You could always try the Tauric template from the D&D 3.5's Monster Manual II.
If it's not -exactly- what you're looking for then you could always use it as a baseline and then just advance the dragons hit dice.
I don't understand what your really asking or what is going on.
If your GM has created a 60th level character you all are playing a really crazy campaign, or he has basically just made this character of handwavium with the intention of basically not allowing him to be frak'd with. If your GM is doing this, I doubt you'll be able to "counter him". Don't treat this as an antagonizing situaiton to be countered. This is not GM vs the players unless you all have a very different dynamic from the normal group of players.
Really more information about this situation would help more than anything else.
| 4 people marked this as a favorite. |
Sorry, you lost me at "60th level."
. . . or he has basically just made this character of handwavium with the intention of basically not allowing him to be frak'd with. If your GM is doing this, I doubt you'll be able to "counter him". . . .
Sounds like this.
***
My first thought is trying to use a leveled homunculus taking into account...
A construct has the following features.
d10 Hit Die.
Base attack bonus equal to total Hit Dice (fast progression).
No good saving throws.
Skill points equal to 2 + Int modifier (minimum 1) per Hit Die. However, most constructs are mindless and gain no skill points or feats. Constructs do not have any class skills, regardless of their Intelligence scores.
If you can (ab)use efreeti (wishes) to get around much of the construction costs, I would recommend it. With a level 60 character in play, I don't think he should complain if your characters start chaining wishes to be able to compete. :\
I think it was just to have a high power character availible for some time later. This creature I am building is my own decision.
Theres not really anything in Pathfinder rules for this. It would be up to the discretion of your GM.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
1. There is no "60th level". There's not even rules in Pathfinder for going beyond 20th. Even if you take the 3.5 rules for epic characters, such a character would be beyond the power level of 3.5 deities. This. Is. Ridiculous.
2. Only GMs can make monsters. You said "My GM", therefore, you are not the GM. This is an exercise in futiliy.
3. The flipping Tarrasque and Cthulhu himself are only CR25s, more or less the equivalent of 25th level characters, and either of their arrivals signal the end of the world. Even using 3rd party material, bloody Lucifer is only a CR 39. This is stupid.
4. Seriously, wtf? I'm thinking troll.
EDIT: Fixed a spelling error. Thanks S.G.
Rediculous.
Ridiculous.
| 3 people marked this as a favorite. |
Just be careful to play your epic games in the privacy of your own home and don't let on that you might be having fun the wrong way.
As you can tell... the fact that you even implied that there is a world of gaming beyond 20 can throw some people's precious little universe into chaos.
But I would really consider the Tauric template for your -wink, wink- level 16 -wink,wink- monster that you are trying to stat out.
-wink....... wink-
To the OP, I would really say templates. Lots of Templates.
. . . don't let on that you might be having fun the wrong way.
As you can tell... the fact that you even implied that there is a world of gaming beyond 20 can throw some people's precious little universe into chaos. . . .
The 20/20/20 comment reminded me of 2nd edition. If you weren't human, you could multiclass, and it was kind of like gestalt in 3.5. If you were human, you could take a single class as far as you wanted and start over in a new class keeping everything you had in the previous class. It made humans kind of behind at first, but it gave them the capacity to do what no one else could.
. . . This. Is. Ridiculous. . . .
I think that last one needs to be an exclamation point.
Advancing Beyond 20th Level
Although classes doesn't describe what happens after 20th level, this isn't to say that there are no resources available to you should you wish to continue your campaign on to 21st level and beyond. Rules for epic-level play like this exist in numerous products that are compatible with the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, although in many cases these alternative rules can provide unanticipated problems. For example, if your campaign world is populated by creatures and villains who, at the upper limit of power, can challenge a 20th-level character, where will epic-level PCs go for challenges? You might be looking at creating an entirely new campaign setting, one set on different planes, planets, or dimensions from the one where your players spent their first 20 levels, and that's a lot of work.Paizo Publishing may eventually publish rules to take your game into these epic realms, but if you can't wait and would rather not use existing open content rules for epic-level play, you can use the following brief guidelines to continue beyond 20th level. Note that these guidelines aren't robust enough to keep the game vibrant and interesting on their own for much longer past 20th level, but they should do in a pinch for a campaign that needs, say, 22 or 23 experience levels to wrap up. Likewise, you can use these rules to create super-powerful NPCs for 20th-level characters to face.
If it were me, I would start with the LeShay from the Epic Level Handbook and add 60 class levels to it.
I did not say this. I was not here. I am not having fun the wrong way.
I don't know why I never thought of this before - should gestalt PCs be fighting gestalt monsters? ;)
It sounds a bit like you guys are just making things up as you go and has little to do with Pathfinder. Nothing wrong with that as I understand people like to come up with crazy ideas sometimes just to see what happens. Your question is impossible to answer because, well you guys aren't really playing the game according to any actual rules.
Just chiming in to vouch for the Amalgam template mentioned above. It's a really fun thing to play around with!