
Generic Villain |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
You know, it just hit me:
When I was speculating above on which Great Old One the PCs would fight in this adventure, for some reason I completely forgot the King in Yellow version of Hastur in Bestiary IV. This is the "against Hastur" AP after all, and as already mentioned in this thread there's no way the PCs will be able to oppose him for real. It would be a great chance for The Unspeakable to show up and beat the ever-loving bejesus out of the party. When (if?) they wake up, they would know exactly what kind of danger they were up against. Plus there would be some cool synergy between this and when the PCs were "killed" by the Tatterman at the very beginning of this campaign.
Also, I mean, the name of this adventure. Kind of a big clue. That said, I'm wrong like all the time. We shall see soon enough.

Thomas Seitz |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Berselius wrote:Do the PC's get Mythic power in this adventure path?Not unless the GM adds those elements themselves, no.
I'm also not sure it's necessary for this game. Especially if you want the PCs to not have the upper hand like they would normally.
That's part of the elements of horror that need to be preserved.

Heine Stick |

I wonder what the reason behind this being moved to november is?
Mr. Lundeen likely has finished writing this long ago.
Even if he has, there's a lot more to these books than just writing the adventure. There's the book's backmatter, development, editing, art direction, layout, printing, and shipping, and likely many moving parts we customers have no clue about, any number of which can cause various complications and delays.
EDIT: Also, what makes you say it's been moved to November? The release date on this page says late October...
EDIT EDIT: Aha! You're refering to the product schedule page, aren't you?

Berselius |

Kalindlara wrote:Berselius wrote:Do the PC's get Mythic power in this adventure path?Not unless the GM adds those elements themselves, no.I'm also not sure it's necessary for this game. Especially if you want the PCs to not have the upper hand like they would normally.
That's part of the elements of horror that need to be preserved.
I'm all for an element of horror in any Pathfinder Campaign / Adventure Path but if the PC's have no way to win then that's really no fun for anyone and can lead to all PC's present leaving the table in frustration. That said I'm sure the challenge rating are still scaled to within reasonable levels but if the PC's end up facing off against a Great Old One at non-mythic tiers at level 10 or less then I doubt they have any way to win or come out of it alive.

Generic Villain |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I'm sure it will be more complex than that. If I had to guess, I'd say that it's more about preventing the horror in Lake Hali from awakening than about punching it to death.
(This is where Ariadnah comes in - she's a threat on the PCs' power level.)
That was my take away from the plot synopsis. That said:
So how can an aristocrat 2/bard 2 be a BBEG? Two options I can think of. Either he gets a power boost and ends up gaining multiple levels, or he's outright possessed by Hastur. Perhaps even both. There's precedence for this too - Queen Ileosa was an Aristocrat 2/Bard 4 at the start of Curse of the Crimson Throne, and by the end she's a magnificently powerful character with a diabolic template thrown on for good measure.

Generic Villain |
3 people marked this as a favorite. |
G-Villain,
I'm 9000% sure Lowls is the guy the PCs want to punch out more than the Briarstone Witch.
Gotta say, he's quite possibly the most unlikable Pathfinder villain to date. A perfect melange of arrogant, stupid, and yeah, having a face that begs for punches. Just all the punches. At the same time he's a perfect bad guy for this particular AP. I will be most satisfied when horrible, very bad things happen to him.

TEN |
I'd like to know where the problem with the publishing is, just so I know if we can still expect the pdf on time. I was hoping to get the third book before my game starts just because I think the GM should know what the players' actual backstories are before they start, to avoid bizarre contradictions.

![]() |

I'd like to know where the problem with the publishing is, just so I know if we can still expect the pdf on time. I was hoping to get the third book before my game starts just because I think the GM should know what the players' actual backstories are before they start, to avoid bizarre contradictions.
The pdf won't be available earlier than the physical book.
That has never been the case.Both will be out on november 19th, earlier if you subscribed.
That said, i have read AP #109 completely and #110 partial and consider it best if the PCs and the GM don't bother with any specific backstories at all.
A rough collection what happened is given in the first 2 books, someone in the GM sections of them has even put together a chronological timeline.

