![]()
![]()
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
![]() Coridan wrote: I expect we'll see a response from Paizo in the 13th, which is when I expect we'll see the final version release from WotC I got my monthly AP authorization email a few minutes ago. Paizo might address it by not addressing it and continuing with business as usual. -Skeld ![]()
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
![]() Have them fly to town and begin harassing the citizens of Otari. This will give your PCs a reason to spend a bit more time in and around town (possibly picking up other leads that are useful later on) and giving them a good lesson in unintended consequences. Lol. I wouldn't have them kill anyone in town, but an couple attacks on civilians and maybe a injury or two might give them a sense of urgency. And if they continue to ignore the flies, there might be a maggot or two inhabiting the corpse of a dead farm animal later on. -Skeld ![]()
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
![]() I own all the original adventures in this book and I have no interest in a 2E conversion of this material... BUT, I really would like the tighter storyline thread between adventures, some additional material, AND a greater emphasis on on breaking the seal since I'd like to run this before Tyrant's Grasp, so this might be something I pick up. -Skeld ![]()
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
![]() If you're involved in litigation and you don't go out and hire the best* law firm you can afford that will put up the most vigorous defense of your position they ethically can, then you are being stupid. Once there's litigation, it becomes a bitter knife fight to the end. The entire point is to secure the best possible outcome for your client. Don't think for a second that the union's representation will do any less for them. It is by definition an adversarial process. -Skeld *No representation is made that the legal services provided are greater to the legal services provided by any other firm. ![]()
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
![]() Master Han Del of the Web wrote:
Live ordnance is the only thing I approach with care. It is, and will continue to be, "reckless abandon" for everything else. -Skeld ![]()
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
![]() Tonya Woldridge wrote: Removed a baiting post regarding posting policies, posts equating like behaviour to stalking, personally harassing posts, and a few other posts that were spam. You say "baiting," I say "snarky humor." Then again, I'm not the one with banning powers. -Skeld ![]()
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
![]() TwilightKnight wrote: Paizo's position as a progressive social-justice minded company is smoke and mirrors. Any company, selling you any product, that tells you how deeply, deeply concerned and committed they are to progressive social justice is lying. They are companies concerned with making money and those statements are a tactic to make you feel better about giving them your dollars. -Skeld ![]()
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
![]() Hmmm, ok. Looks like I need to be a pathfinder on this conversion. I've started putting maps in Roll20. I'll soon start building up the bad guy library (I usually rebuild all of the NPCs anyway). I'll take a look at treasure and DCs as well. My group is about to wrap up CotCT, so I've got about a month before we'd start AV. -Skeld ![]()
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
![]() narchy wrote: Would it not be easier to just play it in 2e? Sorry if that's a silly question! Of course! Why didn't I think of that?! Here are some reasons:
Your question wasn't silly, but your comment wasn't helpful. -Skeld ![]()
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
![]() The thing about APs is that they aren't just adventures. They're also functional world-building, harkening back to the day with Pathfinder was nothing other than the AP. Since it's been a successful format, Paizo has (rightly) been hesitant to mess with it too much. -Skeld ![]()
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
![]() redeux wrote: Mine is still pending. And Yeah, I guess I didn't realize my order is also being split. I created a thread about it. I know orders get split if it is even 1 cent cheaper but it seems a bit off for mine to have split. In my case, it's definitely not cheaper. I'm basically paying double. For no reason other than they haven't fixed the root problem. This is something like the 4th or 5th out of the last 6 monthly orders. Prior to that, my stuff always shipped together. -Skeld ![]()
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
![]() Skeld wrote:
The auth for Order 36291241 is showing that it's shipping in 2 packages. I would prefer that it ship in one so that I'm not paying double for shipping. Again.. Thanks.
![]()
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
![]() Once again, my PF and SF APs are set to ship separately for no apparent reason. Please fix this. It keeps happening month after month. I asked you guys to fix it last month and you did! Then, when my order shipped, they shipped separately. I made a separate thread about this last month, but no one has replied to it yet. -Skeld ![]()
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
![]() Again this month my PF and SF APs have shipped in separate packages for no apparent reason. This doubles my S&H costs with no benefit to me. This has happened 4 of the last 6 months. I caught it last month, complained in the shipping thread, and it was stealth fixed with no explanation. I appreciate that it was fixed, but I'd like to get this addressed such that I don't have to check every month. Paizo's shipping has been reliable for me for the past 13 years and I'd like to see that reliability return. -Skeld ![]()
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
![]() Alzrius wrote:
I all fairness, I jokingly said that last month. Regardless, this is my third month of "APs that used to ship together that are split in two packages with separate shipping" and I'm ready for it to stop. -Skeld
|