Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
James Jacobs wrote:
I hope that you're able to market them more and get added engagement. The forums here are still my main source of info on what's happening because I've abandoned (or never adopted) most of the social media you guys are using (I'm not knocking you for it, it's just the facts of my individual situation). I do see the occasional trailer on youtube, but that's about it. That's probably not very common, but I don't have the insight into the marketing that you guys do. Regardless, the idea single hardcover idea has grown on me. -Skeld
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
After some thought, I dont hate the AP changes as much as I did initially. I dont like what i see as a lack of engagement between AP releases. Having AP volumes every month kept me more "in the loop" on what was going on. Now i think ill be surprused when someting comes out. I have no opinion on PFS. -Skeld
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
glass wrote:
Because spreading them out over 6 or 3 months means that the individual chapters are all in various stages of development at any given time. With publishing as a single volume, all individual parts will need to be in roughly the same stage of development so that the lead person can edit the whole thing at once instead of in pieces spread out over time. -Skeld
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
DavidW wrote: It would be very interesting to know what’s changed here. Paizo has been doing monthly Adventure Path episodes for the best part of twenty years; I can think of plenty of potential advantages of the shift, but none that wouldn’t also have been advantages 5, 10, 15 years ago. A non-trivial number of people buy the first issue and none of the rest. With this change, you have to buy the whole thing. -Skeld
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Coridan wrote: I expect we'll see a response from Paizo in the 13th, which is when I expect we'll see the final version release from WotC I got my monthly AP authorization email a few minutes ago. Paizo might address it by not addressing it and continuing with business as usual. -Skeld
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Have them fly to town and begin harassing the citizens of Otari. This will give your PCs a reason to spend a bit more time in and around town (possibly picking up other leads that are useful later on) and giving them a good lesson in unintended consequences. Lol. I wouldn't have them kill anyone in town, but an couple attacks on civilians and maybe a injury or two might give them a sense of urgency. And if they continue to ignore the flies, there might be a maggot or two inhabiting the corpse of a dead farm animal later on. -Skeld
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
I own all the original adventures in this book and I have no interest in a 2E conversion of this material... BUT, I really would like the tighter storyline thread between adventures, some additional material, AND a greater emphasis on on breaking the seal since I'd like to run this before Tyrant's Grasp, so this might be something I pick up. -Skeld
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
If you're involved in litigation and you don't go out and hire the best* law firm you can afford that will put up the most vigorous defense of your position they ethically can, then you are being stupid. Once there's litigation, it becomes a bitter knife fight to the end. The entire point is to secure the best possible outcome for your client. Don't think for a second that the union's representation will do any less for them. It is by definition an adversarial process. -Skeld *No representation is made that the legal services provided are greater to the legal services provided by any other firm.
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Master Han Del of the Web wrote:
Live ordnance is the only thing I approach with care. It is, and will continue to be, "reckless abandon" for everything else. -Skeld
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Tonya Woldridge wrote: Removed a baiting post regarding posting policies, posts equating like behaviour to stalking, personally harassing posts, and a few other posts that were spam. You say "baiting," I say "snarky humor." Then again, I'm not the one with banning powers. -Skeld
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
TwilightKnight wrote: Paizo's position as a progressive social-justice minded company is smoke and mirrors. Any company, selling you any product, that tells you how deeply, deeply concerned and committed they are to progressive social justice is lying. They are companies concerned with making money and those statements are a tactic to make you feel better about giving them your dollars. -Skeld
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Hmmm, ok. Looks like I need to be a pathfinder on this conversion. I've started putting maps in Roll20. I'll soon start building up the bad guy library (I usually rebuild all of the NPCs anyway). I'll take a look at treasure and DCs as well. My group is about to wrap up CotCT, so I've got about a month before we'd start AV. -Skeld
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
narchy wrote: Would it not be easier to just play it in 2e? Sorry if that's a silly question! Of course! Why didn't I think of that?! Here are some reasons:
Your question wasn't silly, but your comment wasn't helpful. -Skeld
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
The thing about APs is that they aren't just adventures. They're also functional world-building, harkening back to the day with Pathfinder was nothing other than the AP. Since it's been a successful format, Paizo has (rightly) been hesitant to mess with it too much. -Skeld
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
redeux wrote: Mine is still pending. And Yeah, I guess I didn't realize my order is also being split. I created a thread about it. I know orders get split if it is even 1 cent cheaper but it seems a bit off for mine to have split. In my case, it's definitely not cheaper. I'm basically paying double. For no reason other than they haven't fixed the root problem. This is something like the 4th or 5th out of the last 6 monthly orders. Prior to that, my stuff always shipped together. -Skeld
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Skeld wrote:
The auth for Order 36291241 is showing that it's shipping in 2 packages. I would prefer that it ship in one so that I'm not paying double for shipping. Again.. Thanks.
|
