|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
No idea why it costs 50% more (not an appropriate location, maybe?).
Or the PC can add the powers of a Cloak of Resistance to the Cloak of Displacement:
Adding New Abilities
Sometimes, lack of funds or time make it impossible for a magic item crafter to create the desired item from scratch. Fortunately, it is possible to enhance or build upon an existing magic item. Only time, gold, and the various prerequisites required of the new ability to be added to the magic item restrict the type of additional powers one can place. The cost to add additional abilities to an item is the same as if the item was not magical, less the value of the original item. Thus, a +1 longsword can be made into a +2 vorpal longsword, with the cost to create it being equal to that of a +2 vorpal sword minus the cost of a +1 longsword.
If the item is one that occupies a specific place on a character’s body, the cost of adding any additional ability to that item increases by 50%. For example, if a character adds the power to confer invisibility to her ring of protection +2, the cost of adding this ability is the same as for creating a ring of invisibility multiplied by 1.5.
Then there is the Unchained book and the Automatic Bonus Progression.
What I dislike the most is almost all of the specific bonuses you mention and almost all of the spell effects give Resistance bonuses, so they can't stack.
Holy Aura (and the similar spells for the other alignments) is an 8th-level spell. It gives a +4 deflection bonus and a +4 resistance bonus (plus SR and a special effect). At level 15+ the PCs and most NPCs will already have items that give a +4 resistance and +4 deflection bonuses. If they have low wealth they will have +3 items.
Unless you have a veritable horde of NPCs with lover levels and less equipment it is a waste of a high-level spell slot.
this is one of the reasons why the Automatic bonus progression rule was introduced
https://www.d20pfsrd.com/gamemastering/other-rules/unchained-rules/automati c-bonus-progression/
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
i had a GM who house-ruled that resistance bonus and enhancement bonus to abilities (like a belt that increase str etc) from different magic items stack, up to the worth of the more expensive item compared to the generic item for said bonus.
so two items that add resistance bonus to saves, one that gives +2 and one that gives +1 would grant a +3 to saves if the more expensive one was at least worth 9.000 gp (the cost of a cloak of resistance +3). if the items would give a total of +4 but the cost was between 9k and under 16k it would give only +3 etc.
|
|
i had a GM who house-ruled that resistance bonus and enhancement bonus to abilities (like a belt that increase str etc) from different magic items stack, up to the worth of the more expensive item compared to the generic item for said bonus.
so two items that add resistance bonus to saves, one that gives +2 and one that gives +1 would grant a +3 to saves if the more expensive one was at least worth 9.000 gp (the cost of a cloak of resistance +3). if the items would give a total of +4 but the cost was between 9k and under 16k it would give only +3 etc.
Interesting, but labor intensive.
There's an even more general problem that if we stick to the wealth-by-level item generation rules, particularly with the extremely careful balancing done for the Ultimate Equipment guide, most magic items are useless by the time they're discovered, because PCs can do better magic on their own. I think I have almost never dropped a "allows the possessor to cast X once per day" item that the PCs had a reason to keep, because by the time such an item is possible in WBL drops, the spell is at least 1-2 levels below what the PCs can already cast, and they're certainly not going to use an item slot for a utility spell, not when this could be cashed in to get them closer to their +4 or +6 stat boost item.
In my current campaign, I am using a lot of house rules and I don't care about WBL, but only about actual character power.
The Rod of Lordly Might has always been one of my preferred items, as it is a magic Swiss Knife, but it costs like a +6 weapon and, at best, it is used as a +4 battleaxe. Most of the other powers are fun but hardly useful.
So, in my game world, it is the creation of an (a bit deranged) Eldritch Knith with Ranger levels that wanted a magical Swiss Knife, cost be damned.
The PCs did find it?
Well, the magic mart buyer guy will pay it as a +4 Battleaxe, the other stuff is useless fluff. And that if he wants to buy it.
The average magic mart will buy what sells, so all those rings of resistance or deflection +1, but not the 70K item that probably will take 10 years to sell. If you want to sell that you go to an Auction House and with for the bi-annual big auction of magic items.
If they are lucky they can even get more than the book value of the item.
Naturally, the flow of time in my campaign is very different from that of a typical AP. Yesterday the characters passed the 1,000th day milestone.
|
Same.
There's an even more general problem that if we stick to the wealth-by-level item generation rules, particularly with the extremely careful balancing done for the Ultimate Equipment guide, most magic items are useless by the time they're discovered, because PCs can do better magic on their own. I think I have almost never dropped a "allows the possessor to cast X once per day" item that the PCs had a reason to keep, because by the time such an item is possible in WBL drops, the spell is at least 1-2 levels below what the PCs can already cast, and they're certainly not going to use an item slot for a utility spell, not when this could be cashed in to get them closer to their +4 or +6 stat boost item.
The issue I have with items that cast spells X/day is that the spells almost invariably have a crappy CL compared to one cast by a PC at that level, and in the case of a spell that can be resisted, no attribute bonus to their save DC, so you end up with some item that you get at 9th level, that has a spell with a save DC of 13, which is just a terrible joke, at that level.
Every now and then you'll find a mechanical option that allows the caster to use his full caster level with a wand or scroll, or even to apply his attribute modifier to the save DC (but rarely, if ever, both at the same time...), but that's just 'you have a special class option to make a sub-optimal choice, not quite as sub-optimal, while *other* people have options that actually *add* to their effectiveness...'
And such an ability is still almost never going to benefit those random items that have some spell X / day (at CL 3, with a casting stat of 10) in addition to their 'core' function.
| 3 people marked this as a favorite. |
Awhile ago I made it so that the items that "everyone needs" can get a second enchantment / can be put onto another item that takes up the same slot without adding on 50% of the new enchantment. (Or that you could essentially wear one of the main items and another item in the same slot without one of them being cancelled out and we would just pretend that the two items got combined... no one worried about the specifics 'cause they liked the idea of being able to use a cloak of elvenkind while still having a cloak of resistance)
Cloak of Resistance + any other cloak = Cost of both items
Headband of [Mental Stat(s)] + any other headband = Cost of both items
Belts of [Physical Stat(s)] + any other belt = ...you get the point
Ring of Protection + any other ring
Amulet of Natural Armor + any other amulet
That way all of the other cloaks, belts, amulets, etc that the group found and would be useful were actually used instead of "sell it 'cause my cloak of resistance is too important"
My group would allow for combining the items together or changing the slot. One GM even allowed me to give my boar companion rings by having them be legbands instead. Could still only use two of them, but it made things so much easier once the boar was no longer the only one that didn't have a Ring of Sustenance.