Will I be allowed to use a digital character sheet in organized play?


Pathfinder Society

301 to 350 of 690 << first < prev | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | next > last >>
Grand Lodge 4/5 5/55/55/55/5 **** Venture-Captain, Minnesota

Andrew Christian wrote:
But suffice to say, I have had more disruptions at the table from players who have trouble with simple math (not you HMM) than I have due to Hero labs. And when those players started using Hero Labs, the disruptions decreased.

The only reason I'm not disruptive with my math dysfunction is that I'm so open about it. Most adults would be too embarrassed to admit that they can't add the buffs in-game.

Andrew Christian wrote:

So all things being equal, the answer currently, is banning a valid choice because of your personal anecdotal evidence is poor form.

You say you are more justified at a convention, and I say that's when you are least justified in making up your own rules.

Can we not use phrases like 'bad form' here? It just heats up the rhetoric. Let's find common ground instead. I wish that I could get you and Nefreet at the same table. I think this argument would be better settled with a beer than with forum posts.

Your faithful minion
(and Poker of Beehives!)
Hmm

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber
Delete this Character wrote:
I've been on the fence about all the red tape, paperwork, restrictions, and requirements one has to go through to begin PFS play, and this forum thread has just convinced me that it's not worth it. Just something to think about, I'm sure there are others lurking around like me that have just been put off of PFS/convention play.

Heh, yeah, like others have said I've never seen a problem at a table or in a play-by-post game. I've only ever had an immense amount of fun. Mostly a good bunch of people/great community.

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber
Nohwear wrote:
Maybe I am just in a cynical mood, but when I do have to wonder if at least some of the red tape people want to avoid includes being forced to buy stuff from Paizo.

With or without HeroLab you still have to buy everything. I've bought more Paizo product than I ever would have without HeroLab. With HeroLab I find some trait I like, then see I don't own the source, and then buy it for the one trait! Hopefully finding other cool stuff in the material after the fact.

For me, HeroLab means more money in Paizo's coffers.

The Exchange 3/5

Fromper wrote:
The key thing to remember: These forums aren't for Pathfinder Society players and GMs. These forums are for people whose hobby is arguing about things on the internet. 99.9% of what actually happens in PFS has nothing to do with what happens on these forums.

The only part where I won't agree with this is when it comes to bannings and errata discussions. When I'm debating those on these forums it's because it has directly impacted my characters in some way (normally negatively, I've had to rebuild/retrain/retire all but my very first character who I only played to 4-5 exp.)

Silver Crusade 5/5

Hmm wrote:
a beer

Just one?

2/5

Hmm wrote:

I think this argument would be better settled with a beer than with forum posts.

Your faithful minion
(and Poker of Beehives!)
Hmm

Done, this could be amazing. Nefreet, Andy, trollbill, and three others. I will provide a gaming space, myself as a GM, and sleeping arrangements in spare rooms for two. You pick the module and the weekend. We can record everything and someone can do a posting something. If Bob could make it, that would be amazing.

I will provide all food. I have been told I am a decent cook. And can handle transportation from the airport.

Btw, yes I am serious, this could be a lot of fun.

Grand Lodge 4/5 5/55/55/55/5 **** Venture-Captain, Minnesota

Actually, Nefreet will be at Paizo Con. I'm hoping to go. Andrew, are you going?

If so... I'm going to suggest that you both come with me for beer. Or as Undead Mitch suggested, multiple beers. We'll have a great time!

Hmm

PS Tindalen's suggestion sounds great too!

1/5

Tindalen wrote:
Hmm wrote:

I think this argument would be better settled with a beer than with forum posts.

Your faithful minion
(and Poker of Beehives!)
Hmm

Done, this could be amazing. Nefreet, Andy, trollbill, and three others. I will provide a gaming space, myself as a GM, and sleeping arrangements in spare rooms for two. You pick the module and the weekend. We can record everything and someone can do a posting something. If Bob could make it, that would be amazing.

I will provide all food. I have been told I am a decent cook. And can handle transportation from the airport.

