
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

Right, I think the one listed on the boon page is the one mentioned in this blog post. I had forgotten about that one since the timing for it was so out of sync.
A free rebuild using the Boon system.
Note that
The window for applying this boon will close on September 19th. Rebuilding will continue to appear on the Achievement Points chart after that date, but it will no longer be a free option.
Nefreet: I will note that you posted in the thread there so I can only imagine you read the blog.
The easiest way to fix your problem seems to be either revert the character to the way it was before or spend your points before you have online access to them by writing it down and fixing the online expenditure later.

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 people marked this as a favorite. |

Um, its obvious that I'm not the only one totally confused by the rebuild.
Paizo really, really has to start communicating its policies in a better way.
Robert - you may well be right. You may also be completely wrong. If people like nefreet and Andrew (who both spend lots of time on these forums) what chance does anybody really have of getting it right?

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

Looks like another change in how the backend/frontend display ACP information happened in the past two weeks:
1-14 (Lions of Katapesh) reported back in late March shows "1 Pathfinder Society (second edition) GM Credits", the same scenario reported last night shows "6 Pathfinder Society (second edition) GM Credits" Older running of 1-14 still show the "1".
While 1-16/1-17 reported last week show 8 credits, and 1-10 shows 1.
The "6" from 1-14 seems odd -- the other discrepancies seemed reasonable (and require a pretty easily scopable database correction/migration) -- 1-16/1-17 reported the correct ACP for (normal) GM. Older scenarios reported correct gm tables. As we know they have been double using ACP/GM table credit and needed to split those fields out. "6" however is the wrong number for either ACP or gm tables. (6 would be the premium plus player ACP value, but that seems very odd as a mistake on a GM/normal event)

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

Looks like I caught it mid-bulk update.
All PFS2-GM scenarios show 6 ACP now (not 8)
All PFS2-GM quests show 1 ACP now.
FoP shows 24 ACP and a +3 GM ranking.
PFS2-played scenarios are showing 1 ACP (not 4)
No difference seen between local games and con games and Premier Plus GenCon games. So they're still working on that extra level of complexity.
And the boons page doesn't appear to sum the listed ACPs from the sessions page.
Still not sure where the '6' is coming from for a regular GM scenario. Are they decreasing it from 8 to 6? Or is it a mistake in their bulk update.

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

Most of my GM'd sessions shows "# Pathfinder Society (second edition) GM Credits", while most played session show "# Achievement Points - PFS(2ed)" But its not 100% correspondence (GM'd module shows AcP, this week GM'd scenario shows ACP, all previous ones are still wrong) for instance.
Summing up all the AcP entries, matches the number shown on the Boon page.
So it looks like there is still something that's crossing the streams between 'GM credit' (aka table count towards Glyphs) and AcP. So they're getting closer, and seem to have a working procedure for bulk fixing things, they just need to keep tweaking a few things.
I think I should have 601 AcP, but the boons page only shows 48. :)

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

I finally found where they list the points on the sessions page.
The game I'd just reported for Outpost shows 10. Which is correct if it was a premier event.
The standard quests that I have ran are only granting 1 ACP, should have been 2 each.
The standard scenarios I've ran are granting 6 ACP per instead of 8.
All of the games I have played in appear to be accurate. 1's and 4's per.

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

So did the playtest points get rolled over into the AcP? And are the PtP boons no longer available?
I know they posted a PDF of what the Playtest Boons were supposed to be, but that PDF had the word "SAMPLE" watermarked on them. I, like many others, waited to spend Playtest Points to be able to get a printable PDF for my character that didn't have that stamp. I'm hoping that when they get printable PDFs to work for ACP, that they'll restore the same for those Playtest Points.

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

The base amount of AcP you earn as a player is equal to the amount of XP your character earned.
This amount is doubled if you instead GMed, and/or multiplied depending on the venue you were involved in.
For example playing a Society scenario at home earns you 4 AcP, playing at your local Convention earns you 6 AcP, GMing at home earns you 8 AcP, GMing at your local Convention earns you 10 AcP, and doing either at a "premium" event like PaizoCon earns you even more.

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

Benjamin Debrick wrote:So did the playtest points get rolled over into the AcP? And are the PtP boons no longer available?I know they posted a PDF of what the Playtest Boons were supposed to be, but that PDF had the word "SAMPLE" watermarked on them. I, like many others, waited to spend Playtest Points to be able to get a printable PDF for my character that didn't have that stamp. I'm hoping that when they get printable PDFs to work for ACP, that they'll restore the same for those Playtest Points.
I knew there was a reason I had not used my PtP and forgot what it was. That "sample" watermark is what held me back.

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Blake's Tiger wrote:Minor correction: playing at local convention gets you 5.
Play Scenario = 4, 5, 6
GM = 8, 10, 12All of mine show 6, although I suppose that could be a system error.
Was 5 confirmed somewhere?
Yes in the Guide.
http://www.organizedplayfoundation.org/encyclopedia/pathfinder-2-0-organize d-play-basics/

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

Gotcha. I've seen a few people post now that their current AcP counts are a lot closer to what they should be, while mine are still way off (I show 22 AcP when I should have 77, for example.) I was wondering if my understanding how AcP was calculated was wrong when it came to Adventures, but I'm happy to hear I was correct. Thanks!
I'll just continue to wait patiently like everyone else.

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

AcP = XP gained if played, 2 * XP if GMed, modified based on venue (normal, premier, premier plus)
This applies to all content sanctioned for PFS(2).
That assertion does not appear in the guide - do you have a source for it? In fact, the guide mentions nothing but Quests and Scenarios.

![]() ![]() |

Yes, I have a source for it.
Doesn't match how much I earned at all.
I earned:
8 for the games I played at Gen Con
4 for playing a game at an online convention
6 for all others, including games I ran
Also, how do playtest points count for all this?

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

Doesn't match how much I earned at all.
Also, how do playtest points count for all this?
Play test points are a separate pool that will be spendable again when the AcP system is sorted out.
The currently shown numbers are still being processed. Depending on your games 1/4 to 1/2 are actually accurate now, the rest still need a few things in the database to be fixed.

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

Blake's Tiger wrote:Yes, I have a source for it.Doesn't match how much I earned at all.
Pssst. They're not done yet.