Worried about the future of this class


Animist Class Discussion


1 person marked this as a favorite.

The class itself is gold but with so many people asking for nerfs I can already tell its going to get botched at release,


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Until the devs say that it is going to be nerfed, I'm not too worried.

Particular aspects of the class may be brought in-line. But I think the general idea of the class is good to go.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

As I said in another topic I don't want that the class to be nerfed (instead I hope that Players Core 2 classes like Oracle get some good spell boosts and Psychic receive a good errata boosting it too, maybe extending the unleash time).

But I'm hurt after about 4 years in PF2 getting unpleasant nerfs or over-limitations IMO specially for casters. So I try to avoid hypes currently. Yet in the deep of my heart I really hope that the remaster and rage of elements could be a mark where the things finally goes better in general for casters instead of goes down.

The Spirit dmg and the new refocus system, improvements in clerics MAD and armor, removal of the restriction to metal armor to druids and making martial weapons default do bards (probably improving their martial muse) gives me such hope. I just don't want to hold on to it too much so I don't regret it later.


My fear isn't primarily that the class gets nerfed too hard but instead that it gets streamlined. A good example I think is the stackability of Vessel Spells.

I just think Its goofy and fun to have a character dancing in a circle while everything around them explodes with 3 instances of earth's bile up. I would have less of a problem with them lowering the damage a bit but taking away the ability to stack them would ruin that strategy.

Same with the unique spell shapes and casting. It may be complicated but that also is what makes it cool and interesting. Making it so that the animists slots function more similiar to other casters or they have the same spellshapes would thus be in my opinion a huge loss.

Dark Archive

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber

I have faith that Paizo will take actual playtesting more seriously than white room (is that the right term?) theorizing.

Horizon Hunters

I am really surprised anyone doesn't want these things nerfed. Their focus spells are a lot better than the competition as is.

Of course, we have no idea what the remaster will hold. If every caster gets buffs like this the game seems like it will be very easy...

Dark Archive

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber

I almost don't think people are afraid of nerfs for honest balance but are afraid of nerfs that make the class not much different than the Ancestors Oracle.


8 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber

Yeah, balance is good but a lot of the suggestions some of the class' critics have offered are genuinely terrible suggestions that often seem to involve stripping the class of most of its compelling features, and often don't have any basis in the actual functionality of the class at all.


Squiggit wrote:
Yeah, balance is good but a lot of the suggestions some of the class' critics have offered are genuinely terrible suggestions that often seem to involve stripping the class of most of its compelling features, and often don't have any basis in the actual functionality of the class at all.

Hopefully you are right the class really captures the flavor I was looking for, the connection with the spirits feel way more close and personal, they don't just give then powers but are directly watching over the animist and protecting them, they aren't restrictive or judgmental so it feels less like a boss and employee relationship and more like a teacher and student or child and parent, the way they live in the same world as the pc makes then easier to empathize with.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

I am not worried, tbh. Our job is talking about what we like and what we dislike about this iteration of the class, not coming up with a solution. That's Paizo's job. It is still fun, though, so people will keep doing it anyway.

So far I'd say that the most prominent topics are all things I can get behind. What I've seen the most is Sage feeling meh (well, both subclasses being a bit bland too), focus spells being good (maybe too good) and the split casting system maybe being a bit convoluted.

So no, not worried that Paizo will take our armchair dev solutions seriously, since what's behind those comments is what matters and thus far feedback seems to go in a very clear direction.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Remember too that the developers are testing the ideas they are least certain about and most experimental. Have fun. Test them out. See how the options feel in play.


So has anything changed from last time is everyone still confident the animist wont be over-nerfed?


1 person marked this as a favorite.
R3st8 wrote:
So has anything changed from last time is everyone still confident the animist wont be over-nerfed?

The only new news that I am aware of is this note. Which doesn't change anything that I have said.


breithauptclan wrote:
R3st8 wrote:
So has anything changed from last time is everyone still confident the animist wont be over-nerfed?
The only new news that I am aware of is this note. Which doesn't change anything that I have said.

Thanks for the update, to be fair even if one apparition or even many end up under-powered it wouldn't be as bad because you can always add more like bloodlines and eidolons, apparition spells can also be fixed easily with a errata so if its only small changes them its fine because it won't be as damaging in the long run, I'm more worried that cool features will removed like how the animist can become a avatar of his apparition/spirit or class feats being removed because that is much less likely to be rolled back later.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
R3st8 wrote:
Thanks for the update, to be fair even if one apparition or even many end up under-powered it wouldn't be as bad because you can always add more like bloodlines and eidolons, apparition spells can also be fixed easily with a errata so if its only small changes them its fine because it won't be as damaging in the long run, I'm more worried that cool features will removed like how the animist can become a avatar of his apparition/spirit or class feats being removed because that is much less likely to be rolled back later.