Eric Hinkle |

...For certain reasons, I am very interested in these dreams.
My gosh, someone remembers Yidhra.
“Yidhra, the Dream-Witch, clouding the minds of her followers;
Dream-Witch, hiding her shape in illusion,
Dream-Witch, cloaking her shape in strange beauty...”
It would be too much to ask for us to get her and her cult statted up in this AP, wouldn't it?

Eric Hinkle |

Thanks Kalindlara. And while it's likely impossible, I'd love to see references to Mythos material by Brian Lumley like Yibb-Tstll or Bugg-Shash -- what? I like his stuff; it has a very fantasy feel to it. Ramsey Campbell did some amazing work as well, though I suppose Glaaki is still stuck on Earth.

Ron Lundeen Contributor |
Yes Ron, we mean you. If we didn't mean you, I'd think we'd say "Ron Lundeen's father - insert name."
But again looking forward to other chapters you've written. :)
But my father's name is also Ron Lundeen! No kidding.
But more on point, I'm just as sorry as everyone else to hear about the delay, as I'm really looking forward to seeing how this turned out!

![]() |
3 people marked this as a favorite. |

Thanks Kalindlara. And while it's likely impossible, I'd love to see references to Mythos material by Brian Lumley like Yibb-Tstll or Bugg-Shash -- what? I like his stuff; it has a very fantasy feel to it. Ramsey Campbell did some amazing work as well, though I suppose Glaaki is still stuck on Earth.
Our license with Chaosium does not extend to using mythos content from Lumley or Campbell for Strange Aeons, but that doesn't mean that some day in the future for some other product we can't pursue license agreements with either of them to do more with their creations in another book, I suppose. I would LOVE to do more with Campbell's creations in particular some day.

Generic Villain |
Campbell sounds like someone who would be pretty cool with seeing his creations re-used. From what I have heard Lumley is a bit more protective.
I don't work for Paizo and certainly can't answer your point. I can speculate though. Maybe Paizo prefers working with Chaosium because they're pretty monolithic in terms of intellectual property, and by doing business with this fellow gaming company, Paizo gains access to more than enough Mythos goodness to suit their needs.
Trying to negotiate with other authors/companies would add complications while providing diminishing returns.
Again, purely a guess.

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Thomas Seitz wrote:So does that mean that the creatures licensed by Chaosium won't appear in any other adventures?Too bad we can't Dark Young and Dimensional Shambler again...
But still! I look forward to seeing what we do get regardless in this adventure.
That's correct. Also, that material cannot be reproduced like other material as per the OGL (without contacting Chaosium and getting permission). See point 7 of the OGL for how it deals with Product Identity.
7. Use of Product Identity: You agree not to Use any Product Identity, including as an indication as to compatibility, except as expressly licensed in another, independent Agreement with the owner of each element of that Product Identity. You agree not to indicate compatibility or co-adaptability with any Trademark or Registered Trademark in conjunction with a work containing Open Game Content except as expressly licensed in another, independent Agreement with the owner of such Trademark or Registered Trademark. The use of any Product Identity in Open Game Content does not constitute a challenge to the ownership of that Product Identity. The owner of any Product Identity used in Open Game Content shall retain all rights, title and interest in and to that Product Identity.

Generic Villain |
I seriously doubt that this will be out in november (which is too full with too many products anyway).
It still hasn't a product update.
I've been an AP subscriber since Curse of the Crimson Throne. They have never gone two consecutive months without releasing a volume of their AP.
As some people have noted, this is most likely due to just not getting the data to the printer on time, or getting the printed material stateside on time. Once Paizo actually has all that Pathfinder goodness stuffed in their warehouse though? It's ready to ship.

Kajehase |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Marco Massoudi wrote:I seriously doubt that this will be out in november (which is too full with too many products anyway).
It still hasn't a product update.I've been an AP subscriber since Curse of the Crimson Throne. They have never gone two consecutive months without releasing a volume of their AP.
As some people have noted, this is most likely due to just not getting the data to the printer on time, or getting the printed material stateside on time. Once Paizo actually has all that Pathfinder goodness stuffed in their warehouse though? It's ready to ship.
And honestly, with the Curse of the Crimson Throne tome shipping this month I'm actually quite pleased with the AP volume being delayed.