Marvel Universe ends, new combined one starts May with Issue #2 of Secret Wars


Comics

301 to 341 of 341 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | next > last >>

thejeff wrote:
Freehold DM wrote:
thejeff wrote:
magnuskn wrote:
Quite honestly, you get that "OMG squicky" dynamic with every immortal character who dates someone who inevitably is younger than her/himself. So the best you can do is gloss over it, because you want those people to remain sexless for your comfort?

For me it gets a lot squickier when they're interested in people who are still pretty young by their own standards. Even if legal.

Much like the 40 year old dating the 19 year old is squicky. Legal, but squicky.

considering that my father is 20 years older than my mother and that issues of squickiness in this vein are very much a modern day taboo- one that I would even go so far as to say is a particularly virulent example of privilege- I hereby encourage Wolverine to have sex with as many willing people over the age of consent as he wishes.

Not sure how old your mother was when they met, so it might not apply. As I said, age matters less as you get older.

And back in the day when no one thought anything about old men marrying young women, the girls usually weren't given a whole lot of choice in the matter. If you want privilege, I'd say the real privilege comes with actually being able to pick your partners.

not much older than Jean was...although that might be my grandmother's disapproval talking. dad thought mom was hot, and dad was the local badass. Everything was quite consentual.


Freehold DM wrote:
thejeff wrote:
Freehold DM wrote:
thejeff wrote:
magnuskn wrote:
Quite honestly, you get that "OMG squicky" dynamic with every immortal character who dates someone who inevitably is younger than her/himself. So the best you can do is gloss over it, because you want those people to remain sexless for your comfort?

For me it gets a lot squickier when they're interested in people who are still pretty young by their own standards. Even if legal.

Much like the 40 year old dating the 19 year old is squicky. Legal, but squicky.

considering that my father is 20 years older than my mother and that issues of squickiness in this vein are very much a modern day taboo- one that I would even go so far as to say is a particularly virulent example of privilege- I hereby encourage Wolverine to have sex with as many willing people over the age of consent as he wishes.

Not sure how old your mother was when they met, so it might not apply. As I said, age matters less as you get older.

And back in the day when no one thought anything about old men marrying young women, the girls usually weren't given a whole lot of choice in the matter. If you want privilege, I'd say the real privilege comes with actually being able to pick your partners.

not much older than Jean was...although that might be my grandmother's disapproval talking. dad thought mom was hot, and dad was the local badass. Everything was quite consentual.

Meanwhile, my dad received s+*~ for joining the welcoming committee as a junior to pick up incoming freshmen - and his old college buddies still make fun of him for it. Amusingly, he ended up with a transfer student his own age.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
LazarX wrote:
Now it's time to reboot comics again for the younger set who buy the bulk of them.

The problem being that 'the younger set' AREN'T buying comics. They're buying manga and videogames.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Arbane the Terrible wrote:
LazarX wrote:
Now it's time to reboot comics again for the younger set who buy the bulk of them.
The problem being that 'the younger set' AREN'T buying comics. They're buying manga and videogames.

Considering that Manga tends to be more consistent and structured, are you surprised?


The NPC wrote:
Arbane the Terrible wrote:
LazarX wrote:
Now it's time to reboot comics again for the younger set who buy the bulk of them.
The problem being that 'the younger set' AREN'T buying comics. They're buying manga and videogames.
Considering that Manga tends to be more consistent and structured, are you surprised?

I'm not even sure what you mean by that. Is "consistent and structured" something young people today are looking for? And that they didn't used to be?

I'm not even sure what you mean by manga being more consistent and structured. Manga's a far broader field than mainstream western comics. It includes far more genres. The story in one manga isn't likely to be linked to others.

Edit: Manga tend to be one story, if a serialized one, while superhero comics tend to be more episodic. Is that what you mean?


2 people marked this as a favorite.