Btw, yes I am serious, this could be a lot of fun.

It could be interesting indeed.

1/5 5/5

Hmm wrote:

Actually, Nefreet will be at Paizo Con. I'm hoping to go. Andrew, are you going?

If so... I'm going to suggest that you both come with me for beer. Or as Undead Mitch suggested, multiple beers. We'll have a great time!

Hmm

PS Tindalen's suggestion sounds great too!

Could I please tag along and be the bird on the wall for that one? Can't make something 'on the side' because I'm saving money for Paizo Con and Gen Con this year.

I could even split a room with someone, since currently I'll have a bed free for some of the nights...

Silver Crusade

Nohwear wrote:
Maybe I am just in a cynical mood, but when I do have to wonder if at least some of the red tape people want to avoid includes being forced to buy stuff from Paizo.

I can't help but think this was directed solely at me, but I digress.

I can't speak for other people, but I have purchased 3 physical copies (one was stolen out of my car and the other was a gift) and 1 digital copy of the Core rulebook, not to mention many other rule/splat books. Buying books isn't red tape, it's supporting the hobby.

The red tape I was referring to is the 45 page Pathfinder Society Roleplaying Guild Guide, the rule clarifications that you may not ignore but don't necessarily have to have read posted at http://paizo.
com/paizo/messageboards/paizoPublishing/pathfinder/
pathfinderSociety, the FAQ, not being able to play a Summoner despite having purchased the Advanced Class Guide, the Chronicles, being forced to have a physical copy of your character sheet when there's such a thing as the internet and databases, etc.

It sounds like rules lawyering, filling out TPS reports, and from what I see on this forum post, high school immaturity. I'd rather play a roleplaying game and make some attempt at collaborative storytelling.

Shadow Lodge 3/5

This should be a really redundant thing. GMs and players who can't come to an agreement on anything in play - including using digitals - will just say either I'm not playing here or you can't play at my table.

The best result of that is to mutually agree that it isn't a good fit and to find another table, maybe on another day where another table isn't available. That result won't always happen, but the goal should be to keep it respectable.

Not to place bans on to say what GMs or players can and can't do. We can't even force respect between them - we can only ask for it.

Silver Crusade 5/5

We could turn it into our own Con. We could call it CompromiseCon (yeah, the name is bad). Of course, it'd have to be held in the Midwest, 'cause everybody at the ends of each side need to meet in the middle.

Silver Crusade Venture-Agent, Florida–Altamonte Springs

RyanH wrote:
Nohwear wrote:
Maybe I am just in a cynical mood, but when I do have to wonder if at least some of the red tape people want to avoid includes being forced to buy stuff from Paizo.

With or without HeroLab you still have to buy everything. I've bought more Paizo product than I ever would have without HeroLab. With HeroLab I find some trait I like, then see I don't own the source, and then buy it for the one trait! Hopefully finding other cool stuff in the material after the fact.

For me, HeroLab means more money in Paizo's coffers.

Personally, I love Herolab. I never purchase an addon there without having a pdf or hard copy of the book, but that's just me. In my (now sanctioned) campaign mode Iron Gods game it is my way of keeping an eye on the players characters, and initiative tracker. At conventions, I only pulled it out once relying for the most part on the paper sheets, but at my last con between enlarge person, Inspire courage, haste, bless, prayer, and power attack I was glad to have Herolab.

As far as dice rollers are concerned, if someone wants to cheat they will with electronics or real dice. When I confronted a player, in private, at the Iron Gods game about dice dropping he quit rather then come back because he knew he was caught.

1/5 5/5

Compared to other 'living' campaigns I've been involved with, the rules are remarkably 'light' for as long as PFS has been running.

There's a certain campaign out there where the 'house rules' for the campaign now are twice the length of the core material for said campaign...

Others have said it, it merits repeating, do *not* look at the bulk of the forum postings as the sum of the campaign.

If anything, forum posts are akin to the one person in twenty that actually answers the 'How are We Doing' survey at the bottom of receipts.

