of chosen subtype.
    Share Spells with Familiar Can cast spells with a target of "You" on the familiar with a range of touch.

    --------------------

    Gilgamesh
    Toad (Pathfinder RPG Bestiary 133)
    N Diminutive magical beast (animal)
    Init +1; Senses low-light vision, scent; Perception +9
    --------------------
    Defense
    --------------------
    AC 16, touch 15, flat-footed 15 (+1 Dex, +1 natural, +4 size)
    hp 5 (1d8-2)
    Fort +0, Ref +3, Will +4
    --------------------
    Offense
    --------------------
    Speed 5 ft.
    Space 1 ft.; Reach 0 ft.
    --------------------
    Statistics
    --------------------
    Str 1, Dex 12, Con 6, Int 6, Wis 15, Cha 4
    Base Atk +0; CMB -3; CMD 2 (6 vs. trip)
    Feats Skill Focus (Perception)
    Skills Acrobatics +1 (-11 to jump), Linguistics -1, Perception +9, Spellcraft -1, Stealth +21, Survival +3; Racial Modifiers +4 Stealth
    SQ improved evasion
    --------------------
    Special Abilities
    --------------------
    Improved Evasion (Ex) No damage on successful reflex save; half on failed save.
    Low-Light Vision See twice as far as a human in dim light, distinguishing color and detail.
    Scent (Ex) Detect opponents within 15+ feet by sense of smell.


    Several of you good folks have mentioned your interest in being part of this game as it is a classic module, and so I feel compelled to remind you of the first few words of my original post above, just so that we're on the same page going forward.

    This game will be an adventure inspired by Gary Gygax's B2 Keep on the Borderlands, but it will not be the same adventure.

    The original was a fun adventure but 90% of the action was focused around one area on the map, lovingly referred to as the "caves of chaos." After running that classic more than once I felt that keeping so much of a sandbox exploration game's content in one area was a bit of a lost opportunity. Our adventure will be similar to the original in that the 'home base' is the Keep which is surrounded by wilderness and danger, but I have placed more enemy (and possibly friendly?) factions and more locations around the area map to ensure that player choice/player agency has more of an impact on how the game plays out.

    ---------

    I'm going to be reviewing the submissions thus far a bit later today, and I'll put up a post with a list of completed and incomplete submissions. Please make any adjustments you want to before then. I'll probably keep the recruitment open for a couple/few more days but I'll keep everyone up to date about when this recruitment will close when I have a better idea where we're at.


    Tundran wrote:
    What deities are in your world? Looking at your other campaign, I think my dwarven cleric would be a member of the Consortium of Light who fled Craddock when it was invaded. Are you using regular Pathfinder deities? Your own? Should I make up my own?

    This is a great question and it highlights my biggest omission in the current status of my homebrew world. I don't have a fleshed-out pantheon as of yet, so I am completely flexible when it comes to picking deities. You can literally pick any deity you want as far as I'm concerned. In my last PbP game we had a cleric of Moradin (Forgotten Realms, I think) alongside deities from Pathfinder's pantheon.

    The Consortium of Light would likely be defunct at this time in history, as their purpose was to act as a resistance to the occupying forces from Hell. Since the war has ended I imagine that most/all of the members no longer consider themselves actively part of that organization, but will never forget their participation in it. If you want to consider yourself a previous member, that would be cool with me but remember that the war ended 20 years ago, so your character's age would need to make sense in that light.

    AdamWarnock wrote:
    What about the Extra Traits feat? It allows you to get two more traits.

    I have no problem with taking that feat to obtain more traits.


    Here is a list of submissions so far with some errors/oversights that I noticed:

    Complete (or very nearly complete)

  • Dunganagar the Mad (Peet) - Dwarf Barbarian I see a 'drawback' and an extra trait, which is not allowed for per the character creation guidelines.
  • Brandt Holgarson (DBH) - Human Skald
  • Liam Kali (Edward Sobel) - Human Fighter I see that you took 'Weapon Finesse' as a feat, but I wanted to remind you that if you'd like to take it as a trait instead, you may do so. This might yield another feat for you! Take another look at my House Rules.
  • Griar Brand (Waterhammer) - Aasimar Ranger Quick reminder that your 'Weapon Focus' feat affects a weapon group (see 'Fighter' in the core rulebook) instead of a single weapon, per my House Rules.
  • Eina (Adam Warnock) - Human Shaman
  • Pinto Donasetti (Fabian Benavente) - Human Brawler Fabian, go ahead and take a bonus trait because one of my house rules negates one of your class abilities (Brawler's Cunning).
  • Fregault the Wizard (Daniel Stewart) - Pact Wizard Daniel, it looks like you took 'Weapon Finesse' as a trait but still have 2 other traits.