I mean for one manga you have usually have the one writer. It's consistent. American comics generally follow this set up:
1. Have a run with writer who set up story, character development, and actions.
2. A new writer takes over.
3. The new writer spends most of his run undoing what he didn't like from the previous writer or gets in the way of what he wants to do.
4. A another new writer comes on board and the process repeats.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Rulebook, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Yeah, the constant writer turnover, lots of editorial interference and crossovers tend to make the storylines less cohesive, that's for sure. Not to mention character development.


For most of the big time characters, there is no real character development.


Cyclops. >:(

Dark Archive

5 people marked this as a favorite.
Tacticslion wrote:
Cyclops. >:(

Thats more of a decades long character assination.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

FINALLY someone who gets it!


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Kevin Mack wrote:
Tacticslion wrote:
Cyclops. >:(
Thats more of a decades long character assination.

You may not like it. I'm not particularly fond of it. But it's certainly long term character change.

Sovereign Court

Why did the latest comics show Cyclops as some kind of Stark-like genius who can REPROGRAM SENTINELS??? did Beast create the "Dumb Fighter App for Sentinel Reprogramming?"

Why are they somehow pretending that untrained fighter dudes can just pick up computer programming? I get that the MCU has its share of geniuses, but some characters have always been the jocks of the team, or the blasters, and that's fine. I get that Summers has been exposed to all kinds of fancy techs along his career, but where did he find the time to sit and look at the lines of coding for these toys, between saving the world twice a week, traveling in time once a month, and putting 10,000+ hours of piloting on the Blackbird?

Edit: I also forgot to mention the whole thing about running a school...


Honestly... I think Cyclops has become far more interesting in the last 10 years or so... He might not have the most likeable personality nowadays, but at least he has one. Up to the nineties and early 2000s, he was just a generic leader-guy with lasers. Same goes for Jean Grey, who is probably the blandest charactet in MU! Emma Frost is a much better character!


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Lemmy wrote:
Honestly... I think Cyclops has become far more interesting in the last 10 years or so... He might not have the most likeable personality nowadays, but at least he has one. Up to the nineties and early 2000s, he was just a generic leader-guy with lasers. Same goes for Jean Grey, who is probably the blandest charactet in MU! Emma Frost is a much better character!

Well, Jean's been dead half the time. Makes it hard to get much character development. And for the first decade or so she was the girl. That was enough character for anyone.

Scott always had more personality than just the "generic leader-guy", at least by the time the New X-Men came around. He was the leader with a stick up his butt. :)

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder PF Special Edition, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Kalshane wrote:

As thejeff points out, it's a relative maturity thing. If Jean was mid-20s or older, have at it.

Also, at the time, I'm pretty sure Wolverine had just pitched Cyclops off a cliff (more specifically, Cyclops was hanging off a cliff and Wolverine knocked him off rather than rescuing him) and was comforting a grieving Jean. Though that's a completely separate issue of douchebaggery.

Given that Cyclops is now a drug pushing villain, that day may come.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Scott's not an idiot. He never has been. The idea that he was came about as part of the aforementioned character assassination. Also, you are showing your own prejudice with respect to fighters here. A fighter doesn't have to be dumb.


LazarX wrote:
Kalshane wrote:

As thejeff points out, it's a relative maturity thing. If Jean was mid-20s or older, have at it.

Also, at the time, I'm pretty sure Wolverine had just pitched Cyclops off a cliff (more specifically, Cyclops was hanging off a cliff and Wolverine knocked him off rather than rescuing him) and was comforting a grieving Jean. Though that's a completely separate issue of douchebaggery.

Given that Cyclops is now a drug pushing villain, that day may come.

he still hanging out with the loonies in his new legbreaker team?

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder PF Special Edition, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
thejeff wrote:
Lemmy wrote:
Honestly... I think Cyclops has become far more interesting in the last 10 years or so... He might not have the most likeable personality nowadays, but at least he has one. Up to the nineties and early 2000s, he was just a generic leader-guy with lasers. Same goes for Jean Grey, who is probably the blandest charactet in MU! Emma Frost is a much better character!

Well, Jean's been dead half the time. Makes it hard to get much character development. And for the first decade or so she was the girl. That was enough character for anyone.

Not to mention all the time she wasn't Jean at all, but the Phoenix entity embodied in human form. who'd left her buried in New York Harbor.


