RSS RSS Facebook Twitter Email
Pathfinder / Pathfinder Society / Season 1: Year of the Open Road

Pathfinder Society Scenario #1-05: Trailblazers’ Bounty

4.60/5 (based on 21 ratings)
Pathfinder Society Scenario #1-05: Trailblazers’ Bounty

Our Price: $8.99

Add to Cart
Facebook Twitter Email

A Pathfinder Society Scenario designed for levels 1–4 (Subtiers 1–2 and 3–4).

The powerful nation of Cheliax has posted a public bounty that would richly reward the first team of explorers to chart a viable route across the Menador Mountains, linking the nations of Isger and Molthune (all to bypass the economic powerhouse of Druma, which has recently imposed higher taxes on key goods crossing its borders). Yet the Menador Mountains are an imposing obstacle, replete with steep slopes, snowy peaks, and territorial orcs. Even so, there are no finer explorers than the Pathfinders, and the Society has dispatched a team to collect the prize. Are the PCs ready to not only explore the foreboding mountains but also to compete with the rival teams and local inhabitants?

Written by Tineke Bolleman.

Scenario Tags: Faction (Horizon Hunters)

Note: This product is part of the Pathfinder Society Scenario Subscription.

Product Availability

Fulfilled immediately.

Are there errors or omissions in this product information? Got corrections? Let us know at store@paizo.com.

PZOPFS0105E

See Also:

<< Pathfinder Society Scenario #1-00: Origin of the Open Road
Pathfinder Society Scenario #1-06: Lost on the Spirit Road Pathfinder Society Scenario #1-07: Flooded King's Court >>
1 to 5 of 21 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>

Average product rating:

4.60/5 (based on 21 ratings)

Sign in to create or edit a product review.

Having Played & Run, I'd say...

5/5 —

One of my favorite and definitely top 3 in society games. The players are actually exploring, pathfinding, instead of running errands for some dubiously important people. Which is really nice. There should be more adventures like this, instead of the metaplots that I don't think most people care about.

Making things up is fun

5/5 —

This scenario frequently requires skill checks, but succeeding lets you improv things about the environment. For instance, when I succeeded on a check to survey the land, I made up a factoid about a rock formation that could be mistake for a dragon depending on the time of day. Very entertaining.

Pathfinders actually Pathfind!

5/5 —

The exploration here makes sense, as do the victory points.

Nice combination of social, exploration and combat.

The goat encounter is really good.

5/5 —

I wish the orcs had a little more personality - it would have been nice as a jumping point to playable orc PCs. Admittedly, this scenario was early enough in Season 1 so that it may not have been possible, but most of the other playable races got an "introduction" in a scenario, and it would have been nice for this to be the orcs'.

Other than that, it was a really well-written scenario and a good mix of everything that makes a scenario great.

Favorite so far

5/5 —

This is by far my favorite scenario so far ( played in 6 and have ran 2). Thank you Tineke Bolleman for such an amazing scenario. I love that this one has a lot of flexibility and calls out alternative "creative" solutions that players may have. I have seen people have some questions around ambiguity, but I think that lends the module strength compared to some of the railroaded scenarios I've been a player (could be a function of the GM's ability to be flexible).

One of my favorite portions of the adventure was the accumulation of their goal. It reminds me of Dramatic Tasks in the Savage Worlds setting and has given me ideas on how to incorporate more skill based encounters in my home games.

1 to 5 of 21 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>
Search Thread

Search this Thread:

Dark Archive
2 people marked this as a favorite.

Yay Tineke!
Grand Lodge
1 person marked this as a favorite.

Can we get a map requirement list under spoiler so we can prepare to run this in October? Thx
Grand Lodge

bump
Silver Crusade

Are these to be released this month or next? Apsu must know!
Grand Lodge

Wednesday, September 25th
Scarab Sages Organized Play Developer
1 person marked this as a favorite.

Grand Lodge
1 person marked this as a favorite.