I've seen some amazing and fun role play as well as collaborative storytelling at conventions, on virtual table-tops, and in forum play-by-posts.

My suggestion? Try a few games at a local venue (convention, game shop) or online and then make the call?

1/5

So if I am a part of the Weekend of Doom! I can offer a side game if people want. Although it would need to be either Savage Worlds or some form of Cypher System as that is what I can put together last minute.

Grand Lodge 4/5

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure, Rulebook, Starfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
UndeadMitch wrote:
We could call it CompromiseCon (yeah, the name is bad).

If it must be bad, then go full Conpromise.

2/5

UndeadMitch wrote:
We could turn it into our own Con. We could call it CompromiseCon (yeah, the name is bad). Of course, it'd have to be held in the Midwest, 'cause everybody at the ends of each side need to meet in the middle.

This is serendipity! I live in Minnesota. We actually have con of the north coming up soon. Which, like everything in Minnesota, is going to be the best thing ever, any where!

Edit: full discloser it will likely be below -20f.

Silver Crusade 5/5

Steven Schopmeyer wrote:
UndeadMitch wrote:
We could call it CompromiseCon (yeah, the name is bad).
If it must be bad, then go full Conpromise.

GAAAAAHHHHAHHHHHH! I knew there was something better! Conpromise it is!

2/5

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Nohwear wrote:
So if I am a part of the Weekend of Doom! I can offer a side game if people want. Although it would need to be either Savage Worlds or some form of Cypher System as that is what I can put together last minute.

I have as many as two gaming tables available in my house. One is currently used for d&D and pathfinder, with the appropriate GM throne, I am not kidding about the throne

The other is smaller, suitable for mice and Mystics. And closer to previously stated food.

Silver Crusade 5/5

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Tindalen wrote:
UndeadMitch wrote:
We could turn it into our own Con. We could call it CompromiseCon (yeah, the name is bad). Of course, it'd have to be held in the Midwest, 'cause everybody at the ends of each side need to meet in the middle.

This is serendipity! I live in Minnesota. We actually have con of the north coming up soon. Which, like everything in Minnesota, is going to be the best thing ever, any where!

Edit: full discloser it will likely be below -20f.

Don't get me wrong, I've nothing but respect for the MN Crew, but I think we need somewhere that is a bit less of a, how can I put this delicately, a frozen wasteland?

Edit: Though come to think of it, we did get a couple of inches of snow in the Omaha area, and it was like 10-15f. Maybe this should be a springtime con?

2/5

2 people marked this as a favorite.
UndeadMitch wrote:
Tindalen wrote:
UndeadMitch wrote:
We could turn it into our own Con. We could call it CompromiseCon (yeah, the name is bad). Of course, it'd have to be held in the Midwest, 'cause everybody at the ends of each side need to meet in the middle.

This is serendipity! I live in Minnesota. We actually have con of the north coming up soon. Which, like everything in Minnesota, is going to be the best thing ever, any where!

Edit: full discloser it will likely be below -20f.

Don't get me wrong, I've nothing but respect for the MN Crew, but I think we need somewhere that is a bit less of a, how can I put this delicately, a frozen wasteland?

A wasteland! I swear to you on my own life, we se green grass at least two weeks every year!

1/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.
UndeadMitch wrote:
Tindalen wrote:
UndeadMitch wrote:
We could turn it into our own Con. We could call it CompromiseCon (yeah, the name is bad). Of course, it'd have to be held in the Midwest, 'cause everybody at the ends of each side need to meet in the middle.

This is serendipity! I live in Minnesota. We actually have con of the north coming up soon. Which, like everything in Minnesota, is going to be the best thing ever, any where!

Edit: full discloser it will likely be below -20f.

Don't get me wrong, I've nothing but respect for the MN Crew, but I think we need somewhere that is a bit less of a, how can I put this delicately, a frozen wasteland?

Edit: Though come to think of it, we did get a couple of inches of snow in the Omaha area, and it was like 10-15f. Maybe this should be a springtime con?

I would rather be in MN in the winter than the Summer.