As someone who's spent a lot of time lately talking about how the Animist is overtuned and in need of nerfs, I'd say that the special Avatar form and the class's feats are just about the least controversial parts of the class. The general controversy in discussion has been around the versatility of apparition stacking and the power of some vessel spells, but having a different form for your Avatar has so far registered as completely unproblematic, particularly as it's one of those features that manages to be really flavorful without really adding much power (divine casters get to cast Avatar anyway for similar forms).

As for class feats, I've seen people praise Sustaining Dance in particular for its action compression and asking for more feats like it. Most other feats don't appear to have caused too much trouble, and in fact there's requests to free up the Animist's action economy somewhat because right now, it's very difficult to use stance or spellshape feats with all of the other stuff the class has to manage on their turn.

Really, for all the criticism, there's also a lot of requests to buff the Animist in certain respects, chiefly by making their action economy less restrictive. I'd also add that currently the Animist is the only class in the game who can end up with no master proficiency in any saving throw, which I don't think is right.


4 people marked this as a favorite.

Honestly I also think that the most complains about staking Earth's Bile and off-encounter Garden of Healing are overrated and after further analysis both are different from what we normally get but still OK. It's just efficient in what they need to be.

I made a graphic comparison between the Earth's Bile, an Elemental Sorcerer and Draconic Sorcerer both primarily focused in blasts using its focus spells and a Kineticist and in general the 3 Biles is in par in power level with other casters it's just stronger in earlier levels (1-5) but honestly usually the PF2 casters receives complains about being weak in these levels.

About Garden of Healing being strong in off-encounter this is true but for other side the Animist is so focused in use of its focus spells that you usually have to wait 30-40 minutes to full refocus basically taking the same time that other off-encounter healings would take to do same healing.

So I don't se a real need to nerf. Currently my only complain about the class is its spell slot clunkness due it divide its spell slots by half addming more micro-managament and restricting the flexibility of its spell casting.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

As a concept, I like the dual nature of the spellcasting. About half of the magic is the Animist's own, and the other half is coming from the Apparitions.

You get to choose what you cast for your own magic, but what the Apparition brings is chosen for you.

Apparition spellcasting is both quite flexible, and very inflexible. Flexible because you can choose which Apparition to use for the day if you want to choose that based on which spells the Apparition comes with. Inflexible because you don't get to choose the spells for the Apparition. If you choose a particular Apparition for some other reason, like what focus spell it has, or what Wandering feats it allows, then you can't change what spells you get as a result.

Horizon Hunters

1 person marked this as a favorite.
YuriP wrote:

Honestly I also think that the most complains about staking Earth's Bile and off-encounter Garden of Healing are overrated and after further analysis both are different from what we normally get but still OK. It's just efficient in what they need to be.

I made a graphic comparison between the Earth's Bile, an Elemental Sorcerer and Draconic Sorcerer both primarily focused in blasts using its focus spells and a Kineticist and in general the 3 Biles is in par in power level with other casters it's just stronger in earlier levels (1-5) but honestly usually the PF2 casters receives complains about being weak in these levels.

About Garden of Healing being strong in off-encounter this is true but for other side the Animist is so focused in use of its focus spells that you usually have to wait 30-40 minutes to full refocus basically taking the same time that other off-encounter healings would take to do same healing.

So I don't se a real need to nerf. Currently my only complain about the class is its spell slot clunkness due it divide its spell slots by half addming more micro-managament and restricting the flexibility of its spell casting.

Your graph shows Earth Bile does more damage sometimes and close to a min/maxed Kineticist who offers almost zero utility outside of damage and is in melee until level 10+. Also, the Sorcerer/Kineticist is doing partial single target damage. How can you say it doesn't need a nerf?

I guess I am mostly just upset that I really enjoy the Kineticist, but Earth's Bile and Garden of Healing just do what a specialized Kineticist healing/damage (Water/Fire) does but better while having spellcasting. Also requires a total of two feats for the Animist to do this.

Of course, Kineticist still have a lot of fun abilities at higher levels, at low levels Animist overshadow other classes. I guess this mostly comes down to them get everything at level 1. Other classes progressively get better focus/different abilities as they level up.