The Scenario also bears the Tag: Repeatable

Maps Question:
It looks like the Pathfinder Flip-Mat: Falls & Rapids was initially available physically earlier this month but now shows as unavailable. It's in my sidecart as a physical order. I'm assuming I will not be getting it?
Grand Lodge Organized Play Lead Developer
Talon Zorch wrote:
The Scenario also bears the Tag: Repeatable

That's an error on the title page. 1-05 is not a repeatable scenario, but 1-06 will be. Sorry about that!

1 person marked this as a favorite.

The artwork on pg 2 seems to be wrong. It matches the artwork from #01-04, and makes more sense on that one.
Linda Zayas-Palmer wrote:
Talon Zorch wrote:
The Scenario also bears the Tag: Repeatable
That's an error on the title page. 1-05 is not a repeatable scenario, but 1-06 will be. Sorry about that!

Not only on the title page. I just reported a session of this adventure and it was listed as repeatable there, too.

Am I missing something? I can only find 9 treasure bundles in the adventure:

Tresure Bundle locations:

1 from the ravens nests
3 from the orcs
1 in the cave entrance
1 in the bedroom
1 from the ogre's gear
2 from his victim's bodies

And then again, the four lesser elixir of life you find don't count as treasure at all. Am I correct in assuming that those represent the missing bundle?

Also, I found a weird mismatch in the stats of one NPC:

NPC mismatch in stats:

The ogre has listed an ogre hook in his items in low tier. The weapon he uses, though, is a battle axe, which can not be found in his items.
In high tier, he uses a greataxe, which is correctly listed in his items. The picture shows him using a hook, though. So, which information is correct?

Last and probably least: The adventure has at one point listed a 7 player adjustment. Since the actual adjustment is not dependent on the number of players anymore, but on challenge points instead, how can that ever come into effect? The CP list doesn't mention any 7 player adjustment, so it will never be used, will it?

Oh, and about those adjustments: there are certain checks in the adventure that have an effect, if a number of checks equal or greater than the number of players are successes. Does that refer to the actual number of players at the table or to the number of players the challenge points tell you to adjust the adventure to?
Scarab Sages Organized Play Developer
2 people marked this as a favorite.
The.Vortex wrote:


Oh, and about those adjustments: there are certain checks in the adventure that have an effect, if a number of checks equal or greater than the number of players are successes. Does that refer to the actual number of players at the table or to the number of players the challenge points tell you to adjust the adventure to?

Actual number of players. This should smooth out overall as we transition fully over to using CP scaling in sidebars (as long as that continues to be the preferred methodology.

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Hi

Any news on when this is releasing to subscribers who haven't had it yet. Disappointing to have to wait beyond release date to get subscription copies.

Thanks

Medriev
Pathfinder Starfinder Society Subscriber
Medriev wrote:

Hi

Any news on when this is releasing to subscribers who haven't had it yet. Disappointing to have to wait beyond release date to get subscription copies.

Thanks

Medriev

You should have it by now. Since you don't, you should start a thread in the Customer Service forum asking the Paizo folks to fix this for you, or call them on Monday if you prefer.

Scarab Sages
4 people marked this as a favorite.
The.Vortex wrote:

Am I missing something? I can only find 9 treasure bundles in the adventure:

** spoiler omitted **

I'll answer in a spoiler as well.

treasure bundles:

In my final draft, the bedroom had two treasure bundeles. While the optional encounter gives loot, they do not count towards the treasure bundles, so as not to penalise players that skip it, while helping those parties that face a very challenging encounter.
Woran wrote:
The.Vortex wrote:

Am I missing something? I can only find 9 treasure bundles in the adventure:

** spoiler omitted **

I'll answer in a spoiler as well.

** spoiler omitted **

So, I will go with how your final draft was ment and just add the missing bundle there. Thanks. And thanks for a really good adventure :)

Scarab Sages
The.Vortex wrote:
Woran wrote:
The.Vortex wrote:

Am I missing something? I can only find 9 treasure bundles in the adventure:

** spoiler omitted **

I'll answer in a spoiler as well.

