I'm also disappointed in the Voluntary Flaws change. One of the things I've often experienced, particularly in Organized Play, is an intense stigma against "making your character worse for no reason", with the implication that your character is ruining other people's fun. The old system neatly sidestepped that to an extent by offering a small, but still relevant, benefit. Ah well. I look forward to having to rebuild half my characters to comply. :|
Cassi wrote:
My developers—Eleanor Ferron and Luis Loza, who both deserve a ton of credit for the great ideas here!—asked me to provide a place for more "classical" squire-youths in the order. It seemed like an obvious step to name them after 'little angels', particularly with the easy and pleasant-sounding shortening. ^_^ keftiu wrote: As a big fan of Planescape's idiosyncratic cant, bless whoever wrote the "Knightly slang" section. I'm glad you like it! They asked me to come up with a bunch of slang terms the Knights might use, and I had a lot of fun with it. :D (My philosophy of slang, particularly for combat groups, is that it should be quick, snappy, easily belted out under pressure. Hence a lot of one- or two-syllable words. The exceptions are stuff like curses or battle cries, like "wrath and woe".) RiverMesa wrote: A few times the book refers to a 'Flame', presumably as some kind of knightly unit, akin to the established Lights (the small individual squads) and Blazes (rarely-formed out of several Lights for special missions), but it's never elaborated upon. An editing slip-up, perhaps? That's... probably my fault. ^_^; My initial draft had the Sentinels calling the squads "Lights" and the Reclaimers using "Flames", but somewhere that ended up being left behind. But here and there I probably messed it up or misremembered. (This was a lot of words, y'all!)
Also, since a few people have asked what I contributed to this particular tome... it was quite a bit! (Though still only a drop in the bucket compared to my fellow contributors' total work, of course!) Spoiler:
It includes:
—The Introduction to the book proper, as well as the introductions for the Faiths, Notable Figures, Campaigns, and character Options sections.
It might not look like much here, but at over twenty thousand words, it was a ton of work! (My second largest, after only Planar Adventures.) I'm incredibly proud of how it all came out, though, and very excited to see it in peoples' hands. ^_^
My concern with burn as an externally applied mechanic is that it risks feeling "tacked on", rather than like an organic and well-integrated part of the class. Trying to glue it on without making it foundational... seems like it will only result in clumsiness. On instinct, I think the best way to approach it might be as a sort of "kineticist's interface", the way alchemists choose a research field and oracles choose a mystery. This kineticist chooses burn, fueling their elemental power with their health and using Constitution. That kineticist chooses mysticism, using Focus Points to empower their attacks and using Wisdom. And who knows what other intriguing power sources could be devised? This also avoids the archetype lockout that graystone mentioned upthread, which is a definite concern for a class with such a concentious core mechanic. Not being able to multiclass at all is a serious price. Of course, it does mean the class has two major choices instead of one, making it notably more complex. But I think that doesn't have to be a bad thing, especially as the system matures. (I had to have Mr. Seifter himself explain the PF1 version before I fully grasped its intricacies.)
I'm a wee bit late to the mention of it, but honestly, I'm just glad the armored skirt made it to print usefully. I wrote it with only the playtest rules to go on (these books have a pretty long lead time) and mostly aimed for "something that will let people have the pretty armored gown aesthetic while not being embarrassingly bad". I think it did well enough under the circumstances. ^_^ For those interested in the nitty-gritty of design choices, it also has a sort of special design intent. Let's say you get a really cool and unique armor you want to wear, like Mr. Sayre's Iomedae's Armor, but your stats don't quite match up; you don't have enough Dexterity for this chain shirt, or enough Strength for that platemail. The skirt, as a sort of proto-adjustment, lets you sort of massage those stats to fit your own. (I also did the armor and shield adjustments for Grand Bazaar, and I think we're just scratching the surface of concepts there! Hopefully we get the chance to really dig into what those can offer.)
Hmmmmm. So I've been playing a PF1 kineticist in Reign of Winter for a while now (just hit 12th level), in addition to my original bona fides. I love the class in its 1e iteration. So what would I like to see come forward? Thematically:
Mechanically:
The mix of utility and blasting is important too. My fire/water kineticist in RoW can not only blast with eruptions and ranged attacks, but can also heal via kinetic healer and even provide restoration effects via kinetic restoration and (the admittedly officially story-limited) purging flame. I'd really like to see that come forward in some way, though again, given the new edition's emphasis on limited resources, I'm not sure what form that'd take. (In this edition, perhaps something akin to the champion's Mercy feats would be appropriate?) Anyway, just my random thoughts during my annual visit to the forums. ^_^
Luis Loza wrote:
Oh hey, I recognize some of those chapter titles! keftiu wrote: New Marshal toys is an unexpected treat! If we can't get a full Warlord class, I'm very happy with this. Trust me, I would go kill Tar-Baphon by myself for an actual honest-to-Artemis Warlord Class. Especially if I got to design it. ^_^ Until then, though, I hope what you find here will be to your liking!