I am surprised they did this. While leveling I would get bored of this character really easy... There wouldn't really be anything to look forward to that really changes my gameplay. Yes there are some powerful feats but other than sustaining dance I didn't see many that changed my gameplay much. Normally other characters you are constantly getting new special attack or focus spells...

Teridax wrote:
As someone who's spent a lot of time lately talking about how the Animist is overtuned and in need of nerfs, I'd say that the special Avatar form and the class's feats are just about the least controversial parts of the class. The general controversy in discussion has been around the versatility of apparition stacking and the power of some vessel spells, but having a different form for your Avatar has so far registered as completely unproblematic, particularly as it's one of those features that manages to be really flavorful without really adding much power (divine casters get to cast Avatar anyway for similar forms).

Focus spells are mostly just more powerful version of other classes to me. I just wanted to say Avatar forms would have been really unique/fun if they were lower level... I would guess very few people get to level 19 and if they do the campaign ends shortly after.

Surprised they didn't have them as scaling form spells like animal form. Having to wait until level 19 (I am not aware of a way to get them earlier). This would make the class way more unique for me rather than just being X class but with better focus spells and weird spellcasting. Feel like the class would feel much more unique this way.

Silver Crusade

YuriP wrote:

Honestly I also think that the most complains about staking Earth's Bile and off-encounter Garden of Healing are overrated and after further analysis both are different from what we normally get but still OK. It's just efficient in what they need to be.

One thing that surprised me in a Playtest session yesterday is that Garden of Healing is actually pretty decent IN COMBAT healing as well.

I was playing a channeler (obviously :-)) planning on using Garden just for out of combat healing.

First round, stance and bile (the GM interpreted the wording on bile that only one bile spell could be sustained a round which I actually quite like).

Then things went south and my plans changed :-). Danced my way into an optimal position while sustaining bile, whirled, and cast Garden. 3d4+3 group healing ( level 5) that round was enough to bring one character up while topping up some others who needed it.

Next round 2 sustains and a 1 action heal spell.

Not great healing and totally unplanned for but turned out to be adequate and sufficient. And had enough duration remaining after combat to still heal us all up without needing to spend another focus point (mostly irrelevant but it was amusing)


Garden of Healing is decent IN COMBAT it just need that you and your party pay attention in your positioning. If everyone work together you will create many situation where it will be useful in combat. This helps to save some healing spell to situations where you need a more emergency healing to that player who is to far or behind the enemy lines.


garden of healing have 10 feet emanation

not a very good range even for a melee martial

10d4 healing per turn also have lower value compare to higher healing when needed the most


YuriP wrote:

Honestly I also think that the most complains about staking Earth's Bile and off-encounter Garden of Healing are overrated and after further analysis both are different from what we normally get but still OK. It's just efficient in what they need to be.

I made a graphic comparison between the Earth's Bile, an Elemental Sorcerer and Draconic Sorcerer both primarily focused in blasts using its focus spells and a Kineticist and in general the 3 Biles is in par in power level with other casters it's just stronger in earlier levels (1-5) but honestly usually the PF2 casters receives complains about being weak in these levels.

About Garden of Healing being strong in off-encounter this is true but for other side the Animist is so focused in use of its focus spells that you usually have to wait 30-40 minutes to full refocus basically taking the same time that other off-encounter healings would take to do same healing.

So I don't se a real need to nerf. Currently my only complain about the class is its spell slot clunkness due it divide its spell slots by half addming more micro-managament and restricting the flexibility of its spell casting.

Electric art is surprising low, because of the way people speak about it I always assumed it was a broken spell so I wasn't expecting it to be at the bottom.


It's a cantrip. It still better than other cantrips but cannot compete with resource limited spells like focus spells and spell slot spells.

Just for a fun comparison: 3 Earth's Bile in Channeler's Stance VS 3 Flaming Sphere with Burn It! VS 3 Mirror Malefactors VS 3 Ignite the Sun+2 Blasts+Thermal Nimbus
This is a just for math comparisons only. To keep Spheres/Mirrors requires Cackle or Effortless Concentration (both together can reach up to 4) what's not sustainable due the limit of spells that you can cast in a day.
But keep the 3 Ignite the Sun is pretty easy and any fire kineticist can do. The up 2 aditional blast comes because Effortless Impulse and the level 20 second blast come from Kinetic Pinnacle.
The curious is because Ignite the Sun is a lvl 18 Impulse no-one complains about you can do 3 of it resourcelessy.

Community / Forums / Archive / Pathfinder / War Of Immortals Playtest / Animist Class Discussion / Worried about the future of this class All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Animist Class Discussion