Berinor |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
"Obvious" is such a funny word. As someone who has taken way too many college math courses (and taught a few, too), I can say with confidence that when something is "obvious" or "clear" it either means that it's close to being axiomatic for me (or less charitably, I feel it's true but haven't scratched at enough to explain further) or it's too complicated for me to explain why.
Apologies for leading to a bump, but those kinds of comments remind me of a joke that I'm going to massacre about a professor explaining a problem in front of the class, starting with "It's clear that...". A student asks if it's really obvious. The professor gets a weird look on his face and walks out of the room to his office. He works at it for half an hour and then returns to the class. He says, "Yes." and explains the rest of the problem.
And I intend this to be my last post here. There's no need to keep it up now that we're past 1100. :-)
Elbedor |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
Nefreet, I'm totally with you. We are in the same boat. Simply put, the original text in the CRB was ambiguous. One camp focused on the first part and another camp focused on the second part. The FAQ clarified it is the first part that matters. Those of us in the second camp can understand and accept the reasoning behind the FAQ.
It's been an interesting debate all. Moving on now.
_Ozy_ |
To have ever thought that the DC for a huge creature to jump a 5' pit was DC20 is, quite frankly, ludicrous. Most huge creatures could just step over a 5' pit, but throw in a hop and all of a sudden they had to be acrobatics masters or fail?
This result from Nefreet's 'DC = pit size + creature size' should have been the necessary reality check 1,100 posts ago. The fact that the FAQ can't seem to even put a dent in people's claims that this was a 'reasonable' interpretation of the rules is mind boggling.
Havoq |
I think what is interesting is that this applies to high jumps as well.
Say you have a flying mob 15’ above you. |P|5’|X|M|
If you make a DC20, you expend 10’ of upward movement, and given your 5’ reach, you can then use your standard action to make an attack action.
{mumbles something about provoking while falling back to ground}
Minos Judge |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I think what is interesting is that this applies to high jumps as well.
Say you have a flying mob 15’ above you. |P|5’|X|M|
If you make a DC20, you expend 10’ of upward movement, and given your 5’ reach, you can then use your standard action to make an attack action.{mumbles something about provoking while falling back to ground}
Wouldn't it be a DC 40 to jump 10ft straight up? 4 x hieght to get the base dc of the jump.
Havoq |
Only if you don't have a running start - then the DC is doubled.
There are other factors like base speed, ect.
"you can use the Acrobatics skill to make jumps or to soften a fall. The base DC to make a jump is equal to the distance to be crossed (if horizontal) or four times the height to be reached (if vertical). These DCs double if you do not have at least 10 feet of space to get a running start."
Minos Judge |
Only if you don't have a running start - then the DC is doubled.
There are other factors like base speed, ect."you can use the Acrobatics skill to make jumps or to soften a fall. The base DC to make a jump is equal to the distance to be crossed (if horizontal) or four times the height to be reached (if vertical). These DCs double if you do not have at least 10 feet of space to get a running start."
Without a running start then you have a DC80 jump for 10ft.
DrDeth |
Manwolf wrote:I said this should have been locked about 200 posts ago. Maybe Beating A Dead Horse can make another official appearance.It's threads like this that make me yearn for a good old paladin falls/alignment debacle
If a paladin beats a dead horse, does he fall?
Deadbeat Doom |
Beating A Dead Horse wrote:If a paladin beats a dead horse, does he fall?Manwolf wrote:I said this should have been locked about 200 posts ago. Maybe Beating A Dead Horse can make another official appearance.It's threads like this that make me yearn for a good old paladin falls/alignment debacle
Depends on whether the horse is undead or not.
Nefreet |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Just want to voice my mild amusement/exasperation at the ability of theorycraft to take the simplest of issues and make it so obscenely complicated that it beggars description.
Or this could have been about two sides that equally believed their argument to be the simplest, most common sense interpretation.
Manwolf |
Isonaroc wrote:Just want to voice my mild amusement/exasperation at the ability of theorycraft to take the simplest of issues and make it so obscenely complicated that it beggars description.Or this could have been about two sides that equally believed their argument to be the simplest, most common sense interpretation.
[sarcasm] Common sense will not be tolerated [/sarcasm]
Exactly. Each viewpoint seemed obvious to each viewer, some agreed for different reasons, and some disagreed for the same reasons. What didn't make sense to either viewpoint was why the other didn't see why it was so obvious.