So, as one of those freelancers who does all that writing... I support this move unconditionally, both in support of my Black colleagues and in line with my own experiences and beliefs. And I'm really glad Mr. Mona went all-in on committing to this. Very quickly, too. It's a good sign that at least some folks at the top are actually listening now, and ready to take the necessary steps to improve. As for the thing itself. You can still put the thing in your games, with the consent of your group. You can still read between the lines and choose to interpret parts of the setting as involving it, again, with that consent. But it's now opt-in, instead of opt-out, and that makes all the difference. The thing about this is, for folks who aren't Black, it's all too easy to treat it as a toy, a rhetorical object. A sticker we can put on our villains to say "these are Bad People and you have to save their victims!" We say we're "taking it seriously" and "want to be able to confront real evils"... but at the end of the session, we laugh and chat and talk about what a great time we had fighting the Bad People. It is, as they say, Just A Game. And we don't think about the people for whom it's not Just A Game. To speak to my own experiences... I am glad that transphobia is omitted from Golarion. And that's as someone who has, once or twice, thought about writing in Gender Oppressors for punching purposes. It'd be cathartic for me, and probably for some other trans folks (I think KC mentioned similar feelings upthread)... but it'd also catch others unpleasantly off-guard and ruin a perfectly good reading or gaming experience. With frequent occurrences, it might put them off the game entirely. And given the choice, I'd rather do the punching myself and spend my words writing something everyone can enjoy. Except bigots, who I hope will read my beautiful trans NPCs and weep delicious tears.
So if anyone's been wondering why I haven't been on the forums much in months... the stuff coming up in this thread is an excellent example of why. So long as bigotry and hate are permitted to flourish, whether blatantly and openly or in the guise of "just asking questions" and "devil's advocate", this place is simply unwelcoming to marginalized people and those who have empathy for them. To those who fit that qualification and remain, I applaud your strength and wish you the very best of luck. I might peek in when I have the energy, but... I don't have a lot to say these days.
All right, let's see here... Reactions
Charmed Life
Sidestep
Passives
Cat Fall
Steady Balance
Legendary Performer
cloak of feline rest
choker of elocution
shapespeak mask
I've been quiet for a while, but I have to say: I stand in solidarity with all the wonderful people I've worked with at Paizo, and with all the people I've never had a chance to work with (yet!) who deserve rights and representation all the same. I hope management recognizes the union swiftly, so that we can get back to making a world we can be proud of, secure in the knowledge that the people who make it happen are able to get by.
That's good to know, Crystal, and a very good thought. It's just... I'm used to Society players being very hostile about "players choosing to be worse for no benefit". And I don't really expect to be able to play such a character in Society without getting harassed over it, or being told to knock it off when it could make a difference. "Just get out of the chair and come heal me, your character's not really disabled." Is that something I have official clearance to push back on?
Hm. Don't think there's anything else needs noting, but this is only my second SFS character, so... I did update Rally's faction... she doesn't feel nearly as much like an Acquisitive as she did when I first conceived her. (If that sort of change can't be made midscenario like this, that's fine! I'm still learning the ropes here in SFS.) Other'n that, all my data looks correct. Thanks again. ^_^
Tarondor wrote: Can we include an explanatory note telling the editor/reviewer where to find the canon upon which our submissions build, without that note counting towards the word count? The comments feature in Word is an excellent way to do this, and such comments have never counted against wordcount in my time as a contributor. ^_^
Probably going to get some of these. (Putting it here mostly so I don't have to hang onto the tab for two months!) There's not much in the way of weapons or armor she'll be wanting, at least for level 1/level 2 Core items, and I do love armor upgrades.
Okay, took a break and worked on my resume and cover letters a little, then came back to this. Sorry about all that... it's been a really stressful few days. Rally's sheet should be all done, though. If I missed anything, please let me know! ^_^
As will quickly become clear, I'm kind of a newbie at SFS. I've actually written more Starfinder than I've played. But let's see... Boons: None. This is Rally's first time. Player Name: Isabelle Thorne
Preferred Starship Role(s): No idea. Rally's got good Computers, Engineering, and Piloting, though, so I figure that should help folks make recommendations. I can't fill in the Handouts form until I'm given access, I'm afraid. ^_^' Let me know when we should start doing introductions, having our characters enter the briefing, and so on.
|