Ragadolf |
Le technique:
Go into subforum
Enter post
Flag
Breaks other guidelines
Back
HideRepeat several times.
Refresh subforum.
Ah,... AH-HAH!
So you have to enter the subforum itself, I was looking from the feed on the right of the main page. Or from the post itself.
(I almost never enter the subforum to enter a thread)
Thank you! :)
pH unbalanced |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Have you noticed the new names they're using? Like Ricky Williams? Hopefully they're not in anyone's account
Definitely noticing usernames that are more believable lately. The one's I've seen don' have any other posting history though.
BTW, when the spam is in the Website Feedback forum -- that's just taunting us.
Rosita the Riveter |
4 people marked this as a favorite. |
Yes, we'll rally round the flag, mates,
We'll rally once again,
Shouting the battle cry of ban bots,
We will rally from the castles,
and gather from the crypts,
Shouting the battle cry of ban bots!
The Golem forever,
Hurrah! mates, hurrah!
Down with the spammers,
Up with the blogs;
While we rally round the flag, mates,
Rally once again,
Shouting the battle cry of ban bots!
We are springing to the call
Of those gamers gone before,
Shouting the battle cry of ban bots;
And we'll fill our vacant ranks with
A million PCs more,
Shouting the battle cry of ban bots!
The Golem forever,
Hurrah! mates, hurrah!
Down with the spammers,
Up with the blogs;
While we rally round the flag, mates,
Rally once again,
Shouting the battle cry of ban bots!
We will welcome to our numbers
The opine, pedant, and new,
Shouting the battle cry of ban bots;
And though they may have too many perks,
Not a caster shall be nerfed,
Shouting the battle cry of ban bots!
The Golem forever,
Hurrah! mates, hurrah!
Down with the spammers,
Up with the blogs;
While we rally round the flag, mates,
Rally once again,
Shouting the battle cry of ban bots!
So we're springing to the call
From Taldor and from Brevoy,
Shouting the battle cry of ban bots;
And we'll hurl the spamming crew
From the site that we love best,
Shouting the battle cry of ban bots!
The Golem forever,
Hurrah! mates, hurrah!
Down with the spammers,
Up with the blogs;
While we rally round the flag, mates,
Rally once again,
Shouting the battle cry of ban bots!
Cort Odekirk Technology Manager |
Kalindlara Contributor |
Cort Odekirk Technology Manager |
Kalindlara Contributor |
Kalindlara Contributor |
it's really a problem.
Can't we ban the domain or something ?
I think it was established that they're hiding their source somehow. I don't know if that would prevent what you've suggested, though.
Also, if that action is sweeping enough to potentially exclude legitimate posters, I don't know that they'll consider it...
Kalindlara Contributor |
Kalindlara Contributor |
Alright, I have my own silly idea to throw out there.
They seem to favor targeting the subforums with General Discussion in the name. What if the subforum names were changed? I don't know how difficult this would be, of course, but if it could be done on a trial basis, you could experiment with it and see if it helps.
I would start by changing "Pathfinder RPG General Discussion" to "Martial vs. Caster Debates"; feel free to consider your own alternative names for the various General Discussion subforums.
Spiral_Ninja |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Alright, I have my own silly idea to throw out there.
They seem to favor targeting the subforums with General Discussion in the name. What if the subforum names were changed? I don't know how difficult this would be, of course, but if it could be done on a trial basis, you could experiment with it and see if it helps.
I would start by changing "Pathfinder RPG General Discussion" to "Martial vs. Caster Debates"; feel free to consider your own alternative names for the various General Discussion subforums.
** spoiler omitted **
So far, at least (knock on wood) they haven't found the various individual campaign discussion threads!
UnArcaneElection |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
^They aren't going to fall for any such voluntary containment, since they want their spam to be found, at which they are currently succeeding due to sheer rate of spamming and lack of moderation of new account posts. If they are human spammers instead of bots, they can easily defeat Captcha-style technology (unless the obfuscated text is so highly obfuscated that it is hard for the rest of us to read -- a phenomenon which I have encountered on a few sites), but they will have a harder time defeating enforced moderation of the first 2 or 3 posts of new users, because it means that they would have to come up with 2 or 3 legitimate posts (before switching over to posting spam), which is something that people like this are probably not very skilled at.
Kalindlara Contributor |
Manwolf |
Kalindlara wrote:Just a heads-up, moderators - the posts in the link are still present.(If the moderators have gotten there by the time you read this, it was three posts deep in K-spam.)
I'm back on to assist. Lissa mentioned yesterday that it will help them if we flag all the spammer's posts in a single thread instead of just the initial post.
Cort Odekirk Technology Manager |
4 people marked this as a favorite. |
Is there a way to get the message out to people that they should NOT post replies to the spam? That just keeps the thread alive and the spammers win.
We've posted on the boards asking folks not to, but they forget. It messes with our admin display a bit too, posts still show even though they've been banned, so I keep bringing them up to ban them and discovering they already are.
The tech team should really fix that... oh, right.... :)