Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
James Jacobs wrote:
Looks like I'll be playing in that soon, so I'm excited to explore the region! But anyhoo. Numeria. Yes.
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
It was mentioned at some point early in PF2, possibly even during the playtest, that with the 3-action economy something like the four-armed kasatha become a lot easier to balance around, so it's certainly been on somebody's mind, at least. Here's to hoping!
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
Howdy y'all! N'wah/Ashton Sperry here, with an important post. As it is often wont to do, Numeria came up during at least one of the panels today, and while it was confirmed Numeria's not on the immediate radar, there's no reason not to build up some hype and appreciation for a possible time when it is- after all, stranger things have happened! Numeria's a special place- to me personally, as I've always loved that sweet swirl of fantasy and sci-fi that makes it so delicious- but it's also special in that covering Numeria fully would be the kind of affair that potentially affects all the product lines. Tech rules in the rulebooks; the nation, either as part of a Broken Lands book or one by its lonesome, in the Lost Omens line; and likely one or several adventures in the modules and/or AP lines. That certainly makes it an investment, in time, money, and annual shelf space! That's why I wanted to start this thread: to show that there's loads of folks interested and eager to get back to that fantastical place. And not just as customers, but as freelancers, as well! I know I'm not alone in being someone whose go names in Paizo books and is downright eager to further flesh out the developments that have occurred in the intervening years, and I encourage my fellow freelancers who are so inclined to voice their interest as well. So if you're one of the many folks for whom Numeria sings its siren song, let your voice be heard!
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
keftiu wrote: It reminded me to peek back at the Knights of Lastwall book, and I caught something there that I'd missed before - namely, that the Knights are trying to get Kevoth-Kul to share sovereign steel with neighboring Mendev and Sarkoris Scar. Success there furthers my idea upthread of the immortal Kellid king being an appearing leader to some Sarkorians, assuming he ever does decide to lend aid. Glad you caught that li'l tidbit! <3
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
keftiu wrote:
Thank you so much! I try not to typecast myself, but Numeria is absolutely one of my favorite parts of the setting, and when the outline mentioned a Numerian skymetal merchant I pounced on it fast as I could. Writing Tesyovensku was also an opportunity for me to make a fellow nonbinary character, which was really enjoyable for me. I'm so glad you like them!
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
Howdy, all! About a decade ago I whipped up a printable Kingmaker charter that proved pretty popular, and with the upcoming updated release I thought I'd make a new version for folks to enjoy. You can find the printable 3-page PDF on my DeviantART here. Each page is a separate version of the charter, a "standard edition" with clean edges, a version with torn edges, and a version without a background for folks looking to save ink and/or print on vellum-colored paper or the like. Hope you enjoy it! In addition, I might give making some other handouts another go, and also wanted to encourage other folks who want to make or have already made Kingmaker freebie extras to share them here!
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
This kerfuffle reminds me of a lawyer friend talking about reading old case law in school, in particular a case called "Trover to wit two horses," and how, apparently, in older legal documents (at least in my state), they didn't bother with such formalities as punctuation. The text just goes and goes. So I suppose we can thank Ron for at least using modern legalese, which is at least as legible as the End User License Agreements few of us bother to read.
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
silversarcasm wrote:
Not to mention GMs who want to run a long campaign using one or some of these folks without an AP. If the NPCs are locked in a specific "canon" stat block, it can seem like a limitation on the options a GM might have to use them as they see fit.
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
CorvusMask wrote:
You can thank Mikhail Rekun for that line, CorvusMask. :D
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
Popliteal wrote: I'm debating whether to pick this up from my FLGS or just the pdf. I'm reading that the art is amazing, so it's pushing me more towards physical. I'm a sucker for fantasy art and PF2e has been on point so far. Much as I'd like to be like, "oh, buy both!" I certainly understand limited funds to put into stuff like this. I'd probably recommend the hardcover. This is a book you'll want to return to time and time again- or at least I hope!- and having that book on your shelf makes accessing that sense of physicality, of flipping through the pages and enjoying the art and words, very doable.
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
Hmm wrote: Two days to go! I so want people to see this beautiful book! Beautiful is indeed the word for it! Not only is the writing excellent, but there's tons of art- many of which make for great handouts/images to show players. The whole team really pulled out all the stops with this one.
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
Terevalis Unctio of House Mysti wrote: Do we know, if or when these options will be PFS legal? I don't think there's been any word either way, but if I had to guess, due to the nature of the rules stuff being Uncommon/Rare/Unique and focused on being learned/acquired from the specific individuals in question, they'd make for great Chronicle Sheet rewards. But that's just me taking a stab in the dark.
Nonbinary (They/Them) Human Doodlist/Write-a-Tron
I'm considering it, just not sure if I'm quite ready to dive into a long AP at this moment. Oh! And before I forget- Drink Tickets!
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
TRDG wrote:
Well, you can always go to Bosco. |