Freehold DM wrote:
Scott's not an idiot. He never has been. The idea that he was came about as part of the aforementioned character assassination. Also, you are showing your own prejudice with respect to fighters here. A fighter doesn't have to be dumb.

Reprogramming Sentinels is bit beyond "not dumb". OTOH, the X-Men have had access to Sentinels at various times over the years and it's reasonable that somebody would have come up with the "Dumb Fighter App for Sentinel Reprogramming". Not usually applicable because you can't use it on them while they're trying to kill you.


LazarX wrote:
Kalshane wrote:

As thejeff points out, it's a relative maturity thing. If Jean was mid-20s or older, have at it.

Also, at the time, I'm pretty sure Wolverine had just pitched Cyclops off a cliff (more specifically, Cyclops was hanging off a cliff and Wolverine knocked him off rather than rescuing him) and was comforting a grieving Jean. Though that's a completely separate issue of douchebaggery.

Given that Cyclops is now a drug pushing villain, that day may come.

"drug pushing villain"?

Is this the Ultimate one or the regular one? Cause I think I missed the drug-pushing part.

Sovereign Court

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I wholeheartedly agree about my showing of prejudice. Yes, a fighter should be "dumb" compared against "genius" level teammates such as Iron Man, Mr. Fantastic and Beast.

The strength of Summers is not in the lab reprogramming sentinels, but more in line with an insane aiming capacity (imagine all the ranged feats imaginable, he has them, plus perhaps Leadership, Run, Athletic, Endurance, Improved Unarmed Strike, etc. etc. etc.) He's probably Olympic level athlete in many discipline, I'll give him that, although he might be losing some of this with age and trade that off with Wisdom and better Leadership. I'll give him a trick or two with tech, but please, where's Beast, Forge and a host of other nerds when you need them, WHEN YOU HAVE LEADERSHIP??

No, this version of Scott Summers, in the last year or so, I reject. And wholeheartedly ignore with my dollars.

Sovereign Court RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Purple Dragon Knight wrote:

I wholeheartedly agree about my showing of prejudice. Yes, a fighter should be "dumb" compared against "genius" level teammates such as Iron Man, Mr. Fantastic and Beast.

The strength of Summers is not in the lab reprogramming sentinels, but more in line with an insane aiming capacity (imagine all the ranged feats imaginable, he has them, plus perhaps Leadership, Run, Athletic, Endurance, Improved Unarmed Strike, etc. etc. etc.) He's probably Olympic level athlete in many discipline, I'll give him that, although he might be losing some of this with age and trade that off with Wisdom and better Leadership. I'll give him a trick or two with tech, but please, where's Beast, Forge and a host of other nerds when you need them, WHEN YOU HAVE LEADERSHIP??

No, this version of Scott Summers, in the last year or so, I reject. And wholeheartedly ignore with my dollars.

This is the logical progression of a man who left his wife and child to chase his 'true love'. Scott's been an ass since then.

As to 'reprogramming sentinels for dummies' remember, the Avengers books are a bit ahead of the X-books, due to a time skip. It looks like Scott has a mutant homeland/reservation so reprogramming sentinels is easy as cake for Forge, Cypher (even before the silly 'talk to anything' power), Warlock, Danger, maybe Madison Jefferies, Hijack, Kitty for that matter... and that's not counting any MacGuffin mutants that came along in the interim.


Matthew Morris wrote:
Purple Dragon Knight wrote:

I wholeheartedly agree about my showing of prejudice. Yes, a fighter should be "dumb" compared against "genius" level teammates such as Iron Man, Mr. Fantastic and Beast.

The strength of Summers is not in the lab reprogramming sentinels, but more in line with an insane aiming capacity (imagine all the ranged feats imaginable, he has them, plus perhaps Leadership, Run, Athletic, Endurance, Improved Unarmed Strike, etc. etc. etc.) He's probably Olympic level athlete in many discipline, I'll give him that, although he might be losing some of this with age and trade that off with Wisdom and better Leadership. I'll give him a trick or two with tech, but please, where's Beast, Forge and a host of other nerds when you need them, WHEN YOU HAVE LEADERSHIP??

