Though currently the table's limit of 6 (now that Vassago's going to return) is reached, probably better to save that option for another mission.
6 is recommended, 7 optional only if no other option remains.
Taking into consideration, the mission assumes 5 PCs on average, with adjustments for a table of 4.
With that in mind, i can do 2 tables instead, the 5 who have reported in as table #1, and making a 2nd table with Spenser, Vassago, and 2 more with 4 PC adjustment.
|
Asking for a GM judgement call. Would a 7th level cleric be senior enough that wearing Authorative Vestments would be ok?
That sounds like something a bishop would wear.
I'd think a (high?) priest or a leader position would be comparable.
I looked through the NPC database to see where that would measure on lvl, and the earliest with 'a leader of his faith' description starts at a PC lvl 9.
With that in mind, i would say no.
Sele, i hadn't paid attention to it in the past, but er...
Milani is CG, and deities with paladins are either N or L aligned.
|
As i've pointed out to you there is a Paladin of Milani NPC. Achille Parsall get's a small mention in the Guide to the Riverlands. He's listed as, "Lord Achille Parsall, knight (LG male human aristocrat 2/fighter 2/paladin of Milani 4).
There are no rules that Paladins have to worship a Lawful god, just that they are. As long as I follow LG and paladin ideals it should be ok.
Must've been way back. :/
Yes...it's because in some thread there was 'chaotic don't have paladins', that i started to slightly doubt/worry.
Hehe. It's all good for me, and i 2nd the just RP.
Take into consideration the earlier predicament, i don't know how much further the remaining regulars can play together, regarding not played missions.
That was where my slight worry comes from, others seem to have more of problem with the matching.
But that may or may not be of later time. Right now you've a wedding party to be at. :)
|
Back! Sorry for the delays and all.
And, the biggest issue is if you get a mechanical benefit for worshiping Milani somehow. You cannot do that as a LG paladin as to get a mechanical benefit, you must be within 1 alignment step of your deity... barring a couple of archetypes.
But I don't think this'll come up this scenario.
Finally GM, I have to admit that I ran this scenario A LONG time ago, but I have ran it.
Ran - played, or ran - GM'ed?
Hello everybody,
I will only be able to join the game again starting Tuesday.
So please bot Enora ... after having finished with the Tian guy she will aid another with +3 diplomacy and has the helpful trait for +4 aid. Choose who wants her! ;-)
Could've sworn i typed that, must've gotten eaten.
Kn. Nobility or sense motive to discover his weakness.
Afaik, if an object is originating darkness, said object needed to be touched to dispel it.
Targeted Dispel: One object, creature, or spell is the target of the dispel magic spell. You make one dispel check (1d20 + your caster level) and compare that to the spell with highest caster level (DC = 11 + the spell’s caster level). If successful, that spell ends. If not, compare the same result to the spell with the next highest caster level. Repeat this process until you have dispelled one spell affecting the target, or you have failed to dispel every spell.
To the other spell,
It is daytime (normal lighting), -2 steps it goes to darkness, not yet supernatural darkness.Were it dim lighting to start with, then it would have.
That was the reason why i had touch in mind.
Before substracting on the battlemap, i had you on 51, so right you are sir.
Post search edit: Right on regarding the 2nd diagonal. I thought that 2nd diagonal square taking 10ft was if there'd be two consecutive diagonal moves.
That saves you 19 dmg. Instead he'll move it closer near the tables.
Sorry guys. ^^
Enora, about your comment on the aoo,
I am inclined to think it would, with the following (and bottom link reference) in mind.
Normally you yourself cast scorching ray, but now the wand does so for you, preventing aoo for casting the spell.
Your own action, however, is making the ranged touch attacks the spell provides. It's the ranged attacks that draw the aoo. Were it magic missile, for example, you'd certainly be in the clear, as that's without attack rolls.
If you can point me to where it says such attack rolls are invalid for aoo, i'm all ears.
GM, I understand now what you mean! But I have to be honest that I have never played it like this and therefore did not calculate with this rule.
Enora can jump without provoking attacks of opportunities through her dimensional slide ability as a move action and 5ft step for only one arcane reservoir point and she would have done that if she would have feared an AoO.
I do not want to retcon anything but can we assume that she used this ability and jumped out of threat range so that she did not provoke but all other attacks hit her as rolled?
Dimensional slide isn't a 5ft step, now that i read the page.
It merely counts as 5ft movement, as part of a normal moving action or withdraw action.
Where would that have put Enora? Atm you're not in the most favorable of places to move 5ft towards without drawing aoo. Any proper square nearby would put you in threat range of aoo.
Retcon wise, how big it is depends on that action of yours.
So if there's significant retcon due to that or not, will have to be seen.
GM, I could have moved anywhere in the room without provoking by using dimensional slide with a move action. :-) So I could have moved to somewhere where the staff usage would not have provoked, right?
Seems so. Do so at your own peril, milady. ;)
Ok. Thanks. Honestly, I f*** up! So please to not halt the game. Put me somewhere on the map and I take the damage from the normal attacks and then Enora takes her next action. Ist that ok?
Ok, if you wish to be it that way.
It will prevent applied SA, but i'm sure you wouldn't mind less dmg and 1attack missing. That action makes a world of difference. -8 vs 40 hp.
I've placed you on the table, and green would have had to 5ft step.
If Sele escapes (which he probably will do, he can attack green as planned).
If he hasn't rolled tomorrow morning (which he'll probably have done by then i think), i'll bot it.
Thanks GM! Sorry for a dumb question but at how many HP is Enora then?
Just edited.
Thanks!!
Don't thank me just yet, the fight's not over yet. ;)
^
A player of mine pointed that out some time ago as well, now that you mention it.
So consider yourself healed after Enora's spell.
Well, currently either would work. Difference is if Enora casts it, you break free and can heal yourself.
If casting it yourself, you also get that concentration check on top of it.
Let Enora do it!
Captain, we've got a starboard hull breach!
Cap: "Let Enora do it!"
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Sele, you are actually at full atm.
Your lowest HP total this mission was 29.
To reach full just now? Yes.
A charge can end on the closest square from which you can reach the target.
Going straight north, it reaches him from SW position unobstructed.
Added to that, the demon was on higher ground to start.
|
According to the CRB:
You must have a clear path toward the opponent, and nothing can hinder your movement (such as difficult terrain or obstacles). You must move to the closest space from which you can attack the opponent. If this space is occupied or otherwise blocked, you can't charge. If any line from your starting space to the ending space passes through a square that blocks movement, slows movement, or contains a creature (even an ally), you can't charge.
Also:
An incorporeal creature can enter or pass through solid objects, but must remain adjacent to the object’s exterior, and so cannot pass entirely through an object whose space is larger than its own.
One of the reasons I moved where I did was to prevent a charge. Being surrounded by tables larger that the demon, I felt I met the requirements of having obstacles around me.
Technically, with haste, my CMD rises to 21 {10 + 5 BAB, + 1 STR, + 5 DEX, -1 SIZE, +1 HASTE}