
Sporocystian |

This is a check for interest; I deeply love the first two APs in the title, and have not yet had the opportunity for the third.
I thought it might be best to ask my potential players which option would be the most preferred.
I have no arguments for or against LoF; it was one of my most-enjoyed gaming experiences, and I would enjoy running this again.
Council of Thieves could be a completely different ball game with the verisimilitude of social options added since its release.
Ironfang Invasion, being the newest (completed) AP, may have been played out on here recently.
Let me know which, if any, holds the most interest for you. Thanks.

theasl |

I tried CoT on PbP once (on another site), but it died out very early.
Otherwise all three sound great.

hustonj |
I get that you are WILLING to run any of the 3, but I think you should plan to run the one you are most interested in seeing play through. You are more likely to give that one the love and attention required for longer than you are the others.
Whichever you pick, players will be available. Honest.
Now, me? I'm a Boy Scout in many ways. I can play a shady type when called for, but I have trouble working in an environment where I can't be sure the other players are (generally) on the same side I am. I seem to remember the impression that CoT allows for pretty direct internal party rivalry. I remember having turned away from CoT advertisements previously because of that impression.

Sporocystian |

I get that you are WILLING to run any of the 3, but I think you should plan to run the one you are most interested in seeing play through. You are more likely to give that one the love and attention required for longer than you are the others.
I second that, the single most important thing in the PbP is the DM's interest. lol.
There's part of my problem though; I'm interested in all three. I no longer have the regular group of in-person players I had a decade ago, when it would've been feasible to spend six months and run all three consecutively. Should this first one go well, six or so months from now when we've made it through a book or two, I'll likely start a second concurrent of one of the other options.
But the decision of which to start first is arbitrary. LoF is full of nostalgia for me; this won't be the same, but it'll still bring back the memories. CoT, we bought en masse when #6 was published back in '10; that's almost 8 years of new content, which, including the Vigilante and numerous other social mechanics, could literally make this a different game entirely than the one I played before, and that's fun in its own right. Also, I had to phone my old college mate, now a professional copy editor, because I was so bothered by my use of verisimilitude in the previous post. It's technically not wrong, in the same way that Tommy Wiseau's script of The Room is technicallly not wrong. IfI is all new to me; I've even only read the first three parts as of yet, and it seems like a very sick campaign.
But it does look like the leanings are more to LoF or CoT, which I expected given their ages. From here on, let's limit this check to those two.
And thanks for the input from everyone so far.

Cuàn |

Both of those sound very interesting though I'm partial to CoT. It is the first AP I ever played years ago and I haven't played it since. Like you said, all the new options probably turn that one around completely.
Then again, I'd also love LoF if only for the possibility to make a character with a sniper cactus companion.

Lazyclownfish |

I'm not really looking to play, probably. But as someone with knowledge of the first part of CoT and LoF, the opening of Legacy of Fire will be significantly better in PbP format. That's not to say you couldn't get the CoT opening adventure to a point where it could be equally good, but you could run LoF stock and it'll go great. It's really well setup for a storytelling-focused opening. CoT (as someone mentioned) is very tedious to start.

Sporocystian |

Would Spheres of Power or even just Words of Power be considered for any of these?
What about jnusual characters, such awakened animals, masterless familiars, etc?
Also, how much allowance is there for creative solutions and tactics? (silent image is a wonderful combat spell :)
For the third question, there's always room for creativity and innovative thinking.
As to the first two, I'm not really looking to make any sort of mechanical decisions at the moment; simply picking the option.

Ivory Songbird |

I would definitely like to play in a Legacy of Fire game! I would not turn down a Council of Thieves game though.
If you run Legacy of Fire, I will probably create a Sha'i'r type character with genie-binding and elemental magic.
If you run Council of Thieves, I might be interested in playing either a Virtuous Bravo Paladin or a Teisatsu Vigilante.

Slayde77 |
I'd be very interested in all three. I was selected for a Council of Thieves game here but the GM vanished shortly after the opening act. I've tried running Legacy in my home game, but didn't get past the start of the second book and would love to see how it goes from the player side. I have no connection with Ironfang invasion, but it has always seemed very interesting.

Red Heat |
Legacy of Fire has long held my interest despite me knowing near nothing about it. Something about the whole Araaabian Niiights motif just appeals to me. So yeah, I'd be up for that.

Sporocystian |

Recruitment is up for Legacy of Fire.
As I mentioned, if this goes well, I'll likely run one of the others in the future.