    Incomplete:

  • Roland "stitches" Morthal (RJ the Wolf) - Undead Lord Cleric Double check your 15-pt buy ability scores. I think you may be off by 2 points.
  • Niadroub Kliip (Andostre) - Arcanist
  • no name yet (Goddity) - Bloodrager
  • no name yet (Markofbane) - Wizard

    ------------

    Please review the info above to take into account my observations, and let me know if I made a mistake or if I didn't post your character submission. (I think I got everyone so far)


  • Andostre wrote:

    I'm expressing interest, also. I have an idea for an Arcanist, but I still need to stat him up. Here is his background, though:

    ** spoiler omitted **...

    Hi, please go ahead and remove me from consideration. The campaign sounds fun, but I've had some other stuff pop up that I need to prioritize over finishing my character. I don't want this hanging over my head. Thanks.


    This is the working profile for markofbane. Since someone else submitted a wizard remarkably close to what I was working on, I am going to go with an investigator instead. I need to complete his equipment and background, and I'll repost when those are ready.


    Gamemaster Zedth wrote:

    Here is a list of submissions so far with some errors/oversights that I noticed:

    Complete (or very nearly complete)

  • Pinto Donasetti (Fabian Benavente) - Human Brawler Fabian, go ahead and take a bonus trait because one of my house rules negates one of your class abilities (Brawler's Cunning).
  • Ok, I'll probably hold off a little on selecting that trait. I'm leaning towards Beast Bond (I know it's not that good) but is just about right for the fluff if the PC gets an animal companion.

    Liberty's Edge

    @GM Zedth: I actually took weapon finesse as a feat, not a trait. Awareness was gained from familiar and scribe scroll is an automatic wizard feat. Being human I get 2 feats at 1st level, so I took dodge and weapon finesse. I did forget to pickup gear, so I will do that as well as get a background started. I know I could take it as a trait and gain another feat, but I think I would like to stay with what I have.

    Liberty's Edge

    Ok, here is Fregaults background...

    Background:

    Fregault was born into a family of craftspeople. His parents were both well-known for their work, and his older brother and younger sister seemed to be destined to follow in their parent’s footsteps, but not him.
    From an early age, Fregault has had a secret. He tried to tell people, but they usually just smiled at him tolerantly or told him to grow up. You see, Fregault had a friend that only he could see or hear. This friend taught the youth certain morals and ideas that framed his outlook on life. It also opened the world of magic to the youth. As he grew in knowledge and power, he came to understand more and more of the nature of his “friend” and in doing so, he made an agreement with the entity. In return for its guidance and knowledge he would act as an emissary for him. The spirit agreed and revealed itself to be an angel named Omia
    Over the years, Fregault has followed Omia’s guidelines. It was Omia who sent to Fregault the familiar Gilgamesh. A large toad, the creature helped toughen the youth and increase his fortitude. It also made the boy more alert and few could sneak up on him when Gilgamesh was nearby. When Omia told Fregault of the evils off to the far east and north, he was ready to go. He travelled for sometime alone, but met others with similar goals as his, and now they are only a few days away from their goal; The Keep on the Borderland.


    Gamemaster Zedth wrote:
  • Dunganagar the Mad (Peet) - Dwarf Barbarian I see a 'drawback' and an extra trait, which is not allowed for per the character creation guidelines.
  • OK, I'll fix that.

    Do we really have no healers in the running? I see an undead-raising cleric but nobody with positive energy stuff. Dunganagar is kind of a dumb character to play if there aren't any healers around. I expected a lot of his money to go into healing items but he won't have those at the beginning.

    I think I can afford a potion of cure light wounds at the start though.

    1 to 50 of 121 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>
    Community / Forums / Online Campaigns / Recruitment / Zedth's Keep on the Borderlands Recruitment All Messageboards

    Want to post a reply? Sign in.