The Exchange 5/5

Tindalen wrote:
UndeadMitch wrote:
Tindalen wrote:
UndeadMitch wrote:
We could turn it into our own Con. We could call it CompromiseCon (yeah, the name is bad). Of course, it'd have to be held in the Midwest, 'cause everybody at the ends of each side need to meet in the middle.

This is serendipity! I live in Minnesota. We actually have con of the north coming up soon. Which, like everything in Minnesota, is going to be the best thing ever, any where!

Edit: full discloser it will likely be below -20f.

Don't get me wrong, I've nothing but respect for the MN Crew, but I think we need somewhere that is a bit less of a, how can I put this delicately, a frozen wasteland?
A wasteland! I swear to you on my own life, we se green grass at least two weeks every year!

Is one of those weeks on TV?

Silver Crusade 5/5

Nohwear wrote:
UndeadMitch wrote:
Tindalen wrote:
UndeadMitch wrote:
We could turn it into our own Con. We could call it CompromiseCon (yeah, the name is bad). Of course, it'd have to be held in the Midwest, 'cause everybody at the ends of each side need to meet in the middle.

This is serendipity! I live in Minnesota. We actually have con of the north coming up soon. Which, like everything in Minnesota, is going to be the best thing ever, any where!

Edit: full discloser it will likely be below -20f.

Don't get me wrong, I've nothing but respect for the MN Crew, but I think we need somewhere that is a bit less of a, how can I put this delicately, a frozen wasteland?

Edit: Though come to think of it, we did get a couple of inches of snow in the Omaha area, and it was like 10-15f. Maybe this should be a springtime con?

I would rather be in MN in the winter than the Summer.

I think anyone that's spent any time in the midwest in the summer would agree with you there. I didn't walk to the food trucks at Gencon last year, I swam. Thanks, humidity!

That's why I suggest springtime, call it May. Nice, sunny, 60's. Not too hot, not too cold. Not too humid, not too dry.

1/5 5/5

The alternative could be technological in derivation, though that might be a bit... dicier?

Google hangouts and Roll20 (or other VTT), folks would have to buy their own beer (a negative) but could chime in from the warmth of their own home?

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

It's a chilly ~60 degrees here in Northern California =D

Or at least, it was this afternoon. It's probably plummeted to something like 50 right now.

Sovereign Court 1/5

2 people marked this as a favorite.

I'm just hopeful that the new ruling takes into account the current contradiction that Brock put into place by allowing a tablet of official pdfs to be fine to hand to a GM to read up on the rules for your character, but handing it to the GM as a character sheet? OMG DEVICE WORTH HUNDREDS OF DOLLARZZZZ WAT IF DROP?

Silver Crusade 5/5

Wei Ji the Learner wrote:


The alternative could be technological in derivation, though that might be a bit... dicier?

Google hangouts and Roll20 (or other VTT), folks would have to buy their own beer (a negative) but could chime in from the warmth of their own home?

A noble effort, but drinking with people over the internet just isn't the same as sharing a drink with someone face-to-face.

Camaraderie! Beer! PFS! Beer! New friends! Old friends getting back together! Beer!

Explore! Beer! Cooperate!

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

I hope this isn't delaying the potentially great progress that last week's Campaign clarifications blog was addressing.

Those questions really are more important =(. I'd rather see an update to that on Friday than this.

1/5 5/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.
UndeadMitch wrote:


A noble effort, but drinking with people over the internet just isn't the same as sharing a drink with someone face-to-face.

Camaraderie! Beer! PFS! Beer! New friends! Old friends getting back together! Beer!

Explore! Beer! Cooperate!

My heart cries out to say "YES YES DO THIS THING!"

My wallet says with firm Abadarish mannerisms "If you do this thing, you will not only not be able to afford Paizo Con, you will not be able to afford Gen Con."

Silver Crusade 5/5

Quadstriker wrote:
I'm just hopeful that the new ruling takes into account the current contradiction that Brock put into place by allowing a tablet of official pdfs to be fine to hand to a GM to read up on the rules for your character, but handing it to the GM as a character sheet? OMG DEVICE WORTH HUNDREDS OF DOLLARZZZZ WAT IF DROP?

