
Cale Vatay |

well crap,
didn't see that
squishy wizard
wait, they were before me in initiative, yes, if so I would have cast mage armor instead
ah well
either way, that's just how it happens sometimes
hmm next character, ranger, or maybe barbarian ooh, or maybe a dragon disciple, those are cool
wait, no
didn't he roll a to hit of 1d20+0= d20=1?
my AC is 13, (17 after mage armor, 19 with fighting defensively)

Death_Keeper |

well crap,
didn't see that
squishy wizard
wait, they were before me in initiative, yes, if so I would have cast mage armor instead
ah well
either way, that's just how it happens sometimeshmm next character, ranger, or maybe barbarian
That's the danger of posting "I do such and such" right by your initiative...
If you hadn't done so, 5 foot step plus mages armor would've saved ya
The Nat one was in stealth...

icehawk333 |

Cale Vatay wrote:well crap,
didn't see that
squishy wizard
wait, they were before me in initiative, yes, if so I would have cast mage armor instead
ah well
either way, that's just how it happens sometimeshmm next character, ranger, or maybe barbarian
That's the danger of posting "I do such and such" right by your initiative...
If you hadn't done so, 5 foot step plus mages armor would've saved ya
Yep.
Using initiative properly in a pbp will take days per round, but if that's how it's gonna be, fine.

Death_Keeper |

Death_Keeper wrote:Cale Vatay wrote:well crap,
didn't see that
squishy wizard
wait, they were before me in initiative, yes, if so I would have cast mage armor instead
ah well
either way, that's just how it happens sometimeshmm next character, ranger, or maybe barbarian
That's the danger of posting "I do such and such" right by your initiative...
If you hadn't done so, 5 foot step plus mages armor would've saved ya
Yep.
Using initiative properly in a pbp will take days per round, but if that's how it's gonna be, fine.
You guys are from Avalon... yeah right

Cale Vatay |

ah
I am fine with keeping the actions as is, would prefer to have that retconned, that one time,
but am fine with not doing so

![]() |

edited,
and I realize that,
it's just making characters with back stories and names and mandatory RP, to die in one encounter just uugh, to reminiscent of my first time playing DnD
5 characters, in 7 sessions
as if I die we won't have an arcane caster, I'm going to make a dragon sorcerer (later dragon disciple)

Death_Keeper |

edited,
and I realize that,
it's just making characters with back stories and names and mandatory RP, to die in one encounter just uugh, to reminiscent of my first time playing DnD
5 characters, in 7 sessions
as if I die we won't have an arcane caster, I'm going to make a dragon sorcerer (later dragon disciple)
You guys probably wont die...

FireclawDrake |

Initiative Order is as follows:
Goblins: 22
Cale: 12+
Flint: 12
Reda: 11
Eldon: 9
Fulito: 3
Cale has not rolled initiative that I saw, though there is an unlabelled d20 roll, but I figured that was the ranged touch for Acid Splash.
This means it is Flint's turn.
Given Cale's new roll, it is in fact his turn. (Higher Mod wins ties)

Cale Vatay |

really? I thought given tie it was roll again without mods?
meh either way, it's not like my round's actions will really affect his action

Cale Vatay |

Gah dang it, missed that somehow
Thought it was part of another standard action, ah well
Flavor text remains, but I'll edit the AC

FireclawDrake |

That would be up to the DM. It's not RAW, but it does make sense in my mind.
The RAW is that Fighting Defensively is a Standard (or Full Round) Action in which you can still attack, whereas spells are standard actions which grants you an attack as part of that specific action, so you can't mesh them unless your DM says that you can.
I would probably allow it at my table, but that's a personal choice, not the rules.
A feat like Lunge however (Which isn't Core but a good example) /can/ be combined with melee touch spells, for example, since it does not require an action. In contrast, a feat like Cleave or Vital Strike does /not/ work with spells (as both those feats state they take their own Standard Action).

Death_Keeper |

[Evil Voice]Yes... Provoke those attacks of opportunity with un-feated combat maneuvers... gooood. GOOOD. BWAHAHA[/evil voice]
Flank is difficult without a map, since we have no clue where anyone is.
Lol!
Well one goblin is on a table, one is asleep and one is beside reda,
Say: "I move to flank the goblin with reda" and you both have +2 vs that goblin

![]() |

FireclawDrake wrote:[Evil Voice]Yes... Provoke those attacks of opportunity with un-feated combat maneuvers... gooood. GOOOD. BWAHAHA[/evil voice]
Flank is difficult without a map, since we have no clue where anyone is.
Lol!
Well one goblin is on a table, one is asleep and one is beside reda,
Say: "I move to flank the goblin with reda" and you both have +2 vs that goblin
Right, but I don't know if doing so will provoke AoOs (which are very dangerous at this level). I'm fairly certain Eldon would provoke one if he went off to flank with Reda (plus, Eldon /was/ going to summon something to flank with, but Cale needed help right away).

Death_Keeper |

Death_Keeper wrote:Right, but I don't know if doing so will provoke AoOs (which are very dangerous at this level). I'm fairly certain Eldon would provoke one if he went off to flank with Reda (plus, Eldon /was/ going to summon something to flank with, but Cale needed help right away).FireclawDrake wrote:[Evil Voice]Yes... Provoke those attacks of opportunity with un-feated combat maneuvers... gooood. GOOOD. BWAHAHA[/evil voice]
Flank is difficult without a map, since we have no clue where anyone is.
Lol!
Well one goblin is on a table, one is asleep and one is beside reda,
Say: "I move to flank the goblin with reda" and you both have +2 vs that goblin
I will try to provide warnings about AoOs