No, this version of Scott Summers, in the last year or so, I reject. And wholeheartedly ignore with my dollars.

This is the logical progression of a man who left his wife and child to chase his 'true love'. Scott's been an ass since then.

As to 'reprogramming sentinels for dummies' remember, the Avengers books are a bit ahead of the X-books, due to a time skip. It looks like Scott has a mutant homeland/reservation so reprogramming sentinels is easy as cake for Forge, Cypher (even before the silly 'talk to anything' power), Warlock, Danger, maybe Madison Jefferies, Hijack, Kitty for that matter... and that's not counting any MacGuffin mutants that came along in the interim.

Oh. Is that where the Sentinels thing comes from? I was trying to remember something in the X-line. If it didn't explicitly state Cyclops had done the programming himself, I'd assume it was wasn't him personally.


Flip side of course we now have Young Scott doing the space pirate thing with his dad. Plus a Young Jean who's powers are turning her into a Tank instead of "girl who floats in the back"

very curious to see what the plan for the Time Travelled young X-men is when the dust from Secret Wars clears.

Scarab Sages

Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Maps, Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber

I wouldn't mind Marvel following Stan Lee's advice in recent years.
He stated the biggest mistake he ever made in reguards to the X-Men is that he made people hate mutants. He wishes he could go back and change that.
Maybe now is the time to make that change.


Really....wow. what would it be changed to?


Freehold DM wrote:
Really....wow. what would it be changed to?

Yeah, it is sort of "Change the entire premise of the X-Men."

It's their distinguishing feature. Nothing would be the same.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

but does it really make sense. I mean why hate on the guy who shoots lasers from his eyes, but the guy with the magic hammer or the super soldier is ok?

The predjudice works great in an iscolated setting but you mix it together with the rest of the Marel universe and it just seems silly

RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32

The mutant prejudice doesn't make a lot of sense in the Marvel Universe, but it is what made the X-books so popular.

Personally, I think they'd work better if they were shunted into their own universe where other supers didn't exist, but that would mean no more Wolverine publicity for the rest of Marvel's lineup.

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder PF Special Edition, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Charlie Brooks wrote:

The mutant prejudice doesn't make a lot of sense in the Marvel Universe, but it is what made the X-books so popular.

Personally, I think they'd work better if they were shunted into their own universe where other supers didn't exist, but that would mean no more Wolverine publicity for the rest of Marvel's lineup.

For a good deal of their comic history, especially the early years, the X-Men were for all intents and purposes in their own universe. They had their own specific Rouge's Gallery, their own set of issues, and they hardly ever interacted with the rest of the Marvel Universe, nor it with them.


LazarX wrote:
Charlie Brooks wrote:

The mutant prejudice doesn't make a lot of sense in the Marvel Universe, but it is what made the X-books so popular.

Personally, I think they'd work better if they were shunted into their own universe where other supers didn't exist, but that would mean no more Wolverine publicity for the rest of Marvel's lineup.

For a good deal of their comic history, especially the early years, the X-Men were for all intents and purposes in their own universe. They had their own specific Rouge's Gallery, their own set of issues, and they hardly ever interacted with the rest of the Marvel Universe, nor it with them.

This is a major reason why I don't mind the mutants not being a part of the cinematic universe. X-men continuity broke for me when they tried to combine them.


After watching last night's AoS, I am wondering if a version of Quake more similar to Skye will replace the 616 version. Especially since the characters from AoS now exist in the comics.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Greylurker wrote:

but does it really make sense. I mean why hate on the guy who shoots lasers from his eyes, but the guy with the magic hammer or the super soldier is ok?

The predjudice works great in an iscolated setting but you mix it together with the rest of the Marel universe and it just seems silly

Superheroes are superheroes. They're special.