Sorry, guess you didn't get the memo. This thread is now about ConProMise (I thought if I capitalized it like that it would look less like Con Promise, whoch sounds like an entirely different con). We're reclaiming this thread.

No more bad feels in this thread. I'm putting my beer foot down.

Silver Crusade 5/5

Wei Ji the Learner wrote:
UndeadMitch wrote:


A noble effort, but drinking with people over the internet just isn't the same as sharing a drink with someone face-to-face.

Camaraderie! Beer! PFS! Beer! New friends! Old friends getting back together! Beer!

Explore! Beer! Cooperate!

My heart cries out to say "YES YES DO THIS THING!"

My wallet says with firm Abadarish mannerisms "If you do this thing, you will not only not be able to afford Paizo Con, you will not be able to afford Gen Con."

FINE! We don't need you! Surely there is some other dashing Tengu that can take your space?

4/5

UndeadMitch wrote:
It isn't really the program that tends to be disruptive, but players. When I play, I always make sure I have a physical sheet, and make sure my players do when I GM. Whether they use them is up to them.

While I dislike HL, and would prefer people not use it for most of the reasons Nefreet linked to earlier, I agree that the issue is ultimately one of disruptive players rather than disruptive software. But anyone who has ever dealt with children (or immature adults) has ran into something like this:

GM to player using HL disruptively: "OK, I've asked you to stop being disruptive with HL several times already. Put it away."
Disruptive Player: "But he's using HL too! Points at non-disruptive player. That's not fair! You're picking on me! Whaaaaaaaah!!!!!"
GM response A: "He knows how to behave and use HL responsibly. You have not displayed that capability. Therefore, he may use it. Put yours away."
or
GM response B: "Fine. I'll be 'fair'. Mr. Responsible Player, please put HL away so that Mr. Irresponsible Player won't whine about things not being fair. Yes, I know this is unfair to you, Mr. Responsible Player. Please comply anyway, so we can get back to the game."

I'm with Andrew- we can't ban HL or other digital sheets from the PFS table, so long as the player has a paper copy available and isn't being disruptive.

But I can see the appeal of a blanket policy to avoid the hassle of allowing some players to use a thing while forbidding others from doing so. In the other long-running living campaign I play in, that's the basis for most of it's rule set. It's literally a matter of "This is why we can't have nice things". If some players are going to whine about not being able to use something (never mind that they are irresponsible and disruptive players), then no one is allowed to have the thing. I'd be sad to see PFS go that route, even if (on some levels) it would make things easier.

The Exchange 5/5

UndeadMitch wrote:
Wei Ji the Learner wrote:
UndeadMitch wrote:


A noble effort, but drinking with people over the internet just isn't the same as sharing a drink with someone face-to-face.

Camaraderie! Beer! PFS! Beer! New friends! Old friends getting back together! Beer!

Explore! Beer! Cooperate!

My heart cries out to say "YES YES DO THIS THING!"

My wallet says with firm Abadarish mannerisms "If you do this thing, you will not only not be able to afford Paizo Con, you will not be able to afford Gen Con."

FINE! We don't need you! Surely there is some other dashing Tengu that can take your space?

You rang?

4/5

UndeadMitch wrote:
Quadstriker wrote:
I'm just hopeful that the new ruling takes into account the current contradiction that Brock put into place by allowing a tablet of official pdfs to be fine to hand to a GM to read up on the rules for your character, but handing it to the GM as a character sheet? OMG DEVICE WORTH HUNDREDS OF DOLLARZZZZ WAT IF DROP?

Sorry, guess you didn't get the memo. This thread is now about ConProMise (I thought if I capitalized it like that it would look less like Con Promise, whoch sounds like an entirely different con). We're reclaiming this thread.

No more bad feels in this thread. I'm putting my beer foot down.

