Call to Action: #PAIZOACCOUNTABILITY needs your voice

[Porridge]

Kobold Cleaver wrote:

Item Six: Blind Hiring

I want Paizo to go back and guarantee, publicly, that they will continue using a version of Jessica Price's and Wes Schneider's blind test for new hires. If that's the system that gave us employees like Amanda and Crystal, it's the system I want to know they're using.

Just to help keep clear on what Paizo has/has not been doing: I believe Paizo has, in fact, continued to use the blind hiring process Jessica and Wes advocated for. (See the 6th paragraph of this statement.)

So I think you can remove this, at least, from the list!

[Yoshua]

Heather F wrote:

Okay everyone, I'm opening this back up, but if I have to lock it again, it is going to stay locked. I'm going to try a different approach this time and see if it helps. Before you post, read it again before you hit the submit button. Twice. Then walk away for 20 minutes and come back again before you decide to actually submit your words. Consider whether or not you really need to engage/bicker/argue with someone. If you still think that what you have to say is worth posting, take one more minute to spare a thought for us here in customer service that have to read through everything, often more than once when flags pop up. If you STILL feel that what you have to say is worth posting, maybe think about whether or not continually going down that road will get you suspended.

Agreed 100% about consequences for continually abusing the good will of you moderators.

But someone is going to come in and intentionally get it locked eventually. So laying down the if you lock it again it will stay locked ultimatum is a win for someone who wants the conversation to end.

[Kobold Catgirl]

Thanks, Porridge! I'm a terrible reader, I guess. That's good news!