Mutants could be anywhere and anyone. Plus they keep ranting about how they're the future of humanity and we'll all be replaced.
Be kind of interesting if the real reason behind the mutant paranoia was Magneto's early actions and rhetoric, sparked by his wartime experience in the concentration camp and the reaction of his wife and others.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I went back recently and re-read my Uncanny X-Men from the mid '70s to the mid 80's. Those are the stories that left the biggest impression on me and were long lasting. Whenever I think of the X-Men, that's the era I always fall back to. Its become so convoluted now, I've dropped most of the X-titles. The new(ish) Nightcrawler book has been really enjoyable for me, as well as the Amazing X-Men run, as they both remind me of the older stuff.


Greylurker wrote:

but does it really make sense. I mean why hate on the guy who shoots lasers from his eyes, but the guy with the magic hammer or the super soldier is ok?

I think it's funny that the X-Men have a guy whose superpower is that he can LITERALLY kill you by looking at you funny.

Beyond that, no idea. My personal crazy theory is that some evil aliens are bombarding the Earth with Stupid Rays that cause anti-mutant bigotry in order to slow down human evolution.

So, how about that Avengers collapsing-multiverse plotline, eh? Seems to me they hit the "Only the writer can save us now!" point quite a way back....


Matthew Morris wrote:


This is the logical progression of a man who left his wife and child to chase his 'true love'. Scott's been an ass since then.

As to 'reprogramming sentinels for dummies' remember, the Avengers books are a bit ahead of the X-books, due to a time skip. It looks like Scott has a mutant homeland/reservation so reprogramming sentinels is easy as cake for Forge, Cypher (even before the silly 'talk to anything' power), Warlock, Danger, maybe Madison Jefferies, Hijack, Kitty for that matter... and that's not counting any MacGuffin mutants that came along in the interim.

Always hate this argument...

Been hearing it for decades, and when I finally read the X-factor books in question I was QUITE surprised to see that this never even came close to happening.

There may have been a few Plot induced character assassinations... but Scott was still in the good light that time. Maddie was destroyed and turned into a psycho by management, but Scott had nothing to be ashamed of.

As for Scott being the 'dumb fighter'... His house has been incorporating some serious ALIEN technology for years. He was regularly in charge of programming the Danger Room scenarios... And at no point was he ever groomed or trained to be 'just the guy giving orders.'

He may not be a the molecular biologist or anything... but I don't see him as getting less then A's in ANY of his classes. Unless they go into detail how 'difficult' these robots are to program... it may be as simple as typing in 'mutants' or 'not-mutants'... Designed by geniuses... but designed for the government to actually 'use'.

They were never OVERLY complicated as far as marvel robots are concerned. It's not like we're talking Ultron or Vison here ;)


phantom1592 wrote:

He may not be a the molecular biologist or anything... but I don't see him as getting less then A's in ANY of his classes. Unless they go into detail how 'difficult' these robots are to program... it may be as simple as typing in 'mutants' or 'not-mutants'... Designed by geniuses... but designed for the government to actually 'use'.

They were never OVERLY complicated as far as marvel robots are concerned. It's not like we're talking Ultron or Vison here ;)

Well, given that the core thing with the Sentinels has always been that they go after mutants and even their creators can't control them, it's apparently not quite that simple.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Well, you guys may remember a little something called the Onslaught story. Without spoiling too much, they did exactly that: Sent the non-mutant supers away to their own universe, giving the mutants (and the lesser non-mutants, and Spidey) the old Marvel universe. Thing was just that this did not sell. Despite new origin storylines for the FF and others. Despite a darker and more hateful original universe. Despite a new universe where the heroes could be heroes. So, one day they simply returned and everyone pretended that never happened. Gah. Let's say the odds of them trying THAT particular idea again are not very big.


The main collapse of Scott seemed to happen after his "absorption" into Apocalypse and "rebirth" thereafter.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Which, of course, allows for the easy retcon of our series of "Dark Summers," as it were. "It wasn't really him! It's the influence of Apocalypse that made him an @$$h0!e! But he's better now!"

I've never understood why self-absorption and a lack of class is usually equated with better character development.

301 to 341 of 341 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Gamer Life / Entertainment / Comics / Marvel Universe ends, new combined one starts May with Issue #2 of Secret Wars All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Comics