If there's anything that I've learned about the MN lodge, there's no such thing as putting one's beer down until it's drained. I frequently wonder if I'm the only sober one in the lodge. >.>

Tindalen, if you need another GM, lemme know when things are gonna go down. I could probably run something of whatever flavor is desired.

The Exchange 5/5

Nevakali Blackros wrote:
UndeadMitch wrote:
Wei Ji the Learner wrote:
UndeadMitch wrote:


A noble effort, but drinking with people over the internet just isn't the same as sharing a drink with someone face-to-face.

Camaraderie! Beer! PFS! Beer! New friends! Old friends getting back together! Beer!

Explore! Beer! Cooperate!

My heart cries out to say "YES YES DO THIS THING!"

My wallet says with firm Abadarish mannerisms "If you do this thing, you will not only not be able to afford Paizo Con, you will not be able to afford Gen Con."

FINE! We don't need you! Surely there is some other dashing Tengu that can take your space?
You rang?

Not you, bonehead! The other one!

The Exchange 5/5

Fred Hayley wrote:
Nevakali Blackros wrote:
UndeadMitch wrote:
Wei Ji the Learner wrote:
UndeadMitch wrote:


A noble effort, but drinking with people over the internet just isn't the same as sharing a drink with someone face-to-face.

Camaraderie! Beer! PFS! Beer! New friends! Old friends getting back together! Beer!

Explore! Beer! Cooperate!

My heart cries out to say "YES YES DO THIS THING!"

My wallet says with firm Abadarish mannerisms "If you do this thing, you will not only not be able to afford Paizo Con, you will not be able to afford Gen Con."

FINE! We don't need you! Surely there is some other dashing Tengu that can take your space?
You rang?
Not you, bonehead! The other one!

Fred Hayley! What have I told you about talking to people like that?

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

I'm not really dashing, unless you count the Paprika that one character sprinkled over my Tengu Rogue before climbing into a furnace.

The Exchange 5/5

Winnifred Hayley wrote:
Fred Hayley wrote:
Nevakali Blackros wrote:
UndeadMitch wrote:
Wei Ji the Learner wrote:
UndeadMitch wrote:


A noble effort, but drinking with people over the internet just isn't the same as sharing a drink with someone face-to-face.

Camaraderie! Beer! PFS! Beer! New friends! Old friends getting back together! Beer!

Explore! Beer! Cooperate!

My heart cries out to say "YES YES DO THIS THING!"

My wallet says with firm Abadarish mannerisms "If you do this thing, you will not only not be able to afford Paizo Con, you will not be able to afford Gen Con."

FINE! We don't need you! Surely there is some other dashing Tengu that can take your space?
You rang?
Not you, bonehead! The other one!
Fred Hayley! What have I told you about talking to people like that?

But, mom! She smells like dead stuff! And I'm pretty sure I saw her eat somebody while praising Urgathoa!

Edit: D'oh!

1/5 5/5

Now if *that* dashing tengu somehow managed to swing it from CA, I'd have to try and figure *something* out. Not sure HOW it would happen, though.

*coughs*

*rereads* 'climbed into a furnace'?

The Exchange 5/5

Fred Hayley wrote:
Winnifred Hayley wrote:
Fred Hayley wrote:
Nevakali Blackros wrote:
UndeadMitch wrote:
Wei Ji the Learner wrote:
UndeadMitch wrote:


A noble effort, but drinking with people over the internet just isn't the same as sharing a drink with someone face-to-face.

Camaraderie! Beer! PFS! Beer! New friends! Old friends getting back together! Beer!

Explore! Beer! Cooperate!

My heart cries out to say "YES YES DO THIS THING!"

My wallet says with firm Abadarish mannerisms "If you do this thing, you will not only not be able to afford Paizo Con, you will not be able to afford Gen Con."

FINE! We don't need you! Surely there is some other dashing Tengu that can take your space?
You rang?
Not you, bonehead! The other one!
Fred Hayley! What have I told you about talking to people like that?

But, mom! She smells like dead stuff! And I'm pretty sure I saw her eat somebody while praising Urgathoa!

Edit: D'oh!

