
Indagare |

There has been quite a lot of talk over time about martial/caster issues, but I don't know that anyone's quite gotten to the point of asking what makes a wizard a wizard.
Now, it's easy enough to say that a wizard is a character that can cast arcane spells, but thematically that's not a lot to work with. I mean, you have the Bard who can cast spells with the theme of being a singer. Then too there's the Magus which is an arcane caster who is also a warrior.
Finally, you have a lot of distinctive wizard schools of magic but what really makes these work? Why isn't a Bard simply a type of Wizard that specializes in Enchantment and Illusion magics?
I guess what I'm trying to get at is what would you see a wizard doing or being. I, for instance, could see them using a spell book or spells written on bits of paper in order cast spells but can cast spells as long as he has access to his spell book or these papers.
Thoughts?

Mykull |
3 people marked this as a favorite. |

This is all I know about wizards:
Misty morning, clouds in the sky
Without warning, a wizard walks by
Casting his shadow, weaving his spell
Funny clothes, tinkling bell
Never talking
Just keeps walking
Spreading his magic
Evil power disappears
Demons worry when the wizard is near
He turns tears into joy
Everyone's happy when the wizard walks by
Never talking
Just keeps walking
Spreading his magic
Sun is shining, clouds have gone by
All the people give a happy sigh
He has passed by, giving his sign
Left all the people feeling so fine
Never talking
Just keeps walking
Spreading his magic

Drahliana Moonrunner |

There has been quite a lot of talk over time about martial/caster issues, but I don't know that anyone's quite gotten to the point of asking what makes a wizard a wizard.
Now, it's easy enough to say that a wizard is a character that can cast arcane spells, but thematically that's not a lot to work with. I mean, you have the Bard who can cast spells with the theme of being a singer. Then too there's the Magus which is an arcane caster who is also a warrior.
Finally, you have a lot of distinctive wizard schools of magic but what really makes these work? Why isn't a Bard simply a type of Wizard that specializes in Enchantment and Illusion magics?
I guess what I'm trying to get at is what would you see a wizard doing or being. I, for instance, could see them using a spell book or spells written on bits of paper in order cast spells but can cast spells as long as he has access to his spell book or these papers.
Thoughts?
The answer to the first part of your question mechanically, is a character built to the wizard class. After that though, your wizard can be grey-beareded man with a pointy hat, or a savage jungle caster whose spellbook is written on bound leaves. (One example of such featured in the classic AD+D module Isle of the Ape.) Both of those and anything in between are possible. The one thing all share in common is that when it comes time to redo their spells, they are consulting written works.

hiiamtom |
4 people marked this as a favorite. |
VM mercenario wrote:Someone with no sense of right or wrong.My Loremaster begs to differ.
Also, wizards are known for their arcane prowess.

Alex Trebek's Stunt Double |
Class =/= character
A wizard is
(1) an arcane caster which means their spells as CAST by moving, they aren't stoic and still, they'd be the sort you'd see moving their hands and arms in weird ways, saying incantations and manipulating material components
(2) they prepare spells from a book: they must at least be somewhat of a bookworm. They get the majority of their spells from studying other spell sources.
Other than that, they can be anything.
They can be a man or a woman.
Young or old.
Human, El, Dwarf, even an Orc.
They can be cruel or kind.
Wise or brash.
Suave or bumbling.
Brave or cowardly.
A wizard is likely without martial proficiency, though muti-classing is a thing. And even from level 1 a wizard is proficient with a Crossbow and Dagger though not all simple weapons, there is at least some expectation for those who train to become wizards they will be somewhat combat competent.

Larkos |

I think the word you're looking for is Mage. The class names of the magic using classes are something I enforce in my settings when I GM because they're specific types of mage.
Wizard = learned, casts from material components, must use a spell book, must prepare exactly what spells they mean to use
Sorcerer = power comes from the blood, no need for material components, more magical than martial.
Arcanist = has a more limited amount of innate talent, must use material components and spellbooks, knows many spells but can be more flexible.
Bard = casts through music, may be educated or not, has innate power but not through blood necessarily.
Magus = wizard who sacrificed some magical learning for martial training.
Bloodrager = as sorcerer but channeled inward more than outward. More power is unlocked through anger.
Witch = gains power through a powerful patron that is channeled to them through a familiar.
Summoner = limited innate power but has powerful connection to a mysterious being.
The psychic and divine classes are a separate discussion.
The short version is that Psychic classes don't have as much fluff to go on and the Divine classes are named more for their position in a church than their magical abilities since they all gain them from the same place.*
*Except Oracles which are a special case.
So the reason a bard isn't just a wizard who specializes in enchantment and illusion is because they don't act like wizards at all. They may gain some of the same spells but Bards do have their own unique spells like Glibness.

Boomerang Nebula |

The stereotype for me is Gandalf. An old learned person in robes with a staff and a pointy hat who casts spells. They have access to great power but they are wise and know how and when to use it. For example Gandalf does not use magic to enter the mines of Moria, he perseveres until he solves the riddle, but when confronted by the Balrog he uses magic to destroy the Balrog's sword and the stone bridge he is standing upon. Later on they battle on the mountain peak in a huge magical battle with thunder, lightning and fire. Sure Gandalf is originally an angel, but whilst on Middle-earth he is more like a mortal wizard which is why after battling the Balrog he needed to be transported to Lothlorien to heal.

Kaisoku |

I see a Wizard as one who can be portrayed in a number of ways (and more than one given the situation)..
A wizard does research. Whether its translating found tomes, casting divination spells, or testing by trial and error with reagents, the wizard will be noting results and formula down and committing information to memory.
A wizard gains knowledge. Through research, a wizard knows things. Where things are, what does what, what's of best use at what times. Having an answer to whatever questions come up are a perk from the research done.
And knowledge is power. Knowledge kills fear. Despite a frail frame, despite no inherent combat prowess, a wizard will walk into a gruesome charnel scene with confidence and wrest control of the situation with precisely timed words and motions.
Whether we are talking about Elminster, Gandalf, or Harry Dresden, these all seem to be overarching aspects of a prepared arcane spellcaster.