
![]() |

While perusing the hundreds, if not thousands, of suggestions and pleas and concerns and ideas, so many with hyperbole and personal stories and emotion -- I'm wondering how Paizo can possibly sift through it all.
They depend on us for feedback and we depend on them to put out a great product. Let's try to help them listen to us.
Keeping this Thread uncluttered with anything but numbers is the point, a train of posts easy for Paizo to look at. Copy/paste the bolded topic scale, skip a line, put your number. (And if we can just find a way to keep ourselves from adding footnotes or comments or text of any kind, it'll be easy for Paizo to run through the Thread and get an idea. Think of how scrambled it must be for Paizo to go through ALL these Threads and posts trying to get a handle on how many gamers want this or that!
.
On a scale of 1-10, One being only tiny modification, to ten being complete redo....
How much should the Ability Score array/mechanic be changed, MAD & SAD fixing?

Lord Fyre RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32 |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Pathfinder II should make everyone MAD ... Oh you meant "Multi Attribute Dependent."

kyrt-ryder |
10
Seriously, SAD have a massive dominance over MAD with the way PF distributes stats and stat bonus items and such.
Either make everyone have one attribute they care about [lesser option] or make everyone need all attributes roughly equally. At the very least make damn sure Wizards and Witches [and Sorcerers to a lesser degree] need at least two mental attributes for casting.