That's Venture-Captain Mom to you! I took you from Round Mountain, and so help me I can put you back!

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

Wei Ji the Learner wrote:
'climbed into a furnace'?

Spoilered for off-topicness, not content:
Yup. My Rogue was the first person to go in.

Hilariously, when I GMed it, another player took his Axebeak companion in with him. Many of the same jokes were had.

Silver Crusade 5/5

Man, I'm glad I don't have these family issues...

-Berric "The Ladies' Knight" Thorne

Silver Crusade 5/5

Berric Thorne wrote:

Man, I'm glad I don't have these family issues...

-Berric "The Ladies' Knight" Thorne

Really, dad? You didn't even know I existed until I tracked you down!

Silver Crusade 5/5

Adria Thorne wrote:
Berric Thorne wrote:

Man, I'm glad I don't have these family issues...

-Berric "The Ladies' Knight" Thorne

Really, dad? You didn't even know I existed until I tracked you down!

Yeah, but we're cool now, right?

Silver Crusade 5/5

Berric Thorne wrote:
Adria Thorne wrote:
Berric Thorne wrote:

Man, I'm glad I don't have these family issues...

-Berric "The Ladies' Knight" Thorne

Really, dad? You didn't even know I existed until I tracked you down!
Yeah, but we're cool now, right?

*Facepalm*

*Shoulders slump*

Yeah, we are now, I guess.

Liberty's Edge 4/5 5/55/5 **

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Maps, Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Charter Superscriber; Starfinder Charter Superscriber

I am very perplexed how HeroLabs can cause arguments. It is just an interactive character sheet. In fact if you allow the print out of the character sheet from herolabs you have no reason to not allow the digital version since they are the exact same thing. What you see on the paper is what you see on the iPad just different format. Before the iPad version came out I used to add my most common buffs and print a bunch of versions of my character sheet out with those buffs included. Like I said, what you see on the iPad version is what you see on the character sheet.

I am not saying it does not have bugs, it does, none though that should be cause of an argument since they are minor bugs. I will go back to what I posted before on HeroLabs:

Most of the time it is reliable but on occasion there is a bug with it. If you know the software and the rules in question you can catch it and know how to work around it. In general you won't have problems but when yo do you need to know the rules don't let the program be your only knowledge source. Don't buy new software and expect to use it right away with out expecting issues (mostly user generated issues due to being unfamiliar with the program) and pissing people off. Learn the software first and use it in an environment that will allow you to. That way people/GMs who in general don't trust programs really have nothing to complain about.

Now If they are using HeroLabs as a source for the rules, that is a different story. You just tell them they can't and please pull out an approved rule source. I have done that in the past and will continue in the future. I know that HeroLabs biggest problem is not in it's ability to implement a bonus to it's character most of the time that is correct, and when it is wrong it is user error. It's biggest problem is not getting the actual text correct because they like short handing or re-wording the stuff they put in, that is the main reason you should never use it as a rules source, which you are not allowed to anyway.

1/5

Steven, at least based on Nefreet's experience, there are a number of people who believe Hero Lab is infallible and will argue that HL is correct even when shown the book.

Liberty's Edge 4/5 5/55/5 **

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Maps, Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Charter Superscriber; Starfinder Charter Superscriber
Nohwear wrote:
Steven, at least based on Nefreet's experience, there are a number of people who believe Hero Lab is infallible and will argue that HL is correct even when shown the book.

That is a people problem not a program problem.

Edit: And what exactly are they arguing? Because you can't use HeroLabs as a source for an argument, which is once again not a problem with HeoLabs but the person not following the rule that they need the authorized rule source.

Silver Crusade 5/5 5/55/5 **** Venture-Captain, Germany—Bavaria

I use hero lab for 100 % of my characters, and I would not use it as source for ruling, of course I would usually research the issue on the forums in any case, if there is some kind of developer clarification.

But yeah, it is a people problem.

301 to 350 of 690 << first < prev | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Organized Play / Pathfinder Society / Will I be allowed to use a digital character sheet in organized play? All Messageboards