There are no rules that will guarantee anything successful.
You're really going to have to work with your GM and ask them if something of this magnitude is even possible.
You're basically asking, how can I force Baba Yaga to stick to her word, assuming she agrees to it in the first place.
Honestly, the easiest path forward (in my opinion) is to help Baba Yaga because she is better than the alternative, and convince her to agree to set up protections for the common people by whatever arguments necessary. At that point you've done the best you can do really.
Seek an atonement for your role in restoring Baba Yaga to power over her more overtly evil daughter (IIRC).
Attempts to force Baba Yaga to be magically compelled to uphold some bargain are likely to just end up with you (and probably others) getting more screwed before its done.
Too much cheese.
Baba Yaga is not a capital G God. She's just a very powerful mythic character. Doing her a favor to get rid of an overtly evil daughter is fine.
More importantly, Baba Yaga is generally a woman of her word. So compulsion shouldn't really be necessary or an atonement. Baba Yaga isn't a ruler by nature so she's unlikely to actually stick around either. Just make sure you pay her the proper respects and she should acquiesce to a reasonable request in exchange.
Alternately, do by your order's code as best and as wisely as you can. Being a paladin is about playing the conflict between morals and ethics. If this path should lead to falling, either enjoy the opportunity to play the fall and the fallen knight, philosophising about the true aspect of a deity that rejected you for doing good or, if playing a fall doesn't interest you, talk about it with the game-master as a meta-game discussion. Roleplay it as praying for guidance, in particular about what would acceptable behaviour in dealing with Baba-Yaga and what would be outstanding behaviour in dealing with her. The real-world prayer by Niebuhr, asking for «courage to change what must be altered, serenity to accept what cannot be helped, and the insight to know the one from the other.» is a good example.
Your character probably knows much more theology than you do, allowing you the player to decide knowingly whether the character takes that would lead to falling.
Playing a paladin in a campaign about the lesser of two evils is a great introspective role-play opportunity, embrace it.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Being a paladin is about playing the conflict between morals and ethics. If this path should lead to falling, either enjoy the opportunity to play the fall and the fallen knight, philosophising about the true aspect of a deity that rejected you for doing good or, if playing a fall doesn't interest you, talk about it with the game-master as a meta-game discussion.
I'd go a step further: A paladin is about doing good and just no matter the price for themselves. If they do the right thing and fall for it, SO BE IT.
Of course there are many valid takes on how a paladin should be. But be careful not to mix your desires as a player (keeping class features) and the character's motivations.
If she was a God, you'd be flat out of luck. I actually really don't believe even a god can bind another.
No matter : she is very much not one.
She is however way, way too powerful for you to do anything about it.
You could talk to her, negotiate and trust her to hold her end, and that'd be your best bet. Considering the scale of her operations, there's little for her to gain in turning on you, random paladin from one world amongst many. It's just easier for her to do her part, and not that costly.
But really, you're geased to help her. And what she's asking of you isn't even all that bad : ousting an evil queen means at worse nothing, if the replacement is as bad, at best progress, if the new one's better. And that comes with the bonus of Baba Yaga owing you one, which potentially you can leverage. Even if she "forgets" once you've done your job, you've tried.
You're doing a job you have no option of refusing, with a chance of being a positive influence on a country that badly needs it.
If you end up falling for that, the issue is not here.
Associates: While she may adventure with good or neutral allies, a paladin avoids working with evil characters or with anyone who consistently offends her moral code. Under exceptional circumstances, a paladin can ally with evil associates, but only to defeat what she believes to be a greater evil. A paladin should seek an atonement spell periodically during such an unusual alliance, and should end the alliance immediately should she feel it is doing more harm than good. A paladin may accept only henchmen, followers, or cohorts who are lawful good.
Sounds like your paladin is ok to work with Baba Yaga, but you may need to seek out an occasional atonement as determined by you and your GM
The question is not whether Baba Yaga is personally evil, because that is a known fact. Nor is it whether she is more or less personally evil than the witch she opposes. Each has committed sufficient atrocities to merit death from any given paladin, if the paladin could only manage it.
The three questions in this particular instance are 1) which of them poses the biggest threat to the people the paladin must attempt to defend, 2) whether the paladin has the ability to oppose the greater threat without simultaneously aiding the lesser threat, and 3) whether the paladin would be compromised in working with an evil ally. I think you are only asking about that third one.
As a GM and as a player, I don't believe a paladin can justify taking immoral actions toward a goal, however that desirable that goal might be. Nor could a paladin condone evil actions taken by others toward said goal. One thing a paladin very definitely cannot do is sacrifice his or her own beliefs. As Melkiador stated above, an occasional atonement would likely be necessary in this case. The line between tenuous partnership and collaboration is frequently not neon-bright.
I doubt it would be possible to force Baba Yaga into any agreement, and any attempt to trick her probably would go exceptionally poorly (even if that weren't dishonorable, and therefore usually off the table for most paladins in most circumstances). Moreover, she isn't a devil to be bound by a tricky loophole and even if you could somehow twist her to your will, making a being like that mad is a bad idea. It's incredibly easy for a powerful evil being to get revenge on a paladin, if that is a goal. You do it by hurting others.
However, you might perhaps aim or hope to gain her grudging favor. Not for your abilities, of course. A CR 30 mythical Queen of Witches won't be moved by much in that regard. But perhaps she'd be impressed by honor and steadfastness. She has lived an incredibly long life without seeing a lot of that from humanity. If you made clear that you were asking nothing for yourself, but that your aid was conditional on her word that she would permit modest reform, she might consider you an idiot but respect you for it nonetheless. A lot depends on how the write-up on her in the AP defines her character. Your GM obviously can't come out and tell you, but perhaps there is someone in your PC's party who has a knowledge (local) skill high enough to give you a window into her personality that could prove useful in this regard. Does she pride herself on keeping her pledged word? Is she actually repulsed by goodness, or so jaded and cynical she doesn't believe it exists and that it is only a mask for hypocrisy? What are her ultimate goals? To what exent does the misery of the common people factor into them? If the answer is "not much", maybe she would be indifferent to many things the paladin might request (which is a lot better than hostile).