** spoiler omitted **

So, I will go with how your final draft was ment and just add the missing bundle there. Thanks. And thanks for a really good adventure :)

Thank you!

Liberty's Edge
2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Maps, Pathfinder Accessories, Rulebook, Starfinder Maps, Starfinder Society Subscriber

So I just started reading through this scenario to run it this coming Friday, and so far it sounds fun. I don't want to sound like I'm knit-picking, but I think it's important. Not that it's significant, but there's something should be addressed and corrected.

Spoiler:
In the box from Calisro Benarry, the scenario calls for Cold Weather Gear. In the Core Rulebook, there is no Cold Weather Gear, just Winter Clothing under Clothing.

Especially here at the beginning we need to strive to use the 2E terms. I've asked forgiveness from my players many, many times for using 1E terms. They tell me not to worry about it, but I should. I'll admit, it's been challenging converting over from 1E to 2E and using new terminology for so many things. But, while we may know what we're talking about, new players who haven't played 1E won't know what to look for. And the PDF search feature will only turn up the correct phrase, not automatically convert from 1E to 2E.

If I find any more, I'll post them here. If I should follow a different protocol, please message me directly.

Thank you!
1 person marked this as a favorite.

Question about a reward on the chronicle.

Spoiler:

The GM said the scenario grants 1 extra Horizon Hunters fame instead of the 2 granted by other factions so far. Is that a typo?
Bigguyinblack wrote:

Question about a reward on the chronicle.

** spoiler omitted **

That is how some of the scenarios were handled in Starfinder Society. Not saying it is the same since it is a seperate system. It is not explained as clearly as in the Starfinder Scenarios.

Liberty's Edge
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Maps, Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Charter Superscriber; Starfinder Charter Superscriber
Bigguyinblack wrote:

Question about a reward on the chronicle.

** spoiler omitted **

Spoiler:
You still get the 4 to your primary, but the scenario just says 1 extra for Horizon Hunters

A nitpick for wiki purposes: is Jasper Caperinas a typo for Jasper Caperina?
Scarab Sages
1 person marked this as a favorite.

Yes, that appears to be a typo on my part. It was defenitely ment to be Caperina, the family appearing in the Siege of Absalom special of PFS.
Liberty's Edge
1 person marked this as a favorite.

Shouldn't there be some kind of bonus for having Forager in the section where you see whether the PCs can forge for food?
Silver Crusade
1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Ran it today as a non-PFS game. It's a damn fine scenario and although it's linear, you'll never feel it. Great encounters, engaging challenges, good "let's chart this route" feel, excellent NPCs. Two thumbs up!
Grand Archive

Aw why would you take repeatable off of this. This is an amazing "this is the spirit of Pathfinder society" scenario, both inside game lore and outside of the game. This scenario is more the definition of Pathfinder Society than even Absalom Initiation. Initiation is kinda meh. This had actually decent stuff. It's not like yall care about society play anyway. Repeatable are the only thing saving you at the moment and that's barely working as is.

How difficult would this be to run in an online game?
Pathfinder Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber
Terevalis Unctio of House Mysti wrote:
How difficult would this be to run in an online game?

In my experience, the only difficulty in running any scenario online is getting the maps for the online platform you're using. Actually running it is really no different than running in person.

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure, Lost Omens, Maps, Rulebook, Starfinder Maps, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber

I just noticed the B, C, and D encounter maps are in the PDF upside down lol

If the Treeline map is hurting your brain to look at it, just flip it 180 degrees!
Kerblam wrote:
If the Treeline map is hurting your brain to look at it, just flip it 180 degrees!

Yes, this makes so much sense now. It just didn't jive before.

A question that I have to anyone, is for the Travel Checks, where exactly to do them, it's not very clear.
Community / Forums / Paizo / Product Discussion / Pathfinder Society Scenario #1-05: Trailblazers’ Bounty All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Product Discussion